|
Ignatius looks like a fabulous resource , well done !! I may try it out this week, at the momemt I am 'sloshing it up' in the New York merged pool !!
|
|
|
|
Indeed many people with a lot of hash power see the future of the Blake Coin blockchain ! or is someone solo mining with around 80x7950 worth of mining power?  There are a lot of solo miners, multiple private pools, some are far into the double digit GHs range. Unsure of exact private GHs, but your #'s look close. |
|
|
|
你可以挖掘两枚硬币同时使用相同的有电。 其他钱币计划加入布雷克256家在不久的将来。 合并后有什么好处吗
|
|
|
|
yes , i have been running it for months , I'm impressed by frankness of the dev. Did this coin really launch?
|
|
|
|
i have to say , this is really cool
Are we still taking nominations for the IXC foundation or are other matters more pressing at the moment?
I think Vlad can give us an updated picture of the situation. Maybe something like this. Vlad, enlighten us.  |
|
|
|
|
if trhis is new to you are you new around here ?
|
|
|
|
Sorry about that Ignatius..... corrected op...... blockchain seems to be moving ok..... thanks for your sharp eye in pointing this out ... In the example photon.conf given in the first post port is set to 34556. This does not seem to be the port the latest client uses as default, 35556. Because of this addnode was failing for me when trying to add new nodes when those nodes were using the 34556 port setting in photon.conf.
|
|
|
|
thanks i am checking that now, the first version of the client (launch version) I had to change ports on but thought we had this all correct unless my conf file has a typo node showing { "version" : 80901, "protocolversion" : 70001, "walletversion" : 60000, "balance" : 0.00000000, "blocks" : 33348, "timeoffset" : 0, "connections" : 27, "proxy" : "", "difficulty" : 10491.79876783, "testnet" : false, "keypoololdest" : 1398988401, "keypoolsize" : 101, "paytxfee" : 0.00000000, "errors" : "" It seems people are connected on many different ports looking at this...... ./photond getpeerinfo [ { "addr" : "107.170.123.55:55546", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1399427328, "lastrecv" : 1399427367, "bytessent" : 31822248, "bytesrecv" : 2139983, "conntime" : 1398993042, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Blake:0.8.9.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 0, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "107.170.78.146:57725", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1399427339, "lastrecv" : 1399426813, "bytessent" : 591100, "bytesrecv" : 1245889, "conntime" : 1399005826, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Blake:0.8.9.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 31766, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "146.185.135.24:35556", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1399426216, "lastrecv" : 1399426216, "bytessent" : 838239, "bytesrecv" : 671097, "conntime" : 1399006160, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Blake:0.8.9.1/", "inbound" : false, "startingheight" : 31767, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "188.226.213.85:60916", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1399427340, "lastrecv" : 1399427330, "bytessent" : 269100, "bytesrecv" : 1773133, "conntime" : 1399073110, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Blake:0.8.9.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 32105, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "107.170.140.27:35378", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1399427336, "lastrecv" : 1399427365, "bytessent" : 2093031, "bytesrecv" : 903154, "conntime" : 1399159078, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Blake:0.8.9.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 5023, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "50.197.11.193:57141", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1399427339, "lastrecv" : 1399427369, "bytessent" : 258998, "bytesrecv" : 229059, "conntime" : 1399230617, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Blake:0.8.9.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 32728, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "76.175.31.202:55596", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1399427336, "lastrecv" : 1399427354, "bytessent" : 501381, "bytesrecv" : 61758, "conntime" : 1399252033, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Blake:0.8.9.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 32768, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "69.253.24.131:52807", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1399427354, "lastrecv" : 1399425852, "bytessent" : 355026, "bytesrecv" : 213358, "conntime" : 1399276772, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Blake:0.8.9.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 32805, "banscore" : 0, "syncnode" : true }, { "addr" : "99.249.35.123:4968", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1399426216, "lastrecv" : 1399427326, "bytessent" : 308404, "bytesrecv" : 152743, "conntime" : 1399301677, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Blake:0.8.9.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 32855, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "188.226.149.183:35556", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1399427363, "lastrecv" : 1399427327, "bytessent" : 273316, "bytesrecv" : 175789, "conntime" : 1399319084, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Blake:0.8.9.1/", "inbound" : false, "startingheight" : 32945, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "162.243.14.130:35556", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1399426216, "lastrecv" : 1399426216, "bytessent" : 110612, "bytesrecv" : 266409, "conntime" : 1399320591, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Blake:0.8.9.1/", "inbound" : false, "startingheight" : 32946, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "91.156.111.210:50407", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1399427340, "lastrecv" : 1399426891, "bytessent" : 345775, "bytesrecv" : 335706, "conntime" : 1399325684, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Blake:0.8.9.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 32948, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "151.231.43.180:60257", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1399425858, "lastrecv" : 1399425858, "bytessent" : 110385, "bytesrecv" : 44726, "conntime" : 1399341110, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Blake:0.8.9.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 33002, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "151.231.43.180:61502", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1399426215, "lastrecv" : 1399426215, "bytessent" : 178889, "bytesrecv" : 243108, "conntime" : 1399342630, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Blake:0.8.9.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 33011, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "151.231.43.180:9300", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1399427354, "lastrecv" : 1399425849, "bytessent" : 167205, "bytesrecv" : 206576, "conntime" : 1399355341, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Blake:0.8.9.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 33068, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "151.231.43.180:63740", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1399427363, "lastrecv" : 1399426216, "bytessent" : 208808, "bytesrecv" : 110322, "conntime" : 1399355434, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Blake:0.8.9.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 33068, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "31.216.12.30:44648", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1399426216, "lastrecv" : 1399426220, "bytessent" : 60767, "bytesrecv" : 56596, "conntime" : 1399386902, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Blake:0.8.9.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 33165, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "69.253.24.131:50436", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1399425849, "lastrecv" : 1399425849, "bytessent" : 195952, "bytesrecv" : 36199, "conntime" : 1399407692, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Blake:0.8.9.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 33140, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "65.28.235.189:40534", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1399426216, "lastrecv" : 1399427345, "bytessent" : 16385, "bytesrecv" : 5464, "conntime" : 1399419652, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Blake:0.8.9.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 33320, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "65.27.187.72:63479", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1399425850, "lastrecv" : 1399425850, "bytessent" : 503573, "bytesrecv" : 16879, "conntime" : 1399420788, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Blake:0.8.9.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 32963, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "65.27.187.72:34536", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1399426333, "lastrecv" : 1399427354, "bytessent" : 3685, "bytesrecv" : 479, "conntime" : 1399424523, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Blake:0.8.9.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 33348, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "80.219.204.236:54362", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1399427125, "lastrecv" : 1399425324, "bytessent" : 3685, "bytesrecv" : 172, "conntime" : 1399425323, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Blake:0.8.9.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 33348, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "65.28.235.189:56348", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1399427293, "lastrecv" : 1399427362, "bytessent" : 3655, "bytesrecv" : 1404, "conntime" : 1399425487, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Blake:0.8.9.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 33348, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "23.96.54.154:2808", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1399425976, "lastrecv" : 1399425976, "bytessent" : 4578, "bytesrecv" : 288, "conntime" : 1399425967, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Blake:0.8.9.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 33347, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "84.3.113.161:51728", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1399427323, "lastrecv" : 1399426026, "bytessent" : 3708, "bytesrecv" : 227, "conntime" : 1399426024, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Blake:0.8.9.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 33348, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "80.219.204.236:54896", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1399426712, "lastrecv" : 1399426710, "bytessent" : 3623, "bytesrecv" : 227, "conntime" : 1399426708, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Blake:0.8.9.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 33348, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "207.210.117.83:57418", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1399427391, "lastrecv" : 1399427391, "bytessent" : 32706770, "bytesrecv" : 1259833, "conntime" : 1399427321, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Blake:0.8.9.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 0, "banscore" : 0 } but it should be this ,,,,,,, hmmmmmm https://github.com/photonproject/photon/blob/master/src/protocol.h#L21 35556 there is a typo in the op !!! omg |
|
|
|
****MAJOR NEWS***** 2 or possibly 3 new Blake 256 Coins are going to be launched soon ! I have no launch dates & times since I am not the dev. but read about it here http://blakecoin.org/forum/These coins will be merge mined with Blake Coin and the Blake Coin network continues to grow now at 600 giga hash/ sec :-) |
|
|
|
A second pool has been added to merge mine blake coin and photon, http://ny2.blakecoin.com/The blake coin network is running steady now over 500 ghs ---- |
|
|
|
A fast blockchain is secure , as we see the scrypt 1024 switching pools diminish in profit many individuals will abandon mining however those of us who understand how important these networks are to the future will still mine. Some rather than abandon mining will join the Blake Coin blockchain. It is still very very young and just now evolving to show the world it's true potential. I see miners from every corner of the world waiting for true alternatives --- each one who joins will make the Blake Coin (and child coin) blockchains stronger. It may take some time. True not artificial value will be born from the strength of the network as it experiences steady growth. We have all read the details and can see the technology advantages of blake 256. Who here thinks Merge Mining is the future and this will make Blakecoin rise in value ALOT?
We will all find out soon as the genie is out of the bottle now  |
|
|
|
iX atm's !! impressive !!
Thanks cinnamon.
I should have been more accurate. No, you never asked to not be named a woman. Months ago when we first started talking about iXcoin [and Bitcointalk] and such, you mentioned to me that you don't post much and that when you do you prefer to not reveal that you're a woman.
As such, I took that to mean that you'd prefer if I didn't mention that but given this is rather involved there was no way to avoid it. Besides, I think it's a good thing and I'm glad to see you never meant to hide the fact.
On a different note, I contacted Lamassu Inc., and their lead time for ATMs is 8 weeks. The cost is $1,800 per ATM and we can set it up to dispense iXcoins as well as Bitcoins [and any other alts as well].
The press we would get from launching the first one would easily pay for the $1,800 out of pocket expense.
So if anyone here wants to donate to that project, please feel free to do so.
Regards
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin has allready made it
Litecoin is well on it's way
If you are asking for coins that people should be looking at ?
If looking for the 'future contenders' or for coins that can accomplish things that go beyond what is available now or that broke new ground I will chime in.
Blake Coin -- Building a new system with merged mining , a long term project with an algorithm that has every necessary advantage
RieCoin -- Obvious unique math applications
SIC Simple Inflation Coin --- Started all quark + multi combo algo's and is still running strong (more active on the Russian thread than English (never given the respect deserved , not even traded on any exchange)
NOTE --- RIGHT NOW none of these are considered 'profitable' to mine if you are just looking for something to earn bitcoin.......so that eliminates 99% of the people, very few people mine or support coins that they cannot 'exchange' into bitcoin for a 'profit' ......... few believe or care in the future......
|
|
|
|
Thanks guys , i will try to help out if i can Thanks a lot to everyone who sent me coins i compiled the source again , this windows qt wallet is with open ssl 1.0.1g , WITH upnp enabled (some people prefer this, some don't) http://www.mediafire.com/download/emqdbyxdeo4wwpa/iX_with_upnp_support_open_ssl_1.0.1g_win_qt_.7z source here based on frictionless with minor changes , i forked to a repo on github https://github.com/photonproject/iXcoinone thing, I have never concealed or asked anyone to 'hide' i am a woman but I was a frequent visitor to these forums for a long time and never joined until last september when I decided to get info development of coins. I always viewed the forum here as a mans world which it remains to this day..... as long as I don't have to show up for any conventions or give any talks I would be happy to help out anyway I can For a long, (very long) time I owned some iX and had to keep them on vircurex since I could not ever get the wallet to work I knew there had to be working wallets since the coin is being mined and people must be getting their coins sent around but I looked everywhere and could not find a working wallet for months (this was like a year ago into the fall) more recently I noticed Vlad on twitter and asked if he was the same person I saw in these forums and asked him about sending coins how people were sending them ect..... in short order he pointed me to the updated wallet and I finally (after a long time) got to get them off the exchange....... (the funniest thing is the old non working client was based on an early version of bitcoin back when you could not even lock your wallet ......old indeed) Cinnamons iX address xnmyQQbveWtk3xnQzchSjKVyG78jL1zePn
+11
I´ve got only a few hundred ixcoins, but i´ll sent some to cinnamon next days. I also pledge some coins for a new wallet (PASSWORD!!).
|
|
|
|
I will have to look over the original source of iX --- lots of mystery ! appears sha 256d similar to 'old' versions of bitcoin -- at least that is how it started magic numbers were the same as bitcoin until a certain block which changing of which enabled the merged mining bitcoin magic numbers https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/chainparams.cpp#L106ix magic numbers (original source code seems to have them to be changed here in main.cpp) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/chainparams.cpp#L106ix magic numbers in newer source (new dev team) https://github.com/FrictionlessCoin/iXcoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L3023difficulty adjustment (comments reference solid coin) https://github.com/FrictionlessCoin/iXcoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L1226i imagine almost no one is mining iX on their own so if the mining is coming from the merged mining of the huge pools with the heavy hash power anytime they submit work that is below the target to solve the block of bitcoin only then are they submitted to see if they are good enough to solve a block on one of the merged coins........ I realize most of you allready know this but see a few new people in here too who may not reallly understand what merged mining is and the benefits.......
Can someone tell me why the iXcoin difficulty isn't keeping up with Bitcoin?
I've been watching it and there appears to be a different difficulty algo running for iXcoin which allows for a lower relative difficulty relative to its network hashrate.
Cause from everything I've read, iXcoin is exactly like Bitcoin except for the accelerated coin mining output.
Does anybody know what's going on? If it is a different difficulty algo, how can that be and what exactly was changed, why and how clever or how difficult was that particular change in code?
Let's keep on mind, Thomas was very much an inept computer programmer, so any highly skilled change in the protocol would raise some kind of flags for me.
Thanks!
Bitcoin difficulty is different from IXC. IXC use a difficulty algorithm that if I recall correctly is based on solidcoin. |
|
|
|
We are looking into why this block took 3 hours to solve The main nodes of the network all show similar info as does the block crawler http://162.243.101.139:2750/chain/Photon?count=100&hi=32893Thank you for support & mining !! My wallets seem to be stuck at block 32805. 4 connections. The block explorer also seems stuck at this block?32806 2014-05-05 09:53:40
32805 2014-05-05 06:44:30
I mined block 32806, finally...but something appears off given these timestamps. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
