You have to consider the positive with the negatives as well and I feel like negatives outweight the positives a million times. Definitely the environment is a lot better these days, we are going to live the coolest summer in the past 10 years according to scientists all thanks to the virus.

However even though some families are closer, some families are further apart, people are getting divorced at a higher rate (well they can't just yet, but they already applied) or there are more domestic violence as well, which means as you can see there are positives in everything but there are negatives which are higher and worse so I think positives which I agree that it exists, are looking unimportant when you consider the biggest negative, tens of thousands of people dead.

I always love "worlds debt" thing whenever it is said . Like who do we owe to? Do we owe to mars? Is it sun because it gave us life? Should we pay the Sun that much money to keep firing? Who the hell does the earth owe to? There are not that many places that will take it, there are more debts in the world that there are places owed, so it makes no sense at all, there is no mathematically possible way to pay all the debt back, if some people do, there are not enough for others to do it.

In any case, crypto doesn't have to be big like these, companies are fine, richest people are fine, but we do not need to be bigger than US stock markets for example, reaching to that 50 richest people level would be more than enough for us to actually be big enough for us.

I am not going to lie I laughed when I saw "it drops back to 19k and reaches a new high" part, I can't prove it won't happen and I have to say it sounds quite possible and also way too realistic . If one day bitcoin reaches to let's say 50k and drops to 19k I can guarantee %100 that there will be people who will be like "ITS GOING TO 3K AGAIN" even those days, even if its 50k to 20k that we are talking about. I am sick and tired of those people but they exist so we have to learn to live with them.

At the end of the day bitcoin could always go up, it could always be 50k to 100k, that could be today or in 10 years, the thing that matters is not "if" it will be, its "when" it will be, if bitcoin reaches 50k for the first time in 2040, that is not good at all, if it does it by 2023, that is awesome, so timing is very important.

When there is a decrease in the volume of bitcoin, know that there is also a chance that bitcoin could potentially go up as well. Because if there is less volume that means there is usually less liquidity as well, so what you can do with X amount of bitcoin/dollars is much harsher when there is lower volume compared to having a huge volume where X means nothing to the market.

In this case, if the volume is low, and someone puts millions of dollars worth of purchase on bitcoin right now, that means the price could increase very fast without anyone touching it since there isn't enough volume to stop it. This doesn't mean it will happen, the drop could still happen, I just wanted to point out that there is %50 chance that it could be towards downwards or it could be upwards.

You can definitely make advertisement on facebook, there are tons of pages with crypto focus there as well. Do not think of facebook just a place where elderly hang out, even they moved to instagram these days and right now there is no place you can't see elderly hanging around, so you need to make advertisement focus on point. Facebook groups that are based on crypto?

Specifically how to get free bitcoin? Works. Twitter people who have a lot of followers regarding crypto? Works. Instagram pages about crypto that has a lot of followers? Works. As long as you find your audience, it doesn't matter where they are, you can check the weirdest places and as long as it works, it works. Hence you should always look at who you are advertising to, not where you are advertising at.

How could people really not understand why people join the competition but can understand they could gamble? I mean joining the competition is a way of gambling as well, it is just so happens that you gamble with gambling and I get that that is usually quite rare and you do not see it all the time, but gamblers will gamble and that is what they do, so there is really not that much shocking value to it.

You gamble a bit and you risk a bit, you gamble a lot, you risk a lot, that is normal on everything else as well, even on a simple dice game if you wager 1 btc and win another 1 btc, you always have the option to put them together and wager 2 bitcoin together, you could either go back to zero like you never won, your you will get to 4 bitcoin instead. Think of it like that.

That is why I always supported the idea that there should be "some" fans, not really a lot but we are talking about a HUGE stadium and putting like 100 people there couldn't be worse than right now would it? Plus teams could decide on who will come, it could be literally family of the players or their friends or whatever which means the people who will come to view the games would be known people to the team and not "some fans". That way you would have some support.

Right now we are talking about a system where league mostly ended with fans, but the rest will be without fans so if there is any changes the teams could just blame not having any fans at all, and use that an excuse for their losses and all that. I am not sure if this could be done but it looks like not that much more dangerous.

The thing is, in order to make sure that you are the one who sent the link is not something viable, if your friend went to the website way before he clicked from you, but didn't register from google, register from you, that still doesn't work. So in this situation, I am sure that what happened was your friend clicked a link and went to bitkong and checked but didn't played or registered at all, after that you sent a link and he clicked on that link and registered from it and deposited and played but since he clicked on the first google search first way before, his cookies registered there, which is why I think it wouldn't work.

I am not sure if this is exactly what happened but this could be the issue you are having right now. Hopefully you will figure out what the situation was.

It is probably about having a lot more people involved which means there is probably not that much more profit to make but there is more people who are sharing those profits. Honestly not everyone is a bad trader, sure there are some but the amount of people who are getting into trading learns from the better traders, we didn't had that chance we learned it by losing money and testing stuff, but now the new traders hear the bad ideas from us and we warn them so they are starting with more knowledge.

This is why I think it is getting harder because there is a lot of new people who learn from the old ones and we have to share our trading strategies with them and we are doing the same thing while the profit is same but our shares get smaller and smaller.

Everyone tries to promote their thing, that is not really that big of a deal anymore because everyone is doing and if you are doing something and not promoting like this when everyone else is doing it, you are not really doing it properly anymore. I know it sucks and I know we want the world to be better but as long as it is allowed and others are doing it, new places will keep popping up and doing this nowadays, that is about as good as you can hope right now.

Do not really care about what people are promoting these days, just consider what you are doing as a good thing and close your eyes to other peoples stuff they are trying to shove to your face. I have a system and I like my system and I do not care what others are saying I just want to continue doing what I do.

It is not even the experienced traders, anyone who knows what they are doing will diversify their portfolio and that is basically the thing that is taught at everywhere. If you have money that you can invest you should definitely put it in many things and altcoins are a big part of it. Definitely if you want keep it some on USDT, however put some on bitcoin as well, and put some on altcoins as well.

I would say the bigger the altcoin is, the bigger share it should get, and the smaller it is, smaller it should be on your portfolio. 50% bitcoin, 20% USDT, 10% ethereum, 5% eos, and basically just 3-5% everything else. That way you would be doing fine without really risking any of your money all at the same time, you would be doing fine no matter what happens.

Just because a currency has a low volume doesn't mean it should get delisted right away. That is why I always supported this B-side exchange inside the exchange to help out the small coins. Think of it like a second division in football, this way you would have the big ones that have over 100 btc volume per day or whatever (volume could be anything you want) and there will also be a "smaller coins" exchange part where it will not be even paired and only paired with ethereum, I know there are ones who are listed on ethereum already, I mean this will be strictly for the smaller volume ones.

This way you are still making some money, but the smaller ones are separated as well to no confuse people neither. Think of it like stocks and penny stocks.

I can't believe that this lambo thing became like a part of the freebitco.in in general. I was expecting the first one and that is understandable, a great marketing to do and honestly all around a good idea. When the second one started literally right after, I was like wow that is a good result of the first one they are doing another one so it must mean the first one went well for them.

Now that they are literally "as usual" doing the third one now that must mean maybe it is like not a marketing thing anymore, it is officially a thing that is constantly here and part of the house until foreseeable future and not something that we are lucky to have now but generally we will always have. If I knew that I wouldn't buy tickets in previous two and just kept all my money and go all-in to third one. I will do that now, gonna wait for another 2-3 lottery and just go all-in on the 6th one or so.

Hey, that must be a very good read on esports industry, thanks a lot for sharing. I was imagining like esports industry will get double the revenue than it was predicted with pre-pandemic circumstances but honestly I did not expect its revenue decline due to lesser sponsorship on slow economy conditions everywhere. Still, there are plenty of time left on this year and covid19 seems to stay with us, it means esports industry may grow rapidly by exceeding all our predictions.

Esports must be on its historical phase right now and we can expect it will keep growing and dominate other betting industry in future even after the covid19 caused pandemic will be settled down. Because, once gamblers get used to something then they may not quit it even after their familiar things open up. I am personally seeing esports are equally exciting and thrilling me like live sportsbetting. So, esports may stay attractive like others here after forever .

Theme is the new thing, I am coming across on your site. First I thought it will be about look and feel of the site like day mode or dark mode but it is working like a quick filter on casino games to choose my preferred themed games on 2 clicks. Just impressing me on my first visit.

Under sci-fi theme, I find satoshi's-secret (direct link for demo: https://2.egocasino1.com/en/games/demo/satoshi-s-secret-246) which could be checked by most gamblers of this community for sure .

Looking like a full fledged online casino. Already bookmarked for frequently visiting. Looking forward your bitcointalk community specific promotions to get start with.

Crypto market might have a lot more freedom but it also has "a lot of freedom" as well. I know that we all love liberty here and I think that is why we are in a decentralized world but do not forget that in the regular world of stocks the market is screwed for the rich who will basically do whatever they want to do without getting in any trouble, they even do insider trading and rarely ever get in trouble.

In crypto its a bit different, rich people could buy bitcoin in billions and they could potentially increase the price, or they could sell all those billions of dollars worth of bitcoin and drop the price as well. So, there is really not that many difference on the fact that rich people will be getting richer no matter what type of freedom we would have in crypto.

I do not really understand what the cat dead bounce thing people keep saying all the time. I really know the term for it, I know what it means, but I do not understand why people keep insisting on calling every single drop a dead cat bounce, why would you do that? Isn't there other stuff that we can call as well? We could call it a correction, we could call it for simple what it is, people taking out profits. Noooooo, some people want to not only name the drop, but also want to discredit the increase as well.

When you call it correction you don't discredit the increase, when you call it profit realization you do not discredit the increase, but when you call it dead cat bounce you do not name the drop, you are discrediting the increase. I do not get it, what are you gaining with that?

There is one thing different between them. Forex has a lot to do with governments whereas crypto has nothing to do with anyone at all. Forex could make you win a lot or lose a lot when a president of a nation comes up and delivers a great message and does something awesome, or could lose you a lot of money when someone comes up and says stuff that makes no sense and usually doesn't seen with good light.

So, forex ties to government, which is understandable because fiat is tied to governments and forex is fiat, just fiat between each other, instead of one fiat, you are investing to a fiat against another fiat, you say dollar will do better than euro or vice versa, so you are pitting governments and national economies against each other. Crypto has none of that.

There is also a group blackjack thing that could make things a lot more interesting. One of the reasons why blackjack gets so much attention in the casino world (in real life) is the simple fact that there could be 5 people who are playing all at the same time, some busts while others get 21 and some just ties with the dealer and so forth, so having online version would make it a lot more interesting.

I know in coding world that would be quite difficult to do, I am sure it would come with a million different troubles if you want to do it and you have to fix all of that and find a way to make it both provably fair but at the same time have the house edge and still make a profit for the casino, that is why I think this should be down the line type of thing and not urgent, but surely would be great addition.

One thing is for sure, there will be economical changes that will be basically as big as you might imagine. Right now people are learning about what makes them survive and what they need to buy to stay alive and what are basically just luxury. So right now, there is this understanding in people's minds that "maybe I do not need that fifth television" or more like "maybe I should not change my phone every year?" and so forth.

When luxury gets actually luxury and people focus on the things they really need, you will see that there will be less people who are starving because there will be more people who only spend what they need and not spend a lot on stuff that are luxury. We are going to see some stabilization and closing of the gap between rich and poor.