This sounds like a valid reason also justify the steam's action of banning blockchain based games. How a platform will accept to keep on hosting "planned scams", if you ask me, any reputed services will take similar action in favour of their customers.

Steam's ban on blockchain games should not be left out like just another incident in crypto space. It is kind of alarming to this community like scams on crypto space is exceeding the tolerable levels. This way major service provider also may ban all kind of crypto activities when they find 90% of new projects are not keeping up their promises.

Lakers got Lebron back and on the first day they already got a win. I have to say that there is a good chance we could see Lakers recover from the bad start after this and start doing well. I get that we should not be shocked that they beat Rockets which is not a great team, but I believe that they are definitely doing nice, even with Lebron having only 15 points, he was there to regroup everyone together and increase the chemistry which worked. The big shock of the league is Dame and Luka so far, they are star level players, super star level players actually and they are not playing well at all this season.

I may understand Luka, he is getting a little sophomore block on his third year instead, understandable, but no idea why Dame is doing this bad so far, been nearly a month and he is still not doing well and missing threes which was his talent and for some reason he has been bad so far.

We have already seen it that most countries would prefer to have their own digital currencies that are issued by their central banks. So far it has only been El Salvador that has decided to adopt Bitcoin as a legal tender. We are not sure if other countries are going to do the same thing, and by the way that wasn’t the reason why we have Bitcoin today, so I am not expecting it to become illegal tender in anymore country.

If Bitcoin should become a legal tender in every country around the world, then the government will be prompted to attempt a total control over it, which wouldn’t seem like a nice thing for them to do. Bitcoin was created to be a currency on his own that would be used by people who needs freedom and privacy.  So, I don’t get why some of you are still talking about it becoming a legal tender in countries, if you’re not OK with the volatility of crypto currencies, then I will advise you to just take a break.

That is what I meant as well. Provably fair is "provable" is literally that thing we are talking about. I mean if you are getting scammed then it should be proven that way too, if it is fair then it should be proven that way too, there is really no middle ground. If you are scammed and you can't prove it, then it is not provably fair, or even if you win and you can't prove it then it is not provably fair. That is the biggest and greatest achievement of blockchain tech made for gambling world.

Imagine a system where nobody can scam anyone without letting it be fully obvious, it is not just that you can't be scammed, you can be but in other places you were already getting scammed, whereas in crypto gambling world you can't just get scammed and have no proof of scam that you may go to press or forums, here we do have that and if anyone ever tries to scam then it will be provable.

It is nice to see another person who has been around here as long as I have been. Most people I talked to get in during 2017 period, and very few got in during 2014 bull period, rarely I end up seeing someone who got in before 2014, I have been here since late 2012 and it has been a wild wild ride. BNB has double or even triple the amount of marketcap that I saw bitcoin in, I remember bitcoin having less than half of bnb's current market cap when I first got in. Not all of us made insane returns, people assume that just because we have been around for longer, that means we made more money and got rich super insanely.

Someone who bought shiba 1 year ago or so, and still hold it today, made more return than I have ever made in my 9+ years in crypto. It is not about being here longer, it is about being able to sniff out the best returns. 2018 was a different beast, it was a very big crash, I doubt that we will ever have that type of crash again, I saw many drops before and after 2018 and none was like that.

Being emotionally stable is more important regardless of we are making profits or losses. I agree that beginners might find it too hard to treat both profits and losses in a same way but we need to practice it so that we could focus on next trades regardless of what we did in the previous trade. If you celebrate or regret your previous trade then you may miss out another new opportunity.

Having a mentor must be a good idea but it may cost more beyond your affordable levels. Usually what we can do is, just having friends or known people who are already into market and able to guide might be a better option. Moreover most people may not prefer to guide you by leaving off their routine trading schedules.

Yeah, utilizing all the available resources must be a key thing which decide the level of our success. Being lazy must be one of the negative factor which drives beginner into backfoot due to lack of self motivation.

If we are good at technical analysis then we never need to lose those potential profits like how OP is concerning here. Only because of lack of accurate technical analysis, we are suffering by not able to compete against the market fluctuations. If our analysis are good and enables us to book profits at right times then we can easily ride on market swings which must be another level of trading performances to enjoy the maximum benefits for the same market fluctuations.

This might be true only on short term and in long run, you need to let your profits grow along with time which may be trailed with stoploss to cut earlier so that you may not be losing your capital as well. For long term trading of bitcoins, you do not need trailing soploss as far as I have experienced.

I hope Aguero is fine, sure manager changes and bad results and sacking Koeman all are bad things for the general outcome of the team but this is life situation and when we are talking about something regarding someone's life, football needs to take a back seat. I hope that he will feel better in the near future, I hope he doesn't force himself and tire himself out too much, he should take a rest for a while and try to get better.

I know that it is not going to be easy for a player like him to just rest for a long period but he definitely needs it. Barcelona also another bad news from Al-Sadd who doesn't want to let Xavi go, and I think both Barcelona president who doesn't want Xavi since Xavi turned him down before, on top of Xavi not wanting to lead a team that is so bad right now combined will make it near impossible for all parties to come to an agreement.

Hash Clash Vol. I is over. It is really cool to see these things, I really hoped for a much more entertaining game with multiple goals, maybe lead changes and all that so it would get attention. We all know games that end up like 2-0 one team then other scores 3 goals and make it 2-3 instantly gets more views on youtube and other platforms. In that case we would have seen people who take interest in crypto as well since there are more viewers which means there are more people who would see stake and sportsbet together.

In any case, we managed to have two teams, playing a game, both sponsored by crypto companies and that was really good, it was really a step forward in crypto world.

I believe that China assumed if they make every manufacturing very cheap there and let other nations use them for building stuff, they would become the world power. However, just because you are "owed" money doesn't mean that you have money, those are very different things. Can you imagine how richer banks would be if all of the loans they gave out suddenly all gets paid in a single day? China can ban crypto as much as they want, and rule with dictatorship and concentration camps and torture, as long as they keep doing that then people will slowly get away from it.

Even the biggest companies who really need Chinese cheap manufacturing are moving to other nations now because they do not want their name to be associated with them. When you make your nation a stigma and people start not buying stuff just because it is from your nation and you can't get paid what you are owed, the future looks horrible for them. Meanwhile we are out here doubling and tripling our money every year in crypto .

It is not up to banks to allow or not allow something like that. Crypto is a threat to their very existence as well but they couldn't stop it. If there is a money to be made they will jump in willingly, and if there isn't a money to be made then we are going to be fine anyway, it is going to be something of a challenge for a while but if we got crypto accepted then we are going to get facebook accepted as well.

All we need to do is pressure them by using it anyway, do it p2p if you want to first but as long as it grows big then we are going to be fine. All in all I have to say there is a good case for facebook diem or libra or whatever they name it could be seen as something that banks will eventually accept. On top of this, as long as facebook bribes the right people, then banks will not have any say in it, banks became this powerful by bribing anyway, so facebook could beat them in their own game.

Yes, OP is about to find a method to close their trades when they are unable to watch and close the order. I guess it would be on either side like it could be on target side and stoploss side as well. So, I guess going by any automated way of executing orders on behalf of manual trading must be an appropriate solution here but OP is concerned about only stoploss side hence I doubt they are into long term swing kind of trading hence they not in need to close while reaching certain profit levels for their open positions.

Personally I will not look for any automated way of closing options as I instead will go for mobile version or will keep my laptop ready to watch and close orders for the case of if I will not able to trade from my PC. Just a reliable way rather than going for ad-hoc solution on demand.

Plus, when you consider if you are a big name there, like get listed at A list, then not get paid for 10 weeks so you get a big bonus, it does become like any other payment. Definitely other places pay a lot more weekly, and you are required to spend a lot of time here (maybe shorter here since people at high levels may leave for one that pays weekly) then you get to become a high tier participant who gets big bonuses time to time when the payment is done.

I haven't checked but if we checked the highest paid person on the last payment, I am sure when you calculate the weekly, it is closer to the ones from other campaigns as well. So there is "some" reason to stay here, not really logical but at least reasonable.

But, if someone's tip will not get you profits then I guess you may not go back to them for another tip for another match, right? This way I guess people may not keep trying to trap you for their indirect benefits. People usually fix a match where stronger team unusually may lose. It means most bettors will go by stronger team but when it suddenly losses then those match fixers will earn massive profits hence I guess that most such people may not contact you in person if their intention is trapping you by giving out invalid tip.

I am still in the firm belief that if you really want to gamble, do not do it based on what you could get back or what is the competition or what the promotion is and just bet because you want to.

Definitely there could be some eddie's pick situation where you could get something back, but if you wager just because there is a chance that you could get 50 bucks refunded, then you are going to lose a lot. Not because you ended up gambling, we all gamble and yes we all lose eventually, but because you wagered on something you didn't want to which is the quickest way to make a loss. I personally prefer the method where people gamble what they like, and not what someone else picked for them.

In 2017, bitcoin prices started to fall only by December third week hence right now it is too early that we think about repeating of 2017.

Bitcoin needs to show at least 10x growth before repeating the down market; I mean first we need to experience the repeating of bull market this year and then I guess we can prepare ourselves to face similar kind of downfall market as well. Not sure that we are going to have same kind of 4 year cycle this time as well or something new which is hard to speculate, no one knows.

Anything could happen. But, when most people start being cautious then no one could hold the market. I mean all the investors who had watched bitcoin markets by 2013 and 2017, definitely will look for bearish market from January 2022 which means they may not add new bitcoin to their portfolio. So, when market sentiment turns then understood cycle will persist.

Only whales could take the current bullish trend till mid of next year. They need to trigger FOMO to make individual investors to help them.

I just wonder what are the possibilities for the current bullish rally to end without having an FOMO phase? If that will be possible then we may fail to touch $100k itself with this current rally. When everyone was expecting a bearish trend in January then everyone may remain cautious which again will end the trend of understood cycle.

This is quite similar to what we’re facing in my country as well, there have been an increase in the price of almost everything you can get in the market these days. And as for not finding things I need in the market, well I can find them but the problem that I’m having with most of them these days is that companies are beginning to reduce the number of items that were usually in their products they sell: take for example let’s say that you can buy a biscuit of $5 and see about four pieces of biscuits inside it, this time around if you buy that same biscuit you are going to see only three pieces inside it.

And the worst part of it is that even after they have decreased the number of items in that product, they will also increase the price as well which is really annoying. I just hope that things get better and not continue like this.

I am eagerly awaiting for the second entry by OP into the list.

I believe some country must be accumulating as much as bitcoins they prefer but the only thing is they need to declare it. We can expect such declarations in very near future as accumulating bitcoins does not need to be having plans to be used as a legal tender. But, might have plans to be having as part of their central banks' reserve along with gold.

Yeah in my opinion, bitcoin is going to achieve such kind of milestone any time soon which must be a greater thing to have for all the bitcoiners for sure.

This year's most important positive news on bitcoin ecosystem must be the approval of bitcoin ETF after El Salvadar's adaption. But, we bitcoin ETF news came this October but bitcoin remained bullish since last year's November/December so I am not ready to agree that bitcoin ETF is key factor on deciding the bullish trend of 2021. When bitcoin ETF news was arriving, bitcoin was trading around $55 to $58k levels and it helped bitcoin to get around $67k levels.

It is not unpredictable by considering its history. I mean we need to go by what happened in 2017 and 2013. This way I am expecting we are never going to see $30 forever hence talking about $20k is not getting me any sense.