|
wow nice coin. added my win address in sig...
|
|
|
|
scrypt.. 80% fan speed and 75 degrees on my Radeon GPU. JPC = 65% fan speed and 62 degrees  Yes my GPU temperature at 63 degree for mining JPC while at 77 degree for Litecoin |
|
|
|
Det är skumt. If I open my jackpot wallet with a considerable amount in it, the CPU usage goes to 100% almost, but it doesn't generate any stake, yet I have it set up like other POS coins.  How old are your coins ? They need to have been in your wallet "staking" for 24 hours at least. Then at the end of the next 24 hours (say the 3rd day) you should start to get some coins. use coin control you can check of the coin-age, using confirmations. Maybe not enough time yet |
|
|
|
|
diff at 10? wtf, pool please!
|
|
|
|
I am out its now 2Am , can not compile sgminer with jackbot kernel without source code ....
source code are there: https://github.com/rtc29462there are the source for coin, cpu/gpu miners |
|
|
|
|
I think you should use the provided miners or compile from source, the conventional miners such as cgminer not working. This is probably because this coin uses its own hash algo.
|
|
|
|
What triggers the jackpot or superblock? It doesn't sound like it's really random because you mentioned it's paid out when the "certain criteria" is met?
I guess it still based on the block hash. So if the block hash generated (or seeded) random number fall into certain range, the superblock will be generated. The difference is that before the previous block hash is used. This one still use the previous block hash, but the generated superblock will be paid to the finder of the previous block, so there's no chance for someone with bigger hashrate to profit it. Thus a "fair" or true randomness. I read again the Q/As from OP, yes it is the great idea to have true randomness. |
|
|
|
 still no news from the Dev... He really should come and give us an update so people can find out if their fears are justified or not. Isn't this the community coin? After dev distributed the coins, it is the community to move forward, why we need dev here? the code is public in the github repo, the community can move forward, why we look for dev all the time?? |
|
|
|
Dev has likely been dumping all along in small amounts so as not to draw to much attention, why do you feel this should be hidden and swept under the rug? The evidence is fairly damning, you honestly haven't had some of these questions yourself? I answered your questions, answer mine.
Talking with imagination does not help anything, only prove to others who you are. Troll, troll, troll... I'd like to see if you have any facts in your talk. Using the words "likely", "perhaps", "probably" in your dreams, here if you don't have facts, you are just a garbage. |
|
|
|
Voting on Mintpal + support on Bter thread.
On all my duty.
COMM will be another high speed train. No doubt!
Yes voted |
|
|
|
voted @mintpal 4789...
voted too |
|
|
|
You should definitely add CommunityCoin (COMM)!!!  Agree add COMM +1 Add COMM This thread is dead, bter should close its door, why bother. They don't know which is good coin which is bad. |
|
|
|
@venmo
no transactions should happen before the old wallet gets fixed or the new wallet get released
because coins might get lost
that is the reason exchanges stopped the trading of C2
from pure pow to pure pos? well good luck, the codebase for the two are completely different, no way to make it consistent with same blockchain. If the pow chain hacked, then this coin is dead. from pow to pos? lmao.... unless you start with a pow/pos mix like MINT, BC, ECC, etc, otherwise it is impossible |
|
|
|
I like it  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
