Hi,
this morning i was surprised to see that to transfer 1.4btc from my ledger nano to kraken the cost of the transaction fees was 17$??
Anyones have some reasons why it costs do expensive?
Thanks
$17 is actually on the low side at the moment. If you've got multiple inputs and multiple outputs to your transaction then really you're completely screwed and you're left to pay exuberant amounst of transaction fees. Right now it's actually a lot better. A lot of this is generated by the fact that volume of bitcoin cash went so far up, and market activity was just so great. Nothing we can do. |
|
|
|
do you believe will bitcoin be less than a hundred? I think I can be, as it is today suddenly the price of bitcoin has fallen. so it is more likely that the bitcoin falls over a hundred when there is a revelation.
It could happen, i am not denying this as a possibility. We've seen some pretty bad flash crashes in the crypto market with crypto currencies that were previously thought as strong going down pretty quickly. This has happened to fiat inflation as well, your currency could depreciate by 100% overnight. However, since bitcoin is the father of all cryptos, i really don't think it's likely to happen. There are so many floors right now, set at $6k, $5k, even $4k is hard to get dumped on. As soon as price goes down, people start buying. To see a level under $100 would be an absolute great time to buy. |
|
|
|
If any technical traders out there are looking at BTC, what do you see? I am not a technical trader, though I do know some of the patterns and retracement levels.
To me it looks like it tested 5500 two times but got rejected. Furthermore, it now looks like a W, so that we can (technically) expect BTC to go up again, unless we have to test level 5500 again.
What do you see?
Without any technical analysis you can tell that we are entering a new hpsae of bull market because of the fact that bitcoin essentially got pumped like 15% in total between yesterday and today combined. That wouldn't happen unless a real bull market is happening. Still a good entry point though. Price isn't $7k yet. It's guaranteed that price is going to go through $7k(if there aer anything on this world that is guaranteed). You could buy now and rake it a nice $100-200 per coin, even if you're not in btc the long term. |
|
|
|
|
All the while, lydian has not responded with anything to suggest or to confirm that they have indeed raised $10 mil. That is the major deciding factor here in my opinion, and lydian seems to avoid that question quite sensitively.
Unless they provide a signed message of at least even $500k(that's only 5% of what they claim to have gotten), then i would not trust them with a single cent. It is likely that they are using the $10 million raised as an attraction for more investors.
Calling aTriz a troll without any evidence doesn't help either.
|
|
|
|
This is the best time to buy Bitcoin !
Buy Bitcoin now or you will regret later. Listen to me; I am Moses, Bitcoin Moses; Great Great Grand father of Bitcoin Jesus but not the impostor Roger Ver, who is claiming to be Bitcoin Jesus. Believe me he is not the real Bitcoin Jesus but an impostor of Bitcoin Jesus. I forecast accurately.
The price is on pace to break the $7000 resistance level once again. And when it does the price is going to go over that figure quite a bit which means that it's definitely a great idea to buy into bitcoin heavily right now. We've seen this trend 2-3 times already, every time the dump is followed by an initial pump, with a period of sideways movement and then a big pump and another dump. This time should be no different, except price should be expected to go up to $8-9k at least. |
|
|
|
The price will definitely get bumped up by this, and will generate a lot more publicity for bitcoin. As the saying goes any publicity is good publicity. However, i just don't know how this will influence the pricing in the long term. I'm not a fan of futures trading or high leveraging. Basically a recipe for market manipulation, especially on such a large scale market. |
|
|
|
He can say whatever he wants. We've seen McAfee come out and say a similar thing with a prediction of bitcoin going over $500k by 2020. All of this in the end will not affect the actual markets, nobody really takes the seriously unless it's their close followers. I personally think that bitcoin will eventually hit $400k due to natural fiat inflation. But it's not going to if you are talking about the short term. Just no way that the price is going to rise 100 times like that in less than a decade. |
|
|
|
Hashflare sounds promising  - Why do you think they are promising? I don't think so, not with their 1 year contracts and not with what they did to their old customers. And yeah, they never showed pictures of their farms although they were asked to show them many times. All this points to a scam. I don't know if people know about this but recently they added ridiculously high withdrawal limits that essentially you have to wait for months to get to even if your initial investment is more than half a bitcoin. It's something like 0.1 BTC or 0.2 BTC if i remember correctly. This plus the fact that again, they've violated contract terms and reduced all contracts down to 1 year from lifetime is fishy as hell. |
|
|
|
hello ive tried today your service..... but i only have 371 bytes transaction,,,, so it means that this is free??..😊thanks
Yes. Transactions up to 400 bytes can be accelerated for free. If it doesn't, you will redirected to a Coinpayments page to pay for the service. Since when was 500 bytes changed down to 400 bytes? I think i must have missed something here. Also the rates seem to have also be lowered down to $4 for transactions over 400 bytes, so i guess that's the compensation for it. very happy that i could help accelerate some transactions. free transactions are back as well Thanks but can you please address bitkilo with his allegation of you not being partners with bitcoin.com pool? I think he has a fair point. |
|
|
|
Lauda neg trusts people just for offering to buy or sell an account
I've done that myself, and will continue to do so. People who sell accounts are cancerous to bitcointalk, as are those who buy them. What good do you think comes of account dealing? It's either to spam for sig campaigns or to commit a scam using a trust score that isn't theirs. It's so bad here, you can't tell who's who. Dealing with a green-trusted member? How do you know it's the person who actually earned that trust? Ans: You don't. The SMAS thing is a private matter amongst the campaign managers. They have every right to add people to that as they see fit, and campaign managers don't have to use the list anyway. I don't think Edwardard uses it, for example. I've seen some people who got blacklisted who weren't the most egregious shitposters, but it's not my call to criticize that. That's not a bitcointalk thing, it's a private consortium kind of thing. There are probably hundreds of users who deserve to be on that list who aren't. People are human and aren't efficient engines of shitpost destruction. Exactly. SMAS is only a point of reference for signature campaign managers to find potentially spammers that are trying to join their campaigns. So refer to it strictly, others do not. As The Pharmicist said Edwardard doesn't use it, and i don't think Darkstar uses it either. @pleasedontnegme Your claim of SMAS bans handed out as personal vendettas doesn't make sense. Campaign managers usually do not interact with particpants much, only on campaign related subjects usually. How is this so called personal vendetta is even generated? |
|
|
|
|
What he did with ethconnect was extremely shady, since ethconnect was an obvious scam and yet he still went on to promote it for a week or two until someone called him out on it. As soon as people started saying that he is promoting this scam, he immediately stopped. Which suggests to me that he already knew about this all beforehand, but at least he did stop.
Trust farming? I don't know if that is true. He definitely could be but like decoded said trust is completely objective, it doesn't represent everything.
|
|
|
|
Nah, i feel like you just missed out on the previous pumps and is feeling a bit salty at the moment. No way that we're going under $4000 again this year in my opinion. Maybe next year, when a big adjustment in price comes. But it's definitely not going to be this year or any time soon in my opinion, markets are way too bullish for that. $10k is going to happen. You saying that wait a few weeks and buy at a lower price seems like the real fantasy here  |
|
|
|
He made a new post that even with google translate I can't understand.
Seems like he is not using very kind words for the BCH guys
He says that the BCH attack is impressive. But it doesn't change anything, because changing constants is not the solution. He also says we are going to slowly trend towards weekly ma20. Weekly MA20 is around 4 500$. So that means he is bearish short term? Well if the price moves down, the moving average will still move a bit as it's a lagging indicator. So price and MA20 in the weekly chart could probably meet around the $4750 - $5000 area. As the $5000 level should be tested anyway I see this as a good sign to build a good support in that zone. So imo we could see 2-3 more weeks of downside. If we consolidate then or see a strong bounce like the other 4 times before this year needs to be seen. We are still parabolic, I don't understand the pessimism until we break below $5000. $5500 was a perfect bounce off the parabolic curve. We could still be at $10k by Jan 1 2018. I am not thinking downturn in the market for more than 5-9 days unless we go below $5k, then I am bearish for Bitcoin near term. It's still very possible to make it above $10k by new year "while" breaking $5k beforehand, don't you think? That's exactly what i'm thinking. We're more than 50% the way there and even though currently we've experienced a big setback with the rise of BCH and the dramatic panic dump of bitcoin, i really don't see a reason why BTC can't break $10k. December to January should be the deadline of this happening. Pumps and dumps usually happen with 1-2 month cycles at this point. |
|
|
|
Hey, guys. Does anybody know this website coinegg.com? I heard that it now cooperates with China's largest altcoin trading platform called Jubi. Lately, they start a non-fee activity. You can have a look at its twitter: CoinEgg_LTD. Is anyone trading on it? Have never heard of it. I thought at first that it was odd that they are completely a Chinese site but have their headquarters located in the UK, but it turned out that it was just the Chinese government have recently started to crack down on exchanges so many have moved. From what i've heard, they are basically the new Jubi platform reborn. Should be ok to use. |
|
|
|
Unanswered service requests for months. They have dropped my withdrawal limit to 0 as soon as I started to withdrawal.
#431491 Pending verification
Any recommendations of legal action I could take? $30,000 at stake.
Thanks, Mark
That's pretty brutal. You'd have to speak to your lawyer about this, i'm absolutely no expert in law but i'm going to tell you it's going to be a long and tedious process for sure if they do not comply or at least respond to your support tickets. Not the first time they've done this either. Try to communicate with them, even if they do not respond, at least that builds up your case. |
|
|
|
|
"502 Bad Gateway"
And yep, it seems like both guarda wallet and the actual bitcoin gold twitter account endorsed changenow.io. Not sure why exactly, whether they have partnered up with them or they are simply getting paid to say that.
Even though the site is down, when i saw their twitter account there was a latest tweet coming from 27m ago.
Could be just down for maintenance. But no official notice on why this is happening.
|
|
|
|
Changelly has had these issues before, with people buying altcoins or selling them but the transaction does not go through and the whole thing is cancelled by changelly. Extremely shady behaviour since it seems to happen most times when the exchange rate of the altcoin rises. However, what exactly did they claim you do wrong? Did you send the wrong amount of btc? Did you send with too little transaction fees? I sorta can't wrap my head around the situaiton here. And as you said, BCH/BTC exchanges were obviously going to be delayed since the high volume. If you wanted actual instance exchanges, probably should have kept your BTC on an exchange at such a volatile time. |
|
|
|
What do you think guy's?
Is the btc price correction done?
Or it will go down again?
Or it's time to see the price to the moon?
What happens in the short term in my opinion will not affect the long term mechanics of bitcoin. The price of bitcoin is really destined to go up at least until mid to late next year before a real correction and a bear market sets in. Right now yes, the price correction for short term is done and we're looking at another bull wave. We'll probably hit 10k by the end of the year, no doubt about that. |
|
|
|
Hi,
I´m trying to contact chipmixer on their email but I keep getting emails bounced back.
I had a question about this on their FAQ
"""But 1.024 BTC is so uncommon that everyone will know I've used this mixer!
After a while it will get more common, because you won't even need to use mixer to anonymize your coins. Just split them into tokens and they look exactly like chips."""
I don't understand the tokens part. I also have doubts about the amounts. If I mix 10 BTC for example, I get different chips, like 1 chip of 4.096 BTC another of 2.048 another of 1.024, 0.512, 0.256 etc
These amounts are only used by chipmixer so it´s very easy to track on the blockchain.
I´m concerned because I have to mix a decent amount of BTC and I want to remain as anonymous as possible.
Let me know please.
Best regards
True. Even though there is the commonize option IIRC that would basically get all your remaining few mBTCs and tip it to chipmixer so that you are able to end up with a nice, round number instead of 0.512, 1.024 etc. It would be nice to have something to allow customers chose their own chip sizes to make the whole thing more private but i'm not sure how that is possible atm. Also, splitting your balance into chips does not help. The main reason for using a mixer is to dissociate yourself from the initial deposit. |
|
|
|
Told you guys,
This user is lying about partnering with the Bitcoin.com mining pool so i would assume that the whole setup is a lie.
Someone on DT needs to "tag" the users account as a scammer.
Since you are deeply involved with bitcoin.com(at least the forum side), i'm going to believe you. They did claim that they worked with pools from the likes of btc.top, bitcoin.com all the way to BTCC and bixin: Ps: We are working with a large group of miners who use btc.top,bitcoin.com bitfury,antpool,BTCC,Bixin and gbminers. We are not directly linked with these pools. If you will submit your tx to us you will know. I feel like a lot of the transactions are being confirmed using antpool, which means that they COULD potentially be using antpool's free service and charging a fee for accelerating these transactions. Highly shady if that's the case. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
