I think you have this backwards. You know what is interesting is you used to have me on your trust list, but for some "unknown" reason as I became more vocally critical of trust rating abuse you fell in line with all of the worst abusers, not only excluding me, but then becoming their toadie mouthpiece attacking me any time I brought it up.
I just saw this as someone brought it to my attention. This is incorrect. I never had you on my trust list, not for one minute. Never. Not even as an accident. You can use LoyceV's lists in an attempt to demonstrate otherwise, but you'll just be wasting your time. Really man. Your obsession with me is... well... flattering. How far do his lists go back? Regardless the point is you engaged in high levels of scrutiny upon me for simply pointing out the abusive dynamic here, but I am "obsessed" for questioning your own behavior and double standards? |
|
|
|
The part of my selectively edited quote which you conveniently left out: I am not even saying your ratings shouldn't have been left, maybe they should, but that is irrelevant. The point is Nutilduuh felt those ratings were justified, yet when the same standards are applied to them, suddenly we all need to reconsider. I like this one Nutilduuh left for example.  Can you tell me Nutilduuh, why is it account sellers are not to be trusted? Why is this bad for him but ok for you? |
|
|
|
Wow man. You just love a good conspiracy don't you. Me unofficially staking my BTC/XCP address last April: Anybody want to buy the "ownership" of my NFL team name tokens? I have every team name except for "Bears," which was already taken, so I created "Bearsb" instead.
A few years back I had an idea to create a gambling system where people could buy team name tokens and then if that team won the Super Bowl, holders of that token would split a pot of BTC of all tokens sold.
In the meanwhile, people could actively trade, buy or sell their tokens according to how well those teams were doing in the regular season.
Unfortunately, it didn't go so well, because ultimately everybody had to trust that I would pay out the pot and not just run off with it.
I don't think I sold a single token.
I should really come up with a more automated way of doing it before next season starts. But if you're interested in buying the complete set, let me know; they're all under the same address:
1PypgzaAJXHzLPvkLQwWzqwn1AyhJd9YUi
One of my first comments in the Counterparty thread: I shudder to think how much I have spend on btc transaction fees on failed sales of xcp for btc. Order cancel themselves especially mysteriously or the btc holders are logged out so the do not pay... Meh.
Yeah, I agree that this is a problem. Pissing away satoshis on mysteriously failed orders doesn't feel good. I realize that the amounts involved are small, but multiply by X and they get bigger. They need to be more like the real exchanges in this area. (No fees for cancelled orders). Would encourage people to make more use of the CP exchange. Today's message from this address (1PypgzaAJXHzLPvkLQwWzqwn1AyhJd9YUi): tecHshare is an NPC. sincerely, nutildah, dated 3-21-19 (because its tomorrow over here) Signed: H8pDlWVOKBd5TAOUhFiqUTZRhfTd9BEbzJYIosZ2do/bQJXWPzQc/1OSXN1kxJn8WznXJt/IFXfxbw6vzhBMstg= But please, don't take my word for it: https://blockexplorer.com/messages/verifyAbsolutely meaningless. If you sold the account there is no reason you could not have also sold your wallets to sign with. That address was posted after the attempted account sale anyway, so there is no way to verify you are the original owner. |
|
|
|
So what part of this explains why Nutilduuuh gets a pass on trying to sell their account while anyone else who does this gets theirs destroyed?
EDIT: I find it very telling you personalized this even though I said nothing about you.
Nobody dares to destroy my sockpuppets, isn't that obvious to you yet? Let me know when you can coax a logical on topic argument out of that hollow skull of yours. |
|
|
|
As far as I am concerned this account should be considered compromised as there is no way to know for sure it was not transferred. I really wouldn't be surprised if this account is simply a sock used by another more well known member attempting to maintain their desired narrative without risking their main account.
Everyone who disagrees with you is my sockpuppet. Case closed. Now that you don't have to sherlock around looking for dirt you'll have so much more time to implement your "standards". Thank me later. So what part of this explains why Nutilduuuh gets a pass on trying to sell their account while anyone else who does this gets theirs destroyed? EDIT: I find it very telling you personalized this even though I said nothing about you. |
|
|
|
I can't see what you're saying but doesn't wanting to red paint somebody for this go against everything that you have been preaching on Meta for quite some time now? It seems extremely petty. I'm trying to actually help clean things up around here and you are trying to drive me out.. because you don't agree with my politics?
It will be interesting to see what transpired by the time I wake up in the morning, that's for sure.
Pharmacist I'm going to go ahead and merit your post because I agree with your assessment of tecshare 100%. Sorry to have my ilk contaminate your "brigade", hope you can forgive me for that.
You think this is because of your politics? Man if that was the case, this would be a full time job with all the people who disagree with my politics around here. No, this is about your own aggressive behavior toward me, and the resulting extra scrutiny. That is all. Then when you are unable to even engage in debate you call me insane, run away, and "ignore" me.
The fact of the matter is that this is just yet another proof of the fact that there is a set of standards for the ass kiss brigade of which Nutilduuuh is a member, and a set of standards for everyone else.
You said much the same thing about me, but the fact is that you're a online pest who won't stop arguing until the person you're arguing with gets bored and disengages--but you don't stop. This is why people are calling you a troll. You are also accusing nutildah of stalking, which is what you yourself are guilty of. You wouldn't stop pestering me until I had to block your PMs, at which point you left a neutral trust on me that was, to put it mildly, aggressive in tone. Nutildah is probably just tired of arguing with you, and yet here you are digging up 'dirt' that you think is evidence of a double standard. Tell the police that they missed every speeder on the highway and ask them why they don't give a ticket to every one. That's the ridiculous basis of your argument. I was tagging account sellers in 2016 (not many other members were), but apparently I didn't tag him. Must have missed him, because 1) there's no tag, and 2) I don't remember. It was 3 years ago. I'd tell you to give it up, but those words would be wasted on you. Here comes the rest of the gang. What did I say about you? Who is forcing anyone to engage with me at all? Ooo a neutral. MUCH ABUSE! I didn't accuse anyone of stalking. I simply pointed out the only reason I know Nutilduuh exists is because of their repeated hostilities toward me, otherwise I never would have even noticed this. I just find it rather sad they now attempt to play the victim after the repeated instigation of attacks upon me by Nutilduuh for having ideas they don't approve of. The fact is this would be total justification for any of you in the trust police squad to demolish an account, but not when they are just so good at kissing your asses huh? If you were on the end handing out the ratings you would consider negative ratings totally justified, but now you are the one being scrutinized suddenly everyone needs to make exceptions. If it were not for double standards, you and all the other trust abuse toadies would have no standards at all. |
|
|
|
 Funny how he posted this about 13 minutes after I said I was putting him on ignore... Obviously I had a change of heart and have since changed my attitude 180 on account sales. Back then, yes, it wasn't as big a deal, and I was pretty desperate for money. Times have changed, however, with ICOs and an influx of scams to previously unfathomable proportions. I recognize that and now would never sell my account. The crypto space has grown exponentially since then, with BTC going up in price almost tenfold in that time. (which is why I'll probably never be desperate for money again  ) Also I wasn't as committed to the forum then as I am now. If somebody wants to tag me for a non-event from 3 years ago, I can't stop them. Frankly I think tecshare takes things way too personally, which is what led him to comment in this thread in the first place. I've come to peace with the fact that he dislikes me... why he continues to troll me and seek to damage my reputation is beyond me. I think you have this backwards. You know what is interesting is you used to have me on your trust list, but for some "unknown" reason as I became more vocally critical of trust rating abuse you fell in line with all of the worst abusers, not only excluding me, but then becoming their toadie mouthpiece attacking me any time I brought it up. Then later you decided to follow me to Politics & Society where you previously showed little to no activity to prove how much of a brown noser you really are to your masters. Then when you are unable to even engage in debate you call me insane, run away, and "ignore" me. Who knew that joining a mob and attacking people would bring extra scrutiny to you? Poor you. The fact of the matter is that this is just yet another proof of the fact that there is a set of standards for the ass kiss brigade of which Nutilduuuh is a member, and a set of standards for everyone else. As far as I am concerned this account should be considered compromised as there is no way to know for sure it was not transferred. I really wouldn't be surprised if this account is simply a sock used by another more well known member attempting to maintain their desired narrative without risking their main account. |
|
|
|
I found this in Nutildah's trust ratings today and found it rather interesting... usually this would be grounds for completely removing any credibility for an account and red tagging it to the center of the Earth, but as usual, some people around here are more equal than others... Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1622642.0"Account for sale. Archived page if he deleted the thread. https://archive.is/BBMFH " You will be receiving a comment like this " In 2016 the account sales were allowed in this forum and then later it was discouraged" by the forum rules so no one is going to tag that account since it is created in 2016. Anyone knows here since when account sales were considered as untrustworthy behaviour? Exact date will be appreciated. Account sales have never been against forum rules. Over time the user base has deemed it to be unacceptable on their own. Any other time this happens not only is the soliciting account assumed to have been transferred, but it is red tagged by everyone and their mother to ensure it will not be abused. |
|
|
|
^^^ But you have to consider why gun controlled countries are safer than the USA regarding weapons. It's because of weapon freedom in the USA. What do I mean? Governments are people ruling over their citizens. People love to get rich off other people. Government people would love to make their people into slaves. But the USA stops them. How does the USA stop other government people from making slaves of their own citizen people? Through USA gun freedom. The people in Scandinavian countries see two things. They see the gun freedom in the USA. And they see the gun violence in the USA. But the Scandinavian governments see it as well. This is why they keep their people free. They know that if they tried to enslave their people, the people would make guns. Why would the people make guns? Because they know how much freedom there is in America, and they want such freedom. Right now ME people are waking up to USA freedom. All the people want freedom like the USA. Part of the reason why ISIS is dying is that the people are fed up with not having any guns like ISIS. They are helping the USA destroy ISIS from within. Be glad that you have freedom from the need to own guns. But recognize that your freedom is being promoted by the USA freedom to own, and the American people's ownership of... guns.  Everyone wants to see evil people stopped, but no one ever wants to look at the blood. You want to enjoy your bacon but you don't want to slaughter the pig. You want to be free, but you don't want to hold a dangerous scary gun. Society is turning into a bunch of helpless infants begging to be put in a Earth sized playpen, and demanding any remaining adults are forced to join them so they are never reminded how infantile they are in comparison. |
|
|
|
I found this in Nutildah's trust ratings today and found it rather interesting... usually this would be grounds for completely removing any credibility for an account and red tagging it to the center of the Earth, but as usual, some people around here are more equal than others... Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1622642.0"Account for sale. Archived page if he deleted the thread. https://archive.is/BBMFH " |
|
|
|
You're clearly insane. There's no point in talking to you. I'm just putting you on ignore from now on. Take care.
Everyone take a look at what people do when they have no ability to debate and no logic to stand on when their beliefs are challenged. They mock, they make personal attacks, they accuse, they distract, then they call you insane and run away. These are the types of people responsible for most of the suffering in the world because they insist on not having their comfortable little bubble be intruded upon by harsh realities. Like a child in a burning house you run to hide in the closet telling yourself you will be safe as you die of asphyxiation. Reality doesn't give a fuck about your feelings. You keep telling yourself whatever you need to in order to keep your comfortable delusion going, otherwise you might have to critically examine your beliefs, and who wants that right? |
|
|
|
CNN is reporting the source of the existence of the relationship between Bezos and his mistress is the mistress' brother. If this is true, based on the fact that the Enquirer normally publishes this type of stories of high profile people, the theory that the reporting was politically motivated is more or less extinguished IMO. This should also throw cold water on the theory that a "government" hacked Bezos' phone to expose his affair. In theory, the source for the sexting pics may be different, but I would not count on this. The WSJ confirmed the source was Bezos’ mistresses brother, who was paid $200k for the texts. It sounds like the brother really doesn’t like Bezos. He probably could have gotten 100x this much from Bezos just from asking for a favor. Or Bezos could have had him killed for 10% of that. |
|
|
|
Its actually the biological nature of men - similar to why everyone thinks babies are cute.
Anyone talking about biological nature of anyone is a complete and utter moron. And it's cool to see equality on all parts of a country. Draft is shit but all genders draft is better than male draft. Everyone knows biology has zero effect whatsoever on people right? xD |
|
|
|
More pathetic squirming "To become licensed, the applicant must be a fit and proper person over the age of 16. They also need to have adequate secure storage for firearms, attend a safety program administered by the Mountain Safety Council, pass a written safety test, pay the requisite fee, and supply passport-standard photographs with their application. Police also individually interview the applicant and two referees, one of whom must be a close relative and the other unrelated, to determine the applicant's suitability for a license. The applicant's residence is also visited to check for appropriate storage of firearms and ammunition and to ensure any other people living there are not a security risk. Having criminal associations or a history of domestic violence almost always leads to a license being refused. An application can be refused if the applicant has indicators of drug or alcohol abuse, criminal associations, a history of domestic violence, or a physical, mental health or disability issue that would prevent them possessing or using a firearm safely. Previous denied applications or revoked licenses may also be cause for denial. " Actually I quoted the Wikipedia in my very first reply to you. Sounds pretty restrictive to me, but you have such great reading comprehension I must be wrong. The actual previous subject was everything you had no reply to resulting in your desperate attempts to try to cast me as a "Sandy Hook denier". Why are there so many car deaths in America? Shit I guess we should stop driving since cars kill far more people. Cute you used the term "gun deaths" so that it would be maximally inclusive so that suicides, justified use of force, and self defense would be included. Real gun crime has been on a steady decline for a long time in the US, what has increased is the media exposure. and finally "I think its pretty classless to attribute the senseless deaths of innocent people as being part of a grand state-level conspiracy." Everyone knows states never conspire to kill people right? War doesn't exist and national leaders WOULD NEVER kill people to get more control right? RIGHT? |
|
|
|
I know you aren't, that's why you are trying to slide the topic to something else.
Unless if you specifically say otherwise, I'm just going to assume you believe Sandy Hook didn't happen.. Most people would just say "of course it fucking happened," but you couldn't do this, which explains a lot concerning your current attitude toward the Christchurch shooting. And I will take your lack of a logical reply and your insistence of trying to take the discussion off topic to mean "I am incapable of forming a logical reply to your comments, and I should probably stop attempting to debate subjects I am poorly informed on." You mean like your understanding of New Zealand's gun laws? The shooters weapons were obtained legally. So much for gun control working. How does this even make sense? If the weapons were obtained legally, how does that reflect "gun control"? What is your solution to the problem anyway? More guns to more crazies? You were probably confusing New Zealand with Australia, which pretty much banned guns in 1996 after their last massacre, and hasn't had one since. Nobody in Australia (besides a few psychos) seems to mind. Nobody is afraid of government tyranny or oppression there, it never comes up as a seriously entertained issue. As usual, unable to form a cogent reply, you need to shift the topic YET AGAIN in order to make a desperate attempt to appear as if you have any idea what you are talking about rather than reply to my previous response. That statement was based on reports he legally obtained some guns from a local gun shop. The ones used in the shooting were not those weapons however. I was absolutely talking about New Zealand gun laws, I even gave a reference which you promptly ignored: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_New_ZealandGun laws only stop law abiding people from having guns. This is a fact. If you are a criminal, by definition you have no regard for the law. The weapons the shooter used were obtained on the black market, and were of a very restricted variety within New Zealand. It is good to know you speak for all of Australia when you say no one is worried about government tyranny and oppression. I guess I can ignore all the real Australians I have talked to who have said otherwise since Nutilduuh is on the scene. |
|
|
|
The problem is that the word is being used to describe something completely different than its definition. Its not just practice vs theory. The "practice vs theory" argument in the last post would be valid if someone attempted to remove the state, class, and money from society and it resulted in millions of deaths but we all know that isn't what happened.
You can't use a totalitarian state as a practical example for what would happen in a stateless society. The two are literally the opposite. "Firefighters" showing up to your home with gasoline and matches just to torch the place wouldn't mean we should never try using firefighters.
^ How you think it works ^ V How it actually works V https://youtu.be/vHjT2BKYn-s?t=45Everyone just ignore the fact that the process of creating a stateless society literally creates the conditions required to create a totalitarian state. It doesn't matter because that isn't what they intended! It will be different this time! |
|
|
|
I know you aren't, that's why you are trying to slide the topic to something else.
Unless if you specifically say otherwise, I'm just going to assume you believe Sandy Hook didn't happen.. Most people would just say "of course it fucking happened," but you couldn't do this, which explains a lot concerning your current attitude toward the Christchurch shooting. And I will take your lack of a logical reply and your insistence of trying to take the discussion off topic to mean "I am incapable of forming a logical reply to your comments, and I should probably stop attempting to debate subjects I am poorly informed on." |
|
|
|
|
I know you aren't, that's why you are trying to slide the topic to something else.
|
|
|
|
|
Whats that? I can't hear you over the sound of you being off topic and having no logical argument.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
