Hmmm who would gain from having DarkSend fail?

I would welcome criticism of the coin's code. Better that these things get resolved now, than a year down the line.

As far as DarkCoin goes, it does everything that Bitcoin does, with the added feature of being anonymous. I don't need every person I send money to being capable of tracking my spending or knowing my balance. DarkCoin should market itself as privacy centric. Privacy is in short supply these days, but in high demand.

What does BeeCoin have? Only speculators. I'm not denying the presence of speculators in DarkCoin, I'd say most of the cryptocurrency community is made up of speculators. However, DarkCoin has utility. Anonymity has real world use. What real world use does BeeCoin have that any other clone doesn't?

Hahahah Beecoin. Once I saw that I knew there was no point to read further. Let's take a look at the price of Beecoin and DarkCoin a month from now and see who was right.

There are ways to future proof the coin that won't hurt early adopters like this change. Set the reward algorithm so that it caps out at something reasonable, say 10M after a set number of years. It should be us early believers who should be rewarded, the people who are actively contributing to the success of Dark.

I just don't understand why the dev gave in to the trolls saying that Dark was premined. Yes, a good number of coins were mined in the first few months. However the people that mined those coins are what enabled the success of Dark ( Much credit to the dev). Why should some random miners who only came to Dark once it was safe and obviously valuable get the majority of its value?

Eduffield, I would really appreciate a response to this recent change. Why are you taking the majority of the reward away from us and giving it to future opportunists?

The number of coins shouldn't affect the market cap, and thus it shouldn't affect whether a coin will have miners. Miners efficiently assort themselves among the various coins based on how much they make per day mining each coin. As long as a coin has value, miners will mine it. The only thing being decided here is who gets the value from the coin, early adopters who worked tirelessly to promote DarkCoin and believed in it from the start, or opportunistic miners who don't care if they mine dogcoin, catcoin or shitcoin, as long as they get the best return? What this change does is it takes a large percent of that value away from us early adopters and hands it over to (future) miners. This is a change that hurts current holders of Dark severely. I can't believe more people aren't aware and upset about this. One troll complains that the coin was "premined" and the dev capitulates, costing us all a good portion of our potential profit.

My question is why is the dev punishing us like this? We believed in Dark from the start, why should miners who are taking zero risk be rewarded in our place?

Why was the coin changed from being scarce to more common? I'd prefer the old cap of around 10 million. What does the new cap do, other than limit the potential value of our coins?  As it stands, it makes more sense to dump these coins once they get a little more hype. I really hate when devs pull this sort of shit. Bought my coins a few weeks ago , expecting to be part of a relatively rare coin, now they become 5x + more common? Great way to reward the people who believed in you, dev. Not all of us have the space to mine so this change is a big fuck you to all the non miners investing in Dark.

I know that I'll still profit, but with this dilution, I guess I'll have to start day trading. Dump after a big rise, buy back later once it drops.

I believe that if we want to see mass adoption , we need to change the name. DarkCoin is a nice name, but people will associate dark with illegal or otherwise questionable activities. This will preclude adoption on the scale of Bitcoin.

You'd have to be an idiot to invest in the IPO as it was last stated. Just putting that out there again.

This coin has some of the strangest dumping activity I've ever seen. Makes no fucking sense.

I will be happy to remove this accusation and all defamatory posts once I get my Bitcoin. How can I get in touch with someone from Coinmarket?

Price seems to be very stable. Really hope that the dumper is done.

Great fucking scheme, say an exchange is beta and use that to justify the theft of coins.

There is an extremely high likelihood that this exchange is being run for the purpose of stealing users' Bitcoin. I just tried to process a withdrawal of .001 BTC, and it went through. Once I tried processing a withdrawal for .252 BTC, it gave me a nonexistent hash and the funds vanished from my account. A friend of mine is out just under 1 BTC because the transaction is stuck on pending. Don't lose your BTC, use another exchange.

They never reply to PM's ,fucking useless exchange. I now have 1.2 BTC missing.

Guys be VERY careful with this exchange! I just tried to withdraw a small amount of BTC, to test withdrawls. Transaction went through. Once I tried to withdraw a larger amount the transaction is marked as sent on the withdrawals page, but it was never sent. GIVE ME MY BITCOIN YOU SCAMMERS.

I wonder where we would have been now, if not for the c-cex theft?

I'd prefer closed source to start. Otherwise we may never get momentum. Notice how many of the people calling for open source have very few posts in this thread.

Price is tanking. What is going on here? Where are all these dumped coins coming from?