|
These exchanges are utter shit. We need to get on a non-shit exchange as quickly as possible.
|
|
|
|
all that investment gonna because of some dick
Damn that sucks. Do you know how they get access to your account? |
|
|
|
|
Why was the Euphoria text removed from the logo? Also is it still called Fedoracoin or what? Coin ruined.
|
|
|
|
The 1st stage gets 15% of the distribution, but if less BTC is received for the second stage, the second stage investors would actually get more EXO for their BTC. I kind of hope this happens, because the complaining will be hilarious. |
|
|
|
|
Still hold some KDC, but I'm so happy that I went with Dark when KDC started stagnating.
|
|
|
|
|
Mining should definitely not be reduced if you want a fair coin. Otherwise, it's just NXT 2.0.
|
|
|
|
|
I seriously doubt that Anon136 would scam anyone. It's the dev that seems suspicious to me. Why incentivize risk, thus lending to a scam perception of your coin, when you could just release the white paper before taking investment. This is what any legitimate coin would do. This "dev" just seems to be taking advantage of people's greed.
|
|
|
|
Son of the bitch
I hope your child will die
What did the kid do? Irrational, don't you think? |
|
|
|
Google has his IP addresses Yahoo has his IP addresses Bitcointalk has his IP addresses kiwiirc.com has his IP addresses nerdychild.com has his IP addresses since then he seems to have changed it now to stackstack303@yahoo.comTOR?) Yes, sure. But that's pure theory. Of course, he might use Tor whenever he can - and thinks of it! But only one technical malfunction, or only one single user sloppiness - and he has left real footprints. He created a hell lot of postings and emails and accounts - essentially he has left the traces that will lead back to him. Most criminals make mistakes, that's how they are caught, anyway. And: One day he might want to spend the money - which is in a public ledger. Rearranging the letters in your name gives him the solution to that public ledger problem. |
|
|
|
|
Why would a reputable dev even accept investments prior to the release of a white paper or, at the very least, some sample code? Giving risk takers a greater share, when he could just release the paper and not be accused of scamming. Seems really fishy to me.
|
|
|
|
|
I could definitely see a spike soon, similar to what happened with Vertcoin. Really happy with my decision to go with Darkcoin.
|
|
|
|
|
There seem to be people who are dead set against pumping the coin. These people are the reason this coin is dying. No pumps = coin begins to stagnate and then fades into obscurity. You either hype the coin to pump it or actually offer unique/useful features. Absent these things, the community begins to atrophy until you're left with a contingent of delusionals who fantasize about their 100,000 KDC actually being worth something. Congratulations, on being big bag holders, guys. Only you didn't realize that bag is actually full of shit.
|
|
|
|
|
I guess you guys are all regretting not selling at .015.
|
|
|
|
I don't remember.
Is it, when we hit a diff of 72, it will never go lower than 72 again?
Didn't we hit about 100 before the KGW update? |
|
|
|
|
Getting just a bit over 1MH/s with a 270x. Is that about normal ?
|
|
|
|
The bitcoins that are spent for the shares could be burned like counterparty did.
That way nobody gets all the money and you could argue that the value of the bitcoins is actually transferred to the skycoins
The workman is worthy of his pay. Would you like to put in a lot of hard work into something, then don't get paid or are forced to stand in the same line as others that didn't contribute one iota to its success this far? There is no need to destroy value in order to make ends meet. In fact, a lot of value is needed to make ends meet. The more, the better. Marketing for one costs money... so if you burn the Bitcoins spent, who exactly is going to cover marketing and other costs, especially considering that many will not accept Skycoin as a means of payment from day one? Marketing? What's the dev doing, running ads on the evening news? Please. Altcoins don't need direct marketing, a good community accomplishes all the marketing you need. |
|
|
|
|
Either the developer is a lunatic, or this is a giant money grab. To ask 50 BTC for a 1% stake in a project like this is absurd. This project may be worth 50BTC as a WHOLE, not for 1%. What does the dev have to show other than a few lines of code? Who are you, dev? Why should the community trust a sock puppet account, with no reputation? Do you have a WOT account? Who else is on your team? Do you have a timeline, a business plan, in other words you need to provide a little more before anyone ( except true fools) will trust you with their BTC.
Consider two other currencies that used the IPO model, NXT and Mastercoin. NXT took 21 BTC for its IPO, providing the full 100% of NXT to investors. The return on this investment was around 3000x. Next, let's look at Mastercoin. Mastercoin raised 4700 BTC, but they had a team of developers and a solid plan. Investing in Mastercoin would have netted between 100-200x, depending on what time you sold. For this project, if we take the 50BTC = 1% stake, you'd need for this coin to have a ~100,000,000 market cap, just to see a 25x return. Most coins never break 10,000,000 let alone a hundred million. So not only is this an extremely high risk investment, it's also low reward.
In his communications, the dev says things like "initial investors will become outrageously rich". Not only does that sound bad coming from the developer of a purportedly legitimate coin, but no one will become rich with the current model except for the dev. Overall ,I say that this project has a very high chance of being an outright scam. If it isn't a scam, and we're just dealing with a megalomaniac dev, your potential earnings are so low as to be laughable for this level of risk. Stay away.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't get why all the interesting coins have such horrible release models.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
