|
You guys are totally missing the point. I don't care whether the current XC code is original or not. Writing a centralized mixer is so easy that the Fedoracoin guys did it. The point is the difference in difficulty between coding a centralized mixing service and coding a decentralized mixing service is enormous. Being able to do the former is NOT evidence that one can do the latter.
|
|
|
|
|
Deleting criticisms, great way to move your coin forward.
|
|
|
|
Dude get out of this thread. You are only looking for a scapegoat now.
Until your so called Dev releases some code that isn't the FedoraCoin Blender, your coin is a shame.
Then stop yacking about XC on the DRK thread then, it's okay to bash on it here and also invade the XC thread but not for someone to come in and respond to the accusations here? I've never once posted in your thread. And obviously I can't now anyway because you turned it into a self moderated topic. I only came on here to respond because Megges was spreading lies about XC in here, if DRK and ONLY DRK is talked about here then i'll leave. We don't need lies to discredit something that is bereft of substance in the first place. |
|
|
|
|
XC guys, go to your thread and enjoy your Dunning-Kruger bliss there.
|
|
|
|
|
As a piece of advice to your community, ask your dev to verify his identity. That's the first step to gaining trust from investors. A Linkedin profile is not sufficient.
|
|
|
|
|
Will this have original code with a novel function, unlike other coins with a similar name?
|
|
|
|
I have a genuine question, and its absolutely not meant as trolling or what so ever. Personally I haven't dumped my XC and for now I wont because I have trust in this coin - i think  But I can't help to wonder how a coin can survey FUD like this, and mostly coming with that massive dumps. Are there any plans yet? do the DEVs have a certain vision on how to proceed from here? Its not per say a XC problem, I see it happening a lot. I'm still quite new to this whole thing - but how can a coin ever be successful (like LTC for example) with all those wa***rs around? Ok so here is my answer: We have survived massive dumps in the multipool days, we are recovering from this quite well. Here is what I did yesterday to minimize the fud: https://twitter.com/drasticraven and also my Bitcointalk history. The dev himself offered up a review of the code which to my knowledge is still happening for today. Pizpie calmed the IRC. Our three principles are: Privacy. Innovation. Transparency. Which code is it that is being reviewed? No one is disputing that the dev wrote code for a centralized mixer. I want to see code for something that doesn't already exist in a litany of iterations. |
|
|
|
One scam dev vouching for another, how reassuring.  |
|
|
|
I never said XC was a direct copy of Fedoracoin, just that both use a very similar mixing service.
This isn't true at all... XC code for the mixer was written from the ground up Whether or not its original is kind of irrelevant, as both are centralized. yes the first release is/was centralized. REV2 is not That's like putting together an Ikea dresser, and then saying your next project will be a rocketship. |
|
|
|
I never said XC was a direct copy of Fedoracoin, just that both use a very similar mixing service.
This isn't true at all... XC code for the mixer was written from the ground up Whether or not its original is kind of irrelevant, as both are centralized. |
|
|
|
I never said XC was a direct copy of Fedoracoin, just that both use a very similar mixing service.
This isn't true at all... XC code for the mixer was written from the ground up You haven't delivered anything to distinguish XC from Fedoracoin. XC is pure hype until you do. I'm not holding my breath, however. All I've seen from XC is a centralized mixer and an excessive use of the word "paradigm". |
|
|
|
|
I never said XC was a direct copy of Fedoracoin, just that both use a very similar mixing service.
|
|
|
|
I'll invest when the dev delivers something that isn't just a Fedoracoin copy (centralized mixer).
You expect to have the same risk when investing @ $0.5,$1.5 and $15? Well, mate sorry to disappoint you but it does not work like that. I'd rather pay $10 once I know it isn't vaporware. |
|
|
|
Big claims, little actually delivered. Be cautious.
Took about 2.5 seconds to check your post history, Mr Darkcoin. Why don't you just buy in and hold both coins? Or are you too heavily invested in DRK ? Like I said, I'll buy XC when the dev delivers something original. And not just words, talk is cheap. |
|
|
|
|
I'll invest when the dev delivers something that isn't just a Fedoracoin copy (centralized mixer).
|
|
|
|
|
Big claims, little actually delivered. Be cautious.
|
|
|
|
|
Evan really needs to communicate what's going on more effectively. Like every day. The near silence is not exactly reassuring.
|
|
|
|
Out of respect for the other dev's, I would ask everybody - lets keep this clean and professional....
XC has its own path...
What is your ETA on the delivery of a decentralized version of XC's anonymity, along with autonomous nodes using PKI? |
|
|
|
|
That thing looks gimmicky as fuck. Please stop spamming the DRK thread with it.
|
|
|
|
|
If the XC dev is such a competent and serious guy, then why was he mining things like badgercoin and summercoin just a week before launching his coin?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
