Authentication posts don't really stop scammers from joining bounty campaigns. This could help if, for example, there could join a minimum of Jr.Member accounts to the campaign. Anyone can create as many Newbie accounts and Twitter or Facebook accounts as they want. The truth is that the project that launches a bounty campaign will not introduce restrictions on accepting participants from a minimum of Jr.Member, because they want to build the largest community possible. As long as this does not change, it will not be possible to earn good money on a bounty campaign.

Looks like I don't know something. It is possible that non-cryptocurrency tokens have some other definitions, but as far as I know, it is precisely cryptocurrencies that are made on smart contracts that are called tokens. If a cryptocurrency has its own blockchain, it is called a coin. As far as I know, there are no exceptions to this. However, if I am wrong, I would appreciate if you could give some examples.

I agree with Matic and BNB, these two projects certainly have a long development way ahead of them and are going very fast. Without a doubt, these are some of the best investment options in the cryptocurrency market.
As far as Litecoin is concerned, it is indeed a proven project and is a veteran in this market, but unfortunately I do not see any steps towards improvement and development of this project. Fear that it will only be forgotten more and more. In my opinion, ATOM is a much more prospective project.

In my opinion, March will continue to be very negative for the entire cryptocurrency market. The war in Europe began a few days ago, and its first consequences will be felt in March. I am sure that all exchanges in the world will react negatively, and this will cause the price of Bitcoin and all cryptocurrencies to drop as well.

I don't think we understood each other. I'm not asking for any evidence because I guess you don't have any. I also have no evidence.
My point is that I can't really relate to what you wrote, because it's too general statement. I think if you could give a specific example and we will discuss it, then we would have a better picture of the situation.

The problem is that in this thread are struggling people who don't really have actual evidence as to which side is telling the truth. Such fight is pointless, because everything is based only on guesses, and it is impossible for either side to ever be convinced. In my opinion, this discussion will go on forever.

You should provide link to this project, or to the tokenomics info itself, then you would get more precise answers.

From what I understood, only some of the tokens will probably be in the hands of investors, and tokens from a separate pool will be burned. This type of strategy only gives the illusion that if the total supply decreases sharply, it will automatically increase the price. Unfortunately, it usually doesn't lead to anything else but a quick pump & dump.

I think there may be a misunderstanding about "pending" accusations. 1xbit claims to have answered all issues on Bitcointalk. Without a specific example, that you are talking about, it's hard for me to comment, because maybe 1xbit answer was negative and the user does not agree. I think it would be best if you show some example, then we would have a better picture of the situation.

Unfortunately, you were just lucky. Of course, when there is a bull run on the entire cryptocurrency market, it doesn't matter what you buy, because you will earn on every coin. The only differences can be that you earn more on one currency and less on another. However, when we have a bear market, or the situation is stabilized, the prices of only good projects increase, then you can only earn money if you do very good research of the project and do not buy it randomly.

Unfortunately, I have to agree. At the moment, investing in anything in the cryptocurrency market is too risky. Of course, there is a possibility that the trend will change and prices will start to rise, but in my opinion we will have to wait at least a month or two for the situation to improve, so I advise you to hold with investing a bit.

Incredible enthusiasm radiates from your post and if it wasn't the hundredth meme coin I see today, maybe I would even have a closer look at it.

I wonder when high school and college students will realize that the meme coin hype ended at the end of 2021.. 

I noticed that LTC casino publishes a video from influencers and YouTube streamers - whom I believe are playing for fake money, but they publish the video as if it is a real win and I think it is very shady marketing. So in my opinion what you say is very likely.


As for the reasons for delaying paying such a large amount, I am not sure about this, because there may actually be several reasons. The one you named is likely, but if we now know there was something wrong with this win then maybe LTC casino also created this delay to give itself time to check the winnings more carefully. In my opinion, both versions are equally probable.

I totally agree. Depending on how big money I trade and on which cryptocurrencies, and as I see that the waves are often repeated, I sell even with up to 5% profit (more often 10%). When there are a lot of moves I am able to do the buy-sell trades safely even 3 times a day. Also when it comes to cutting costs, in my opinion it is better to stick to the same % when price goes up and when it goes down.

When it comes to only reminding them on Bitcointalk, a signature campaign is certainly enough to stay on the list of cryptocurrency casinos. We do not really know what the owners goals are and whether they care about the development of the cryptocurrency market, or maybe it is only a small part of their activity. Anyway, I hope that the marketing team will see a potential in the Bitcointalk community and give us something special. We all here like when Bitcointalk users are treated in unique way

Nobody is saying that Gamdom is making any mistake. It looks like it is doing very well and even when there was no signature campaign on Bitcointalk and their thread was forgotten at all, they still were doing very well on the cryptocurrency casinos market. Commenting here, we only point out that if Gamdom did promotions exclusively for Bitcointalk users, they would definitely attract many more gamblers.

Looks like the casino has been robbed.
In such situations, I understand why casinos sometimes delay withdrawals and check exactly where the win came from.


I wonder who will cover the losses related to a bug in the software now. Software developer or casino..? 

Also, after launching the signature campaign, I was wondering what interesting Gamdom would prepare for Bitcointalk users. However, it seems that the marketing team has still not discovered the potential in the Bitcointalk community and their promotion is aimed at places other than this forum.
It is also interesting that creator of this thread - cryptasm, has not been active almost 2 years:

Last Active:   April 17, 2020, 10:58:28 AM

Losing to a weak team always causes speculation to arise. I also don't really understand what happened. It is possible that Bayern had a bad day, or because of a large point advantage, they simply approached the game unfocused and completely ignored the game. Anyway, this loss did not change much, as they still dominate the table and Bayern's advantage is still very big.

Thanks for informing us and it's good that everything ended positively, because I was afraid that the ending of this story might be a bit different..

If the person representing bitdice.me reads this thread, should report this type of situation. I understand that in some situations withdrawals can be delayed because they need extra review, but when it comes to cryptocurrency deposits, it should be automatic. After all, even in the case of doubts, the security team will be able to verify everything before someone wants to withdraw.

Unfortunately, the only true cloud mining, i.e. the Hashnest, no longer exists. They mentioned that maybe they will come back with a similar project, but as far as I know, nothing is officially known for now.
Hundreds of other cloud minings have appeared since 2016, and they've all turned out to be a scam, so don't be fooled if someone offers you easy pasive income.