Well only if I'm not paid for the work I've done, I might as well have said "If I get paid I'll leave positive trust".

It's not a threat, it's how the reputation system is intended and supposed to be used.

Am I the only one starting to get a bit impatient?
I'm going to change signature, and I expect 0.0003x90 btc paid to me, last date 15th of march or there'll be minus reputation.
Op already has my private message.

Is this offer still active?
100% strict on the 50+ activity even for junior members with 42 that'll get 50 within 10 days?

OP: Time to update, and possibly pay us who didn't reach 50 activity before they reworked the signature structures for the full advertising we did. I sent you a personal message, but I can't wait much longer for a proper response.

I nowhere imply that it's the sole reason I'm using the forum, and I know a lot of other people don't that are advertisers don't either.
But knowing there's a slight reward for contributing increases the incentive of making good posts.
Spammers will exist with or without these signatures, for the simple fact that they're not getting paid anyways.
Nothing changes, spammers didn't get paid before signature changes, and they won't get paid afterwards. The only thing that changes is that the non spammers won't get paid either, which -will- lead to less good posts being made.

It somehow feels like you might as well be telling your employees at work "We're removing all salaries because we've a few people here that slack and don't work during the day. I know this will affect the ones that actually are working and contributing, but then again, if you're only here to make money, perhaps you should look for another job." Rather than "We're going to fire the people at our company who we have found are in fact not working during the days".

That's a comparison of changing the signatures to banning spammers.

You still can't argue with it being unfair towards the people who don't spam.
Changing signatures only damages the community, banning spammers helps it.
Also as stated above, the main advertising sites like primedice only pay for -constructive- posts.
It's in their interest to not pay out for spam as it gives their service a bad name.

109

Oh my god, I didn't even realize this option was available.
This makes me question this decision even more, why on earth would we make signature changes because someone is tired of the ads when he can tick 1 checkbox to solve his own issue?
I don't know about you, but I think it discourages good posting as well as bad posting when many people are making a few extra bucks by doing this. It's also a problem to change it without a proper warning, as many people are not getting paid for work they've done advertising.
When will we get an official statement about whether this change is here to stay?

Either your photo is tampered with or the site is. Rolling 10000 should give the maximum reward of 0.2~ btc, while you only won 0,02~ with that roll.

You still have been fully advertised by me for 90 posts, and I expect payment for it.
You cannot change the policy in the middle of a campaign without paying off your workers.
Otherwise this has been a scam, and will result in negative trust rating from at least 5 people, with a reference.

Proposal to the OP:
Set a new date ( today or tomorrow ) for payouts,
let people send you the pre-set message, pay everyone that has advertised with the prices in the OP, including those with less than 50 activity that would've reached it before the 15th of march.
When everyone's been paid, feel free to change the payments to the different forum account levels, as newbie / junior member advertisements will probably not give anything if this system is here to stay.

But make sure everyone gets paid fairly -before- you change any policies.

Another issue I clearly see with this is that the advertising services that are going to stick around on this forum ( yes they will ) are going to pay even smaller sums for newbie / jr members, therefore creating an even bigger incentive to post high quantities of low quality posts to make up for 'lost' money in comparison to the full members.

It would indeed decrease the incentive for low content posting, but it would also take away the incentive for high content posting from newbies / jr members like myself that are currently advertising.
Many advertising services already state that they do not support spamming, meaningless posts or general BS, and therefore advertising itself doesn't make people spam.
I think this will hurt the users of the forum, especially the newer members that are actually trying.
Hope you change this again, it's not good.

I'm not sure I understood that post to the fullest, do they mean .4 bitcoins per player or .4 bitcoins in total spread to each and every of their users?
0.4 btc per person for free seems -far- too good to be true, far too good.

What exactly is a flappy coin and what does it translate into in pure dollar bills?
You'd be lucky if someone wanted to take those coins from you for free...

This is the 1st thing that came to my mind as well.
The only reason I could see for a 'non' profit ponzi would be if the owner intended to steal at least a couple of them and disappear.
It's a newbie account with no reputation or reviews.
Be aware people.

It can't do any harm as far as I know, and it'd give people more qualified than you and I to take a look at it.
Many helpful people around here, I'd say do it. Nobody can use that information against you (correct me if I'm wrong).
Atleast I for one wouldn't have any concerns about posting my own transaction links, lots of people do it all the time.

This is all I wanted to hear, someone unrelated to the OP saying he got paid.
It means -so- much for the reputation of your website to have proof / people confirming that everything is working.
Hope you get a lot of traffic and that people benefit from the site.

Doesn't your wallet let you see the transaction details,
as well as a link to the block chain with said transaction, as multibit does?