|
I'm gonna bloody screenshot everyone's huge increase predictions and PM
them to them at the end of 2014, to rub it in their faces that it didn't rise
to ******* 10 000 USD, rofl.
|
|
|
|
Your guess is as good as mine. I suspect $2000 (hopefully higher  ) Best Quote for Bitcoin: "First rule of Wall Street, nobody, and I don’t care if you’re Warren Buffett or Jimmy Buffett, nobody knows if a stock’s going up or down, or *ucking sideways, least of all stock brokers. But we pretend to know." ~ The wolf of wall street. You know this was a movie, right? Some people have a much better idea of whether a stock is going up or down than others. I agree though that bitcoin is difficult to predict price-action wise. Lol, this is a bunch of ****. Of course you can predict the value rise / fall of a stock. It's just bitcoins that's quite hard to predict, but some companies / sites are actively doing quite well on that matter. Google is your friend. |
|
|
|
This doge coins getting really popular.
Quite popular indeed, might be one of the few alt coins worth while. Altho they could for all we know just crash down to nothing within a day, lol. |
|
|
|
The Newsweek Credibility MatrixDorian Nakamoto has vehemently denied being Bitcoin's creator. Did Newsweek act irresponsibly in pursuit of a scoop? Could they have known, prior to the denials, that Dorian wasn't Satoshi? This article makes some great points. It sure raises some interesting issues. I personally think they just made up everything, actively knowing what they were doing. Anything in pursuit of a scoop, indeed. |
|
|
|
Create a forum then ask for donations.  this you think it is so easy? Because it is not. Who does he think is going to donate? lol. I think that is a joke. It is very hard to create a successful forum. Yeah I suppose it's a joke. You never know on the internet though, some people will amaze you with their stupidity, absolutely amaze you. |
|
|
|
|
If you really want some sort of interest or profit rate on your money
you're best off lending to private persons. But please be aware of the
risk. People tend to be dishonest when it comes to money.
|
|
|
|
You alone person who is crying This OP is scammer but many are saying he pay them just because of one person we cannot give him scamer batch
I'm not saying he scammed everyone, I'm saying he scammed me. You have the whole story posted here, I can provide screenshots as proof and everything. You be the own judge. But once again note this: He DID pay almost every of his advertisers, but not ALL of them. |
|
|
|
Primedice earned the credibility and RGC will require to stablish themselves before competing with PD We have to wait till April to see if RGC passes first hurdle ..!
They passed the first hurdle unless I'm mistaken, they've already made 1 months worth of payments ( for February ). Next one coming up within 8 days. I'm excited to see how it pans out! They paid out for about a week's term and only a few people took part. I think he might've had lower rates then too, so paying out for a handful of people a tiny amount for a weeks worth of posts doesn't mean he will when he's got an army of spammers earning themselves several bitcoins, but I hope he proves my scepticism wrong. 4 from Stunna compared to 6 from a new casino is good but when you are a Member or a Full Member you get 0.0001 from Stunna compared to 0.0004 from RGC so staying with Stunna is hard
Stunna is implementing giving links that will give some revenue from the refs gambling so it is a nice bonus for PD
Ritz has the best offer for everyone at the moment, that's why I'm using it. If some competitors turn up, we'll deal with that then. But at the moment nobody is near matching RGC, that's why more and more people are moving there. As long as they keep the good rates and pay out next month I think a lot of people will move. He has the best offer providing he pays out. I wouldn't give him the title of best deal just yet until he's paid out a full months term. Every single deal that has offered more than Stunna previously has turned out to be a scam. I'm not saying Ritz will, but it usually pays to be sceptical until proven otherwise. Competition is very important because monopoly hurt every where in life but currently all are scary with RGC because of his few month back scam but now we have just 8 days then can talk whats going here in this competition
When did he scam people? Links, sources? I haven't heard about it at least. I just saw last month's payment made. Check his feedback and previous thread. I think there was a couple of people who didn't get paid because he cancelled the deal abruptly because he was pissed people were abusing it by signing up with multiple accounts. Says quite clearly in the rules that only 1 account is allowed. Yes, but he terminated it for everyone and refused to pay everybody for posts they'd made. Hence if I was posting and he didn't pay me I'd feel scammed. Aha, well that's a whole different story. Since then he seems to have paid everyone he promised though, I checked his trust and some references. Fingers crossed. But how many people took part? I only see 3 feedbacks left for what was probably less than a weeks worth of posting at what was possibly a lesser rate than what it is now. The real test is if he pays out the legions of people who have been posting all month. We can only wait for that. There are definitely more people that is part of his campaign this month. However not -that- many, he should be able to pay for it. The question still remains - will he? I think he loses WAY more than he earns if he doesn't pay. Imagine his whole site reputation gone, and for what? Not paying a few advertisers? Nah, I don't think he'll run to be honest. Too much time put into this whole thing, and too little to earn by doing so. |
|
|
|
lol wait  are you sure thats the only reason? Feel free to check all the posts I made in this thread, that was basically the only thing I said. Don't worry about getting 'on the list' though, people see through his mental issues. Most people around here are intelligent enough to spot a spastic. |
|
|
|
I love just-dice and bitcoin-scratchticket.com. Heard lots of good things about the scratch ticket website, have you won anything? If so, could you provide some tx links? |
|
|
|
^ Lololol. I have a social life, don't worry  I just have Bitcointalk open all day long and refresh once in a while to see new topics. Don't want to miss something Same goes for me. I try to keep logged in as much as possible. Were you talking about this?When you said sleep is for the weak?  Haha that's pretty accurate. Altho the image link is not working, had to find it manually. |
|
|
|
why would i get placed there
For the same reason I got placed there, saying "Why do you bother complaining about ponzis when you can just ignore them". Apparently if you type that in this thread you're a Liar, scammer, and all around a nasty piece of work.  |
|
|
|
Exactly, if it's not rape it's ok in my opinion. Of course there's got to be some sort of restriction to protect the younger children, but the fact that you have to be 18 to chose who you want to have sex with is a ridiculous law. However teachers shouldn't have relations (sexual or not) with their students, as it's inappropriate ( grading, marking tests and such ).
it depends really, when I was in high school (more than a decade ago I guess) I remember my english teacher was in a relationship with one of the student and they were engaged once the year was over he married her, he is a professional and he did his job properly, and also their relationship was "clean", they only meet in public places or with the family I'm almost sure they married as virgins both of them. Well in 9.9/10 other situations he'd get fired. Can you imagine how hard it is to do your work fair if you're dating one of your students? if you are a professional it shouldn't be a problem at all trust me, in fact it has an opposite effect I can tell you this from my experience, since a lot of my family are teachers (high school and university) and I can tell you that they are more strict with me than with the other students. it doesn't change the fact that there are some that might want to abuse the system but that's the exception not the general rule Mhm, I don't know where you're from or anything but the general opinion is that teacher-student relationships are taboo. It's not that hard to wait till you finish school, and if you're not having a physical relationship anyways it shouldn't be a problem. But if everything works out well and professionally, then I don't see a reason it could not be. yes exactly, the teacher-student relationship is a complex one, since usually we are talking about underaged or immature students and old teacher, also the nature of the relation/influence the relationship have makes things more complicated, but again in this case it's silly that one guy should go to prison if they were having consented sex, him being fired from the school is a punishment for it self since he did something morally wrong Exactly. Shouldn't be against the law, but if it's against the school policy, his punishment should be school related, e.g getting fired. |
|
|
|
BAHAHAHHAHAHAHA IM LAUGHING SO MANY BUTTHURTS HERE
Why is this funny? I only see one butthurt, and that's OP. just laughing, personally i just ignore 99% of ponzis, so i cant complain nor do i care to waste my time posting about them. That's basically the point I tried to make myself, until OP jumped me and posted my name in his list. Be aware of sharing those opinions, you'll get placed there too. |
|
|
|
But you need to write here from time to time if you want to lift those restrictions.
You only need to post once a fortnight to get your full activity points though, providing your post count is higher than your current activity. I thought this was common knowledge? There's a sticky in the Meta for those who wants to read about it themselves though. Apparently not given the number of queries and threads about it. Admittedly, it is quite confusing at first. This is basically cause 99% of everyone who joins the forum does NOT read the "Newbie read-me" thread that's stickied. They rather just join, post all their questions and has someone else answer it for them. That's true, but the activity still is confusing even if you do read the sticky explaining it. Oh yeah I agree, I found their formula mind-melting for the first week. |
|
|
|
Loyalty program means he would probably drop per post rate, but intoduce a multiplier for each month you are with PD. Don't get all your hopes up too high, cos PD should be targeting those senior and hero members who have left, not necessarily standard and full memebrs who are sticking with PD. I am just analysing from a business point of view. It will be interesting to see how it will play out I think he will reward non sr and hero members for sticking with PD, as competition currently pays out much higher. Then he might aswell just increase rates? People wont swap back anyways as they already changed, and if he highers the payout for -some- people, he doesn't earn new signups anyway. There will always be a higher paid campaign out there. With a loyalty multiplier, Stunna do not need to match those higher rates and still can retain members, cos it discourages members switching to other higher paid short term campaigns. The was no "cost" before, now you loose the loyalty bonus. Regarding whether Stunna wishes to attract those sr/hero members who swapped out before, i really don't know. Only Stunna has the stats for the number of sr/hero members and their payouts. I would guess their aggregate payout is high. That is why Stunna cannot raise sr/hero rate too much, but undeniably their sigs are the most effective. I think Members and Full Members tend to make more posts than Senior & Hero Members. The latter don't seem to make that many posts, but there's fewer of them, but their sigs are also much more visible. Hopefully when the ref links become active that will give Stunna some idea of what's more lucrative. It'll be interesting to see how many hits we personally get. The reason there are lesser sr and hero member posts are the reasons you stated yourself, there are simply fewer of them. I'm excited to see if we get some referral system as well, would be cool. It's not that. From what I've observed they literally just don't seem to make as many posts compared to users from lower member groups. Maybe they've tired after 3 years on this forum then. I still see quite a few posts by 800+ activity people on this forum to be fair. They still post, but tend to only make the bare minimum or a 100 posts or so, whereas lower ranks tend to go in the hundreds. Would be interesting to see the full stats though. Maybe somebody could work them out haha. Also congrats on your 1000th post haha. Yeah well maybe they're not as interested in semi dull topics and save their precious posts for the important topics. And thanks. |
|
|
|
BAHAHAHHAHAHAHA IM LAUGHING SO MANY BUTTHURTS HERE
Why is this funny? I only see one butthurt, and that's OP. |
|
|
|
^ Lololol. I have a social life, don't worry I just have Bitcointalk open all day long and refresh once in a while to see new topics. Don't want to miss something Same goes for me. I try to keep logged in as much as possible. |
|
|
|
Well to my limited understanding this threads OP is not a scammer and I hope that remains the case for obvious reasons. I've just recently read someone make that claim but don't believe it is valid at this time.
I'll go through my experience with the OP and you'll be able to be the judge whether he scammed me or not. Before the signature rules were re-worked, I joined this programme. I only had 42 activity at the point, and was not technically eligible to participate, but OP then stated that everyone who reached 50 activity BEFORE the payment date ( March 15th. ) could join straight away, no matter what activity they had. I knew I would reach 50 activity before the 15th, so I joined. I made 90 posts, after which the rules about signatures were changed. The OP then changed his own rules, now everyone had to be a member ( 60+ activity ). I knew I wouldn't reach that before the 15th meaning I would not get paid for the posts I made up till that point. I asked the OP in PM if I would get paid for the 90 posts I had previously made, and he answered that everyone would get paid, even those who signed up with too little activity. I thought that was just fair, and changed my signature to a programme where I would actually get paid for my posts. At the 15th I sent my message, and was refused payment, for having "changed my signature in the middle of the period". What OP implied was that he expected me to have kept his signature in my slot, posting for 17-18 days without being able to get paid for them. Also in the original post right here, there are no rules stated about changing signatures in the middle of the period. I did not get paid for my 90 posts, and he has stated that he refuses to pay me. In my opinion this counts as scamming. I don't know about you, but I wasn't paid what I was promised. |
|
|
|
Haha, sleep is for the weak anyways. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
