Bitcoin Forum
May 07, 2024, 07:30:24 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 [62] 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 ... 830 »
1221  Economy / Reputation / Re: A theory, DT in/exclusion and eventually the DT network on: January 22, 2023, 11:23:23 AM
Why don't you explain the names? To avoid drama? Surely they already know that you are referring to them and you will not avoid the drama.

That's correct. Still, I feel that the discussion is intended to be something generic about principles, not about pointing fingers.

May be we need to be more careful from today before adding anyone in our trust list especially if they are too quick to have their DT status. The good one takes time to earn rewards but the one with good plan makes it easily. We need to be careful about those who have good plans.

I think that you are only partly right. People have to weight it when the do something in their trust inclusions/exclusions. They have to understand the repercussions of what they do (i.e. add or remove certain powers to/from certain users), hence the trust should be related to more than just a (momentarily) feeling. It's not easy, hence mistakes are probably usual.
I think that the bigger problem is laziness together with the fear of offending. Pus maybe also the hopes for inclusion (back-scratching is real). Many people should watch closely their trust lists and adjust it. But this means some work to do, this means that some people may get offended because they notice you no longer trust them or even distrust them, this means that your own DT status may suffer.
And it's a shame exactly because the current way of things gives too much power sometimes.
Plus, and I feel this important: there is (currently) no tool that could allow one trust certain people's old trust ratings without giving them the same powers from now on. And this, together with the laziness I've said about, create some sort of vicious circle.

Maybe the trust ratings should have more importance not when somebody is DT, instead when somebody was DT when he gave that trust rating?! I don't know. It may not be easy to implement.
1222  Other / Archival / Re: Selling for recovery 1.35 BTC on: January 21, 2023, 05:46:31 PM
Selling my wallet with 1.35 BTC for recovery. https://satoshidisk.com/pay/CHUIiW

I lost access because the Yobit exchange changed the BTC deposit address, which was my wallet password.

The only clue is the account history where I deposited BTC to the exact address that is the password. https://ibb.co/kHSyzmz

I also remember that I did something with raw transactions, but I didn’t understand anything and I don’t remember. I also read the reviews and contacted support, but the support of the exchange died. https://ibb.co/zRyWfc1

I contacted recovery services. The password has an address that starts with 3****************************** and is longer than 30 characters. I was told that the current day can not be restored.

Suggestions and sponsors are welcome.

The story is so weak I am convinced it's scam.
1223  Local / Română (Romanian) / Re: Concursuri/tombole pe bitcointalk (sau pe aprope) on: January 21, 2023, 05:34:33 PM
[FREE RAFFLE]🔥🔥- DOBLEBIT DIY COIN-🔥🔥

Am participat. Multumesc!
Tu cum de nu?

Quote
I have some nice items set up for the 500th Raffle which I should hopefully setup next week.

Abia astept sa vad ce premii va pune la bataie!

Da, si eu. Pacat de porcaria pe care a facut-o yogg, s-ar putea ca paguba/lovitura incasata sa umbreasca un pic aceasta tombola...
1224  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [FREE RAFFLE]🔥🔥- DOBLEBIT DIY COIN-🔥🔥 on: January 21, 2023, 05:29:40 PM
78 - NeuroticFish

Please & Thank you
1225  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum Transaction ID - Real or Fake on: January 21, 2023, 11:10:15 AM
Size: 230 bytes
Fee: 0.0125674 BTC (No Data) ( 2.1 sat/byte )

I see no way to multiply 2.1 with 230 and get 1256740.
Even more, you can easily check your address on any block explorer and see if there are any incoming transactions, even if not confirmed.
And, at the end, you can filter transactions with this tool. The more details you'll add you'll sooner or later end up with no transactions meeting the criteria.

You still hope you'll get 12 BTC and it's not a scam, heh?  Sad
1226  Economy / Reputation / Re: I received this private message (Royse777's screenshot manipulation). on: January 21, 2023, 09:54:01 AM
There is a site that allows you to determine whether a photo has been modified with the help of any editors or not. In 2018, this site made it easy to identify fake photos. If the photo was edited, then the site clearly issued a conclusion on editing. You can try checking your screenshots.

http://imageedited.com/
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5055311.msg47163222#msg47163222

Well, the images were edited anyway, since some names were hidden. So that website, while it can be useful in some cases, it isn't here.
I agree with LoyceV here:

I never trust screenshots, unless I trust the sender. Either way, they're useless as evidence.
1227  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: How to keep account secure, is there 2-step verification for forum accounts? on: January 21, 2023, 09:13:26 AM
Sorry, is it only me who thinks that something is fishy here?
OP's account is here since 2013, he has a lot of posts (1000+) and also feedback (good and bad too, plus quite some retaliatory feedback from his side).. and now he's asking about 2FA and securing the account (instead of searching) in B&H and talks about an alleged problem from years ago?
1228  Local / Altcoins (Monede Alternative) / Re: Discutie despre PI network on: January 21, 2023, 08:43:57 AM
Nu ai nevoie de KYC sa folosesti wallet-ul, ai nevoie de KYC pentru monedele "minate" (bs).

.. informatii KYC si din telefon care nu au cum sa nu fie vandute. Dar daca e vorba de 1$ in plus, cui ii pasa?  Cheesy

https://www.huobi.com/support/en-us/detail/84926622541921
...
Totusi pare sa devina reala povestea celor de pi, au facut bani de foame cu mizeria asta.

Am sapat un pic mai mult. Si e mirifica treaba. In principiu oamenii aia tranzactioneaza... nimic. Promisiuni de valoare, adica niste "chestii" inexistente. Uite ce zice CMC (nu o sa traduc, sper sa nu va suparati).

There have been reports questioning the legitimacy of Pi Network. Please note that mainnet has not launched yet and the price displayed below for certain exchanges reflect the value of the IOUs and it may not be transferable across exchanges. Read more here and DYOR.

1229  Economy / Reputation / Re: My 10 000th post on: January 20, 2023, 06:57:42 PM
Though, I must admit that if I would through my post history, I would delete many of my posts, especially from my early days here.

Don't worry, that stands true for many people in here (including me). It's the learning curve, and sometimes more than that (in my case getting older and gathering experience did also matter).

However, it's a nice achievement indeed. Congratulations!


Will I ever reach 20k posts?

Possibly, why not? It's not something one actually plans, I guess...
Depending on this or that you may stay more (or less) in here, you will post more or less every day...  If it helps I've made less than 2000 posts in my first two years on the forum (less than 1000, actually, I think).
1230  Local / Altcoins (Monede Alternative) / Re: Discutie despre PI network on: January 20, 2023, 06:37:03 AM
-Sunt foarte suparati ca cineva a vrut sa le listeze "moneda" pe niste platforme mai mult sau mai putin dubioase de traiding

Cum nu poți scoate banii din ecosistem, asta ar fi fost probabil scam la scam.
Sau ar fi demonstrat că Pi nu valorează nimic.

Acuma parerea mea generala ramane ca este un SCAM.
Ce nu pot sa inteleg este de ce mai sunt oameni care cred ca se vor imbogatii din ceva de genul.

Cât timp unii trimit bani la pagini care le promit că dau înapoi dublu, eu nu mă mir.
1231  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: Fryx Finance - An open-source Monero/Bitcoin exchange. on: January 19, 2023, 12:29:03 PM
FRYX finance review

Initial notes
* I’ve replaced in this review the API key, addresses and so on with not-too-random strings, they're not be valid addresses, for example, don’t worry about that.
* I should have been hiding/replacing better some numbers too, but I guess that I'll just mix some more coins and we're good.
* This has ended up being a mix between a review and a test session after all.
* I guess that I should have done some more re-reads and checks on my writing, but I think that's not so bad.

First impression
The first impression was pleasant, the UI is nice, although a bit simple, but that’s not a problem.

What I’m feeling that’s missing is a small tutorial page, made without any need to login or deposit. At first I was not even certain it’s a standard p2p exchange or an OTC exchange, or both. So it could help to have a small page with what a newbie should do. The only documentation – the API page – can also contribute to the confusion (since /orders tells about user’s open orders). I learned while using that it’s basically both.

Also the clear web page doesn’t show – or at least I didn’t find – any onion address, although you clearly have one (or two).
So I’ve done all the tests on clear net, which may be a bit unusual for BTC-XMR trades.

Operations: Buying Monero without an account
I wanted, for a change, to start with “Sell Monero”, but for small test amounts the 0.0001 BTC withdrawal fee is high (at least compared to 0.0001 XMR for the other side). It’s not a problem per se, since centralized exchanges are even more expensive, still, it may worth weighting this.

The approximative price conversion was not too bad though, at least at the first glance.

Since for the depositing I’ve made another “chapter”, so I’ll continue with the rest.
What I feel like I’m missing is a session key. Normally it should not be necessary, still, if one has been using a low fee, or the blocks are slow, and the user wants to come back to see the status… he cannot. It could be also useful to track the order in case of errors. Even more, the platform is actually using such a session key and it’s visible in the URL, so it only needs to be added to the UI for the user to copy it if he wants to.

As soon as the 5th confirmation has come, the XMR was sent to my wallet pretty much instantly.



Depositing BTC
As soon as my bitcoin transaction got broadcasted, it was shown on FRYX finance page, which is nice and reassuring (compared, for example, to pages showing nothing until the first confirmation).



I think that the number of confirmations should depends on the amount to be sent. I find 5 confirmations for 5$ amount a bit of overkill. But that’s up to service owner after all…

Account in UI
Creating a new account works easily, even with temporary mail server addresses. I like that!
Interestingly there’s no password required (basically you just tell your email address and that's all). Strangely the workflow is not much different between creating a new account and logging it to that account. But it’s okay.
On the other hand, maybe it would be nice to also offer the account’s API key somewhere I’m not much of an API trader, so I don’t know if it’s OK or not, for me it would have been nice to not make 3 deposits and 3 withdrawals while trying out the system (no-user, user-UI, user-API).

The UI, again, is simple, but it seems to have all that’s needed.
I would recommend though that OP is considering an automatic log out after a certain amount of time with no new pages opened. It’s a pretty common security practice and it should not hurt.

Depositing Monero (to account)
The deposit was visible on the website (only) after the first confirmation. I am not that much of an XMR user, I don’t know if it’s normal or not (at receiving XMR my wallet has shown the new amount instantly). However, confirmations are not so slow, so it’s okay.



There are 25 confirmations needed until the account is credited. Maybe same discussion applies like for Bitcoin for the small amounts.
After the 25 confirmations the amount was visible in the balances tab.



Trading
There are no orders visible, not even the default orders the platform offers, hence for somebody who doesn’t know the numbers from API it may be difficult (at least at start), depending on the implementation.
I’ve got the numbers from API, I’ve done the math and made my order. Since I’ve used (intentionally) the sell price from the API, my order is visible, but not filled.



I’ve canceled it and made a new trade order, with the current buy price.
The order got filled instantly and instead of the “A new order was created with order ID ...” text, now I’ve got “The order was filled”. Also the balances are updated in the other tab.



It worth mentioning that there are a bit too many digits there…

Withdrawing from account
Here a “max amount” button would be nice. Also it’s not clear whether here we fill the amount before or after the withdrawal fee… I’ve put there my whole balance. I’ve got error: invalid amount. Of course, it’s because of the too many digits and this should not happen.



When I’ve set a correct amount (with 8 decimals), I’ve got the message that the request was successfully submitted. Within seconds my bitcoin wallet has seen the unconfirmed incoming transaction.

Using the API
I’ve used the API with Postman under Windows, I’ve bought some Monero too for the tests. I repeat, I am not an API trader, so some of my conclusions may be wrong.

Getting the order book
https://fryx.finance/order_book?market=XMRBTC
Code:
{
    "buy": [
        {
            "executed": "0E-18",
            "price": "0.008084340000000000",
            "volume": "11.233281562737444779"
        }
    ],
    "sell": [
        {
            "executed": "0E-18",
            "price": "0.008247660000000000",
            "volume": "9.197584532662045095"
        }
    ]
}

The result is pretty much meaningless to me. OK, the price can help, but the exchange’s volume… is it useful or it’s the maximum amount to work with? I don’t think that maximum is 9 or 11 XMR. Or is everything posted in BTC?!
The executed tells nothing useful (at least at start), plus the format is not nice (I don’t know if the problem comes from the platform or Postman).

Creating an user
Actually this creates an API key, not an user, since there’s no relation with the user from UI.
https://fryx.finance/new_user
Code:
{
    "api_key": "irTkrTkrTkrTkrTkrTkrTk"
}

Depositing BTC; balances
https://fryx.finance/deposit?api_key=irTkrTkrTkrTkrTkrTkrTk&asset=BTC
Code:
{
    "address": "bc1qabcabcabcabcabcabcabcabcabcabcabcabcab"
}

https://fryx.finance/balances?api_key=irTkrTkrTkrTkrTkrTkrTk
Code:
{
    "BTC": "0E-18",
    "XMR": "0E-18"
}

All nice, but while depositing the balances stay empty until… when? I guessed that’s 5 confirmations, but no info/documentation, no progress, nothing.
As soon as the 5 confirmations were done, the account got credited and the balance visible in the API.
I advise a better approach here, from progress report to the block number when the accoutn is expected to be credited, or even better, maybe some sort of callback so the one implementing this doesn’t have to keep doing calls.
I will add that 18 digits after the decimal point may not be nedeed for Bitcoin (and may freak out some people).

Order book, buy, sell cancel order
Buy: the API documentation would need to tell better what one is buying and what is one selling (yes, I know that the pair is XMRBTC, but more clarity never hurts).
Well… here it gets complicated, or I am overthinking it. As I see it, one can make an order at the desired price and that may or may not be filled, like in normal exchanges, but if he wants to do it at the current market price he has to call /orderbook and do calculations.
Maybe a “get me XMR for this amount of BTC at market price” and “get me BTC for this amount of XMR at market price” API calls can also be of help.

Order book was:
https://fryx.finance/order_book?market=XMRBTC
Code:
{
    "buy": [
        {
            "executed": "0E-18",
            "price": "0.008040285000000000",
            "volume": "11.294831895747580133"
        }
    ],
    "sell": [
        {
            "executed": "0E-18",
            "price": "0.008202715000000000",
            "volume": "9.197584532662045095"
        }
    ]
}

Although using Excel, my first order was not OK:
https://fryx.finance/buy?api_key=irTkrTkrTkrTkrTkrTkrTk&market=XMRBTC&volume=0.0248249906564257&price=0.008040285000000000
Code:
{
    "order_id": 1018
}

Hence I canceled the order and tried again.
https://fryx.finance/cancel?api_key=irTkrTkrTkrTkrTkrTkrTk&order_id=1018
Code:
{
    "success": true
}

Funny enough, after an order of 0.0002 BTC that was aborted I ended up with 0.000199999….BTC; this looks ugly, sorry.

After more tries in Excel and copy-paste errors getting me to insufficient funds error, I finally got success instead of order ID at buying XMR from API.

https://fryx.finance/buy?api_key=irTkrTkrTkrTkrTkrTkrTk&market=XMRBTC&volume=0.0243334066830312&price=0.008202715
Code:
{
    "success": true
}

The balances now show my new XMR and also some dust BTC (under 1 satoshi, but with your API doing this automatically dust would not happen); but the numbers are pretty much as expected.

Withdrawing
After reporting a bug in the API documentation (the address parameter was missing), the documentation was updated nicely and also the meaning of the amount was cleared up there (“total withdrawn is amount-withdrawal fee”).
A small problem was that when I’ve copied the amount I had in balances, I’ve got:

https://fryx.finance/withdraw?api_key=irTkrTkrTkrTkrTkrTkrTk&asset=XMR&address=89xyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyz&amount=0.024333406683031200
Code:
{
    "error": "Invalid amount"
}

When I’ve cut the amount to 12 digits after the decimal point, I was OK.

https://fryx.finance/withdraw?api_key=irTkrTkrTkrTkrTkrTkrTk&asset=XMR&address=89xyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyzxyz&amount=0.024333406683
Code:
{
    "success": true
}

And the transaction was instantly visible in my Monero wallet.

Again, I will remind that normally, after all operations done, including the withdrawals, this kind of balances may look a bit bad:

Code:
{
    "BTC": "7.99999998E-10",
    "XMR": "3.1200E-14"
}

Conclusions

The platform has a nice and easy interface and the OTC trading is simple and works perfectly.
The account and the API could go together and they both need small touches here and there to make users’ life easier. Here p2p trading seems to be also available, but the platform is too young and its missing, at least for now, larger order book (with more buy and sell orders).
1232  Local / Română (Romanian) / Re: ATM-urile AtmBytes si BitMahavi -- de evitat! on: January 19, 2023, 10:58:53 AM
In acel moment, niciuna dintre maimute nu se ducea la banane, stiind ca va fi batuta de celelalte, dar niciuna nu stia de ce.

Da, am mai auzit despre acest experiment. La noi cred ca e ceva mai mult:
* vanzatorul se considera atotputernic in acea mica lume a magazinului sau (vezi comportamentul tipei de la amanet)
* vanzatorului nu-i pasa de parerea ta, el oricum e platit la ora (eventual isi va pazi serviciul, dar in general reprezinti doar un scurt deranj)
* patronul merge pe efort minim pentru castig, deci o sa angajeze pe oricine accepta acel salariu, patronul nu va investi in mai nimic (deci nici nu va plati o persoana care intelege legile si poate face un T&C mai de bun simt)
Rezultatul e ca cei care fac 1mm in plus s-ar putea sa castige clienti, iar cei "clasici" nu inteleg de ce lumea e rea si ii evita.

De aici, deduc ca toate celelalte tranzactii sunt fara KYC. Oricum, cum spuneam in topicul dedicat acestei firme, cand am fost acolo nu mi s-a solicitat niciun fel de KYC... Ca idee, daca o sa mai am drum pe langa vreun ATM al lor o sa ma uit in meniu, sa vad daca macar aparatul are o sectiune de Termeni si Conditii, intrucat pe site nu vad nimic in acest sens.

Pai am impresia ca BitcoinRomania isi dau un pic mai mult interesul, cel putin 1mm in plus Wink
1233  Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: Alias for main address on: January 19, 2023, 10:20:59 AM
You seem to be forgetting that a wallet can consist of many addresses.
So you can assign for each user different deposit addresses (they won't have private keys), but you are still the master of the whole wallet. And you'll move the funds away of the various addresses when you need that, it's not important to empty them at sight.
Hence a HD wallet can do the job. Maybe you look into something like BTCPay; maybe it already does what you want to implement.

As already said, be careful on what/how big funds you keep in a hot wallet.
1234  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Newbie Must Be carefull about Ledger live Browser Extension on: January 19, 2023, 08:55:33 AM
If you look more careful, it's not developed by Ledger, instead it's done by a random no-name developer.
Also if you look careful, it's categorized as fun/game, and the description is about some game where you do fishing.
So if you are just a little careful, it's clear that's not the extension you would need.

On the other hand, if it's asking for the seed words.. it must be reported.
1235  Other / Archival / Re: Another fake bitcoin giveaway? on: January 19, 2023, 08:49:33 AM
And even if they Merit him, he'll end up tagged like Mitch212, and still nothing is lost.

As Dave said, if he has bad intentions, he may merit (sooner or later) another of his alts and, if done after months, such a move would go under the radar. That could potentially be bad. But not many have the patience to go that slow that far, so I don't know...
1236  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: BTCFinder.net 🔑 Bitcoin Private Key Finder on: January 19, 2023, 08:44:07 AM
Since you don't offer any open source code to be ran locally, I can easily expect that you have also implemented the part where you cash in the money from the found private key (what would stop you?)
Apart of that, we do know that "finding keys" is 99.999.......999999% of the cases wasted time and resources, plus, if one finds by chance a private key and cashes in, that's... stealing.
1237  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [FREE RAFFLE] 499th- ฿ECAUSE I AM STILL IN A GOOD MOOD-CYPHER HODL PRINTED COIN on: January 19, 2023, 08:37:42 AM
10 - NeuroticFish

Thank you!
1238  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Genesis Bankrupt, Impact on BTC? on: January 19, 2023, 08:25:34 AM
What would be the impact on bitcoin's price? Should we be worried and sell a part of our portfolio to buy back a bit lower after the news ? Or better hodl?

The news came out yesterday. Was it the news on Genesis, or it was the news about more targeted regulations to come in US, I don't know, but the price has got a correction.
Should we sell and buy back? I am against such moves because they're overly risky. You simply don't know how low the price goes, you don't know when the price jumps back and how fast.
1239  Other / Archival / Re: Another fake bitcoin giveaway? on: January 19, 2023, 08:20:15 AM
Because Mitch212 didn't deliver on their promises to give out a prize to the winner

I didn't do research on account's background and possible links, but I had the impression the owner knows the drill and he's fishing for merits.
That's why I've decided that unlike most of the free raffles I see or participate, where I give merits to the OP because of his gesture, here I didn't; I'll wait and see how everything develops and then decide if merit is in order or not.

As Loyce said, we've seen all kinds of newbies and all kinds of raffles. It's too early to make too big of a deal of all this; we'll see in less than a week.
As long as people are careful and don't just throw merits, nothing is lost.
1240  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum version 1.7 is unable to sync with the blockchain. on: January 18, 2023, 07:27:54 PM
I tried it but i kept receiving no wallet file found

I think that the easiest may to:

1. Make a copy of the old Electrum Folder
2. Overwrite electrum-[version number]-portable.exe with the newer one.
3. Run the new exe.



I want to warn you that if you don't know yet where your wallet file (default_wallet or whatever) is, I wonder what you've backed up for safety. I surely hope you did backup the actual wallet file and not a link or the exe...
Pages: « 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 [62] 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 ... 830 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!