He has in his personal text "I am Satoshi Nakamoto". See also the archive.
His post history, and also this very topic is just trolling in that direction.

Even in this very topic, just read this again:

Banuiesc ca logica ar fi de genul: Microsoft este proprietarul Git si poate ca face ceva necurat exact cu sursele Trust Wallet.
Na, pai atunci de ce cu sursele Bitcoin nu are Microsoft nicio treaba?
Si atunci de ce nu s-au dat cu curu' de pamant aia de la Trust Wallet?

Nu, pare o teorie conspirationista mai mult decat slabuta. Mi se pare mult mai rezonabila asumptia ca au ceva de ascuns.


Asta stim si noi (adica, ma rog, eu unul stiam). Dar atunci ce explicatie ai pentru faptul ca sursele (de Trust Wallet) pentru Android sunt arhivate (si, bineinteles, neatinse) din 2018, dar Trust Wallet de android are ultima actualizare afisata pe Google Play - 7 Ianuarie 2023?
Explicatia mea este ca se lucreaza cu altceva decat putem vedea in Git. Dar sunt curios si de parerea ta...

You've said this before, and not long afterwards you gave some... strange answers to actually not too difficult questions, making me (and not only me) doubt you.
That's why I prefer answers from more established (and more technical) people.


Maybe, after you also gain more trust and the business gets more traction too, you get to offer plastic cards too.
If the prices also don't get much higher (than/for the basic plan), that could become very interesting.
But no rush. One step at a time.

1. This is a very informative story, but imho it would have been better to post it to Beginners & Help.
2. I use Bitwarden. It may worth a look.
3. Although I use a good/reputable password manager, I do use 2FA on the websites where I have more than 1 cent worth of coins, I keep my BTC on hardware wallet and I don't keep any seed data stored on places connected to the internet. This "setup" may also worth a thought.

46 - NeuroticFish

Awesome raffle, thank you!

---

While the prizes are more than beautiful, I am sure that there will be free slots even in 12h from now (100 slots don't fill up that fast, no matter how nice the prizes are), so he could have been letting you sleep

Un nou concurs cu premii impresionant de frumoase:

[FREE RAFFLE] MYBITS GILT BF + TWO SERIES 2 COINS
Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5434027

Organizator: MrMojoRising26


Sunt 3 premii pentru 3 castigatori:
* o moneda de argint (fara sa contina bitcoin)
* o moneda placata cu argint si continand 0.001BTC
* o moneda placata cu aur si continand 0.001BTC

Modalitate de inscriere: se alege un numar care nu a fost luat, intre 00 si 99.
Pentru a participa trebuie sa fii cel putin Jr.Member.
Fara conturi multiple.
Transport gratuit in USA, de acolo se discuta cu MJ.

Bafta!

Well, this is what PawGo said he doesn't want (after I made a similar test at first).
He was aiming with a test with Electrum; i.e. with a wallet made from that address in Electrum.
Thanks though.
You've scared me, I thought I was missing something obvious with Electrum

Are you sure you know what you're talking about? Because Electrum can be used as hot wallet, as cold wallet, or with a hardware wallet...


Again, are you sure you know what you're talking about? The hack everybody is talking about is more likely due of some malware installed on his computer than any problem of the older Electrum. If Electrum itself would be affected we would have been hearing already of much more hacks...

I would start with
2009-01-09 (Bitcoin's first transaction date)
2016-05-05 (the date that wallet got funded at)

Make sure you do tests offline, or if you are knowledgeable enough, on a live OS, still offline. Hacks are really a thing and 10BTC is an overly good looking amount.
Make sure you know how your father was writing the dates (mm/dd/yyyy. dd.mm.yyyy, yyyy-mm-dd or other ways)
Beware of people that may offer you help in private, some may be scammers.
Good luck.

In primul rand multumesc pentru raspuns. Macar avem parerea (inca) unuia care se pare ca intr-adevar foloseste MetaMask.
Dar, din pacate, mi se pare ingrijoratoare situatia, fiindca vad, din nou, MetaMask folosit doar ca portofel hot/fierbinte separat si cu sume mici, si nu impreuna cu un portofel hardware. Dar asta pare modelul "de succes" de utilizare a MetaMask.

Sa fie situatia aceasta din cauza monedelor necunoscute/adaugate de mana, sa fie din deprinderi incorecte de mai demult, sau pur si simplu e mai bine/mai indicat sa nu legam portofelul hardware de MetaMask?
Oricum, pe mine m-ati convins: daca ma ating de MetaMask, nu o voi face cu portofelul hardware.

This is an impressive move and thank you NotATether for trying it out. After the way OP was answering in the first days of January I thought that this will be another project to end before actually starting.
Can you please confirm whether the limit of the 99$ card is 200$ or 2000$? I know the OP has said it was a typo and it's 2000$, but I am sure everybody will find the information more ressuring if it comes from you. (No offense, OP).

While I do read more and more news that are trying to imply that the world may have avoided a recession for now, the news from China are still overly concerning.
The number of people infected is very high and keeps rising rapidly, the death toll is overly big too, so this is far from good news. I don't know how is the economy going, but this may not end well. And what happens in China, doesn't stay/remain in China, we all know that.

With Electrum on default settings?! Or you have a special build (or setting??!) for Electrum?
I would like to try the same, but when trying with Fulcrum I've seen those messages in the log and I thought that Electrum has failed me (I've waited with Electrum on Fulcrum more than 30 minutes before giving up).

Here there are imho two problems, and the server is the smallest one.

According to the documentation, in order to allow this kind of addresses, Fulcrum may need in config something like:
max_history = 25000000

Also according to what I've read, Electrs may also offer a similar option in config or command line, but I don't know if it's
index-lookup-limit = 1000 (is it enough?)
or
txid_limit = 1000 (or more?)

However, I could not get any success, I've got in logs the nefarious
WARNING | NotificationSession | MemoryError('dropping message over 1,000,000 bytes and re-synchronizing')

And from what I've read here, in order to fix this, Electrum itself needs a change in the code ^{MAX_INCOMING_MSG_SIZE in interface.py}, and then recompiled.

So my few tests are irrelevant, it seems. I've done more reading than testing.


PS. I start hating Fulcrum. It starts up too slow from my external HDD, while Electrs is lightning fast on that.

Yes.


It's there. Only the UK cannot access it, thanks to the fine logic (/s) of the justice in UK. The rest of the world is fine.


Nothing special.


Yes.


Because you're nobody, unless you can prove anytihng.
Of course, you can sue him, I won't stop you.


For now, just another sad wannabe on the list.

It was added to the winner's amount?  (I don't know for sure).
It has increased the "ending time" with 140+ blocks? (I am 99% sure it did).
This means that it was seen as a smaller (non-winning) separate bid, no matter the originating address.

So it can be "the expected behavior", just it must be documented.

First of all, big thank you to the few ones who managed to answer to this without quoting all the names (ie without triggering my notifications for nothing).

Now, to the topic: sorry BitcoinGirl.Club, but icopress is not wrong. The only reason I didn't leave red feedback was because I was sure other will do that. And while too much red feedback is useless in this case, at least one is a must. OK, when the missing money is paid back or resolved as debt with the involved people, then it can become neutral. But until then.. it has to be there. Else everybody will become campaign manager until the first big payment they can "lose" (and, why not, beyond). I am not telling that julerz12 is a thief (I don't know and it doesn't matter). What I'm telling that this kind of mishaps, if not handled, can give ideas to others.
Plus, indeed, he's also not wrong about the fact that red feedback doesn't stop people still do campaign management.

"What would you feel and do if you are in the same shoe of julerz12" <- this is bad approach. He did make a big mistake in handling money, and we don't talk about 5$ here. And while people get red tag for asking "no collateral loans" of 100$, he has lost ... 50x more.

But, with a bit of political skills, julerz12 can easily turn icopress' feedback to neutral. All he has to do is discuss with the campaigns he was handling and "convert" the missing money into debt with clear agreements about paying that back, and where that is not possible, maybe lend some money too for covering all this. Loans are neutral feedback. And then he can go on.
I mean, even some of the current big exchanges have lost users' money, but they've paid back soon enough and kept pretty good reputation. It can be done. Not cheap, but it can be done.

I see, like every time this kind of things happen, people go more for the drama than for being helpful.
Of course, the first impulse after reading this is the drama. But that was yesterday. Let's be helpful today. 5k is not the end of the world, at least one of the campaigns have shown understanding and I think that a rationale discussion can easily take place. So, with some more luck, it should not be that hard for julerz12 to "patch" a little this fuckup.

Fiind la capitolul MetaMask, am citit azi un paragraf despre (inca?) un fel de phishing bazat pe MetaMask, si poate ca ii sta mai bine aici decat altundeva (presa sau mai stiu eu ce).
Originalul, in engleza, este partea cu ‘Blank Check’ eth_sign phishing de la https://cointelegraph.com/news/5-sneaky-tricks-crypto-phishing-scammers-used-last-year-slowmist

Si zice acolo ca te poti trezi cu MetaMask cerandu-ti o semnatura, ceea ce mi se pare destul de cuminte, adica si cu potofelul hardware nu ti se pare ciudat sa semnezi (e doar o semnatura, nu e seed sau cheie privata), pentru ca mai apoi sa foloseasca acea semnatura si in alte locuri pentru a-ti fura banii.

Na, e clar ca daca nu ai de trimis bani, nu ai ce semna, dar daca chiar ai de trimis...? Utilizatori de MetaMask, sunteti draguti sa imi ziceti ce imi scapa?

Since I am doing tests with Fulcrum right now, I can tell you:
I took some 70 seconds, but it opened it (Fulcrum + BTC-RPC-Explorer).
It shows only 10 transactions per page, 8822 pages, but clicking on the pages load up pretty fast.

Si mai bine! Ma bucur pentru voi!


Ma ocup imediat.


Ei, vazusem ca a concurat si chiar ma gandisem ca s-ar putea sa apara asemenea "probleme".
Era un banc intr-o vreme:

No cam asa si acest suparat. Si legat de "neica nimeni".. fiecare este centrul universului sau, iar la unii ego-ul este prea mare sa vada cat de mici sunt. Dar ce sa facem? Mergem mai departe. (Iar despre permaban, e treaba moderatorilor; nu cunosc subiectul, nu are rost sa ma bag. Am vazut ca are un pic de rosu, clar, fum fara foc nu iese, dar la ora asta nu am rabdare sa sap.).