It will link them.
If I send to you and you send to me, we are linked.  I didn't say it was the same owner of both addresses.  And, in this case, we have not proved that we can sign from each others coins.

Even if we both share signing from the same address doesn't mean we are the same person.  Example:  Several people were playing with a private key (redeemed casascius coin - and was even later made public).  One of us would send a small amount and see who could sweep it first.  Doing this a couple of times between the four of us ended up linking all 4 together (even a complete link since we could pull the funds out (sign from it)), but it doesn't mean we have access to each others coins.  Using a walletexplorer though DID link the four of us together into a single wallet account.  It was just an experiment proving that a walletexplorer / chainanalysis can be fooled.

I don't know how that happened.  I was trying to quote a response of yours as my response had nothing to do with the one quoted.  It's fixed now.

If you're genuinely interested in learning, maybe you should read the responses given already stating that if someone has your seed they then can in fact link all transactions.
With your seed, they can see all your transactions on all the HD accounts for the wallet.

Putting in a tentative bid of 16 BTC.  Fine with escrow if you don't want to send first.

Nice few coins you have.
I would be able to match Wheelz offer except that I would require shipping as I am in Seattle.

Happy to have an escrow involved.

What I bring to the table is that you've mentioned they would end up on Kraken, so I am happy to offer a cash/check/money order/bank deposit instead of coins since it appears to be your goal.

Ummm, if they have your 12 word seed, then they know EXACTLY what all your transactions are to all associated accounts.

So, if you tell me your 12 word seed, I can simply load up on my phone and see everything you've done and the multiple accounts you created with the seed.

Don't give out your seed.

No, they are completely separate.  Meaning, even sending payments and getting change is to completely seperate addresses.  So, only way to directly connect them (that I know of) is if you send between the two accounts in which case a wallet explorer can link them.

Ideally, to keep things completely seperate without the possibility of making a mistake, you should keep completely diff wallets (12 word seed wallets).

Congrats.  You gotta have a nice collection by now. 

I miss all the deals.

I understand the buyer wanting to remain anon; however, does that mean you can't let us know what you accepted for it?

Like others, I would have been happy to bid on it.

Thinking about it more, it's best if you don't tell us.  If it was a low amount than others might think it's the new price for these coins.  Hopefully more than 16.  If graded, then even more.  It's worth grading all coins even if just for the protective case. 

Sparked my interest. 

I can't personally say for auctions; however, for their store, I have purchased quite a bit and trust they will deliver.  I did want the auction since they would be able to ship directly to me as opposed to having a re-shipper from outside of the USA.
I believe your 30+ coins are safe from a scam (assuming you pay them directly (not to some random newly created account for the scammers that may try to get you)).

I can hope. 

Again, congrats.

Just got to a computer.
Have to admit that I wouldn't have gone that high anyway.

I would have bet TwinWinNerD would have taken it.  Good thing I don't gamble.

Congrats Zanzibar.

Of course, if he doesn't pay, then TwinWinNerD highest bid before Zanzibar started is:

Possibly better for me, in this case, if the auction restarts. 

Also, have to admit that I thought Prod B would have gone higher cause of the loaded number of bitcoins.  I like the engraving of Prod A though.

Just to be clear... I am not accusing anyone of wrong doing.  While watching, I could clearly see that you were trying to make your bid valid as other bids came in.
I'm sure we can all agree on that easily.

5 min rule - correct, doesn't show.  This is why I said it could have only been an issue is someone bid slightly after the 15 min rule as the real time wouldn't be correct after a potential edit.  Everything self corrected though as the price continued to climb.

I MUST leave now, so can't bid.  Good luck.

Only two edits to price.  He changed the amount in order to correctly bid above prior bids, but in editing, the post keeps the original time.  It would have only changed the outcome if someone bid slightly outside the 15 min posting time.

For this auction, so far, yes, it is completely fine.  

Appears that the thread should have been locked from edits to keep the time frame correct for bids that are being changed after submitting. 
Note for the next time an auction is done. 

B  for 15.3

And the timer starts over.

Just realized I have the high bid.  Wait, didn't it end?

Product B: 15.1BTC

Love it.
And, thanks for the updates.