Bitcoin Forum
May 01, 2024, 11:01:34 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 [93] 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 »
1841  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Announcing NEW 3TH/s and 5TH/s 20nm Bitcoin Miners on: January 29, 2014, 02:55:21 AM
Awesome work guys.  It's great to see scammers get busted.  Having been scammed a few times myself it sours me on even doing other thing than hoarding bitcoins now...so really makes my day to see scammers get busted.
1842  Economy / Speculation / Re: Obama expected to announce US-backed crypto currency in State of the Union? on: January 29, 2014, 01:39:04 AM
Lol. Not going to happen.

If the goal of those in government was to help the elderly, then maybe.  But this is not the case. The goal of much of the monetary policy is to protect and enhance the asset portfolios of the mega-rich that run the country, everything is a secondary.

The Federal Reserve, who create money, is a private company of which profits 6% for every dollar they create out of thin air.  Why would they encourage alternate, logic-based monetary systems or policies that would weaken their own power?  The banks have power over the government and it is one that is much more prevalent than elections, so they'll try to hang on to this until the collapse comes, which is inevitable, because our world economic policies are fundamentally flawed and continue to get changed only to benefit the few  people on top who actually pull the strings.
1843  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Antminer S1 open for sale again] The last round before the Chinese New Year on: January 28, 2014, 11:28:00 PM
Wow man nicely done ^^^^^^^  !

Big improvement.
1844  Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Ukyo.Loan - Paying 0.05% daily. on: January 28, 2014, 10:12:08 PM
"3) Ukyo continued to accept deposits to WeExchange for over 2 months, knowing fully that we has unable to let anyone withdraw the BTC they deposited. "

Say that again this's incorrect. Ukyo you are full of shit.
He stated that the problem, that made it impossible to do even manual withdrawals, started around November 15.
Quote from: #bitfunder
<nsa__> When did you first hear about the "other" issue?
<Ukyo> within 4 hours of disabling withdraws
<Ukyo> and stopping the manual ones
<Ukyo> rahter
<nsa__> date?
<Ukyo> dont recall
<Ukyo>Novemebr.. 15th? or something

From December 16:
I have also disabled the ability to send funds to BitFunder already.
^I can confirm that the deposit address was removed from weex December 16th, because I checked weex just after his post.

  • The first issue with the bitcoind client that made withdrawals really slow was first reported by Lophie in the middle of October. So the deposit page was removed about a month after the first withdrawal problems appeared. He did do manual withdrawals in that time span though.

  • According to Ukyo, depositing was disabled within a day of him being made aware about a second issue(the legal issue) that meant that he couldn't do even manual withdrawals anymore.

Either way, you are incorrect.

What is the point of having this second account to publish FUD with Ukyo? Why don't you just keep it to your own account, less spam that way.

1845  Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Ukyo.Loan - Paying 0.05% daily. on: January 28, 2014, 10:10:50 PM
Expect the coins to be gone. It is highly improbable that Ukyo will honor the terms of the loan as he has shown criminal behavior, and borderline mental illness in his attempts rationalize his behavior.

Look at the facts:

1) Ukyo lied about all the coins that were being deposited to WeExchange being unavailable due to a technical error.

2) Ukyo owes millions of dollars of BTC to users who deposited to WeExchange and has not given any reason beyond 'the coins are gone'.

3) Ukyo continued to accept deposits to WeExchange for over 2 months, knowing fully that we has unable to let anyone withdraw the BTC they deposited.

I think it is safe to say after reading 1000s of posts on the subjects that it is most likely that Ukyo treated deposits to WeExchange as his own personal wallet. He then made some gambling investments that blew up in his face at lost all the money.  He lost money on Labcoin, Active Mining, and likely sold BTC into cash thinking that the high of $260 was a good time to sell, when in reality , it is probably never going back to this figure again. Of course I can't say I'm 100% -- the only person who knows is Ukyo and he is conveniently not telling. Which should be a red flag.

He is thief and what he did was not only unbelievably stupid, it was just plain illegal.  It is not even a matter of factors out of his control, he simply stole and lost millions of users' money. It is quite the mess.  

If you are going go the route of legal action the good news is his identity is known.  The bad news is a) legal action is expensive  b) it is unlikely to recover much funds as he likely lost much of them.  At the least though it would be satisfying to see him criminally charged, forced into bankruptcy, and have to tell us (finally) in a court of law what he actually did.

He's been buying for time now for 2.5 months, but it looks like finally people are starting to realize that they've been ripped off, and the house of cards is starting to crumble.

Stop trolling.

1. Incorrect
2. This is not supportive of your claims.
3. Incorrect

You forgot to mention:
4. Ukyo has not dissapeared
5. Ukyo distributed proportionally funds that were able to be made available
6. Ukyo is clearly working towards gathering BTC at _least_ from ActM shares to be able to distribute to users also


I had about 400btc of my personal funds tied up in the listed assets.
Somehow that does not amount to the total of the issue.



Jon why do you lie? This is all public record.  Mostly covered in this thread of the six or seven threads on this thievery going on:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=337523.0



1) You said the problems were purely technical in nature at first.  Then 'something' happened, which you have not explained, were you changed your tune. You changed your tune after it was infeasible that you were having a technical problem you couldn't solve and could not explain.

2)  The people waiting for funds was posted and it was over 2 million dollars worth of BTC. And it wasn't even the full list of people who lost money.

3) The withdraw problems were first brought to your attention in the third or fourth week of October.  Yet you put no warning messages up and continued to accept depositss even though you knew you could not pay them back until sometime in December (anyone can check that thread themselves for the exact date.

And I'm not trolling.  I'm mad about having my money stolen from me and I'm trying to warn others. There's a big difference.

1846  Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Ukyo.Loan - Paying 0.05% daily. on: January 28, 2014, 10:03:25 PM
^^^^ here is a link to a thread regarding the addresses used:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=437154.0

1847  Economy / Speculation / Re: Noble Prize Winner who predicted Housing Bubble: Bitcoin is a bubble for sure! on: January 28, 2014, 05:48:02 AM
The  Nobel Laureate in Economics is a big joke.

You must, absolutely must buy into the bullshit fabrication known as contemporary monetary policy to get award this award.  It is not awarded to anyone who sees things at all differently.  (At least as far as I know, can't say I studied it much, pls correct me if I'm wrong).

As bitcoin is in many ways different than the prevailing popular believes in economics, of course a Nobel Laurete is likely to be opposed to it. This doesn't seem very surprising to me.  Besides, many of these baby boomers probably just mastered the science of sending an email, I don't think they are even capable of understanding how bitcoin even works, it's probably as far-fetched as traveling faster than light to them.
1848  Economy / Speculation / Re: I AM HODLING on: January 28, 2014, 05:44:04 AM
No, no, I AM HODLING. 

Anyone who says otherwise is an impostor. 

I'm the real Hodling.
1849  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gox blowing up? $820 vs $1020 on: January 28, 2014, 05:43:12 AM
Slightly off topic, but what the heck is even happening with Gox? How could they be this locked up for so long? 

I guess they are waiting for paper work to be processed that the gov either can not process quickly or is in no rush to.  I mean for all the profits Gox was making they sure don't seem to be handling the problems well at all. I honestly don't remember how long it has been since you could withdraw... 8 months?
1850  Economy / Speculation / Re: If FBI dumps 144,000 bitcoins, bitcoin will crash once & for all! on: January 28, 2014, 05:39:39 AM
That'd be awesome. I hope it crashes. I'd love to pick up cheap bitcoins.

I'm holding mostly fiat these days and I this makes me really nervous.   I think the prospect of an economic collapse causing fiat to become worthless is in fact a greater chance than bitcoin crashing and becoming worthless, because bitcoin makes a great deal of logical sense, whereas fiat is mostly imaginary funny money IMHO.
1851  Economy / Speculation / Re: The last time this happened... on: January 28, 2014, 05:37:14 AM
I've always been a bull but I think just with all the many governments doing turn-arounds and banning bitcoin, we are in for a prolonged slump. I think it'll go back down to 600 and stay there for a while.

We'd be doing great if the gov's weren't so anti-bitcoin, no doubt on the behest of the banking cartels.  (China did such a 360 in particular it was like the people who really pull the strings just sent out the email to the world gov's recently: okay bitcoin ain't good, shut it down, it is a threat).

Bitcoin will still strive and do fine even if all govs' are against it, but I'm not foolish enough to think that this would not hamper somewhere between 60% - 90% of BTC's USD value if there was a concentrated effort.

I'm all good with that though, probably would at least purge out the abundance of scamming go on, such as Ukyo / Montroll's multi-million BTC theft and the plenitude of other scams going on all the time (yeah, I'm a little bitter these days, I admit it.).
1852  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: No ROI on future Mining, its a FACT! on: January 27, 2014, 11:01:14 PM
Been saying this for awhile. Bitcoin is so popular now that we are on a big race to the bottom.

What's the bottom? Well someone always is willing to do something for less, globally.  Like I charge 10$ to jump around my house, someone, somewhere will offer to it for 5$, Then some other dude will offer to do for only a dollar ! Then and so and so, until:

For Bitcoin you are going to need next to free power, and a large amount of money to get into, and for those people, they'll be making just pennies profit a day. That's where we are going. That's just globalization.

Bitcoin wasn't as popular before so it wasn't the case, but now that it is much more widely known, we are racing to the bottom. It doesn't matter the industry that much, its the same in most fields.

I definitely don't think we are there yet. But I do think the good days of mining are over , and that is where we are headed.
1853  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Should i buy a butterfly monarch. on: January 27, 2014, 10:57:13 PM
NO


And congrats on at least doing more research than a couple of 1000s of idiots who did none.

BFL is a shit company. They accept tons of 'preorder' money to actually develop their product and internally expect they'll be at least 6 months late on their announced release dates.

1854  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Jamie Diamon’s Comments On Bitcoin (WTF!?) on: January 27, 2014, 10:48:20 PM
Basically, the corrupt banking conglomerates are the most powerful entities in the world. They do have more power than governments, because they are able to control governments from the shadows, and set economic policy .

This is particularly bad because our global economic construction and monetary policy is basically a giant fabrication.  Money is printed / generated out of thin air, from other wealth that doesn't have much tangible existence, and then leverage over 10x, and this is all controlled by an incredibly small cabal.  Forgot the '1%', it is more like the 0.000001%.

The situation is pretty bad and scares the beejuzus out of me. Because all the indicators point towards the same thing: our global financial system is headed for collapse.  And instead of any policy or change being brought in to fix it, the banking cabal will wrestle against change to the death of the system.

Does anyone think that any of the 1st world countries will ever get out of debt?  What does it say when the supposed richest countries in the world will be paying more than 60% of the taxes you give to them as interest on money that should not even have been created in the first place? And then, on top of that, most of the world largest corporations pay less than 2% tax. (http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/tax-free-tour/ )

The more I read about economics this year, the more I see how crazy the situation is. Quantitative easing, all the way back to ancient equivalent in Grecian currency debasements in the ancient world, have never, ever, been able to enable a country to get out of debt. You can not inflate your to a healthy economy --- This should be clear. Yet because of the power wielded by the banking cartels, who are the strongest entity in the global world, we are following a doomed economic policy.  This has happened 100s of times, and it ends with either war or revolution. With a lot of starvation thrown in for good measure.

The thing is, if the global economy completely collapsed, the people on the very top would be fine, they have enough actual wealth to get through anything. So for them, their behavior is not reckless, is just 'acceptable levels of greed'.  Because of their personal natures, if the world economy was absolutely ruined and everyone not having enough to even survive, they'd properly still be focused on increasing their own wealth and profit in that crisis.

The reason the banking cartels are above the law is simply that: the individuals wield more money and power than governmental, elected civil servants.

The American Constitution was a strong beacon of hope against this state, with the constitutional directives such as basing a currency on gold and silver, and not being able to charge an income tax. However the citizenry did not fight when these were not followed (no easy task), and it is far too late to go back now, we are in the end-game, death-spiral.
1855  Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Ukyo.Loan - Paying 0.05% daily. on: January 25, 2014, 02:19:08 AM
Expect the coins to be gone. It is highly improbable that Ukyo will honor the terms of the loan as he has shown criminal behavior, and borderline mental illness in his attempts rationalize his behavior.

Look at the facts:

1) Ukyo lied about all the coins that were being deposited to WeExchange being unavailable due to a technical error.

2) Ukyo owes millions of dollars of BTC to users who deposited to WeExchange and has not given any reason beyond 'the coins are gone'.

3) Ukyo continued to accept deposits to WeExchange for over 2 months, knowing fully that we has unable to let anyone withdraw the BTC they deposited.

I think it is safe to say after reading 1000s of posts on the subjects that it is most likely that Ukyo treated deposits to WeExchange as his own personal wallet. He then made some gambling investments that blew up in his face at lost all the money.  He lost money on Labcoin, Active Mining, and likely sold BTC into cash thinking that the high of $260 was a good time to sell, when in reality , it is probably never going back to this figure again. Of course I can't say I'm 100% -- the only person who knows is Ukyo and he is conveniently not telling. Which should be a red flag.

He is thief and what he did was not only unbelievably stupid, it was just plain illegal.  It is not even a matter of factors out of his control, he simply stole and lost millions of users' money. It is quite the mess.  

If you are going go the route of legal action the good news is his identity is known.  The bad news is a) legal action is expensive  b) it is unlikely to recover much funds as he likely lost much of them.  At the least though it would be satisfying to see him criminally charged, forced into bankruptcy, and have to tell us (finally) in a court of law what he actually did.

He's been buying for time now for 2.5 months, but it looks like finally people are starting to realize that they've been ripped off, and the house of cards is starting to crumble.




1856  Economy / Securities / Re: Trustworthy Cryptostockexchanges? on: January 24, 2014, 09:18:01 PM
I'd recommend keeping money in exchanges a little as possible.

I'll tell you what happened to me anyways:  I deposited money to a big stock exchange know as Bitfunder.  Turns out that the fuck-guy Ukyo was using money people deposited as his own personal wallet, making stupid investments which crashed.

I'd wait until a de-centralized exchange is set up, this should come eventually, ppl are working on it.  Until then, unfortunately there are too many scam artists out there, many sites and stocks have taken money and vanished with it.

1857  Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Moving Forward/Resolution Process on: January 24, 2014, 09:00:37 PM
Ukyo what has active mining have to do, at all, with someone, like myself, who deposited money to wexchange then could not withdraw the btc.   How can you conflate these two things?  There is no link that I can see.

You can't just accept deposits from people then keep their money  (...like do I really need to describe this to you? Apparently).  What you have done is called thievery and there are repercussions.

Your information is public, you will not be able to hide from this.

Uh. Really?

Do you not want me to continue to try to sell ActM shares so you can receive some BTC from it?
I thought you were demanding BTC and didn't care where it came from even if its my personal.
Perhaps I should stop "conflating" these two things.

You did not answer my question. AS usual, you attempt to deflect it by talking about something else.

What does ActM shares have anything to do with the money that was deposited to WeExchange ?  I didn't but any shares with my deposits. I really doubt you'll answer this but I'll ask anyways:    So what you are saying is you were buying shares and making other investments with customers' deposits on WeExchange, is this accurate?  Are you simple or something? Don't you see this as a big fucking problem?  BTC deposited into WeExchange was not your personal wallet to make investments with. (I can't believe I even need to explain this, are you trolling me, on top of taking my money?)  

I demand my BTC that I deposited.  I care where it comes from sure. But that isn't even an issue. I simply deposited money to you, assuming it was a safe place to deposit like your tag line says on your website, ("A safe way to pay and get paid") and you spent it on an gamble investment. And you continued to take money knowing you couldn't pay it back for over 2 months. This is a serious situation.  If you don't see the problem with this than you either have serious mental deficiencies or are psychotic.  You will pay, if I don't get my money back you are fool to think that this will just go away. I know who you are , so does anyone who wants to know, you will not be able to hide for ever. No amount of money will cover what you could lose, such as time spent in prison or worse.

The only chance you have of improving your situation is at least telling people what the fuck happened and being honest for once. A thousand odd dollars isn't even a big deal for me. What is a big deal is being taken advantage of  and ripped off, I can't let you do that do me without any there being repercussions,  on principle. I will not let this go.
1858  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: WHAT! :( Butterfly Lads won't deliver the Monarch Till March or April:( on: January 24, 2014, 07:14:45 PM
Anyone who ordered a Monarch and thought it was going to be on time is pretty dumb.

This company has a terrible, terrible track record. Some of the last generation products were what, shipped a YEAR late? More than a year?

It was painfully obvious there was no way in hell they were going to finish the Monarch when they said.  I said as much when they first announced it, trying to talk people out of ordering. You have to be just plain dumb if you thought they would ship on time, knowing their slimy track-record.

I feel bad for the people who ordered all the non-Monarch gear, that was a shitty mess to be in. But I don't feel that bad for people who ordered Monarchs. Once again, you were just plain dumb to believe they'd ship it on time if you did any research at all into the company.

BFL probably only had the vaguest idea of how to build the Monarch. They probably just some doodles on a napkin which was the extent of the design plans when they announced the product. All the idiots who ordered the product gave them money to actually feasibly develop it.  I'm guessing the first Monarch will arrive late May, early June. No way it's going to ROI, not a chance (if you paid in BTC. If you paid in fiat, then maybe)...  
1859  Economy / Economics / Re: [POLL] mBit or mBTC for "MilliBit"? on: January 24, 2014, 06:09:26 AM
mBit  rolls of the tongue the easiest. Thus, I think it is the winner.
1860  Economy / Economics / Re: Talk of China economy collapsing in 3rd/4th Qrt 2014 reaching Fever Pitch on: January 24, 2014, 06:00:22 AM
Ya I hear that dude ^^^^^^^^

It makes me both angry and amused at the same time to hear the Syrian government blaming all of it's country tearing itself apart on 'terrorists'.  Who are they fooling? If your government is actively trying to kill half its citizenry  then it is probably not legitimate.


The sad fact is that most of America's opponents, aka 'the scary terrorists' , fall into one of these 3 categories.

1) The occasional loonie.  He accounts for maybe 1% of terrorist attacks. Okay fine, he is a terrorist. This is the rarest, most uncommon form of terrorist.

2) Terrorists made by the government that is trying to kill them.  Such as Al Qaidea.  Al Qaidea was brought to power / given power and arms by the CIA to fight the Russians. Many other terrorists cells were once in the pay of the U.S government , and now that they aren't following orders anymore, are then used as villains for PR purposes.  

3) People defending themselves or their country.  Okay so you can't blow some one up with a home made bomb.  But you can bomb a country with an air force, rape their women, kill their kids by the dozens, just in order to expand your fruit selling business? One of 1000 examples   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1954_Guatemalan_coup_d'état

And then the real kicker:  If the founding fathers of the United States were alive today they would likely be considered 'terrorists' by today's government, just for the ideals they had. That about sums it up.

edit: also thought I'd add, just about the only people the NSA doesn't spy are .... wait for it.... terrorists.  That's right.  Terrorists actually use the available tools to get around being tracked. The NSA spies on everyone else BESIDES the terrorists. And if you don't like them spying on you -- you are a-- you guessed -- you are a terrorist. Because you won't want to be spied on if you didn't have anything to hide, right ?    Roll Eyes
Pages: « 1 ... 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 [93] 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!