Bitcoin Forum
May 02, 2024, 08:48:30 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 [134] 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 »
2661  Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: Can someone send me some testnet coins? on: July 15, 2011, 11:24:17 PM
You can get .11 testnet coins from here:
https://testnet.freebitcoins.appspot.com/
2662  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Newbie restrictions on: July 15, 2011, 11:08:36 PM
(and even year long lurkers, such as myself)
...but we can't read your mind. Nowhere in your request did you say that.

Why should it make a difference if someone claims to be a lurker? Anyone can do that. And no, you couldn't check my ip or anything, because I mostly browsed this site with Tor before needing to register.
It allows us to look for more subtle hints in the post to see if what they are saying is true. It's usually not something we look for, since it's usually not the case for most people.

Anyway, I know big forums have troubles with newbies. But a forced newbie section is quite extreme. FAQs and closing repeatedly asked questions by a sizable number of lower ranked moderators is the norm for a reason. It's much more friendly and doesn't create a giant hurdle that probably offends and deters intelligent new users more than your average joe.
Yeah, but we don't have, nor do we want, such a big moderator staff that we can do that. Hell, most of our moderators have their own projects they do outside of the forum. We're really understaffed, but we don't want to risk the possibility of a moderator becoming corrupt, as that's much worse. We don't even have the power to ban people.
2663  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Hello, I really need help with this! :) on: July 15, 2011, 10:10:01 PM
Well, if you want a service that can do this for you, you'll want to check this out:
http://www.casascius.com/

Otherwise, to do it yourself, you'll need to check into this:
http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8091.0
2664  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Newbie restrictions being taken too far on: July 15, 2011, 09:38:07 PM
The site says: Due to spam, non-established users can only post in the "newbies" section."

I would like to argue that this is a blatant lie. If we go by spam defined as defined by wikipedia, that is, paraphrased, "unsolicited bulk messages sent indiscriminately", then a quick peek at the reasons given for not whitelisting new users will show that something is amiss: A common reply is "try to resolve your issues in the newbie section". This reply directly admits that the message appears to be a legitimate issue. Otherwise, why would it be responded to at all? Thusly, people are being acknowledged as not spam while still being denied normal usage of the forum.

Maybe the restrictions are in place to prevent trolls and random clowns from making stupid posts
This. Spam, in this case, is the more general case of a bunch of people always asking the same questions, or trolling.

but again, what do we have beyond a "try to charm the moderators" game. I've seen 1 line 'take my word for it' posts whitelisted, so surely the trolls can get in if they wish.
More goes on behind the scenes than you realize. In a whitelist review, every post the user has ever made is checked. Their post requesting whitelisting is only a small part of it.

All we got here are power hungry mods (yeah, that's a  new one for an internet forum, I know)
We take every whitelist request seriously...

(and even year long lurkers, such as myself)
...but we can't read your mind. Nowhere in your request did you say that.

Surely this can be done better, and in the interest of the good of bitcoin it really should be.
We agree. However, this is the best we can do for now.
2665  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Silk road on: July 15, 2011, 09:07:19 PM
This thread is quickly entering illegal territory. I'm afraid that I have to close it.
2666  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Lots of 0.01's... change, or not? on: July 15, 2011, 08:25:27 AM
If a wallet has a lot of coins to select from, such as an ewallet, there will very likely be a very small amount used for change. It wouldn't surprise me if it turned out that MtGox sent this specific transaction.
2667  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: I have been subject to fraud, not you! on: July 14, 2011, 07:35:39 PM
Sounds like you might have been Man-in-the-middled. Contact the email address on the PayPal account and ask for a refund.
2668  Other / Meta / Re: allow newbs into the "honest trader list" thread on: July 14, 2011, 05:16:37 PM
You can't honestly tell me that anybody reads that thread. Just tell them to leave feedback for you on bitcoinfeedback.com (I have no relation to this site)
2669  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: [Scam Alert] Bitmole scammed services on: July 14, 2011, 06:06:47 AM
And then for no reason Vegetta and Jessy King come in!
HA! You joke, but since I brought up the Newbie forum, Jessy Kang will likely post here shortly  Roll Eyes
2670  Other / Meta / Re: Speculation Section Sucks on: July 14, 2011, 04:56:34 AM
I, too, are not interested in all things discussed in Bitcoin discussion, BUT I use my better judgment to pass over the topics that do not interest me with my mouse.  In actuality, there are only about 6 or 7 threads that I keep tabs on while the rest are left unread.
Then do what I do: set your profile to ignore boards you're not interested in, and patrol the Recent Unread Topics.
2671  Other / Meta / Re: Forum search could be better on: July 14, 2011, 04:47:19 AM
Too often I can't find previous articles despite providing excellent search queries. For example, if I know most of the words in the TITLE and the original poster's USERNAME, I still might get zero (0) hits. Perhaps the search form should just redirect input to google appending site:forum.bitcoin.org ?
Remember that the search is always done in the context of the page you were on. Always do you search from the home forum page if you don't remember where it was posted.
2672  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: [Scam Alert] Bitmole scammed services on: July 14, 2011, 04:37:47 AM
I appreciate the hands off policy approach, but in reality when it comes to FUNDS that were promised, it's a little bit of a different story, especially (as I'm sure the legal guy here would back me up on) bitcoin.org can be made responsible in a court of law for some situations that arise from these forums. If I were to sell cocaine here, I doubt bitcoin.org would never be affected in any way, so why would this be any different? It's a community that has moderators. So moderate! (Other anti-police state members might completely disagree with me on this one).
Any post even suggesting selling illegal drugs or directly linking Silk Road will be deleted on sight, no exceptions. We do not allow that stuff on this forum. Note: discussion itself is okay
2673  Other / Meta / Start a Bitcoin Court on: July 14, 2011, 04:19:01 AM
To quote myself from the BitMole thread:
I think I know what we need to do to fix the core issues you explained. I think we need to post some official policies regarding reporting scams, and we need to setup an official Bitcoin court, much like the IRC channel.

Thoughts?
2674  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: [Scam Alert] Bitmole scammed services on: July 14, 2011, 04:13:20 AM
Maged: Would it be ridiculous to suggest that there be a formal process of hiring services/etc on this forum? I know that's quite an undertaking, but I wouldn't mind working on the code or whatever else needs to be done. You know, kind of like rent-a-coder or something.
Sadly, it would be ridiculous to suggest that. As I stated, we currently need to have as few hurdles as possible to offer products/services. Maybe at a later point in time.

What we really need is a public template for legally enforcable bitcoin contracts, possibly with (optional, should both parties agree) terms that include Mandatory Binding Arbitration with our Bitcoin Court. It would be great if someone started a bounty for that.
2675  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: [Scam Alert] Bitmole scammed services on: July 14, 2011, 03:54:18 AM
Bitmole:-


I offer interest free loan. If you want 1 BTC , I will send you right now. You can pay me back after 1 week or 2 weeks, after you sort out your payment issues.
Believe it or not, I so thoroughly examined BitMole's post history before I even posted that I was willing to offer this same deal to him should he have come here to post his side. That changed once he said that he refused to pay altogether.

Being new to bitcoin (but not new to IRC, forums, flaming, etc), I have been on the end of attacks since my very first post here. This community is NOT a friendly community. It's almost as if everyone is sitting around looking for an excuse to blast someone for not knowing something. Someone could argue that that's the case on all forums, but frankly speaking, I don't see any place for it on a forum that exists to spread the knowledge and love of Bitcoin.
This is completely unacceptable. In fact, that's why we made the Newbie forum. We found that it was significantly more damaging to newbies to even allow them to post on the normal forum. Unfortunately, if the moderators started deleting personal attacks, people would start crying "CENS0RSH1P!!11!!" and our mods would be overwhelmed. That being said PLEASE report off-topic personal attacks. ALMOST NOBODY is currently using the "Report to moderator" button, and it's making our job of moderation pretty hard.

My personal respect for bitcoin has only grown stronger since I first signed up here, but my opinion of the community here has only soured. The ridiculous amount of newbies running spreadsheets 'games' and calling them 'services', the 30 second startup sites that were obviously made from freetemplates.com, and the endless onslaught of 'experienced' users, trying to say that bitcoin will not be profitable for exactly the purpose that I am in fact using it for. It's been tough to say the least, and I've seriously considered doing everything I'm doing in bitcoin WITHOUT being in this forum.
We hate it too, but the biggest complaint about Bitcoin right now is the lack of businesses. For the moment, we have to take what we get. I pray for the day that we can actually be afforded to have standards for advertising businesses here.

The ONLY reason I have acted this way is because, as someone new to these forums and basically receiving non-stop bullshit from users here, KeyserSoze basically demonstrated to me a reason to give up.
I agree. KeyserSoze was way out of line. Refusing to PM the person you are publicly accusing when you were explicitly asked to? WHAT?!? KeyserSoze was clearly acting in bad faith.

I had NO idea (and arguably no way of knowing) that any mods were paying attention, and felt that the entire job of A) resolving this issue, B) teaching an impatient seller a lesson, and C) dealing with the repercussions, was completely on my shoulder. Now why would I think that? Because I've spent 10+ years on other forums and IRC where how you act becomes who are you known as, and moderators are seldom involved in anything.
I'm surprised that you got that impression. We have one of the most involved moderation teams that I have ever seen. This should have been obvious as soon as you saw a single thread where a mod nonchalantly posted.

KeyserSoze has had a point from the start. He performed a service for which he was not paid. I am at fault for not paying. There has never been a doubt of that in my mind. The LACK of any presence or communication with any moderators of any sort is what brought me to take things into my own hands and make the claim that I wouldn't be paying.
Any ideas of how this can be improved?

I don't care if KeyserSoze thought I was a life long scammer, or that I am an habitual liar, or whatever else he has fabricated. All I care is that I've done what's right-- and until Maged came in here telling me that he had actually been WATCHING this thread from the beginning and that the scammer tag was not just the whim of some trigger happy mod (which is what I am quite used to where I come from), I had felt that the RIGHT thing to do was to defend myself against what seemed to be a bunch of KeyserSoze whiteknighting and an arrogant, irrational and impatient seller.
And I have the notification emails to prove it.

KeyserSoze: Did anyone message you? DId anyone tell you they were investigating/watching/trying to resolve things?
No, nobody did. We tend to keep a hands-off policy when it comes to conflicts. Everything was posted publicly. The only time that I messaged KeyserSoze was to tell him that I reported you to theymos (the only one who has the ability to add the scammer tag) once you refused to pay. The only reason I didn't say that here is because I don't have the authority to say that you would/wouldn't be marked as a scammer. Looking back, I probably should have threatened it. (although I don't know how happy theymos would be if I did that)


I think I know what we need to do to fix the core issues you explained. I think we need to post some official policies regarding reporting scams, and we need to setup an official Bitcoin court, much like the IRC channel.
2676  Economy / Marketplace / Re: [Scam Alert] Global Standard Bank - the first Bitcoin bank? on: July 13, 2011, 10:51:44 PM
Honestly though, if they wanted to participate in the community you're stuck in the newbie zone for the first 5 posts, and for professional groups that represent outside interests I believe that requirement is waived with a simple request, right?
That is correct.
2677  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: the silk road? on: July 13, 2011, 09:50:33 PM
As a reminder, discussion about Silk Road is allowed, but you are not allowed to link it directly or advertise specific deals on this forum. Additionally, we reserve the right to delete any post about Silk Road for any or no reason.
2678  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: donations on: July 13, 2011, 09:17:21 PM
People are greedy, and want even just a few Bitcoins, it's very unprofessional to have it in your signature if you own a business.
Now, this I can agree with. The only real exception, of course, is businesses where the whole business model is based on receiving donations.
2679  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: [Scam Alert] Bitmole scammed services on: July 13, 2011, 08:19:53 PM
I can't say much since this was sent to me via PM, but BitMole is apparently willing to resolve this. I asked him to post the message he sent me here, so hopefully he will do that.
2680  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: donations on: July 13, 2011, 08:14:59 PM
Quote
Also, no one donates.  Ever.    But just have it there.

Very funny whoever you are!  No donations ever, then when you say it and stop asking, bam, donations!
In my defense, you deserved a donation anyway. Congrats on getting over 1000 posts!
Pages: « 1 ... 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 [134] 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!