I've added a new p2pool. Here are the parameters: cgminer --scrypt -o next.afraid.org:8115 -u yourFC2address -p . statistics available here: http://next.afraid.org:81152% fee. ---- This one is up, and fully reliable. Awesome, this one is blazing fast! Anybody know how long it takes for the wallet to get a connection? It's taking ages. Make sure you've opened port 9131. I have 62 active connections at the moment. |
|
|
|
if wolf rainer actually made that i think he still wins though  ill wait for his pm I agree. I like wolf's best. I've gotta head out for a few hours though. If everyone agrees that wolf's is the winner, I owe him my promised 200 FC2 when I get back. |
|
|
|
|
It'd be nice to have a block explorer made for this as well.
|
|
|
|
That guy has more BQC than I do now  The guy stole my idea whoever it was. I was really contemplating buying everything up to .0001. I'm still contemplating doing that to .0002, as I believe most of the cheap coins have been dumped at this point, and we'll start to see a pretty good price rise. |
|
|
|
This is being blown out of proportion.
The only reason this happened is because Mtgox were foolish enough to lie and say they aren't a 'money transmitter' and try to operate without a license.
If they had the appropriate license this wouldn't have happened. A lesson to other exchanges in the future.
This cannot be said enough. The government has had previous chances to go after BTC and has declined. They are only targeting a company that broke the law with this warrant. If Mt. Gox is smart (which that's debatable), they'll immediately reach a deal with the government, in which they agree to properly register and pay whatever penalties/fines are assessed. The government is NOT going after BTC. Atleast not yet. |
|
|
|
Ill host the website throw the logo/banner on then we should have a good relaunch by tomorrow
Excellent. Thanks for all your work kinetic. |
|
|
|
Give me the right coin name , so i can change the design
Go with FireCoin 2, so it complies with the FC2 standard. |
|
|
|
Gotcha. It was above 200 earlier? Or fyrecoin whichever spelling sounds better
It was around 250 earlier today before all the others launched. I'm using this as a chance to get many more coins before this becomes much more popular. |
|
|
|
What is the current network hash rate? That should be Included in the relaunch post?
Right now it has dropped down to 43Mh/s as people have tried the other coins that have launched today. This one has much more support and viability though, so as soon as the relaunch is announced, they'll come flocking back in a hurry. |
|
|
|
Also the bounty has increased to 720 FRC2 and 5 LTC. I don't know why no one takes this seriously or at least attempts. That's a decent amount for the work asked.
so how much is 720 FRC2 worth in LTC or BTC? I thought that the coin was developed as a joke. Originally it was developed as a joke. But it ended up being one of the most fair launches of an alt coin in quite awhile, so people stuck with it, and now it's turning into something more. |
|
|
|
Wait, so we want regulation now?  Swing and a miss. Let's try this again. This is a suggestion for voluntary compliance. Those that don't comply could be viewed at with a skeptical eye by the traders. |
|
|
|
|
That is really pretty good. If we're going with flash coin, maybe change it to lightning bolts. If going with firecoin, well. That's obvious what to do there. But I like the logo too.
|
|
|
|
I think you should list them all and let the market shake them out. Some will make $$$ some will lose big but in the end the good will rise to the top and people will spend less time dumping electricity and good cash into shit coins.
I'm not sure what's involved in listing a coin on an exchange, as an exchange operator. In theory I agree. I would certainly hope that the exchange operators aren't saying "I'm not going to list XXX coin because we're too good for that coin! We have a reputation to keep up!" That would be foolish. But if it costs resources and a cost/benefit analysis has to be done, than I understand their reasoning for not adding all coins. I just believe their standards should be made public so as to prevent outright bribery. |
|
|
|
|
We probably need to get the name of this thread changed as soon as possible to the name of the new coin. People thinking FC2 = Feathercoin 2 isn't helping with adoption.
|
|
|
|
The exchange rate in BTC is not a good measurement for value. After all, it fully depends on the amount of coins generated. If I make an alt-coin that gives 10K coins per block, it's going to have a low exchange rate with BTC no matter how popular it is. On the other hand, the OneCoin example: The whole currency is capped to 1 coin, trading only happens with fractions of that coin. The single coin is never going to drop below 0.001 BTC (it has that much value for curiosity reasons alone).
A better metric would be the market cap measured in BTC, so exchange rate times coins mined.
Good suggestion. I like it. |
|
|
|
I'll never turn down anything that's free  Except for maybe an STD. I'd probably turn that down..... MAANHrFqaEFvZidnSYkBiUX5i2FDozDT5z |
|
|
|
|
Anyone else feel that there should be published standards by the exchanges for when a coin should be listed and delisted? This would prevent backhanded deals, such as what was attempted with NVC & BTC-e.
For example:
"A scrypt based coin will be listed once it achieves a mining hashrate in excess of 100Mh/s. A coin will be delisted once its trade value drops below .0001 BTC/XXX and remains there for a period of 72 hours."
This would prevent the bribing of an exchange to list a coin, and it would also prevent the countless threads of people crying for their coins to be listed on various exchanges.
Obviously each exchange would be free to adopt their own standards. But they should at least be publicly available.
|
|
|
|
BQC, FC2, RYC, all those new BS coins would never be added to MCXNow if I had to guess.
I guess my question to the people who are upset about this.. How can one start a discussion organically about MCXNow? It seems like even suggesting using it, with supporting arguments is considered spam.. How else do you start a discussion?
You could make an argument for FC2 & RYC being "BS" Coins. But if you lump BQC into that argument, you're simply too ignorant on the subject of alt cryptocurrencies to discuss the matter further. |
|
|
|
|
Add BCQ, FC2, & FRC to MCXNow and I'll move my business there.
|
|
|
|
So what's the current FC2/FTC rate? (assuming it's been valued at all yet)...
I don't think it's been valued at all at this point. This coin is interesting in that the mining began before the real identity of the coin was established. We've pretty much determined the coin's name now, now we're working on graphics and a website. (and when I say "we're" I mean the royal we're. I don't really have anything to do with the coin, other than putting up a little bit of bounty and offering input.) The real promotion and trading of this coin hasn't even begun yet. I would advise those that don't have any, to try to start mining though. Difficulty is going to go up pretty quickly and the coins will become harder to come by. Right now is your best shot to get some, if you don't already have any. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
