if that is the evidence proving that all those accounts are mine, sorry but I really think those are not acceptable evidence for proof. You should have proof that those accounts created them myself or that at least they come from the same IP. [...]
Yeah, about that... there is a teeny weeny details that igeble07 --or dare I say... you?-- forgot to omit: his email info. I have the archive here and here, but unfortunately web archiver can only log in as a guest on this forum --duhh-- and thus, the said information is protected by the forum. So, a screenshot should do. I've deliberately mark the forum timestamp, just to... add a little eligibility of the evidence.  . About why an account who wrote a trust feedback in Japanese characters --I think it's hiragana, but I'm not a Japanese expert here-- actually registered under an italian email address, or if I may turn the situation, "why an italian registered email address wrote a feedback in Japanese instead of their own language?", is beyond my comprehension. I can only wonder if this is the same reason with uhh... certain someone who uses google translate to speak German. But this is where things getting more interesting. You see, the email address used by igeble07 came from reboldimario[dot]it, the same detail for contact info also listed officially by reboldimario[dot]it, so it's kinda safe to say igeble07 really works on that company and have access to their email.  Now, it's been established here that metalcecco real name is Francesco Reboldi, and combing through the site, I found Francesco!  I don't know what's your opinion about this, but I personally think it is a good enough evidence to say that igeble07 at least works for you, if they're not you yourself. As for Ylli, (un)fortunately he hide his email address from public, but seeing how: (1) he wrote in Italian, (2) his account was created only to write the feedback and gone inactive right after, with a, (3)creation date that's awfully close to igeble07, and how (4) above evidences heavily implies that igeble07 is related to you and (5) metalcecco is you writing a very positive and supportive feedback to yourself in way that took pretense that they're two different people, would it be too far fetched to think that he is also you, err... I mean your employee? |
|
|
|
Finally someone who speaks politely.
Uhh... sorry, what? Oh, yeah, sure. Always glad to be polite whenever I can. May I use this occasion to compliment your comprehension skill too? Moving to the topic, let me answer your in-between-the-topic question first, as this is the easiest and the most obvious: I am also waiting for an answer to the article section:
Why am I in the scam section? if you don't show the facts that it's a scam, that's wrong too.
Please read the board title carefully, several times if needed. The board called, in case you still failed to realize, scam accusations. Keyword: "accusations". If I may use the broad term given by wikipedia --as you seems to love this encyclopedia so much: An accusation is a statement by one person asserting that another person or entity has done something improper. [...]
An accusation can be made in private or in public, to the accused person alone, or to other people with or without the knowledge of the accused person. An accuser can make an accusation with or without evidence; the accusation can be entirely speculative, and can even be a false accusation, made out of malice, for the purpose of harming the reputation of the accused.
And that, my Bro, is the purpose of this board: to get a better grip of the situation, to assess the case, whether the accusation is baseless and out of malice or it's based on findings and facts. People here are working side by side to dig the truth, to find who actually did wrong and who tell the truth. Bear in mind that if you ventured to other threads on this board, you'll find several case where the thread creator are found to be the one who wrong and the accused got a lot of support because they're the one being wronged. Unfortunately, I don't think that the same situation applied to you. Why? Well, this brings us to the lengthy explanation below: Let's summarize the situation based on your point of view: Lafu accuses you of plagiarism, which you consider equal to a copyright infringement, and thus --in your opinion-- is not correct, borderline wrongful, because you've contacted the original author, LockNess, and they couldn't provide you the depository of the copyright for said document and/or written content, thus the said work is not copyrighted, and thus you should be free to copy them. Ultimately, these series of events, according to your lawyer, it is not correct and deserve a lawsuit for defamation. Am I correct so far? Lets continue, if we may further condense the situation, it goes to: LockNess did not register their work, so there's no copyright infringement, anything that or anyone who said otherwise --you plagiarize/stole copyrighted property-- is wrong. I have to be the bringer of bad news, but allow me to let you familiarize yourself with the fact that there is this rule that said upon being published, a content owner automatically get their work protected by copyright. I am not sure with how it goes in Italy, but I know a lot of --if not most, or even every-- countries apply this rule. People often use the terms "author rights" and "literary rights" to mean copyrights. Copyrights are legal rights that attach to certain types of intellectual property. Copyrights are granted under federal law to authors of creative works at the time of the work's creation in a fixed, tangible form. Authors do not have to apply for or file a copyright. [...]
Copyright is a type of intellectual property that protects original works of authorship as soon as an author fixes the work in a tangible form of expression. In copyright law, there are a lot of different types of works, including paintings, photographs, illustrations, musical compositions, sound recordings, computer programs, books, poems, blog posts, movies, architectural works, plays, and so much more!
[...]
And no, it is not limited to published papers, a website content are also automatically protected once it is published, and that nice "©" symbol is just a nail to the coffin, the unequivocal proof that the plagiat --that's you-- are completely aware that the material they're about to copy is protected --automatically. Remember, any piece of writing or artwork is automatically protected under U.S. copyright law, regardless of whether it is formally registered with the U.S. Copyright Office, the federal agency charged with overseeing copyright registration. However, placing the "©" conspicuously on the footer of the website provides a clear signal to Internet users that you are aware of your rights and intend to enforce them.
Should you ever need to sue an infringer, the existence of the copyright notice will help to establish that the defendant had actual notice of your rights. Put differently, he or she will not be able to claim ignorance.
Honestly, I'm curious how your lawyer didn't know or didn't explain these matters to you; worse, they suggested and encouraged you the exact opposite. This rule is pretty much known and drilled to students of higher education --during associate, bachelor, master, and doctorate-- to help them wrote a good and "legal" paper. Now, one question is still left unanswered: wheth Lafu should sue you for defamation, based on your accusation that he didn't check facts before publishing this accusation, which leads to a case where you tainted his reputation. And another question seems to raise: whether Lock.Ness should sue you as well, for a blatant proof of copyright infringement. Please share us your lawyer's insight regarding this. |
|
|
|
[...] Metalcecco belongs to me personally while Blokbro is from the company that I am CEO and I also represent my community ... the other authors can be parts of my community that I spoke to. When I wrote in German it is because first the form was in the German section, then they moved it and I didn't notice it. Plagiarism is the violation of copyrhigt. A work or website is required to specify whether it is copyrighted and if it is copyrighted, anyone can ask for access to the document that must be deposited. "With the term plagiarism (or piracy), IN COPYRIGHT, we refer to the appropriation, through total or partial copying, of the authorship of a work of the genius of others. The term derives from the Latin plagium (reduction into slavery or theft of someone else's slave) [1] and in this meaning it is reflected in the English plagiarism and in the French and German Plagiat. " (source: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plagio_(diritto_d%27author) in this case the copyright is not deposited, anyone can use information and photos of the site and no one can say that it is plagiarism. Defamation, on the other hand , occurs when someone publicly comments on untrue facts or offends or causes damage to the company or person. In this case Lafu, without checking this information and without listening to my reason for error, points to the fact of plagiarism by writing it publicly, also causing damage to my project. I am not here to ask for damages on the project (although I could) but I am here to make you think about this fact and I ask for the removal of the article. I have 3 months to file a complaint and have the authorities intervene, but I believe that the matter can be resolved without this.Thank you for your attention A little late to join as I get into this tread and have been wanting to comment on it since you posted this, but I got some on my plates that needs to be done. Apology for the delay, but without furter ado, may I suggest you to perhaps reconsider your "lawyer"? I don't think they know exactly what to do or what basis they can use, so instead they just throw random things at you... of course, I am assuming these lawyers are real people and firms and not just you googling some things. I've nicely highlighted some critical point you raised as the basis of your threat to file a defamation complaint. First, let's refer to this article published by a well-known law firm, just to make sure all of us here are on the same page, given recently, there are a lot of caught plagiat and scammers trying to get back by throwing these "we will sue you" threat, I think we need to be sure --well, at least I need to be sure-- if it is really applicable To prove prima facie defamation, a plaintiff must show four things: 1) a false statement purporting to be fact; 2) publication or communication of that statement to a third person; 3) fault amounting to at least negligence; and 4) damages, or some harm caused to the reputation of the person or entity who is the subject of the statement.
Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but although you meet the other three condition to file a defamation complain, the first and foremost point to build the case is not met, and thus everything became obsolete. In order to prove a first look of defamation, it is need to be proven that the accusation is wrong, --e.g. Lafu spread false and baseless information that I stole 1M BTC from him while I actually never did, for this case, I might have a chance to build a defamatory case against him. In your case though, everything he said is true, namely you copied and plagiarize a content from someone else, so, all he said is fact and not a false statement. Again, as Stalker22 repetitively pointed out, the case is not a copyright infringement, it is a simple plagiarism. I don't think I need to join his effort to explain to you what the differences are, he explained good enough, and how you still persist that it is exclusively synonymous is well, beyond my comprehension. Lafu accuses you of plagiarizing someone's work, and indeed you are, how is it a defamation if what he said is true? Second, let's assume for a sec that you somehow had a chance to build a case, on which country shall you build and have your court? In your country, Italy? Or is it on Lafu's --I assume Germany--? Are you sure the law on said country complies with what you build? And to what address shall the summoning order be addressed to? The court needs to made it known to the defendant that there is a case against them, and far as I know, you're the one who need to supply the details of the suspect. You somehow have Lafu's home address in your pocket? Please don't tell me your lawyer suggest you to address "Lafu, a member of bitcointalk, wherever he actually stays". And the very last, the mundane thing, Lafu actually did some work of checking the information, how else do you think he knew you plagiarized a content if he didn't check past works of someone else? How you failed to see this simple thing and "accuse" him of not doing any work is beyond me. Perhaps Lafu should consider to raise a defamation case against you as you wrongfully made fake statement that he didn't di any work, made the said statement public, and you caused him a tarnished reputation as people will now think he didn't do enough work. Oh look at that, he actually has all the four points against you. |
|
|
|
I'll bite this one. First of all, let's archive this. And then, what is this part supposed to mean for us? You accidentally copied your email body... of you begging them to reply you? Is this the continuation of you applying for binance lab review? That meets radio silence? And you demanded them to reply because you've been investing on them in BNB for quite some time? LOL. Also, 3035? Really? Do we supposed to trust and treat a project that's not only copying copyrighted content but also couldn't pay attention to the details of their published materials as something serious?  Third, i strongly remember you claimed you have tax and reg number? And you still use outlook for your official email? You do aware that if you can't really afford to build a complete site, google suites helps and provide cheap email service that'll help you convince your soon-to-scammed-victim... ehm, investors, i mean to say investors, to think you're a bunch of professionals, right?  |
|
|
|
LOL, we are not intrested in any discussions with you, we dont need you guys here and really... make fud how you want. by time we will publish something to bitcointalk, support oradmins here not even react and thats a joke.. these forum is using simply his position and pushing own things, so we really dont care. u will see us at cmc  bye here  we will publish some to that circumstance here, also find it not funny. can provide absolutely everything and ADMINS HERE not even answer. really sad.. but it give more important things for crypto then this here! One, to be categorized as a FUD, I believe the information should be baseless. This accusation, though, are presented with evidences. Two, the mods here didn't meddle in scam accusations, especially one that's proven to be true, i.e. you took copyrighted materials --from binance-- without their permission, having your logo from a free source too instead of making an effort to create or hire a professional to create your own, and you can't even show your self-proclaimed reg and tax number. Three, bad news for you, but CMC is no longer the paragon of project tracker, it's been known to people who dwell on this forum that they're, in a way, bought-able. Being listed on CMC doesn't instantly means a project is legit. |
|
|
|
WARNING do not use INDOEX.IO it’s a scam
Wanted to move my funds out of there. Made a withdrawal 18-6 but never received it.
Contacted their support but I haven’t received a reply. Phone number listed doesn’t work. They won’t reply on their what’s app chat. Their Facebook posts doesn’t have a single like or respond. No answer on my Telegram chat as well.
Looks like my 0,5688 BTC withdrawal is gone… They are just thief’s. Wonder how these criminals can be stopped. Any ideas? Looks like they are located in Estonia and London.
If you can provide supporting evidence like the screenshot for pending withdrawal and unanswered queries from their support channels, it'll greatly help giving a better insight of your case. I'll advise you to use the recommended reporting format: [b][color=black]What happened:: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Scammers Profile Link: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Reference Link: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Amount Scammed: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Payment Method: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Proof of Payment: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]PM/Chat Logs: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Additional Notes: [/color][/b]
This is their profile link, which already tagged by several DT, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2652465, it's quite save to say they've ditched the account, though. And, for a further info, back in 2020 they got couples of accusations as well: indoex exchange is a scamindoex.io SCAM & FAKE exchangeIndoex exchange |
|
|
|
Because of his username on shoppy.gg I couldn't find a feedback for this guy..
fairly sure I ran into him on this forum, just don't know when
[...]
If you can add a tiny bit more info, it might be helpful to widen the search. A search with current info to pinpoint to one user seems to be near impossible, at least from what I've tried from this bed-ridden sickness I'm currently in. Like his tg account, or what item did he sold on this forum.
$50 for a $500 bestbuy gift card? Does this type market actually exist or were you just greedy and forgot that “if it’s too good to be truth…”?
Don’t get me wrong OP, I’m not trying to throw salt on the wound. Am actually curious about your situation.
The price for the stolen cards is arround 30-40% but with bulk deals you can find easy at 10-15%, just saying. And they prefer to sold them at discounted price rather than redeeming themselves? I am yet to purchase and redeem an amazon giftcard, but I'll take a blind faith that they work like Google play voucher where you input the code at the back of the card and your amazon account will be topped-up? So why would a thief sell them at discount rather than get a full amount of the balance on the card? Like TryNinja, I'm just trying to understand the situation here. |
|
|
|
Still nobody lost a penny, you can try all you want. Every costumer is back to purchasing cards again. Let's never forget that you where the guy that asked for a free card. And when he didn't receive it you spammed and FUD'ed now for 3 months. And have a fleet of solar powered jets. hahahahahahahh  Assuming the screenshot is true, that dkbit98 at one point back in March PMed you with the content as per the screenshot, I failed to see where he's doing something wrong. He asked you to tell you more, as in conducting due diligence by inquiring more. I didn't see any part of the message that can be intepreted as him asking for a card. Even if at one point, on different PM that you are yet to reveal to us, he blatantly asked for a card to be shipped, it stil fall under the realm of DD, as in testing whether you'll really send a working card or not. And even if --let's amuse you for a bit-- he indeed got pissed and annoyed and FUDed you for months, it still doesn't change the fact that you're caught redhanded being the same person behind criptodebit and satoscard. Well? |
|
|
|
we are on it.......
And, my questions are still left unattended |
|
|
|
If they were to add source links, I won't call them plagiarism here. Because all the definitions like Solana or Binance smart chain are the same. We can't change it anyway. But likely we can write is ourselves for a better experience. But whole the theme is the same and we can't change any part. They did a mistake by not adding the sources.
Yea, likely they will come here with the same excuse and will blame their writers. That will prove the team's irreversibility.
The same thought crossed my mind when I strolled through their litepaper and crosschecking them with the plagiarism checker, that if only they added bibliography on their last page, their action will be justified --I even checked their last page to see if they did this, which unfortunately they didn't. Nonetheless, the plagiarism of abstract can hardly be acceptable. Copying definition --with proper citation-- and description of things from existing media is acceptable, copying an abstract, though, is something that's entirely different. |
|
|
|
plagiarism detected Reading your litepaper, which most of them are graphs and pictures, most of the text-part of your documents are found to be plagiarizing several sources. I hereby cordially invite you to defend yourself and give an explanation for a scam accusation raised here. |
|
|
|
I ve got scammed 3 years ago; they have stolen 5,6 btc from me.
[...]
Small minor details, but 3 years ago put us on... 2019? You sure it's not 2020? Web archiver shows that up to 30th of June 2019 the domain is still for sale. 2020 though, gave us a little peek of how the website used to look like. Not sure how this'll help, given their "about" page is not crawled. It is sure there are not real names of scammers, [...]
If any scan projects ever thought us anything, it is that they'll never use their real credentials. Names and photos can be taken without consent from social media. Scammers can even hogriding someone's LinkedIn profile to boost their credential. |
|
|
|
please ban this monkey he scammed me too
pplease ban this guy and his ip he is very evil scammer... not just a scammer
LOL whoa are you. Dude just stop using your alts for that drama. Hopefully i got an arguments against you soon. Just stay in touch. Hmm... Unfortunately, it's been more than one week since you promised to prove your innocence, and you haven't provide anthing, not even the smallest evidence to unhinge the accusation toward you. I hope I am wrong because I stil believe 50$ is a very small amount to risk a reputation, but... due to the stretched silence, I think we should conclude this case. |
|
|
|
As per ypur claim on your whitepaper, you have all of the required registration for your business, and according to your webpage, you're registered under "Gold Guaranteed Yazılım ve Teknoloji Ltd. Şti.". Now, my Turkish is nonexistent, but with Google's help, I can get the gist of what the search result under that name says:   Can you please she'd done light into this matter? |
|
|
|
And how come your mods have different knowledge on this matter? Does communication betr team is not well established? And by the way, I am still waitijgr for your clarification about the degree of responsibility and involvement of the Hermansyahs on this project |
|
|
|
You're the child project for this label/promoter/group: https://www.artiswarrecords.com/? If so, why don't they have any mention of you anywhere on their website and other media? Sure, they have a project callen AtEM, as well as NFT, but all of them are directly offered on their website, with zero mention of this project. The only thing that ties you to them is this picture from one of your team, which can be easily stolen from their page.  |
|
|
|
[...]
🧛♀️SKYVERSE offers you to create your METAVERSE AVTAR by uploading your photo
[...]
How safe will this photo uploading be? Basically, you're giving a different name to KYC and data collection. And what about the security risk of leak or breach into your database? Maybe I am not too familiar with the whole metaverse system, but wasn't the main idea of VR metaverse is an option to people to create any image they want? Wouldn't using their own image kinda defeat the purpose? and how can you be sure that the image they use for their avatar is rightfully theirs and not someone else's workout consent? |
|
|
|
Ok, so I got enough curiosity to peek into their telegram, a bit lost at first because the link on the opening post is for their old group, which rather quiet and abandoned. I found what you all refer as the different opinions between admins, as shown below:  However, this concerns me more:  It seems they're pretty generous on ban hammer, and rather sensitive about questions for topics. I can see on their pinned message that they have meetings, so it quite a reassuring factor, although from the video we can learn that tney barely introduce the whole team and it seems only use other Hermansyahs as their face, because I can only see Anang Hermansyah --I assume the one on the video is him because well... they looked the same-- on all of the videos, and barely other family members.
ASIX PLUS, I would really appreciate if you can clarify the issue with bounty debate between your moderators. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
