The forum DID NOT still keeping 1xbet running in their platform, kindly point out the evidence that bitcointalk promote, run, or shows any support toward the betting site. Nor they have the control and ability to ban the site.

Well... first thing first: sup fellas, LOL.


Been wondering, how important is the comments made on each report and/or how big is it on helping to make your work easier? Is a blank comment as useful as the one with some description?

I've put a negative trust the second they kicked me out of their tg as I think its rather obvious that they're evading the accusation... not that my rating matters as it didn't directly impacting them. So, thank you for tagging them for us.

Given the nature of their previous record with Moneta, and their shady decision in bounty --if we take Erdogan's statement as a fact-- I wonder if it's wise to raise a newbie flag against them, especially as they're still doing public sale --I'm just guessing here as I have no sources to check if their sale is still ongoing or concluded. Their shady action, alongside with rather questionable review on their other site, could indicate rug-pull.

Personally, I want to give benefits of doubts amd wait for them to give their defense, but as they ignoring my forum PM and removed me from TG, I somewhat think the possibility of them coming here is out of the horizon.

Dear lord, I was wrong... well, partially. Maybe Stabila didn't do a foul play with their WP, but --staying true to their root with Moneta-- other documents that they published are copying other works, and they claimed them as their own.

Stablila official scam accusation here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5390639.0

What happened: Plagiarizing documents --not their WP, other documents (plural)-- from different sources

Scammers Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3425174
Scammers Website: https://www.stabilascan.org/ | archived
Scammers ANN thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5379020.0 | archived
Plagiarized Documents:

Maybe they learned from their past action, their WP is actually rather clean. However, other documents of their project are not. Below is the list of documents available on their website which are copying content from others' work.

Brand Assets - Plagiarizing "Stablecoin Evolution and Market Trends"
Stabila Documentation - Plagiarizing Tron's Documentation
Stabila Asset Tokenization Plagiarizing 10XTS Article about Tokenization
Banking blueprint - Plagiarizing "Banking Blueprint for the Crypto World" by Arun Ghosh
Stabila for banks - Plagiarizing BCG's Article by Zubin Mogul

Additional Notes: Stabila is a child company of Moneta, a project with a plagiarizing history. In the past, upon being outed that their WP is stealing content, they defended themselves by saying that they hired content writer, and that some members are blackmailing them into paying some sum of money or else... well, they never shows the concrete evidence --screenshot and anything-- to backup their claim. Instead, they went full witch-hunt mode accusing and tagging anyone that stands against them.

I was notified by miWana about Stabila's connection with Moneta. Thanks to their help, the project enters my radar and I re-investigate them. The second section of this post is a snipped quote of what I wrote on the other thread in response to miWana's information, I'll copy them here to add them to the investigation materials for the case of fake team on top of the plagiarism accusation.

The third section of this post is what I called as a happy coincidence. Given that they've been online for days after I PMed them --they should have noticed my message and choose to ignore them-- and they gave no response, I decided to dive into their TG to well... notify them and take a look around their community. What I find is probably what we can say as a shilling service.

Some screenshot for easy view:

Brand Assets:


Documentation:


Asset Tokenization:


Banking Blueprint


Stabila for Banks:


And in case the team tried to get away from this accusation using the old excuse of "we hired a content writer and they copied material without our knowledge", allow me to add this evidence stating that their CEO, Daniel Varzari, is the author of the document, which --if they still insist they hired a writer-- means their CEO lied by claiming a paper that he didn't write as his.

---

---

---

So... what does their community think about their consensus network?






How about their decentralized feature?




So, overall, what do their community think about the project?


[note: the "valerstudio" username is a bounty hunter using the project's name and not Valerstudio's official tg handler]

---

---

Edit: notifying them via telegram as well, let's see if they'll come here or kick me out of their channel
Edit 2: they kicked me, LOL

Did you just... admitting a ban evasion? Wow, that's honest.

Yep, @19Serr was autobanned few months ago. And although it is allowed to create a new account for the sake of pleading the mod to reconsider the ban, you are not alowed to use the new account to do other things like posting or creating threads outside of the pleading, let alone joined bounty, because it'll be considered as ban evasion.

Yeah, AFAIK, Welsh took a very quick action on that issue, soon after I posted my suspicion --maybe within minutes, if not seconds-- he wiped them clean by himself.

P.s.: what's the address for checking that report status?

Ohh, forgive my lack of knowledge on the NFT generator site. Is it not for free? You mentioned that initially you want to issue 50 NFT, and their platform stated this:




As they gave a "free trial" of 100 NFT, and your initial NFT is 50, wuldn't it means the first NFTs you sold to fund your website are freely made?

In regards to your comparison with DegenApe, I failed to grasp how you both are in equal position so that you can compare yourself, nor I understand the point you tried to raise by comparing both of you

Three things:

One, it is correct that you're wrong on your thread placement. To make it simple, scam accusation board exist for people to report scam, and service announcement board is for --surprise, surprise-- announcing one's service. As your thread serves a purpose to announce your service, disregarding if it's paid or free, and not to accuse anyone, your thread should belong to the service board. If any, your thread title could mislead people who just read the title and not the posts within, backfire to you by giving an impression that "(I am posting a) scam report (thread about) Glasschain.org."

Two, your reasoning of using this board and not the others --because you feels that this is the right place as people came here to report scam-- is somewhat rather weak and could indicate a minimum effort to really chase scammers and contribute to cryptocommunity, because if you're really dedicate yourself to eradicate scam projects, you could actually post on the service ann board and frequently visit this board yourself to update your database by yourself based on the reports posted --and proven-- here instead of waiting for them to come to you.

Three, just out of curiosity, you claimed that your site, I quote, "do not store anything but the report." however, it appears to me that visitors on your website didn't have an option to decline your ToS upon accessing your website, that you will store some personal details, as there's only one button and it reads "accept". Why?

Let's see if I get this correctly, you want to sell NFT from a free NFT generator platform, so that you can fund your website, to promote your project, which will later conduct token sale?

Another question, why don't the users... holders, create their own NFT and have to buy from you? Given fhat the NFT you sell can be generated by themselves, for free, with the same platform.

I don't think I understand you correctly and, as a result, I failed to grasp what you tried to propose. Based on your "official website" link, you tried to offer an investment in form of NFT, with NFT that's created from a free generator inst of having a professional made them specifically for your project?

By "no fee blockchain framework", were you meaning an absolute 0 fee on each transaction, or were it a tad bit exaggerated for marketing purpose and there's still some --infinitesimals, perhaps-- fees involved?

Thank you for this follow up information. Stabila is off my radar, I didn't even expect Moneta to continue their works this far, given their account is no longer active since last year, and your tips helped me. I'm reinvestigating both project.

The situation in the past was --aside from the hilarious witch-hunt of accusing everybody of blackmailing them-- Moneta plagiarized whitepaper from many sources. I didn't think Stabila followed this path, especially because one third of their whitepaper is already allocated for terminology, which... by itself, is already prone to the art of ctrl+c+v. However, to prove myself wrong, I ran a duplichecker, and indeed the result is negligible.

With that out of our way, I want to lay some foundation about how Moneta and Stabila is connected. Just like the link you provide as well as stated on Moneta's website and Stabila's whitepaper, Stabila is the child company of Moneta and teamed by the same people.



Several things that raised my concern upon reinvestigating them are:

1. The change of their office(s).
Although it is quite understandable for company to relocate themselves, it is quite uncanny for them to close all of their office on big cities --and country-- and move to a rather remote umm... town?



Something that's perhaps worth mentioning about the building where they're located, it is notoriously known for being listed as the address of a shady offshore trading company, at least that's the impression I get from reading the auto-translated review from people cross contries.

2. The lack of details about their team.
Moneta listed 9 people as their team according to their website, but from 9 of these people, I can only verify 3 of them as a real person, in a sense that their name and record is searchable outside Moneta, and all 3 are the higher ups. From these three people, only 1 acknowledged his empoyment with Moneta, the other two didn't mention Moneta on their profile. These person are:

1. Daniel Varzari
Out of the three people, Mr. Varzari is the only one that shows and declare his relationship with Moneta, which should help us decide whether the project is real or not --if the only one person associated with the project is not provable as a real person, then it will be justified to question the project's legitimacy. However, there is an article published --and written by himself-- on the website of other companies that he's been a board director of.



2. Igor Scvortov
Mr. Scvortov mentioned an employment with Paragon Capital on his LinkedIn, but not Moneta. However, sadly, if you try to access Paragon's website --I deliberately put the entire link here instead of shorten the link with bbcode for fair play-- http://www.paragoncapital.com/, the site will redirect you to a website called e-lease, which rather feels like that the site as well as the project itself has failed and the site is now used by other user.



3. Anastasia Kovaleva
With a little dig, I managed to get a means of contact with Ms. Kovaleva. Well, to be honest, she's very active on social media and has a lot of press published about her, indicating that out of the three, she is the most real person. Details about her is deliberately not served here to respect her privacy, because of that very reason. However, below is the proof of contact.



With all of the evidences I can gather in a day laid for public, the ball is now out of my court. I'll notify Stabila about this thread and hopefully they'll be able to clarify things. The way I see it, the easiest way to strengthen their credibility is by asking Ms. Kovaleva to reply my DM and vouch for them.

---

P.s.: hmm... that's odd, their ann thread as well as other threads they owned are all locked. It is also brought to my attention that the thread is tagged by GazetaBitcoin as thread that utilizes bumping service. I guess I don't have other way but to contact them via PM.

Edit: proof of notifying Stabila

The conception that sport is luxury is brought by you. The general conception that the rest of the world held and believe is --common-- sport is very cheap. While for the exclusive and exotic sport, let's say horse-riding, as stated above based on anecdotal evidence by me, their community will be more than happy to pitch in.

And, again, repeated, governments on developing countries will most likely lend their hand to help talented athletes. Unless this part of statement [paragraph 2] is based on a research, kindly cite me the source of this claim.

In regards to nutrition, the common trend thus far is actually the opposite of your perception. Unless you're still living in the 90s, social media works really great for talented people who in need of support. Many talented athletes are paid to promote health products, which not only helps their income, it alo gives them proper nutrition from the product they represent. Thus your project is rather useless unless you can offer something more, which you don't.


Wait... what? So why'd you even here? The numbers are low, the government and society do their works, thank you very much.

This part is from your whitepaper:


This means, during the first tier which also will happen in the first year of team token release, team will own [(2B x 20%) / 2.5B] 16% of the current circulating supply. And given your first tier will ends when the tipping reached 200M USD, there will be a probability that the first tier ended in 1+ years, which means your team will own more token ratio to the current circulating supply.

Second, before we start, just to be sure, your basis is a tipping platform, correct?

I prefer this one, LOL.


What do you think about this thread [ANN][PX][PRESALE] ProtocolX Decentralized Trading Protocol on BSC [METAVERSE]⚡⚡? Their thread started to get infested by the bumping accounts on the list referred above as well as several bumping accounts tagged by lovesmayfamilis, such as:

--sorted in order of the oldest to newest post on their thread--
Z1_FINANCIAL - tagged by rikafip on the aforementioned list
LaCucina - on my additional list that completes rikafip's list
Predict Vision - Rikafip's
i8v8i - tagged by lovesmayfamilis
LunaFox - lovesmayfamilis'
SAWACrypto - mine
SDKmaster - lovesmayfamilis'
METASENSE - new one, untagged¹
TmHsHel - lovesmayfamilis'

However, it might be wise to mention that Protox.App deviates from the group's pattern as they never posted on other's thread.

As the likelihoodness of the group to do bumping for free --and that thread is certainly being bumped-- if we assume Protox.App is not part of the group, then they're either hired those shillers or --I rather doubted this theory-- those posts are made deliberately to throw off their scent.²

---

¹[ANN] ✨✨✨ METASENS ✨✨✨ Build the universal amusement park another with similar characteristics of bumping group that apparently missed from our initial sweep, their thread is no longer active, though
² I think I need to start tagging those bumping accounts for my future reference and convenience on tracking which account already reviewed and which account is new

---

Edit: [in reply to Welsh's post below] Noted, will report these accounts from this point forward whenever I stumbled upon them. I see that you've cleaned those posts on ProtocolX's thread, that was fast.

It might be biased due to the lack of other supportive evidence and my lack of knowledge on navigating through the site --this is my first time utilizing this analytic site-- but I wouldn't say that creating this thread or other accusation threads works in their favor.

True that the more mention about them across the forum directly impacting the visibility and optimization of the search engine for them, as evidenced by the increment in visitors graph, but if we judge from the time spent on site --about 2 mins-- I don't think those visitors really visits the site and played, I can't imagine why would people only play for 2 mins on a betting site.

Most likely --I imagined-- they stumbled upon the site maybe by referral or by own search for gambling site on google --or like naim027 raised concern, from the youtube channel-- got curious, looked around the site, and googled further about their legitimacy --as evidenced how 9% of those visitors goes to google right after-- before deciding it's not worth playing. Hopefully because they googled "1xbit scam" or something alike and served with results of threads after threads of accusations from bitcointalk forum. This forum still held a huge credibility and research-source for crypto community.



Source: https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/1xbit.com

Oh, wow! Not only innovative, you're deeply philosophical as well. Swole.

Let's see, I pondered upon the existential question the entire day and it shook my entire awareness... if I have to try to answer such magnificent question, and failed miserably, I'll start with my first attempt when I tried to address the question from literal perspective, the merriam-webster define matrix as:


and I thought, "no, this can't be it! Maybe the king was talking about something less literal and more metaphorical." It was after a full hour of deep meditation marinated in himalayan salt that I thought maybe you're referring to The Matrix, where everybody lives through a motion monotonously without being aware of the other outside factors, nor realizing the real world, the bigger picture out there, which means, being in the matrix means I am oblivious to the outside factors that's actually simple: you will not be in the same system as other crypto, or other matters, you live in the jungle! A metaphysical jungle! And, oh lord, how loud I gasped that night when I meet this realization: you're Morpheus! Or... Jaguar Paw. Honestly, can't decide between both. But fret not, as you've shaken my entire awareness of existence, I'll return the favor by giving you a question: what does it mean to have a delusion of grandeur?

Anyway, I am also in awe with your love to nature. Tell me, what happened with your initial plan that every holder has to plant one tree? You removed that part from your website.



Does the king care less and less of his throne that he decide the reforestation is futile? Hmm... then you have to be Morpheus! I'll take the blue pill, thank you.

Meanwhile, please explain to me again, in a very simple manner as I am still living in the matrix and couldn't see the bigger picture, what'll be your project's attempt to ensure price growth? Certainty it can't be as simple as "community vote", because I can't imagine that just because the community --I'll use the term "high council" so we can fit the themes better-- voted that the price will rise from 10 USD to 100, it instantly happened, no body want to buy 100 without any base.

Unfortunately, my king, I am afraid that you being failed to answer these questions --the clear plan of your project and the people behind the team-- would raise another red flag.

Aaannnddd... ladies and gentleman and attack helicopter, if you're looking for a sign, this is your first red flag. Please proceed with caution.


So you're saying that all transaction will happen OTC and/or p2p, forever? That'll be very convenient and liquid, what a breakthrough that'll be very appealing to investors and holders!!! Please tell me more, aside from this very innovative trading method, what's the other feature you offered to ensure growth?

LOL, seriously? In spite of your site, I'll bite.

You plan to go against 3 world problems; volatility, crashes, and inflation. How? You claimed that you've been around crypto for a really long time, what evidences can be used to prove this claim? You didn't even use your main account. And third, how exactly will your token price grow? What measures will you take to enforce these growth?