I haven't read your whitepaper yet, as it's 65 pages and definitely not what I'd like to call a light reading before bed, but meanwhile, as your project is an ERC-based token, it'll be more fitting if you move the topic to token sub-board. There should be a button to "move topic" at the bottom left of the page.

That doesn't exactly answered what I asked, ir even remotely close to covering the point. The question is: if anyone want to test your feature, they have to create account and/or login through firebase, where you possibility has access to see their data such as email and profile picture?

For a comparison so you get what's your competitors offered, craiyon didn't require you to create an account just because you're curious about their ai-image-generator.



And umm... where are we on the team details? I thought it'll be released "very soon" last week?

I don't think I understand correctly, were you saying that OP tried to cheat with multiple accounts and pooled the winnings into one account --not familiar with your platform, but I'll guess you allows user-to-user fund transfer-- and tried to withdraw them? If I understood you correctly, then OP is dumb, but can you provide a screenshot of multiple accounts transferring their winnings into the main account, to help backing up your claim?

You understand the message wrongly, OP tried to extort 1xbit --which, ironically, is the lesser of two evils on this case-- by asking for 1btc in exchange of OP deleting his post and give full access of his account to 1xbit, not offering.

The ulterior motive has also been nicely explained by OP on his second message, namely gathering customer's login details and funds confiscated,



Not sure how that'll scare 1xbit, given the best OP can do with the details he got is compiling a list of the victims and the total sum scammed, which would just further paint 1xbit one or two shades darker on their already vantablack reputation, where it's also quite established here that they couldn't care less about.

I see that your whitepaper is in Cyrillic, is there or will there be an English version available so I can read them and understand your project better? Kinda weird, at least to me, that you're ready to go global but your project details are lacking the supporting features to help achieving this goal. And do I understand correctly you're based in UEA?

If I have to be honest, prior to posting this thread and take a quick google search after it, I was divided between thinking if this is a serious offer of malicious software or is this an attempt to scam a scammer-wannabe, i.e.: offering a dud software. Sure, I've stumbled upon several people sharing their story of being hacked or warning about the possible hack through telegram, but this is the first time I finally "introduced" to the software and how it works; drain-ware, is what developers and cyber-security-analysts named them.


I think this software is not exclusively threatening newbies, inexperienced --or even experienced-- BM and those who dealt with contract-approval of web3 frequently are also at risk, in a sense that they might led into the trap in guise of escrow or NFT welcome bonus. Reading this article and from what can be inferred from the scammer's suggestion, one of the MO seems to be duplicating an existing platform, so even when people researching the said platform before they connect their wallet, they'll led to believe that the phishing site is legit as they shared the same name.

I'll dare say it won't be far, like... really, at all.

Read the negative feedback left by the DTs, 1xbit officials has denied that "Mark" is part of their management, or related to any degree with them. I think he just tried to collect database from email and the username. I'll discourage victims of 1xbit to send him any PM as per his request.

Uhh no, they're not. The OP of that thread, 1xbit1.com was an impersonator and not the official representative of their "new management".

Reading their opening post is enough to raise suspicion whether they really the representative or just someone tried collecting email and username for whatever reason. The negative feedbacks given by several members helps us with the link to the confirmation needed,

I saw that the account mentioned on my opening post is already nuked too. Big applause to the community and mods who work so quickly against this persistent user.


Will update this thread and reporting to Lafu's thread next time I stumbled upon them. I've set the notifier to inform me whenever some phrases used on their thread are being mentioned again on this forum, hopefully it'll work and help tackle this scammer easier.

---

yhiaali3, edited as suggested.

What happened: Offering malicious script to drain crypto from its unsuspecting victims
Suspect's Profile Link: Xdrainer543tre
Suspect's Website:
archived
Suspect's ANN thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5445535.0

Additional Notes:
I initially hoped I understand their service wrongly, that they offered a service of blacklisted address so their user could proceed with caution, much like... that specific user who offered such service on neighboring sub-board. I honestly not sure if raising this thread would works against their favor by limiting their movement or I did a mistake by offerring a free advertising for their service, but I thought it's better be reported so unsuspecting people would proceed with caution.

It might be worth mentioning that --I think-- the service looks and works like the one thread in the past where the user's fund were drained after he approved a contract [can't find it although I've spent long minutes on ninjastic and generous time by manually leafing through the scam accusation and reputation board].

Some screenshot for easy view:






archived source: https://archive.fo/2mkOe

It might be wise to add here that they're available on playstore [android] under the name "iEarn bot Plus" and appstore [iOS] on "pro iEarn bot", just in case anyone googling their app name, seeking review before signing up, not realizing that those app are the ones the article published by BBC on OP's opening post talked about.

I understand correctly that CG has not made their decision yet and still verifying the photos and video? If it is, then I think the best all of us can do now is wait for their findings and see what their final decision is. Though --judging from their reply which you copied from CG above-- TD's representative seemed wouldn't care about the findings and still persist on their initial decision, suppose you shared the truth here and the evidences you give are verified by CG to be original and raw --i.e.: TD somewhat tampered the evidences themselves to win the case-- the verdict would still be shown on CG's page for anyone to see and help them consider the platform.

Given the accussed was online yesterday and still no response to address the concerns raised on this thread, I will leave negative feedback for the time being until everything proven and said differently than the initial suspicion.

But for the time being, anyone signing up on your site just to try your flagship feature will have to get through firebase? I understand that it's automated service, but I also understand --if I perceive it correctly-- that there's a way for the web developers to collect the data, wouldn't you agree that it'll contribute certain degree of reluctance from the users? Especially as your competitors doesn't require any data for people just to try their service.

Up to this point where this post was made, only AG gave the final verdict that OP submitted a photoshopped KYC document. Their case on CG is still open as CG's representative asked for OP's side of proof after verifying that the submitted docs from TD is indeed manipulated, to be sure that they've verified evidences from both side and both side were given equal treatment, just in case something happened like what logfiles concerned.

OP has submitted 6 evidences to support his claim and is currently under CG's verification. Only after CG get through these submitted evidences and give their verdict that we can say for sure what really happened.

---

I've been crossed path with Stalker22 on this sub-board numerous times, I am quite confident and can assure you he's not paid or siding with TD or any sides, just slightly misunderstood your case.

Talking about "misunderstood" and "confident" in the same sentence, unfortunately --or hillariously-- I have another one coming: I am quite confident that I misunderstood your reply quoted above.

To clarify, you're not saying that you are not the one who filed this complaint under username "juz62" on AG, and instead you tried to say that you didn't get a chance to give your side of evidences on the complaint on AG?

Only after obtaining an extra permit for conducting the activities, I assume? So you'll still need to submit a request for an "expansion"? Or do I understand it wrong?

"[...] as well as any other commercial activity that is not prohibited by law, but when there is a registration or permit regime - after registration, respectively - after obtaining the relevant permit or license."

I could understand very well if a law allows business entity to work outside the sector they initially registered themselves as, but only after/with extra license. Many companies did this around the world, working outside the initial sector they registered as, but they also have the required permit to do so.

But of course I can understand that Bulgaria maybe applied a different policy. Can you please help us by pointing out the specific clause on Bulgaria's constitution which state as you claimed? That you can do anything allowed by the law in EU, such as constructing and opening investment for solar energy farm, with business registered under IT services?

They did. CG's representative finally made OP's replies available for public. Their position so far is that TD sent them the allegedly edited passport, which the arbitrator verified to be true, and they're now offering OP to upload another picture of their passport to double check from both sides.



OP, alol1986, if you're really the side being wronged on this case and your KYC is real. I think this is the chance where you cou offer to send video evidence alongside the new picture as requested by Nikolas.

---

Edit: I just realized from glancing at TD's ANN thread that OP also simultaneously opened a ticket to AskGamblers, which TD announced as clear based on the verdict given by AG's representative upon checking evidences given by TD.

fixing your quote pyramid

I think a video type of documentation is harder to be forged, thus gives more reliability upon being original, unless OP is somewhat --like I previously said-- an professional video editor. But if that's also proven to be quite difficult to be verified, I think OP can --if they would-- ask for video conference. I would boldly presume video editing is damn near difficult during live feeds, and if the passport in their country works as how mine works, they will have holograms and other security measures that'll rather hard to be forged --as in OP printed a fake passport and hold it during the video conference-- thus authenticating it and OP's credibility would be easier.

And looking at the thread on CG, I think it's less to the representative took a long time to verify the documents and more to because OP send several new evidences. If you look closely, OP uploaded another posts that --as per this post was made-- were kept as private for review  three days ago and six hours ago,



This could mean two things, IMO, either CG internally --maybe by email-- asked OP to provide another evidences because the other ones are invalid, or OP voluntarily provided a video as evidence like what some of us here suggested.

Hi, forgive my cluelessness, but where is the details about these transparent team located at? I can't seems to find it anywhere on your site. And with a little effort of digging your whitepaper, I think it is rather short to be considered as a clean whitepaper, don't you agree

https://cswapfinance.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/whitepaper.pdf

Interesting, to sign up and try your platform, we can only sign in with our existing Google account and there's no other method like manually creating an account in your system? Am I correct? And you'll get these info as shown in the picture below upon us "connecting" our account to your platform?