Wait... So you're planning to withheld such crucial information that'll help people determine the profitability --well, possible profitability-- of your project and what they'll get upon investing on you, and decide to let them join private sale --and possibility latter, suppose the info is still not made public during public sale-- based on faith?
I am failed to see the logical reason or the benefits of withholding such info if those information is ready and available --you have those details on your initial concept, right?-- as those info can be really helpful for investors to estimate your project.
Such info is not important now, it's important later after the testnet launch so that people know how much fees are paying when trading and not now when they need more informations about how the protocol works and the features and informations about the token sale. Arguably not important, some would think it is rather crucial for decision making. No matter what people think, there's no harm in providing that info. It is easy --easier than typing excuses and evasion like you keep doing-- and readily available as it should've been on your core strategy |
|
|
|
As this is not OP's first questionable project, I wondered if a newbie-flag is necessary. For example: BabyEuro was created back in 13 August 2021, seemingly without website or anything other than telegram, which... in less than a year, is no longer accessible, most likey an abandoned project. Fegnomic also didn't have any website, was first announced on 14 October with their telegram group last activity was back in 7 November and their ann channel is no longer accessible, another abandoned project. Polynomic has a website... which I can't access. No telegram group and channel, though, So I can't really tell how long did it take before the project sunk. Fegzilla has a "better" fate with their website still running and their telegram group still accessible, but wait... the chat on that group is extremely sporadic, jumping from November to January to March, and filled with trashy announcements and useless chats. Zillamatrix? Same fate. Inaccessible website and their telegram's last activity was on 26 November, a mere two weeks from their initial ann thread. Even if they're not the owner of the project and just paid to publish the ann --which IMO, judging from how 11 of their 11 posts are project announcement where they didn't even bother to post any update, is kinda likely to be the case here-- they still deserves a warning flag as newbies could fall into their "lucrative" project(s). I will edit this post with link to the flag or create a thread regarding accusation against the user --not the project, to cover the whole cases-- if needed. |
|
|
|
Another group of ANN threads that hired bumping service just discovered. If anyone has any doubt about what's going on, just look at the screenshot below and the same group of 7 accounts working across at least 6 threads. There are probably more but this was enough to make a point and provide enough proof.
[...]
Uhh... 13, you're missing some others. I color coded them here. Aside from bumping --and shilling as their post shows fake enthusiasm-- they also cheated several bounties by enrolling their accounts altogether. Proof of connection in form of transactions between wallets are also documented.    |
|
|
|
Since you're so insistent that you're wrongly accused and those accounts were not related to you at any degree, that you're the victim here and those users use your credentials without your knowledge, these are the addresses you ever used to enroll to bounties: 0xE816462EA2812c91028C5f406EE9Ef0Fe6140122 10x34C9C81398a57D2248d2f3327947b3D55b914E130x253269a4386BF8104b67DAd22FE46f3f5aad36A20x68c31f4e128fb6257280b5685e5f919ada7f3e930xF85c3cF3F81C9fc92FaBaec532493cAC886b63650x5B98bF1B1AAbd44bc40182D8BFDe8d558cA5B40b0x59181d515a44daf4d1a7e1f8f923811c6e15eb9c20x01b3829a062cAa6fE7aBEaA9B5A081E1DDeBe19F0x2b53afbc3acab8fbcfec426e3ae5361ecdf295ea 310xE816462EA2812c91028C5f406EE9Ef0Fe6140122 was used by the following users other than yourself: TahminaMim with your details which later edited to their own, NuhaNurul with your details which later also edited to their own, and Ohid2021 which later deleted. 2This is the address in question which ties you to Hrlove. In your defense, those are not your account and they stole your identity --which, more or less, is like the case of address number 1 above, where they stole your ID and later changed them. But interestingly, if we look at point number 3 below, you did the same with below address 3According to the autorecord before you ninja edit the post, the address was used by you, with username BountyManager99, at first to enroll for username TahminaMim, which later changed to your own username and details. Point number 3 would at least ties you to TahminaMim, unless if you tried to claim that by some miracle you both copied each other PoA and later edited them. And if you're tied to TahminaMim, it won't be too far fetched to assume that the other accounts accused on the posts above are also tied to you |
|
|
|
You missed my question about the exact fees rate for each of your feature.
For 2 and 5, if you hold the IDO for 1 month, wouldn't it delays the development for funds that require the IDO fund to proceed with their milestones, and with the thing delayed for 1 month, we couldn't be sure if the project is scam or not, given they couldn't come with any result
We'll share all that when the dex goes for the public testnet... Private Sale Started!
Wait... So you're planning to withheld such crucial information that'll help people determine the profitability --well, possible profitability-- of your project and what they'll get upon investing on you, and decide to let them join private sale --and possibility latter, suppose the info is still not made public during public sale-- based on faith? I am failed to see the logical reason or the benefits of withholding such info if those information is ready and available --you have those details on your initial concept, right?-- as those info can be really helpful for investors to estimate your project. |
|
|
|
So, in exact number, what's your rate for each of your feature?
And with point number 1 almost cleared, I am adding point 2 and 5 simultaneously as they're within the same topic. What'd you propose, then? For both the improvement in security and the clean DEX.
You're certainly wouldn't be that naive to think that just because you said you're clean and conduct a research before listing a project, your platform will be 100% free of rug-pull projects and that people would be totally assured --especially those with bitter experience of 2018 ICO fever-- that all of the projects you hosted is shady-free? Unless there a guarantee or some other method you propose to ensure this situation?
We'll hold the funds of the IDO 1month before sending it to the project, to make sure there will be no dumps or we'll send back the funds to the IDO buyers. Also, we'll make sure the team doesn't have more than 10% of the total supply unlocked, they must lock all unused tokens like we did. So, even if they dump they'll just dump 15% and we'll know that and stop it. Better than dumping 60% of the supply. You missed my question about the exact fees rate for each of your feature. For 2 and 5, if you hold the IDO for 1 month, wouldn't it delays the development for funds that require the IDO fund to proceed with their milestones, and with the thing delayed for 1 month, we couldn't be sure if the project is scam or not, given they couldn't come with any result |
|
|
|
I think I'll take one point by one others to keep the focus steady. So, I'll took my first point and pick up the four others later once the first one cleared up.
Were you referring to gas fee? Because DEX's fee --as I previously said-- is very small. Uniswap and sushi took 0.3% while PCS is 0.25%. Now if you're talking about the gas fee, there's literally nothing a dex platform can do, as this rate is determined by the miners, which again, kinda solved by the emergence of low fee chains like BSC and polygon. With those said, it means the only factor a dex can manipulate is their fee itself, so the question would be: on what rate will your DEX be that you're confident enough you'll appeal traders to use your platform because you "solve" this high fee problem?
Zero Fee system, how would that work? We can take our fees from other products such as The Launchpad, NFT Marketplace and The Liquidity Pools. If you could apply this rate, I'll have to admit that it'll be quite appealing and a possible bargaining power against PCS --leave Uniswap from the equation as their erc miners fee is obviously can not be compared here-- however, will this decision impacting other aspects of your platform, e.g. your fees for launchpad, NFT marketplace and LP will be higher than other platforms? If this decision could affect other aspects of our platform we wouldn't do it, it will be the cheapest and the best platform. Most projects just think about getting rich by either taking high fees or by dumping their team tokens and minting more... We have a fixed total supply of 100M and we have already locked 50% of the total supply (Proof). So, in exact number, what's your rate for each of your feature? And with point number 1 almost cleared, I am adding point 2 and 5 simultaneously as they're within the same topic. What'd you propose, then? For both the improvement in security and the clean DEX. You're certainly wouldn't be that naive to think that just because you said you're clean and conduct a research before listing a project, your platform will be 100% free of rug-pull projects and that people would be totally assured --especially those with bitter experience of 2018 ICO fever-- that all of the projects you hosted is shady-free? Unless there a guarantee or some other method you propose to ensure this situation? |
|
|
|
Well, the project were offering a grand 382,945.41% APY in 12 months, that's 3,829 times of your initial investment in one year, I wouldn't be so surpised if they have something fishy like a rug-pull build up being cooked in their kitchen. Speculation aside and facts first, were there an agreement or statement before the bounty begin that the bounty allocation is USD-pegged, in sense that they're allocating 300,000 USD for bounty that's paid in SAFUU, and not --let's say-- 20,000 SAFUU regardless of its USD rate? If the former is what's agreed, then their decision to burn some of the bounty tokens in assumption that their rate will continue to grow up and matched 300,000 USD on distribution date is rather justified. If it is the later though, it means they cheated agreements. While for the burn address, just like what witcher_sense said, is there any proof or prior statement that they possess or didn't possess the private key of the address? Although it is rather unusual for project to create their own burn address instead of using the existing usual 0x00...dead, theoritically, it is not impossible to create a wallet "without" private key. Looking for some materials to get a better insight for this case, I stumbled upon several methods proposed by some people in reddit. Two of them were by creating a paper wallet but not storing the recovery key, and the other is, although the method's efficiency is yet to be confirmed by anyone, by "tweaking" a generated address: I created a burn address for a BSC token by taking a normal BSC wallet address and replacing all of the actual numbers with 0's.
example:
portion of Original address: 0xc20bd506d3ac925e5e....
portion of Address after I altered it: 0xc00bd000d0ac000e0e...
[...]
So, unless there is a proof or prior statement about the existence of the private key for Safuu's firepit, we can't just accuse them of possessing the backup for said address. |
|
|
|
I think I'll take one point by one others to keep the focus steady. So, I'll took my first point and pick up the four others later once the first one cleared up.
Were you referring to gas fee? Because DEX's fee --as I previously said-- is very small. Uniswap and sushi took 0.3% while PCS is 0.25%. Now if you're talking about the gas fee, there's literally nothing a dex platform can do, as this rate is determined by the miners, which again, kinda solved by the emergence of low fee chains like BSC and polygon. With those said, it means the only factor a dex can manipulate is their fee itself, so the question would be: on what rate will your DEX be that you're confident enough you'll appeal traders to use your platform because you "solve" this high fee problem?
Zero Fee system, how would that work? We can take our fees from other products such as The Launchpad, NFT Marketplace and The Liquidity Pools. If you could apply this rate, I'll have to admit that it'll be quite appealing and a possible bargaining power against PCS --leave Uniswap from the equation as their erc miners fee is obviously can not be compared here-- however, will this decision impacting other aspects of your platform, e.g. your fees for launchpad, NFT marketplace and LP will be higher than other platforms? |
|
|
|
I am excited to inform you that you're completely ignoring my latest post on your thread. Certainly a good and prestigious financial firm won't do such a mistake of ignoring queries, no matter how stupid the question is? And if you visit and do a bumping comment on the other project, please also inform YachtX that they also failed to answer my last post. |
|
|
|
Aandd... you just make it worse. You tried to say that your major selling point and feature is that --unlike the old and conventional lottery-- no body lose. By purchasing 10 Clotba, we're eligible for a lifetime entry to the weekly lottery? Don't you agree that it'll just further de-motivate people to buy each week? Why do they need to spent another money if they already have an entry? Which, further decrease the reward pool, which further discourage new joiners to actually buy and join, given they'll see that the amount is even less. This cycle is repeated until no one buy, and the project got abandoned by team.
my impression here -- if they will ever push thru this lottery platform, they won't last. maybe they will create some hype but seems that they have no solid development here. maybe, they thought they are just riding the bandwagon, decentralised gaming...but it is all in how the team will deploy the project and the rep is not doing his job. you are right, if once the player bought the ticket one time and they have access to succeeding lotteries, then, why buy the next time around? the people behind this should re-think their concept of lottery system here. I talked to the developers about your message, they said they have made the following updates. They plan to integrate with the casinos by making casino agreements and the income will be transferred to the Clotba staking contract (the relevant contract is being prepared). In addition, online games will be integrated into the system and the revenues from this will be transferred to the staking contract. They stated that they will implement a different time-limited model in the staking process, permanent staking will not be possible, 6% deduction will be made for each entry and exit, and staking revenues will be given to the stakers, again in the form of a lottery. They stated that they would establish a dynamic lottery system in this way. So they'll solve this "glitch" in their brilliant concept by now offering a casino and online games? Will this casino be their own? Or will they make partnership with existing casinos? What online games? |
|
|
|
[...]
If I may just jump into my questions, as it is rather confirmed that you're indeed --at the very least, if not more-- caters the same service as PCS and their colleague, this is from your whitepaper:
[mage snip]
Can you please explain more on these matters, about how those things are still a current problem, with each numbers represents your point on the whitepaper:
1. This problem is solved through PCS and other dexes with infinitesimal fees.
2. Again, solved through dex --PCS, uniswap, and even binance dex-- with their non-custodial nature.
3. If a trader asked about this, then they need to read more about the rule of thumbs in crypto trading: never put your money in an exchange, it's not your money as long a you didn't hold the key, etc. Which... also kinda solved by DEXes ans swapping platform. So what's your point here?
4. Yes, it is possible go get NFT, metaverse, defi space, and even perhaps meme token in one plarform. I cordially invite you to visit the altcoin token section on this forum. Spoiler alert: you'll be surprised.
5. Now, this is a recurring amd currently unsolved situation. But, what's your solution?
As for the section after it, the "solutions" you propose, I'll have to echo what jc12345 said, zi didn't find something new on your solution. Literally all five of them are "features" that's been offered by tons of projects
1. Even if there are many dexes up there, they're still taking a high fee for trading. Including Binance Dex. 2. Most likely solved, but we'll come with more improvements and new releases of contracts. Staying up to date is an important thing. 3. Our point here is that most people are transferring their assets daily from an exchange to another one, because there is no exchange that holds all the needed features. - For example Binance is centralized and host most features. Binance Dex decentralized but has only few features that traders need. - Our goal is to bring all those features in one decentralized exchange: Spot Trading, Margin & Futures, NFT Marketplace, IDO & NFT Launchpad and finally Metaverse. Holding one of those features is easy, but holding all of them in one DEX is hard and that's our Goal. 4. Most projects offer 1 product or a max of 3. 5. Creating a clean decentralized exchange, and studying the whole project before listing it. Because most exchanges don't really care about the if the project is real or scam, they just want the Listing Fee. I think I'll take one point by one others to keep the focus steady. So, I'll took my first point and pick up the four others later once the first one cleared up. Were you referring to gas fee? Because DEX's fee --as I previously said-- is very small. Uniswap and sushi took 0.3% while PCS is 0.25%. Now if you're talking about the gas fee, there's literally nothing a dex platform can do, as this rate is determined by the miners, which again, kinda solved by the emergence of low fee chains like BSC and polygon. With those said, it means the only factor a dex can manipulate is their fee itself, so the question would be: on what rate will your DEX be that you're confident enough you'll appeal traders to use your platform because you "solve" this high fee problem? |
|
|
|
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the impression I get after reading your whitepaper is that you're akin to trustwallet-PCS and metamask-Uniswap? Or is there an extra thing that I need to know before I ask further?
You can say that we're a binance dex, in binance you find everything you want incuding trading, margin, derivatives, nft, launchpad. In Protocol X you'll find all those things the only difference is that we're fully decentralized and binance is fully centralized. Sorry, but I ends up getting confused because your explanation is rather not correct. You put yourself in equal to Binance dex, with a difference that you're fully decentrlized and they're not. But inance dex is not cenralized, tey're non-custodial dex --as the name indicate-- where you trade directly with other users using walletconnect or priv key. Am I wrong? If I may just jump into my questions, as it is rather confirmed that you're indeed --at the very least, if not more-- caters the same service as PCS and their colleague, this is from your whitepaper:  Can you please explain more on these matters, about how those things are still a current problem, with each numbers represents your point on the whitepaper: 1. This problem is solved through PCS and other dexes with infinitesimal fees. 2. Again, solved through dex --PCS, uniswap, and even binance dex-- with their non-custodial nature. 3. If a trader asked about this, then they need to read more about the rule of thumbs in crypto trading: never put your money in an exchange, it's not your money as long a you didn't hold the key, etc. Which... also kinda solved by DEXes ans swapping platform. So what's your point here? 4. Yes, it is possible go get NFT, metaverse, defi space, and even perhaps meme token in one plarform. I cordially invite you to visit the altcoin token section on this forum. Spoiler alert: you'll be surprised. 5. Now, this is a recurring amd currently unsolved situation. But, what's your solution? As for the section after it, the "solutions" you propose, I'll have to echo what jc12345 said, zi didn't find something new on your solution. Literally all five of them are "features" that's been offered by tons of projects |
|
|
|
[...] In regards to tax evasion:
--as well as correspondence to the earlier section about demographic, which I'd really love you to prove me I am wrong, that you've already did the segmentation stage analysis; on this particular topic, geographical demographic-- please tell me which countries that allow exclusion of wealth in crypto form and which countries do you plan your first customers to be and/or which regions do your partners usually catered their customer at. We are backed by a private capital firm based in Dubai known as Big Rock Private Capital. So with our initial plans, we are planning to target the customers in Dubai since we have credibility from a private firm there. It correlates to our luxury vacations since Dubai is one place that indulges in a luxury vacation. Since our team is just in the initial phase, we already have thousands of members on telegram, which helps us identify their demographics to a certain degree. Hopefully, we can develop a good roster of the regions and more in-depth details in the future. [...] Oh wow, this is interesting that I am going to drop every other topic I raised to pursue this matter and meet the bottom of it. This private capital firm who back you up, this is the aforementioned firm who conduct the first hand survey that one of their client prefers crypto and thus made a summary which became the basis of your project? This is the top-tier luxury villa provider? And they're in Dubai? And this is their website, which clearly confirm your claim that you're partnering with them as they mentioned you on their website.  But... wait, how big are they, again? Not that the age of website determines its reputation, but how could a prestigious firm only made their website barely two months ago? With their buttons barely functional? The "our offices" is just a placeholder? The image on their website is stolen from "Namaste", a yacht who docked in Italy?    Oh, talking about country of origins... This firm is in Dubai, UEA? Funny, their govt didn't list the company. Was it an unlisted, illegal company, just like how you suggest your people to evade tax?  |
|
|
|
|
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the impression I get after reading your whitepaper is that you're akin to trustwallet-PCS and metamask-Uniswap? Or is there an extra thing that I need to know before I ask further?
|
|
|
|
[...] P.S. I made an account today and right now, just to reply on your comment  This is quite interesting, you have an active newbie-warning flag and a scam accusation for fake team profile on your past project. For this one, I need to take some detour and do an extra dig to get a better profile of your team, as your whitepaper only gave very vague details like this [image snip] What's interesting is, in spite of the claim that he has a very broad experience, his LinkedIn looks awfully empty, almost like it's newly created, or at least were not managed by someone with such claim of background. [image snip] And that the buttons on your website is mostly did nothing other than --I assume-- for aesthetic looks, the "about us" didn't bring us anywhere, etc. With all above said, and an extra stress on the previous proven accusation, why do we have to trust this project? Since you've made an account and is capable of writing your own post and thread, and given the account posting this thread is flagged and negative trusted by DT, I'll advise you to ask the thread owner to remove the entire content from this thread via edit --deleting thread is not possible if you're not mod--, disassociate yourself from the thread owner, and made your own thread. I am not pushing you to pay the membership, just saying this as a small advise and matter of information, you'll need to pay a copper member in order for your newbie rank to be able to post image, and although that means an extra expense, but it'll be better than being automatically assumed as a scam project due to an association with tagged account. Regardless of copper membership or not, suppose you heed my advise and create a thread of your own, we'll continue our discussion there |
|
|
|
This is quite interesting, you have an active newbie-warning flag and a scam accusation for fake team profile on your past project. For this one, I need to take some detour and do an extra dig to get a better profile of your team, as your whitepaper only gave very vague details like this  What's interesting is, in spite of the claim that he has a very broad experience, his LinkedIn looks awfully empty, almost like it's newly created, or at least were not managed by someone with such claim of background.  And that the buttons on your website is mostly did nothing other than --I assume-- for aesthetic looks, the "about us" didn't bring us anywhere, etc. With all above said, and an extra stress on the previous proven accusation, why do we have to trust this project? |
|
|
|
I had to ask, given some people gave their statements here about how poor your bounty managing performance is, did you do a at least a quick research for the project you're about to manage? Or were you thinking that by writing this statement, you're free of all of any possible repercussions? ATTENTION! OUR TEAM DOESN'T DO TOKEN DISTRIBUTION AFTER THE BOUNTY CAMPAIGN IS ENDED - THE PROJECT FOUNDER DOES IT! WE DO NOT ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR DISTRIBUTION. OUR TASK CONSISTS ONLY IN CONDUCTING A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN. ALSO BY THIS MESSAGE, WE CONFIRM THAT THE FOUNDER WANTED TO CARRY OUT A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN AND IN THE COURSE ON COOPERATION. WE ARE NOT A MEMBER OF THE PROJECT. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE, THEN PLEASE DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE BOUNTY CAMPAIGN.
If I may remind you, although it is on every participants duty to do their own DD, a CM and BM were still responsible to do their own DD to at least see how likely the project to be a rug pull, because their action of moderating the project implies their confidence for the said project and can be seen as a support toward the project. With that out of the way and assuming your answer is, "yes, I do my DD" --because if you said otherwise, that you just randomly accept any project hiring you as their BM, we'll have a whole different situation and conversation here-- then how come you deemed project with these quality of whitepaper like below to have a likeliness, no matter how slight, to stay for a long term? This is the one you raised on the accusation:  They have no clear date of roadmap, just "phase 1" and so on. How did this exactly shows a carefully planned and well thoroughly thought project? Their whitepaper is just 8 pages long and two of them were dedicated for cover --plus one for the obscure roadmap. Another one of the whitepaper of the project which bounty you managed with similar situation:  Their entire whitepaper is just 9 pages long, with 2 pages allocated for front and back cover, and the other 7 serves basic and uninsightful content. And like CoinSale, their project hasno clear roadmap . This one has a very trashy telegram group, with a questionable channel name --I even had to double check just to be sure I landed on the correct group-- and filled with spam bot.   So my question is --assuming you said that you've done your part to sort which project is an utter trash and which aren't-- how do you determine those project with such quality as something prospective? Or did you couldn't care less as long as you get paid? |
|
|
|
Ahh, how happy I am to learn that it wasn't just me that think they're a bit off. I've been curious and suspecting that they're part of a group, unfortunately I didn't have enough evidence to proof that they're indeed connected --other than the aforementioned same thread ann style and each of them commenting each other's thread. I've been asking details about their project for a while and each of them, one by one, started to "didn't see" my questions So far, what I can gather from them before they stopped replied my barrage of questions were: Nexum - well... I am ashamed that I closed my topic with them as that field is rather unfamiliar for me. Predict Vision - I didn't get into this project Z1 Financial - Practicing a rather discouraging decision of the equivalent of nepotism by offerring 30% of the private sale token --sold at lower price than public token sale-- to their staffYachtX - where do I start? Let's see... Ohh, they encourage their customer to use their service to avoid taxes, or in their own words, tax benefits.Goge - failed to prove the charities they mentioned they did, also didn't want to divulge team in fear of "some of us were living in a non-LGBT-friendly zone"clime finance - I didn't get into this project With that said and my suspicion shown to be quite justified, i took a slightly deeper search and found these other threads with similar thread title style, similar post pattern [see quoted below], and within these thread are username with bumping services that's already tagged by lovesmayfamilis, so I think they who rikafip listef above is a part of the same bumping service
Thank you for provided links. I just check the price of the Shuna token
Shuna Inuverse SHUNAV2 Rank #3848
Shuna Inuverse Price (SHUNAV2) $0.0000001379 32.15%
0.000000000004 BTC32.61%
0.000000000057 ETH33.33%
SHUNAV2 rise while the whole cryptocurrency market falls.
32% rise during market fall means that investors really believe in the prospects of the project.
I just checked the price of Doge Gay Son Price (GOGE). It continues to raise. The idea to create a metaverse now is very popular and many projects create their own metaverses for the community that support the ideas of the project. A metaverse is a place that is able to unite the people who support the same ideas. Such kind of virtual lends with all useful tools create $GOG
Just check the price. Imagine 32% during one day.Doge Gay Son Price (GOGE) $0.00001372 31.54% 0.000000000316 BTC16.02% 0.000000004697 ETH18.36% It means that people really like the idea of the metaverse and the products and community that $GOGE People want peace and they need peace. Peace all over the world. There is a big demand for peace. |
|
|
|
I accept the fact that these are real people but the project's team messed the whole thing up, wrong links here and there I mean what kind of project management is this? Also I'm suspecting that these influencers aren't even aware that they are been used, none of these people posted anything related to this project on their social media.
Did you read my post carefully? Although I have to agree that their professionalism and competence are quite questionable in regards to wrongly linking username of their "partners", your suspicion is proven to be wrong. If you see the images on my previous post, you can see that the accounts they announced as their influencer on their feeds did posted content about influencio on their own Ig story. This proves that your claim of they're not even aware that they are being used is wrong as I am sure --unless the influencio team is a hacker who hacked each of those influencers' ig profile just to post a story, and that those influencers somehow didn't notice an extra content on their story-- those stories didn't upload themselves, those influencers post the content on their consent. Just to satisfy my curiosity and double check, I looked at their ig once more few good hours ago and managed to snip some evidences.    However, it need to be noted that partnering with tons of influencer didn't directly translates as a good project. One of the best example of this is the McAfee's situation. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
