First thing to be confirmed, were the screenshot of the conversation is true, i.e. you're "Crypto Has" and the conversation between you and him really happened, at least up to the screenshot below? Not judging which side said the truth and which side lied as it is too soon to pass the judgement, but suppose the answer for both question is yes, and that you're really waiting for him to send transaction before proceeding to do the job, why didn't you say anything when he gave a screenshot of transaction to the address --assuming, if they lied, then the address on the screenshot is not yours because if it is, then keraldk would have finished their side of contract by paying you-- knowing that they gave a screenshot of a transfer to a wrong address.

For reference, the address is indeed credited with USDT and immediately drained, https://bscscan.com/address/0x0707d5e717f3090bdc6f8893fee2c3d12c27bb05

I'm trying to understand this, so you agreed to pay him upfront, 50 USDT, to fix your coding error, and after he received payment, he deleted all of your conversation? Is there any proof to backup this claim? Like the empty chat room or a sign that they blocked you? I am not doubting anyone, just trying to be logical as 50 seem... too low to risk a reputation.

Meanwhile, I see that ThatsMod is online today, I'll try to reach him through PM to invite him here and give his side of the story.

---

---

Edit: invited

What happened: Either a seriously severe case of plagiarism and recycle, or rugpull, or both.
Suspect's Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3410072
Suspect's Website:

• BabyShibaFloki - archived
• ShibaGamesToken - archived
• FlokiMonk - archived
• ShibaSurfers - Error
• ShibaHunter - archived
• MetaFarmDAO - Seemingly no longer active
• MetaCity - I can't find their website
• FighterShiba - archived
• MetaVillageDAO - archived
• MetaDragonCity - archived
• MetaTownship - archived
• ArabianCity - archived special thanks to mandor for digging their web address

Suspect's ANN threads list: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3410072;sa=showPosts | archived

And this is the part where things get a tad bit more interesting. The suspect seems to recycle their whitepaper from the old projects to the new ones, which... the original WP itself is copying from other sources [see screenshot section below]. Basically, they create a project, abandoned it after a few days, and made another one, an exact copy, with different name. So if Cryptokool001 said they're just hired to be a CM, they did an extremely awful job of DD because they can't even spot plagiarized materials which an exact copy of the project they previously moderated. With that said, I think it is safe to rule out the old "I'm not part of team" excuse.

Second, rug pull. 2 out of 12 of their projects telegram group are no longer available, and the others were not so good, with months of gaps in between chat, all were only made by the team because they limit their members from writing on the group, most likely to prevent people asking something like this:


which wouldn't be too far fetched to think that the latest and the ones that is yet to come will also be a quick money grab before they abandoned their TG group. Departing from this opinion, I think I am not too harsh to the suspect if I raised a newbie-warning flag against them, and hopefully people will support to activate it.

Flag raised: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2963

Some screenshot for easy view:

Nice findings! This is as what I'm afraid of, I've has a feeling that they'll raise one or two red flag, like fake team or plagiarism. The source they plagiarized though, is another project by the OP that seems to be failed. I think I'll launch a deep look into the user --not the project-- once I get some free time at hand.

I read your entire post yesterday and tried to give it a good night sleep and re-read them again today in hope for a new perspective. And the impression I get still the same as last night:

Where exactly on your narrative is the scam attempt happen? I haven't read or do any DD on 5Dimes, just a glance at their website, and although the website looks... worrying, based on your narrative --unless you can provide further info and evidence on whichnpoimt amd what form does the scam happen-- the impression I get from both time is that this is a simple case of Karen. And no, not only when you pull the card to[ask for manager, it's from the exact point where you demanded something so technical about 30% discount.

Forgive me if I'm wrong, I have no idea about gambling terms at all, but wasn't what you insisting are explained here already?

The way I see it, you're being banned for wasting their time with 2 hours of chat, spamming their helpdesk by asking on multiple chat topic, and ultimately asking something rather personal and completely not related to the topic in discussion.

That should be the first big red flag, I think it is a rather general and common understanding that a legit and reputable service --any service-- will not try to reach their customer first. Included within, not adding people to their tg group through any means.

Where can I find your website and other useful info regarding your project details? It doesn't seem that you have a website yet, because even Google didn't bring me a result. I assume you also didn't have any prototype, MVP, or even a teaser yet?

Edit: fixing autocorrect --swipe-typing, actually-- typo

How do they lure their victim on the first case? They're a telegram group, so either you need to be invited by someone or you joined yourself with a link provided somewhere, correct? So how does it exactly begin?

We can start from solving the case of whether you're really hired by a "team" or not. So far, you've been asked three times on your ann thread to provide a proof that you're really hired. And so fr you keep evading it. Repeatedly insisting that you're just hired --like the post you made on your thread, I quote below-- without giving any concrete proof is rather... not convincing enough. Something like a screenshot of your discussion with the "team" or a screenshot of your contract from Fiverr is simple to be provided in matter of seconds if it's real... unless the team is nonexistent and you need to photoshop the said screenshot from nothing. That'll take time.

Excuse me? Like... You're planning to create many alt-accounts to "get involved" in a "discussion" of your project? Like this one I quote below, is one of your alt you use to... make a lot of discussion?

Judging from the quality of their website, I don't think their v2 --which, according to their roadmap, will be released on Q3-- will bring much info. They planned to explain about their utility on that update, yet IMO, it's counterproductive. If they are really giving thought and careful planning to their project, they should have composed a whitepaper consisting of the utility and the whole features available on the project since the v1 of their WP. If the details of the feature is not comcrete enough to be published, a serious dev will prefer to wait the launch of their ann instead of giving bare minimum website and WP.

People would not just revisit the project three months later to be updated of a meme project. Unless they brought a very revolutionary breakthrough, which --again, judging from the quality of their website-- is rather dubious. It's a meme project, after all.

Let's see, anonymous dev? Check. Enormous supply? Check? Meme token? Check. Zero effort on website and the information provided in it? Check.

How is that good, exactly? If you read what Slow death said on this thread, it's kinda legit to question the truth behind OP's statement that they only working for the team instead of they're actually the real one behind this. And so far, OP didn't show the evidence asked.

For OP, I'd urge you to give the proper evidence to prove your claim, and probably better to answer the questions on the open scam accusation too.

If I may add more red flag to the project --well, rather move the info here as this findings are also available on their ann thread linked on OP's opening post-- they claimed to be KYCed by an KYC service provider which I barely ever heard of --not that I ever followed any news of KYC, KYB, KYD, KYT, and other KYseries available on the net-- and the document issued to prove this certification is rather funny looking, which prompt me to look further. They're customer number 878 according to their certificate number, but the KYC company website itself is just one week old, a rather wonderful feast if they can check and certify 878 projecrs in one week. And more, the link to their certification page is non-specific like, for instance,


Instead, their full link is as follows:


Which rather looks like the "certification company" is another dummy website of theirs to boost their "credibility" with no prior projects being certified before, only them.

Yes, of course, the easiest way to clean the mess you made yourself fall into; "I am not the team, I was just hired".

Did you do your part of DD before accepting the job or were you blindly accept them without even looking at any details they have --much like your previous project which seems no longer available in matter of months-- because if the project turns to scam, you can always disassociate yourself through the "I am not part of the team"?

And I'm curious, what's the team say about the KYC by kycspy?

That Certik logo is most likely another "click bait" intended to mislead people into believing in the project. I looked into Certik's page and searched for them in the database, just to be sure, and as expected, none came as a result.

I can't find your token allocation on either your website and your whitepaper. You only list your tx tax, how much of those 10 quadrillions is allocated for team and other sectors? Not only tokenomy, actually, your whitepaper is extremely lacking of any useful info.

I have to make sure, you're being audited by this company? And this is a third party independent KYC service provider that's been --according to the number of your issued certificate-- checking at least 878 companies? In the entire time they've been online, which is like... one week? With the link to your report is a non-specific non-unique link to help differentiate your KYC certification page with other 877 companies they've checked, that's almost looks like you're their only customer so far? You sure this is an independent good quality trustworthy and reliable service provider and not your uhh... well, I don't wanna imply the obvious here.

[archived]

Medium page announcing KYC archived
KYC service provider's page archived

I've given it a read, your whitepaper, unfortunately, it just worsen the situation. Not only I still couldn't understand your insurance fund and anti depletion --although that's more due to the lack of coverage about these matters on your document-- I am now questioning the consistency of your project.

At one page, you said you have an anti whale system by enforcing a system with maximum withdrawal of 30 BNB daily, and then on other section you gave a "levels" of withdrawal --with lack of explanation of what levels are these and how are they determined-- that surpasses the 30 BNB limit.

Ok, two things. One, you said that you're manned by 16 people, but I can't find details of any of these people on your website. It'll be a nice of you could share is this info. Two, forgive my small knowledge on a.... uhh... uncommon and eccentric street name, but I don't think the address you listed on your website as your store is a real address? Or am I wrong? Note that Google didn't help this matter too as if have zero result of any business address as shown like below:

Is there a website to learn more about your project? Preferably with some graphic and --perhaps-- diagram that explain your scheme better. This thread could use the help of some images too, especially the insurance fund and the anti fund depletion section. Tried to read them three times, and still failed to get a good image of what you tried to propose.

Edit: ok, LOL, this is embarrassing, being too focused on the bigger picture yesterday, I failed to notice that the website is literally on the thread title