ANyone else still suffering from bad ATI drivers for RX cards? I'm getting Crazy
RX 580 cards works fine with ALL drivers up to latest 20.3.1. |
|
|
|
Can you guys explain this to me.... Several times I've noticed miner is switching from DAG epoch 329 to 'Generating DAG epoch #0'. I have a mix of 1070, 1060 and 104-100 cards. My 1070 cards are doing 32+ MHs for a short time then miner is restarting with DAG epoch 329 and cards are doing about 27MHs. I understand it's slowing down with bigger DAG but what is DAG for epoch #0.
2020.03.03:15:55:49.480: GPU4 GPU4: Starting up... (0)
2020.03.03:15:55:49.531: GPU6 GPU6: Starting up... (0)
2020.03.03:15:55:49.542: GPU5 GPU5: Starting up... (0)
2020.03.03:15:55:49.561: GPU3 GPU3: Starting up... (0)
2020.03.03:15:55:49.585: GPU2 GPU2: Starting up... (0)
2020.03.03:15:55:49.600: GPU8 GPU8: Starting up... (0)
2020.03.03:15:55:49.708: GPU1 GPU1: Starting up... (0)
2020.03.03:15:55:50.463: GPU7 Light cache generated in 1.0 s (15.4 MB/s)
2020.03.03:15:55:50.463: GPU7 GPU7: Generating DAG for epoch #0
2020.03.03:15:55:50.463: GPU4 GPU4: Generating DAG for epoch #0
2020.03.03:15:55:50.463: GPU6 GPU6: Generating DAG for epoch #0
2020.03.03:15:55:50.463: GPU5 GPU5: Generating DAG for epoch #0
2020.03.03:15:55:50.463: GPU3 GPU3: Generating DAG for epoch #0
2020.03.03:15:55:50.464: GPU2 GPU2: Generating DAG for epoch #0
2020.03.03:15:55:50.464: GPU8 GPU8: Generating DAG for epoch #0
2020.03.03:15:55:50.465: GPU1 GPU1: Generating DAG for epoch #0
.
.
2020.03.03:15:56:00.753: main GPUs: 1: 31.981 MH/s (29) 2: 32.471 MH/s (31) 3: 32.563 MH/s (27) 4: 23.654 MH/s (27) 5: 32.588 MH/s (31) 6: 40.112 MH/s (46) 7: 40.876 MH/s (42) 8: 23.580 MH/s (34)
It's nicehash pool? If so - nicehash can switch on the fly between different eth forks, so it can change DAG's. DAG #0 - is one of this switches to some fork untill it give better profit. Thanks. Yes it is nicehash. Is it just idling at that time or doing shares? It's finds shares on any fork or DAG. Just not always have time till DAG changes back. |
|
|
|
Can you guys explain this to me.... Several times I've noticed miner is switching from DAG epoch 329 to 'Generating DAG epoch #0'. I have a mix of 1070, 1060 and 104-100 cards. My 1070 cards are doing 32+ MHs for a short time then miner is restarting with DAG epoch 329 and cards are doing about 27MHs. I understand it's slowing down with bigger DAG but what is DAG for epoch #0.
2020.03.03:15:55:49.480: GPU4 GPU4: Starting up... (0)
2020.03.03:15:55:49.531: GPU6 GPU6: Starting up... (0)
2020.03.03:15:55:49.542: GPU5 GPU5: Starting up... (0)
2020.03.03:15:55:49.561: GPU3 GPU3: Starting up... (0)
2020.03.03:15:55:49.585: GPU2 GPU2: Starting up... (0)
2020.03.03:15:55:49.600: GPU8 GPU8: Starting up... (0)
2020.03.03:15:55:49.708: GPU1 GPU1: Starting up... (0)
2020.03.03:15:55:50.463: GPU7 Light cache generated in 1.0 s (15.4 MB/s)
2020.03.03:15:55:50.463: GPU7 GPU7: Generating DAG for epoch #0
2020.03.03:15:55:50.463: GPU4 GPU4: Generating DAG for epoch #0
2020.03.03:15:55:50.463: GPU6 GPU6: Generating DAG for epoch #0
2020.03.03:15:55:50.463: GPU5 GPU5: Generating DAG for epoch #0
2020.03.03:15:55:50.463: GPU3 GPU3: Generating DAG for epoch #0
2020.03.03:15:55:50.464: GPU2 GPU2: Generating DAG for epoch #0
2020.03.03:15:55:50.464: GPU8 GPU8: Generating DAG for epoch #0
2020.03.03:15:55:50.465: GPU1 GPU1: Generating DAG for epoch #0
.
.
2020.03.03:15:56:00.753: main GPUs: 1: 31.981 MH/s (29) 2: 32.471 MH/s (31) 3: 32.563 MH/s (27) 4: 23.654 MH/s (27) 5: 32.588 MH/s (31) 6: 40.112 MH/s (46) 7: 40.876 MH/s (42) 8: 23.580 MH/s (34)
It's nicehash pool? If so - nicehash can switch on the fly between different eth forks, so it can change DAG's. DAG #0 - is one of this switches to some fork untill it give better profit. |
|
|
|
Thanks! I decided to buy sapphire pulse. But didn't know XT or nonXT. I can buy almost the same price both... Maybe XT better cooling system? Advises? |
|
|
|
|
Cuckaroom fork is here! Need miner update!
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm, Sapphire and PowerColor gives only 2 years of warranty. MSI gives 3 years... Asus - don't know...
MSI refs 5700 too often with defects...
ASUS DUAL EVO without memory cooling at all...
I didn't know what 5700 card to buy )))) Maybe MSI Gaming...
|
|
|
|
It's strange, but I'm searched info's about memory temps of Sapphire Pulse 5700 XT and nonXT.
All reviews and tests where measured memory temp talks about 80C. Even in XT.
But many peoples who buy Pulse cards speaks about high memory temp - about 92-94+C. Some of them writes in Sapphire tech support and recieved answer that it's abnormal memory temperature and recommend to return card to shop cause of defect.
Very strange...
pulse 5700 non xt and xt different vram cooling solutions ,but also ım not sure xt pulse have good results.i'll buy refsdon't need to take risk. According to micron max temp is 95 . pulse non xt  Xt  Thanks for info... XT pulse looks much better ))) |
|
|
|
|
It's strange, but I'm searched info's about memory temps of Sapphire Pulse 5700 XT and nonXT.
All reviews and tests where measured memory temp talks about 80C. Even in XT.
But many peoples who buy Pulse cards speaks about high memory temp - about 92-94+C. Some of them writes in Sapphire tech support and recieved answer that it's abnormal memory temperature and recommend to return card to shop cause of defect.
Very strange...
|
|
|
|
refs memory cooling way much better then others(evoke,pulse,mech,msi gaming tested)
Not sure where you’re getting your info on ref vs pulse cooling, but it’s completely opposite to everything I’ve seen. Pulse has been demonstrated by numerous publications to have a far superior cooling solution vs the ref. Maybe you’re just lumping it in with the shitty ASUS, msi, etc solutions... this would be a mistake. For $10 more than the ref, the cooler, quieter pulse appears to be the better buy. EDIT: Here's Tech Jesus' take on the matter - the most respected voice on these things afaic: https://www.gamersnexus.net/hwreviews/3513-sapphire-rx-5700-pulse-review-non-xt-vs-red-dragonDue to my own expreience.Took ss, left side pulse 92 mem temp, right side ref 5700 80 mem temp. i have many of them msi mech even worser 96 memory temp.İn pulse 5700 and 5700xt different memory cooler.  What about Power Color, f.e. Red Dragon? |
|
|
|
Don't buy vega 56-64 , my vegas don't work even 850mv and consumption too much,(7 vgas 1380W from wall),my best findings are 5700nonxt ref. series.
Thanks for advise! Why 5700 nonxt, and why ref.? Xt's more expensive ,not less chance to memory won't go over (900mhz,5700non xt's 950mhz)refs memory cooling way much better then others(evoke,pulse,mech,msi gaming tested)no idea nitro,strix and red devil(bu these are expensive already). So you recommend to buy nonxt 5700 blower? Any manufacter? Yep in memory hard algo's best pick to buy 5700 blowers.Doesn't matter manufacter, all same.just sticker different  ) Thanks! |
|
|
|
Don't buy vega 56-64 , my vegas don't work even 850mv and consumption too much,(7 vgas 1380W from wall),my best findings are 5700nonxt ref. series.
Thanks for advise! Why 5700 nonxt, and why ref.? Xt's more expensive ,not less chance to memory won't go over (900mhz,5700non xt's 950mhz)refs memory cooling way much better then others(evoke,pulse,mech,msi gaming tested)no idea nitro,strix and red devil(bu these are expensive already). So you recommend to buy nonxt 5700 blower? Any manufacter? |
|
|
|
Don't buy vega 56-64 , my vegas don't work even 850mv and consumption too much,(7 vgas 1380W from wall),my best findings are 5700nonxt ref. series.
Thanks for advise! Why 5700 nonxt, and why ref.? |
|
|
|
Does anybody mines eth with vega 56? What speed and power conpsumption it give?
Yes, ~50Mh core ~1000 , mem ~950 check pbfarmer posts for amdmemorytweak settings. What power it eat with 50MH? approx 150w @wall Hmm, not bad... In compare with RX580... Thanks for info! Whant to buy Sapphire Pulse vega 56 for about $350. I should do it? Might want to look at the pulse 5700 xt instead for ~$410 (or maybe even pulse 5700 for $340?) - assuming you care about power costs / efficiency. Nitro would be even better efficiency-wise, but price jump is significant - not sure it's worth it. I'm not up to speed on the latest state of the drivers/miners for navi (other than TRM team still waiting on a proper toolchain,) but it seems 50+MH/s for the 5700xt is normal for 2/3 the power of a vega Thanks! I looking on 5700xt, but prices is too high on them on my shops... All 5700xt starts from $450 for me... Exists Asus vega 56 ROG-STRIX Gaming for $400. |
|
|
|
Does anybody mines eth with vega 56? What speed and power conpsumption it give?
Yes, ~50Mh core ~1000 , mem ~950 check pbfarmer posts for amdmemorytweak settings. What power it eat with 50MH? approx 150w @wall Hmm, not bad... In compare with RX580... Thanks for info! Whant to buy Sapphire Pulse vega 56 for about $350. I should do it? |
|
|
|
Does anybody mines eth with vega 56? What speed and power conpsumption it give?
Yes, ~50Mh core ~1000 , mem ~950 check pbfarmer posts for amdmemorytweak settings. What power it eat with 50MH? |
|
|
|
|
Does anybody mines eth with vega 56? What speed and power conpsumption it give?
|
|
|
|
Is is normal to have different hashrate for eth and etc? Nvidia gpus. Difference is about 2.5% more when mining ethereum. 4.8c version.
why there is a difference with the same config eth mining and etc 3% difference is nobody understands Try to make autotune both on one and another. I think best -gt parameters will differ. |
|
|
|
The size of DAG allways increase steps by 8Mb every time. And every time when it grows up it's need more vmemory. And you must remember that all equipment wears. PSU, GPU chips, vmemory chips... All these equip can degradate with time cause to 24/7 work on close to 100% using. Try to raise voltages on GPU's and mvddc a bit and check. |
|
|
|
I've tried 4.9b now with driver 19.12.3 and it says unknown openCL driver and hangs when mining about 15 seconds (totaly freeze, cut the power is the only solution)
Reverted back to 19.9.2 driver and it mines at about 20 minutes, then hang and reboots itself. About 0,3% better hashrate than 4.7c (cant use 4.8c at all)
No logging.
Hardware:
Motherboard: Asus B250 Mining Expert
CPU: i5 6500
RAM: 8gb
Virual memory: 64gb
Gpu's (in order in miner): RX470,RX470,RX580,RX580,Vii,RX470,RX470,RX470,RX580,RX470
Conf for cards:
-cclock 1240,1240,1250,1250,1830,1240,1240,1240,1220,1240
-mclock 2150,2150,2150,2150,1030,2150,2150,2150,2120,2150
-cvddc 930,890,890,930,970,890,930,900,950,900
-mvddc 935,900,910,930,950,900,930,900,950,900
-clKernel 1
-mi 14
-amd
-acm
-cdm 2
Is it something there that's not compatible with 4.9b?
Edit: over an hour now with 4.9b without issues. 19.9.2 driver, still can't use 19.12.3.
On RX 580 8Gb cards 4.9b works fine with 19.12.3 driver. |
|
|
|
better image  Try to download and use PhoenixMiner_NVRTC_Windows.zip |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
