nine GPUs, nice rig bro! decent RX580 can achieve 1200+ and even 1250+ with good modding. JCE your newest miner is top notch, I'm getting 1350 h/s stable on rx 580 8gb. How? 1.1-1.2v I would guess...  It's abot 150 Watts... Noo, better 1150 h/s on 100 Watt. |
|
|
|
|
Exccelent! On b9 speed on my RX 580 8Gb is 1195 h/s. Devfee is 0,9% - so my is about 1185 h/s. But total shares is 158/2/1 on 4:15 hours:min. So 3 from 158 - is about 1,89% bad shares... Effective hasrate is only 1015 h/s - it's low...
SRB gives 1187 h/s. Devfee is 0.85% - so my is 1177 h/s. Now will test - how much bad shares gives SRB...
|
|
|
|
nine GPUs, nice rig bro! decent RX580 can achieve 1200+ and even 1250+ with good modding. JCE your newest miner is top notch, I'm getting 1350 h/s stable on rx 580 8gb. How? |
|
|
|
What memory type on cards?
Hynix As I know Hynix 8Gb only MJR... AJR is on 4Gb cards... So your Hynix memory is MJR, right? What memory straps you use? |
|
|
|
|
JCE, allready next day! I'm waiting next version with nicehash fix! Thank you!
|
|
|
|
RX570 8GB - Haven - 630w@the wall Best release so far, great work dude   What memory type on cards? |
|
|
|
My first tests with SRBMiner 1.7.2
Cryptonight Heavy
"heavy_mode" : 1
Windows 1709
Adrenalin 18.3.4
6 x PowerColor RX 580 8Gb
GPU0: Radeon RX 580 Series [ellesmere] [8192 MB][I: 58.0][W: 8][T: 2][F: 9999][BUS: 5]
GPU1: Radeon RX 580 Series [ellesmere] [8192 MB][I: 58.0][W: 8][T: 2][F: 9999][BUS: 3]
GPU2: Radeon RX 580 Series [ellesmere] [8192 MB][I: 58.0][W: 8][T: 2][F: 9999][BUS: 6]
GPU3: Radeon RX 580 Series [ellesmere] [8192 MB][I: 57.0][W: 8][T: 2][F: 9999][BUS: 1]
GPU4: Radeon RX 580 Series [ellesmere] [8192 MB][I: 58.0][W: 8][T: 2][F: 9999][BUS: 4]
GPU5: Radeon RX 580 Series [ellesmere] [8192 MB][I: 58.0][W: 8][T: 2][F: 9999][BUS: 7]
1st hashing speed:
GPU0 : 1227 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 1530, CC: 1225 MHz, MC: 2020 MHz][BUS:5]
GPU1 : 1228 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 1610, CC: 1225 MHz, MC: 2020 MHz][BUS:3]
GPU2 : 1228 H/s [T: 50c, RPM: 1503, CC: 1225 MHz, MC: 2015 MHz][BUS:6]
GPU3 : 1210 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 1540, CC: 1225 MHz, MC: 2010 MHz][BUS:1]
GPU4 : 1229 H/s [T: 51c, RPM: 1576, CC: 1225 MHz, MC: 2015 MHz][BUS:4]
GPU5 : 1230 H/s [T: 42c, RPM: 1332, CC: 1225 MHz, MC: 2020 MHz][BUS:7]
Total: 7352 H/s
After 3 hours:
GPU0 : 1228 H/s [T: 67c, RPM: 1108, CC: 1225 MHz, MC: 2020 MHz][BUS:5]
GPU1 : 1228 H/s [T: 67c, RPM: 1447, CC: 1225 MHz, MC: 2020 MHz][BUS:3]
GPU2 : 1230 H/s [T: 66c, RPM: 1477, CC: 1225 MHz, MC: 2015 MHz][BUS:6]
GPU3 : 1220 H/s [T: 62c, RPM: 1104, CC: 1225 MHz, MC: 2010 MHz][BUS:1]
GPU4 : 1228 H/s [T: 68c, RPM: 1476, CC: 1225 MHz, MC: 2015 MHz][BUS:4]
GPU5 : 1228 H/s [T: 54c, RPM: 1077, CC: 1225 MHz, MC: 2020 MHz][BUS:7]
Total: 7362 H/s
Stable as a rock!
No HW errors.
Thank you very much, Doktor!
Memory on cards - samsung? What memory straps you're using? Samsung memory with straps from PolarisBiosEditor 1.6.7 - "ONE CLICK TIMING PATCH" Cool! Samsung memory is the best... On my hynix memory cards speed is slower... Another one question - why intensity 58? As I know 8Gb memory enough for up to 59.5. More intensity gives more speed isn't it? |
|
|
|
My first tests with SRBMiner 1.7.2
Cryptonight Heavy
"heavy_mode" : 1
Windows 1709
Adrenalin 18.3.4
6 x PowerColor RX 580 8Gb
GPU0: Radeon RX 580 Series [ellesmere] [8192 MB][I: 58.0][W: 8][T: 2][F: 9999][BUS: 5]
GPU1: Radeon RX 580 Series [ellesmere] [8192 MB][I: 58.0][W: 8][T: 2][F: 9999][BUS: 3]
GPU2: Radeon RX 580 Series [ellesmere] [8192 MB][I: 58.0][W: 8][T: 2][F: 9999][BUS: 6]
GPU3: Radeon RX 580 Series [ellesmere] [8192 MB][I: 57.0][W: 8][T: 2][F: 9999][BUS: 1]
GPU4: Radeon RX 580 Series [ellesmere] [8192 MB][I: 58.0][W: 8][T: 2][F: 9999][BUS: 4]
GPU5: Radeon RX 580 Series [ellesmere] [8192 MB][I: 58.0][W: 8][T: 2][F: 9999][BUS: 7]
1st hashing speed:
GPU0 : 1227 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 1530, CC: 1225 MHz, MC: 2020 MHz][BUS:5]
GPU1 : 1228 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 1610, CC: 1225 MHz, MC: 2020 MHz][BUS:3]
GPU2 : 1228 H/s [T: 50c, RPM: 1503, CC: 1225 MHz, MC: 2015 MHz][BUS:6]
GPU3 : 1210 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 1540, CC: 1225 MHz, MC: 2010 MHz][BUS:1]
GPU4 : 1229 H/s [T: 51c, RPM: 1576, CC: 1225 MHz, MC: 2015 MHz][BUS:4]
GPU5 : 1230 H/s [T: 42c, RPM: 1332, CC: 1225 MHz, MC: 2020 MHz][BUS:7]
Total: 7352 H/s
After 3 hours:
GPU0 : 1228 H/s [T: 67c, RPM: 1108, CC: 1225 MHz, MC: 2020 MHz][BUS:5]
GPU1 : 1228 H/s [T: 67c, RPM: 1447, CC: 1225 MHz, MC: 2020 MHz][BUS:3]
GPU2 : 1230 H/s [T: 66c, RPM: 1477, CC: 1225 MHz, MC: 2015 MHz][BUS:6]
GPU3 : 1220 H/s [T: 62c, RPM: 1104, CC: 1225 MHz, MC: 2010 MHz][BUS:1]
GPU4 : 1228 H/s [T: 68c, RPM: 1476, CC: 1225 MHz, MC: 2015 MHz][BUS:4]
GPU5 : 1228 H/s [T: 54c, RPM: 1077, CC: 1225 MHz, MC: 2020 MHz][BUS:7]
Total: 7362 H/s
Stable as a rock!
No HW errors.
Thank you very much, Doktor!
Memory on cards - samsung? What memory straps you're using? |
|
|
|
I noticed that speed start to flactuate after recieving new job... Maybe it's nicehash problem...
Why didn't you say so? i've a special sync for nicehash, with dedicated netcode (Nicehash is a lot more netcode-aggressive than other pools). Please try on a normal pool, if it gets stable, so here's the problem. Maybe SRB doesn't have that nicehash special, so in this precise case, it avoids the problem. I'm preparing v8, which will be like -sync, but :done, online is the 0.33b8 GPUCrash on old HD cards fixed (was a typo in my old card's code)
Light optim for modern cards on Heavy/forks
edit: ok I found my bug on Nicehash netcode, but too late to fix in b8, that will be for b9 meanwhile please test on a normal pool  Yes! It's only on nicehash! I changed pool to usual and voila! Max speed after several seconds after start! JCE, make fix please! I can't waiting! ))) |
|
|
|
|
I noticed that speed start to flactuate after recieving new job... Maybe it's nicehash problem...
|
|
|
|
doctor, what about old cards like Pitcairns? I have R9 270X 4Gb, but on 1.7.2 I can recieve only 80 h/s on heavy... It's too low... Must be 400+ h/s.
It must be ?  It gives 400+ h/s on heavy on other miners like JCE or XMRig-AMD. On your miner old versions too. |
|
|
|
|
doctor, what about old cards like Pitcairns? I have R9 270X 4Gb, but on 1.7.2 I can recieve only 80 h/s on heavy... It's too low... Must be 400+ h/s.
|
|
|
|
Oh, thanks! I know this straps... Meanwhile, doctor83 released new version of his miner... Wrote that he did stable high heavy algo speed on RX 4xx/5xx cards supporting latest drivers. And he stopped to use binary kernels as before he did, and new fast kernel compiling... All as on JCE miner... After my work would try his miner... On JCE sync version I can't still recieve stable max speed for a long time... Increasing core and memory voltages didn't helped. Lowering multi_hash parameters also didn't helped. After 15-20 minutes speed can be max (but not always), but after some time it start to fluctuate and drops to about 1 kh/s. EDIT: Wow! doctor83 made it! His miner last version have stable speed on heavy algo as rock! And on heavy mode 3 only a bit (about 10 h/s) slower than JCE. But his devfee 0,85%... So... If I can't recieve stable max speed on JCE, I would forced to use his miner... |
|
|
|
Hi UnclWish,
I already explain even without warm up my rig with 8 GPU RX 580 8GB on first print hash rate it already reach max on all GPU.
Windows 10 Build 1709
AMD Driver 18.6.1
2 thread multi_hash 944
Maybe in your case because you have latest Windows 10 and latest AMD Driver.
Maybe you're right. I have 1803 Windows 10 and 18.11.2 drivers... Still playing with GPU voltages to check... Or maybe your cards have good samsung memory... Or maybe your memory straps better than my... What memory type and clocks/voltages you use? What memory straps? JCE, can drivers affect that way? 2 samsung memory (GPU 1 & GPU 7) CC 1250/890 MC 2000/890 and 6 hynix memory (the rest), GPU 4 is really bad can only set CC 1250/890 MC 2020/890 GPU 2,3,5,6 CC 1250/890 MC 2100/890 GPU 8 CC 1250/890 MC 2080/890. samsung memory strap from PBE 1.6.7. hynix memory strap from doktor83. Thanks for info. You use high memory voltage - 890 mV... I use 825-850 mV for clocks near 2000MHz... Can you share your hynix memory strap from doctor83? |
|
|
|
Hi UnclWish,
I already explain even without warm up my rig with 8 GPU RX 580 8GB on first print hash rate it already reach max on all GPU.
Windows 10 Build 1709
AMD Driver 18.6.1
2 thread multi_hash 944
Maybe in your case because you have latest Windows 10 and latest AMD Driver.
Maybe you're right. I have 1803 Windows 10 and 18.11.2 drivers... Still playing with GPU voltages to check... Or maybe your cards have good samsung memory... Or maybe your memory straps better than my... What memory type and clocks/voltages you use? What memory straps? JCE, can drivers affect that way? |
|
|
|
@Unclwish: did at least the -sync solved your problem of stuck thread? JCE, b5+ to sync versions requires more power than b4 version yes, measured +20% speed and +6% power on RX. Still a good deal Strange question from myself: i just plugged back my HD6950 that hasn't mined (except for quick tests) since the golden age of Claymore 9.7 and so far i cannot use multi_hash over 256 (=512Mb), while i got report from GitHub support tickets the value 864 was good. Did somebody managed to allocate >512M on those cards? I'm still using the drivers 15.11 on win8.1 i used with the card it replaced (a 7900), not tried yet to use the recommended 14.4 Yes, thread stuck bug is gone. Now trying to undestand why my RX 580 cards didn't have stable speed long time... On old cards. Maybe my 270X 4Gb with availible only 3,5Gb for OpenCL can use all 4Gb somehow? Who allready have good tests of sync version - please say what time need to recieve max speed on RX 580 8Gb. I want to spend some tests, but I need to know how much to wait every time... 1st try - rise a bit voltage on GPU cores - 12 minutes - no result - speed not max... |
|
|
|
0.33-sync GPU works great, all cards warm up and stay at max hash. Good job What cards, drivers, config please? |
|
|
|
|
For my RX 580 8Gb 33-sync version didn't give max speed all the time... After 10-20 minutes speed can be max, but after some time it drops. After 2-3 hour speed on both GPUs is dropped to 985-1015 h/s (Max speed on b5+ versions is 1170-1180 h/s) and stable. Method with disabling/enabling GPU's didn't helps to boost speed...
Effective hashrate after 3 hours is only 1900 h/s...
Forced to return to version b4 - it gives about 5-8% lower speed (about 1120 h/s) but stable and effective hashrate is close to max speed.
All talking about heavy algo of course...
JCE, b5+ to sync versions requires more power than b4 version? Can my speed problem be cause of lack of power?
|
|
|
|
forget the b7 and try the new experimental (read: very untested) B-sync GPU
That's the lone .exe in the github page.
1. Stable and fast hashrate
2. new parameter --no-monitor to disable fan/temp monitoring (the purple report)
3. various optims for some cards and some algos, expect about +0.5%
4. Fees still 0.9%
so far it burns like fire on my rigs, i hope it really fixes all the hashrate and warmup problems.
with: - cpu: working perfect - integral gpu: working perfect - 8gb rx 580: working perfect - 4gb rx570: after pool login, the miner stopped and i got: "Press any key to continue..." message my config: "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 3, "multi_hash":944 }, any idea? *update: algo = bittube thanks! 4gb GPU multi_hash should be lower for 2 thread about 464 or 480. Maybe he use 1 thread? He didn't copy 2 strings... yes, only 1 thread, and this config worked with all previous version. Try with 928. |
|
|
|
forget the b7 and try the new experimental (read: very untested) B-sync GPU
That's the lone .exe in the github page.
1. Stable and fast hashrate
2. new parameter --no-monitor to disable fan/temp monitoring (the purple report)
3. various optims for some cards and some algos, expect about +0.5%
4. Fees still 0.9%
so far it burns like fire on my rigs, i hope it really fixes all the hashrate and warmup problems.
with: - cpu: working perfect - integral gpu: working perfect - 8gb rx 580: working perfect - 4gb rx570: after pool login, the miner stopped and i got: "Press any key to continue..." message my config: "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 3, "multi_hash":944 }, any idea? *update: algo = bittube thanks! 4gb GPU multi_hash should be lower for 2 thread about 464 or 480. Maybe he use 1 thread? He didn't copy 2 strings... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
