|
Anyone tried 19.9.3 AMD drivers? Miner supports it?
|
|
|
|
Just curious here - are there any plans to introduce/integrate memory straps into the miner like Claymore's v15 does?
It's allready done by author: -mt <n> VRAM timings (AMD under Windows only): 0 - default VBIOS values; 1 - faster timings; 2 - fastest timings. The default is 0. This is useful for mining with AMD cards without modding the VBIOS. It's not memory modded memory straps, it's just setting options wich exists in Radeon Settings - timings section. But without vbios modding it can significant increase speed. -rxboost option is absent in this moment... I hope Phoenix will add it in future too. interesting, thanks for the info! Never seen any timings settings in the drivers. I still use the best performing 18.6.1 and also without gui. will check it out later anyway. Also regarding the Claymores "rxboost" I'd guess its REF and RFC that you can (among all other values) update with Amd mem tweak. Im hoping for Nvidia timings though:) Be carefull, I didn't know will -mt work with old drivers or not... Yep it doesn't. Just gives me this: "GPUx: Unable to set VMEM timing to 2 - error: -8" Maybe I'll try to install 19.9.2 or something and see what's what. Yes, try to update drivers. This option appears only in 2019. Install latest WHQL, all works fine! Speed the same. |
|
|
|
Just curious here - are there any plans to introduce/integrate memory straps into the miner like Claymore's v15 does?
It's allready done by author: -mt <n> VRAM timings (AMD under Windows only): 0 - default VBIOS values; 1 - faster timings; 2 - fastest timings. The default is 0. This is useful for mining with AMD cards without modding the VBIOS. It's not memory modded memory straps, it's just setting options wich exists in Radeon Settings - timings section. But without vbios modding it can significant increase speed. -rxboost option is absent in this moment... I hope Phoenix will add it in future too. interesting, thanks for the info! Never seen any timings settings in the drivers. I still use the best performing 18.6.1 and also without gui. will check it out later anyway. Also regarding the Claymores "rxboost" I'd guess its REF and RFC that you can (among all other values) update with Amd mem tweak. Im hoping for Nvidia timings though:) Be carefull, I didn't know will -mt work with old drivers or not... |
|
|
|
Just curious here - are there any plans to introduce/integrate memory straps into the miner like Claymore's v15 does?
It's allready done by author: -mt <n> VRAM timings (AMD under Windows only): 0 - default VBIOS values; 1 - faster timings; 2 - fastest timings. The default is 0. This is useful for mining with AMD cards without modding the VBIOS. It's not memory modded memory straps, it's just setting options wich exists in Radeon Settings - timings section. But without vbios modding it can significant increase speed. -rxboost option is absent in this moment... I hope Phoenix will add it in future too. |
|
|
|
Is there option to do miner command "Z"(autotune) in intervals? Like every 3 hours . If difficult changes renewing GT option makes mining better. https://hiveos.farm?ref=14664With the same core and memory clocks, and clKernel gt best parameter stays the same. It's no need to find it regural. |
|
|
|
They not so great... Just about 0.2-0.4MH better than usual good eth hynix timings. And I will not share them. Sorry.
is ~1% better than some, as you called, usual good timing every positive percentage is great noways, cause in this case, you can simply "forget" the pool fee for example when you make some math to predict a month revenue if you have one card, or one rig, maybe is not a number of interest, but for a mining farm a ~1% of increase in profit is a number of interest Yes, when rig is big this 1% is important. I'm taked usual good timings for hynix memory and spent many time in tries to improve them... Every change I flashed timing into vbios, restarted comp and make tests some time. So I invested a lot of time in 1% improvement for timings and making them stable. I use 1235MHz cclock with 856mV and 2250MHZ mclock with 800mv. Card is Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+ SE. Good card with good memory cooling and ASIC quality. I have other 580 card with hynix memory, but it can't handle 2250 memory clock with this straps and require more core and memory clocks to work proper - MSI GAMING X 8Gb. Not so good as Sapphire... So I maked 2nd good timings for not so good cards. And them also a bit faster than usual good hynix timings and allows my MSI to work on 2215MHz memory clock with 850mV memory with about 32,5MH/s on Claymore with rxboost and 33,3MH on Phoenix with clKernel 3. |
|
|
|
Polaris. RX 580 8Gb. On Phoenix miner i have 34,2MH with cclock 1230 mclock 2250.
Polaris ok, but what type of memory? Samsung, Elpida, Hynix, Micron? And what is the power consumption of your card running on 34.2 MHs? I have only with hynix. And it give 34.2MH on PM. Power consumption about 90-100W from sensor. About 125W from wall. Can you please tell me the OS version and what drivers are you using Cause your results are simply gorgeous Windows 10 x64 Pro, 19.9.2 drivers (not WHQL). I'm using my own straps )))) On Claymore with rxboost I have 33,5-33,7MH Ok, so here is the main answer You have some great straps And is there any chance you share them with us? They not so great... Just about 0.2-0.4MH better than usual good eth hynix timings. And I will not share them. Sorry. |
|
|
|
Polaris. RX 580 8Gb. On Phoenix miner i have 34,2MH with cclock 1230 mclock 2250.
Polaris ok, but what type of memory? Samsung, Elpida, Hynix, Micron? And what is the power consumption of your card running on 34.2 MHs? I have only with hynix. And it give 34.2MH on PM. Power consumption about 90-100W from sensor. About 125W from wall. Can you please tell me the OS version and what drivers are you using Cause your results are simply gorgeous Windows 10 x64 Pro, 19.9.2 drivers (not WHQL). I'm using my own straps )))) On Claymore with rxboost I have 33,5-33,7MH |
|
|
|
Polaris. RX 580 8Gb. On Phoenix miner i have 34,2MH with cclock 1230 mclock 2250.
Polaris ok, but what type of memory? Samsung, Elpida, Hynix, Micron? And what is the power consumption of your card running on 34.2 MHs? I have only with hynix. And it give 34.2MH on PM. Power consumption about 90-100W from sensor. About 125W from wall. |
|
|
|
|
Phoenix, you added memory straps applying some versions back. Can you add using REF parameter like Claymore's rxboost?
And 2nd: Can you add additional parameter to force releasing videomemory on start and on stop of miner?
|
|
|
|
I reach 33,1 MH/s per card with exactly the same setup here my settings for Claymore : -dcri 24 -cclock 1220 -mclock 2200 -cvddc 900 -tt 65 -strap 2 -rxboost 1 What GPU can reach such speed ? Polaris. RX 580 8Gb. On Phoenix miner i have 34,2MH with cclock 1230 mclock 2250. |
|
|
|
|
On 8Gb 580 cards with -clKernel 3 gains additional speed about 0,5-0,7MH, but ONLY with new finded -gt parameter.
|
|
|
|
So you have a 5% speed gain, but losing 5% to incorrect shares.... seems like a wash to me. Until the kernels are written for that worksize (if it's even possible), seems like using the default settings is the best way to go.
You mean a 10% gain? 50MH/s increased to 55MH/s is 10%. But I get your point. Yeah, sure. I tried all the settings you just did, and every time, the % gain was almost exactly offset by % invalid shares. However, I did not run very long tests, so it could be possible that pool-side effective hashrate might go up even with the incorrect shares, but I doubt it. All of my incorrect shares were from the same GPU (I have three) so it's possible that it's just my XFX GPU since it's also the GPU that won't let me clock past 900Mhz without the watchdog error. Thinking of returning it. But from 49.5 to 57 seems like an improvement to me. Once Claymore releases some Navi kernels for his software then we'll be in business for sure. Claymore has already released his version with Navi support. Quoting Claymore: ----------------------------------------------------- v15.0: - now miner supports up to #384 epoch (4GB DAG size). Note that previous versions support up to #299 epoch, you will not be able to use old versions after #299 epoch. - added support for Navi cards (ETH-only mode). - now miner sets environment variables automatically (required for 4GB AMD cards). - a few minor bug fixes and improvements. PS. AMD still has no public Navi drivers with DAG-fix, so currently 5700XT shows a very bad hashrate. But AMD already solved this issue and they promise to release public drivers soon... ----------------------------------------------------- What else do you expect from him, to start walking on water like Jesus did? I've removed the "-openclLocalWork 64" completely and I'm averaging 52 instead of 49.5 with ZERO errors or incorrect shares. PhoenixMiner says that the new kernel is included in the latest version. IF the developers coordinate and assist each other instead of competing against each other more can be accomplished. Granted I don't know if they do share tips with each other. Anyway, I still prefer Claymore... but so far Phoenix yields better results after this update. Not sure how he did it but it is an improvement nonetheless. I hope he can figure something out (and I'm sure he will) because I prefer Claymore. Why do you prefer Claymore? It is slower than PM on any GPU. It takes twice more devfee. Consumes less or equal power. What is more important than these three facts? Your emotional affection? Are you a female? WHAT THE HELL DOES IT MATTER AND WHAT IS IT TO YOU??? Mind your own business. If I like Coke over Pepsi, I'll drink Coke. If I like mustard on my hot dog, I'll take mustard on it. Last I knew I needn't explain my preferences or loyalty. I don't give a shit who or what you like, do I? What does my GENDER have to do with anything? Are you wanting to fucking ask me out? Will you try to date rape me or some shit? Fuck off! This loss of control obviously shows what your gender is. Don't worry! I date only normal female. You don't know shit. Mind your own business and stay on topic. But he right about PM. And here is only positives - less fee, faster speed, equal or less power with him... |
|
|
|
has anyone experienced a constantly decrease in hashrate 1070 and p104 cards? P104 drops hashrate from 40 to 39 in last 2-3months, same settings. Any workaround?
Hm. I have the same problem. Two 1070 cards of 6 have decreased its hasrate. I thought it is because these cards work much time. Nothing was changed in configuration files, MSI Afterburner was not updated, Phoeninx miner was not updated too. Maybe it happens due to DAG size growing? |
|
|
|
|
With -clKernel 3 and new founded -gt parameter (it differs from -clKernel 1) you can gain about 0,7-1MH/s additional speed...
And I recommend to find -gt parameter for each card individually, not using the same for all cards. Best of it can be differ even on two equal cards. Each changing of cclock or mclock leads to new best -gt parameter, just check it...
|
|
|
|
|
BEAM on Nicehash gives incorrect shares always...
V2 works fine, but usual BEAM not... Using latest 0.8.8 version of miner.
|
|
|
|
AMD released 19.9.2 driver. Is anyone tried? Miner supports them or not?
Have updated today to 19.9.2 version. Same hashrate. Confirm. 4.6c supports 19.9.2 AMD driver version. |
|
|
|
|
AMD released 19.9.2 driver. Is anyone tried? Miner supports them or not?
|
|
|
|
can you share/post your settings Thanks 2375 Mhz GDDR5 Samsung? WTF? It's simple - in vbios exists settings for maximum clocks. Max memory can be set even higher. And then overclock... I tried, but after several seconds memory on clocks higher 2250 starts give many-many errors... |
|
|
|
19.9.1 driver AMD released... People writes that on Navi good speed on eth with them...
Waiting miner update...
The new version is coming within a few days. We are performing some additional tests with the new driver because it changed the behavior of Navi cards beyond the fixing of the TLB issue. Thanks for info! We'll wait. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
