nomad13666
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 03, 2016, 09:10:46 PM |
|
I've been trying to develop some kind of model for the celestial objects:
The Sun and Moon appear to be flat disks; doped diamond lenses that step down radiation from the dome and project it as light. The image you see on the Moon's surface is probably the surface of the dome, hence its concave appearance.
But this is only a theory. Really, no one can prove otherwise in practice, not what we say at NASA. If you already have appeared such works, they should be supported by evidence rather than theory. Ya, like how fluid water sticks to 70% of the surface of a spinning ball.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, but full nodes are more resource-heavy, and they must do a lengthy initial syncing process. As a result, lightweight clients with somewhat less security are commonly used.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
exemplaar
|
|
September 03, 2016, 09:26:59 PM |
|
None of this has anything to do with proving round earth science to be faulty in any way. At the same time, flat earth science doesn't have enough depth and scope to suggest that it has anything factual behind it. Man, you are stubborn. Stubbornity is not a "good" fruit to produce Let's try again(how can we try to educate badecker) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTPXjXt759Y
|
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 1372
|
|
September 03, 2016, 10:37:53 PM |
|
Yes-mad-quite-mad-nomad13666 to keep on ignoring the the facts of round earth when the flat earth videos don't show any proof of flat earth whatsoever.
|
|
|
|
Gleb Gamow
In memoriam
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
|
|
September 03, 2016, 11:28:56 PM |
|
I've been trying to develop some kind of model for the celestial objects:
The Sun and Moon appear to be flat disks; doped diamond lenses that step down radiation from the dome and project it as light. The image you see on the Moon's surface is probably the surface of the dome, hence its concave appearance.
But this is only a theory. Really, no one can prove otherwise in practice, not what we say at NASA. If you already have appeared such works, they should be supported by evidence rather than theory. Ya, like how fluid water sticks to 70% of the surface of a spinning ball. Don't forget that that spinning ball is traveling around the sun at how many thousands of miles per minute? And that our solar system is spinning around the middle of the galaxy at how many thousands of miles per minute? And that our galaxy is vectoring in some direction in the universe at how many thousands of miles per minute? Hey, maybe all that directional vectoring equals out, hence the Earth's water adhering to the planet.
|
|
|
|
|
nomad13666
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 03, 2016, 11:31:42 PM |
|
I've been trying to develop some kind of model for the celestial objects:
The Sun and Moon appear to be flat disks; doped diamond lenses that step down radiation from the dome and project it as light. The image you see on the Moon's surface is probably the surface of the dome, hence its concave appearance.
But this is only a theory. Really, no one can prove otherwise in practice, not what we say at NASA. If you already have appeared such works, they should be supported by evidence rather than theory. Ya, like how fluid water sticks to 70% of the surface of a spinning ball. Don't forget that that spinning ball is traveling around the sun at how many thousands of miles per minute? And that our solar system is spinning around the middle of the galaxy at how many thousands of miles per minute? And that our galaxy is vectoring in some direction in the universe at how many thousands of miles per minute? Hey, maybe all that directional vectoring equals out, hence the Earth's water adhering to the planet. Science! Yay!
|
|
|
|
nomad13666
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 04, 2016, 12:32:23 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 1372
|
|
September 04, 2016, 03:23:31 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
dihari
|
|
September 04, 2016, 04:04:50 AM |
|
If science found that earth is flat, what happen with it's side around? Is it cheese topping there?
|
|
|
|
nomad13666
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 04, 2016, 04:07:49 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
CoinCube
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1055
|
|
September 04, 2016, 04:32:09 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
nomad13666
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 04, 2016, 04:35:27 AM |
|
If science found that earth is flat, what happen with it's side around? Is it cheese topping there?
ok bye
|
|
|
|
nomad13666
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 04, 2016, 04:35:42 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
CoinCube
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1055
|
|
September 04, 2016, 04:37:31 AM |
|
I am blown away by your deep heartfelt and intellectual defense of your beliefs.
|
|
|
|
Mersedes
|
|
September 04, 2016, 04:55:18 AM |
|
I am blown away by your deep heartfelt and intellectual defense of your beliefs. A lot of evidence is what form the earth people still found in the ancient teachings that came to us from those times when the ability to fly and watch the space was not possible. Therefore, such a belief today did not exist.
|
|
|
|
nomad13666
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 04, 2016, 05:12:03 AM |
|
I am blown away by your deep heartfelt and intellectual defense of your beliefs. ok bye
|
|
|
|
nomad13666
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 04, 2016, 05:22:19 AM Last edit: September 04, 2016, 05:33:21 AM by nomad13666 |
|
|
|
|
|
notbatman (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
|
September 04, 2016, 11:24:41 AM Last edit: September 04, 2016, 12:14:00 PM by notbatman |
|
Sorry dude, you're just a brainwashed retard rehashing the same flawed spinning ball Earth argument over and over again. You get the same results from Errortosthenes experiment if the Sun is ~32 miles wide and ~3k miles overhead, which it is. If you need proof that the Sun is ~3k miles overhead you can measure the distance yourself with a sextant.
|
|
|
|
|