qyzackk
|
|
September 08, 2016, 08:25:07 PM |
|
The fact that the earth is round, it was known long before the birth of Christ, for example from the book of Isaiah EC. [40: 22] Or from the book of Ezra. [3 Ezd.11: 32] But about the fact that the earth is flat on three stalactites is mentioned in the Bible: Iov.9 6 Shifts earth from its place, and shake its pillars; or Isaiah 24:18. Many do not match.
Of course, the earth is flat, that's obvious, and are the two hemispheres, as scrambled eggs in a frying pan. Whether it is round like a ball, so all got used to it. Sorry, but this is a joke.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1382
|
|
September 08, 2016, 10:24:16 PM |
|
You're implying that solid state gyroscopes such as the ring laser are the only kind suitable for testing if the Earth rotates, that's also a lot of bullshit. The experiment you're showcasing is purportedly to measure some subtle variation in Earth's so-called rotation. This is overkill for the simple task of testing for the presence of rotation. I agree that this modern experiment I highlighted above is an overkill for the simple task of testing for the presence of rotation. Science has long moved passed that and is now measuring the small variations that occur in this rotation. BobLawblaw above already highlighted the Michelson-Gale experiment done almost a hundred years ago which tackled the simpler task of measuring the angular velocity of the Earth. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson%E2%80%93Gale%E2%80%93Pearson_experimentThe Michelson-Gale experiment was a very large ring interferometer, (a perimeter of 1.9 kilometer), large enough to detect the angular velocity of the Earth. The Michelson-Gale-Pearson version compared the light from a single source (carbon arc) after travelling in two directions. Light was sent into the rectangles, reflecting off mirrors at the corners, and returned to the starting point. Light exiting the two rectangles was compared on a screen just as the light returning from the two arms. The expected fringe shift in accordance with the stationary aether and special relativity ...In other words, this experiment was aimed to detect the Sagnac effect due to Earth's rotation. ... The outcome of the experiment was that the angular velocity of the Earth as measured by astronomy was confirmed to within measuring accuracy.
But, but, but... They will tell you that a faulty understanding of perspective lies at the center of all this science. And that is why we get faulty pictures of the whole earth, making it look round when it is not. The first thing we need to tackle is perspective, or most of our round earth stuff will always be flawed.
|
|
|
|
nomad13666
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 08, 2016, 10:36:42 PM Last edit: September 09, 2016, 01:19:46 AM by nomad13666 |
|
|
|
|
|
crockoo
|
|
September 08, 2016, 10:40:27 PM |
|
I know that the Earth is round just out of school! Myself I do not seen with your own eyes! And even flight does not mean that it is round! In my flat-earth theory at least should make a reasonable person's view, ask questions regarding our non free world! The world which manages tv! Want to ask a question to those who believe in the realm of how often they look at least at the stars! Most of them even see! Due to the light blockage of the Earth!
|
|
|
|
nomad13666
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 08, 2016, 11:24:47 PM |
|
I know that the Earth is round just out of school! Myself I do not seen with your own eyes! And even flight does not mean that it is round! In my flat-earth theory at least should make a reasonable person's view, ask questions regarding our non free world! The world which manages tv! Want to ask a question to those who believe in the realm of how often they look at least at the stars! Most of them even see! Due to the light blockage of the Earth!
Yes, yes, young crockoo.
Breathe the glue deeply and repeat, "Earth is a spinning ball, I live on a spinning ball."
You'll be just fine.
|
|
|
|
|
pseexh
|
|
September 09, 2016, 05:03:45 AM |
|
Aristotle (which made a lot of observations of the Earth's spherical nature) noticed that during lunar eclipses (when the orbit of the Earth puts a planet exactly between the Sun and the Moon, creating a shadow) shadow on the lunar surface - a round. This shadow is the earth, and cast by the shadow it points directly to the spherical shape of the planet.
|
|
|
|
Whtwabbit
|
|
September 09, 2016, 05:18:59 AM |
|
Aristotle (which made a lot of observations of the Earth's spherical nature) noticed that during lunar eclipses (when the orbit of the Earth puts a planet exactly between the Sun and the Moon, creating a shadow) shadow on the lunar surface - a round. This shadow is the earth, and cast by the shadow it points directly to the spherical shape of the planet.
If the moon was in "space" you would not be able to see it in the day time You can focus a camera in the distance and then use the same setting and the point camera point at the moon and the moon is in focus 50 miles vs 237000 miles... how is this possible? The moon is always (sets and rises) full only in the "hemisphere" which is in winter. If it rises/sets in the north east- north west - its winter in the northern hemisphere If it rises/sets in the south east - south west - its winter in the southern hemisphere Coincidence?
|
██████████ ██████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ██████████████ ██████████████ ████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████████ ██████████ Monero
|
| "The difference between bad and well-developed digital cash will determine whether we have a dictatorship or a real democracy." David Chaum 1996 "Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect." Adam Back 2014
|
| | |
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1382
|
|
September 09, 2016, 03:24:44 PM |
|
Now you are starting to sound like "Gaia" in Issac Asimov's Foundation series.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1382
|
|
September 09, 2016, 03:49:04 PM |
|
Right^^^. They don't have enough science behind their claims to make flat earth into a theory, let alone to prove that it is true. What they have is a religion. It isn't a philosophy, because they don't philosophize about it. They simply have a bunch of beliefs that don't have a basis in fact or reality. This doesn't mean that they don't have a few facts. If they didn't have a few self-evident facts, they wouldn't have such a large following.
|
|
|
|
vantyzz
|
|
September 09, 2016, 04:16:29 PM |
|
According to the school curriculum, and Wikipedia, the Earth has the shape of an oblate ellipsoid. Many perceive this information as an indisputable fact, and do not even try to check it in practice. Nevertheless, common skepticism still alive on our planet
|
|
|
|
the joint
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1020
|
|
September 09, 2016, 05:17:17 PM |
|
According to the school curriculum, and Wikipedia, the Earth has the shape of an oblate ellipsoid. Many perceive this information as an indisputable fact, and do not even try to check it in practice. Nevertheless, common skepticism still alive on our planet
If a person tries to argue on rational grounds that it is reasonable to be skeptical of an oblately-spherical Earth because they don't "check it in practice," then in order to be consistent he needs to be skeptical of a litany of other facts he hasn't personally verified. Some examples may include: the existence of any country they haven't been to; molecules and atoms; bacteria; photons; his own mortality; any image/photo/video of any event they didn't personally witness; etc. It's easy to see how consistent application of such extreme skepticism would be detrimental to him.
|
|
|
|
elena-tur
|
|
September 09, 2016, 06:04:13 PM |
|
If you believe that our planet is like a bloated soccer ball, you are unremarkable; once deceived man, one of the 7 billion. But how much more original to believe that our planet - it is something like a huge plate of frisbee is currently a giant UFO? But such an idea - a direct path to an exclusive club, which has only 100 people: Flat Earth Society.
|
|
|
|
montaga
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 658
Merit: 266
Freedom, Natural Law
|
|
September 09, 2016, 06:55:05 PM |
|
NASA and other world governments have spent untold Billions (Trillions even) of dollars sending probes into space, and all sorts of spiffy STEM research resulting in photographic and mathematical evidence revealing spheroid planetary shapes.
How come we have not one photo showing that the Earth is flat ? Where is proof of a dome (What is it made of, for example ?) Where are photos of this alleged ice wall that surrounds a flat earth ?
Whenever I press the FE's in the thread on the science of things, all I get is links to (very) poorly produced videos on YouTube that are hyperbolic at best.
Hmm.
With the Billions Quadzillions spen how come we dont have a photo showing the Globe earth. Or have you got one? Dont try to find one at NASA they will tell you straight up that they dont have one, only cgi's. BADecker reminds me of Comical Ali (Chemical Ali).
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1382
|
|
September 09, 2016, 07:26:47 PM |
|
NASA and other world governments have spent untold Billions (Trillions even) of dollars sending probes into space, and all sorts of spiffy STEM research resulting in photographic and mathematical evidence revealing spheroid planetary shapes.
How come we have not one photo showing that the Earth is flat ? Where is proof of a dome (What is it made of, for example ?) Where are photos of this alleged ice wall that surrounds a flat earth ?
Whenever I press the FE's in the thread on the science of things, all I get is links to (very) poorly produced videos on YouTube that are hyperbolic at best.
Hmm.
With the Billions Quadzillions spen how come we dont have a photo showing the Globe earth. Or have you got one? Dont try to find one at NASA they will tell you straight up that they dont have one, only cgi's. BADecker reminds me of Comical Ali (Chemical Ali). Imagine smoking a flat cigarette, or drinking a flat beer, or climbing a flat mountain.
|
|
|
|
CoinCube
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1055
|
|
September 09, 2016, 07:35:44 PM |
|
With the Billions Quadzillions spen how come we dont have a photo showing the Globe earth. Or have you got one? Dont try to find one at NASA they will tell you straight up that they dont have one, only cgi's.
You do not have to trust NASA. If you are willing to spend the money you can go up in a balloon 24 miles and see the curvature of the earth for yourself. Like the guy who broke the skydiving record a few years back. http://www.foxnews.com/science/2012/10/14/supersonic-skydiver-hopes-to-break-sound-barrier.html
|
|
|
|
notbatman (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
|
September 09, 2016, 08:02:53 PM |
|
...[clip]... <-- This is your proof the Earth is a ball? Have a nice day!
|
|
|
|
montaga
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 658
Merit: 266
Freedom, Natural Law
|
|
September 09, 2016, 08:26:39 PM |
|
With the Billions Quadzillions spen how come we dont have a photo showing the Globe earth.
But we do have plenty of photographic and video proof that the earth is a spheroid. Not to mention the gobs and gobs of maths dealing with celestial mechanics. And why have you locked-up the photos in the closed. Others like to see them too, would you be so kind and share, or to you wait for the price to sell them. Maths, yeah to you use the 8 inch per mile squared or the distance (miles, km, cm, inch......) multiplied by 0.318 to bet height of drop? At what distance you start to see the "hump" of water. Why trees, grass ...grows Up when gravity is so strong that it keeps you to the ground?
|
|
|
|
olyaru
|
|
September 09, 2016, 08:29:08 PM |
|
Many prefer to believe that believe in a flat Earth can only form the illiterate and dim-witted people. Nevertheless, many personalities were similar views. Among them are our contemporaries whose names may be familiar to you. For example, Nigerian terrorist Mohammed Yusuf, founder of Boko Haram that Jaro hates Western educational system for its twisted worldview.
|
|
|
|
montaga
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 658
Merit: 266
Freedom, Natural Law
|
|
September 09, 2016, 08:32:30 PM |
|
...[clip]...
The photographer is using a fish-eye lens in that photo (do I really need to point that out for you ?!) 100 points to the Candidate.
|
|
|
|
|