Up Like Trump

[Spendulus]

Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders Contemplate a Debate
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/27/us/politics/donald-trump-bernie-sanders-debate.html

Hillary Clinton has declined an invitation to debate Senator Bernie Sanders before the California primary election next month, but he may have found a willing replacement: Donald J. Trump.

The idea of a debate between the two men came up on Wednesday when Mr. Trump was appearing on “Jimmy Kimmel Live” and Mr. Kimmel said that Mr. Sanders had passed along an invitation to Mr. Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee. Mr. Trump, who opted out of a debate in Iowa in January and decided that he would no longer participate in primary debates after the Republican field narrowed to three candidates, said he would be open to debating Mr. Sanders if the proceeds were donated to charity, although there were conflicting reports about how serious he was.

“If I debated him we would have such high ratings and I think we should take that money and give it to some worthy charity,” Mr. Trump said. “If we paid a nice sum toward a charity, I would love to do that.”

...

I also heard something about TYT hosting a debate, but Hillary dropped out, so they invited Trump instead

Donald Trump Officially Invited To The Young Turks Debate
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXuBJvzeC1Q

I view TYT with disgust as lying propagandists but am genuinely curious how Trump would handle them and how he would act toward them.

Well, he's not exactly your typical right winger Republican....

[Moloch]

[Spendulus]

No no no!

Some surgical enhancements are definitely in order, though!

[Wilikon]

We don't need to mention bernie anymore hey berniebots?

 

[BADecker]

Hillary Clinton Admits U.S. Created Al Qaeda, ISIS

Why isn't the Mainstream Media (MSM) in America reporting the fact that Hillary Clinton admitted in public that the U.S. government created Al Qaeda, ISIS, Al Nusra, etc.? Why does the MSM refuse to tell the American people that the United States has not ever actually fought ISIS but instead has surreptitiously and very actively supported ISIS and the other radical Muslim terrorists in the Middle East? Why has the media refused to reveal the fact that ever since Russia started to fight a true offensive war against ISIS the terrorist organization has been reduced to almost half?

I'll tell you why: the MSM is nothing more than a propaganda machine for the U.S. government--no matter which party is in power. The MSM doesn't work for the U.S. citizenry. It doesn't even work for its corporate sponsors. It works for the Washington Power Elite permanently ensconced in D.C. (and yes, those same Power Elite control most of those media corporate sponsors).

It is a sad reality that if one wants to get accurate news reporting, one must mostly bypass the U.S. propaganda media and look to sources outside the U.S. Here is a Canadian publication that covered the Hillary admission:

"The following video features Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton acknowledging that America created and funded Al Qaeda as a terrorist organization in the heyday of the Soviet-Afghan war:

"'Let's remember here… the people we are fighting today we funded them twenty years ago.

"'Let's go recruit these mujahideen.

"'And great, let them come from Saudi Arabia and other countries, importing their Wahabi brand of Islam so that we can go beat the Soviet Union.'"

"What she does not mention is that at no time in the course of the last 35 years has the US ceased to support and finance Al Qaeda as a means to destabilizing sovereign countries. It was 'a pretty good idea', says Hillary, and it remains a good idea today:

"Amply documented, the ISIS and Al Nusrah Mujahideen are recruited by NATO and the Turkish High command, with the support of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Israel.

"The more fundamental question:

"Should a presidential candidate who candidly acknowledges that 'We created Al Qaeda' without a word of caution or regret become president of the US, not to mention Hillary's commitment to waging nuclear war on Russia if and when she becomes president of the United States of America."

Read more at http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Opinion/197655-2016-05-26-hillary-clinton-admits-u-s-created-al-qaeda-isis.htm.

[BADecker]

Well, the way people are growing after eating fast foods, we are going to need bigger ass-sets (chairs, etc.).

 

[RoomBot]

Hillary Clinton Admits U.S. Created Al Qaeda, ISIS

Why isn't the Mainstream Media (MSM) in America reporting the fact that Hillary Clinton admitted in public that the U.S. government created Al Qaeda, ISIS, Al Nusra, etc.? Why does the MSM refuse to tell the American people that the United States has not ever actually fought ISIS but instead has surreptitiously and very actively supported ISIS and the other radical Muslim terrorists in the Middle East? Why has the media refused to reveal the fact that ever since Russia started to fight a true offensive war against ISIS the terrorist organization has been reduced to almost half?

I'll tell you why: the MSM is nothing more than a propaganda machine for the U.S. government--no matter which party is in power. The MSM doesn't work for the U.S. citizenry. It doesn't even work for its corporate sponsors. It works for the Washington Power Elite permanently ensconced in D.C. (and yes, those same Power Elite control most of those media corporate sponsors).

It is a sad reality that if one wants to get accurate news reporting, one must mostly bypass the U.S. propaganda media and look to sources outside the U.S. Here is a Canadian publication that covered the Hillary admission:

"The following video features Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton acknowledging that America created and funded Al Qaeda as a terrorist organization in the heyday of the Soviet-Afghan war:

"'Let's remember here… the people we are fighting today we funded them twenty years ago.

"'Let's go recruit these mujahideen.

"'And great, let them come from Saudi Arabia and other countries, importing their Wahabi brand of Islam so that we can go beat the Soviet Union.'"

"What she does not mention is that at no time in the course of the last 35 years has the US ceased to support and finance Al Qaeda as a means to destabilizing sovereign countries. It was 'a pretty good idea', says Hillary, and it remains a good idea today:

"Amply documented, the ISIS and Al Nusrah Mujahideen are recruited by NATO and the Turkish High command, with the support of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Israel.

"The more fundamental question:

"Should a presidential candidate who candidly acknowledges that 'We created Al Qaeda' without a word of caution or regret become president of the US, not to mention Hillary's commitment to waging nuclear war on Russia if and when she becomes president of the United States of America."

Read more at http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Opinion/197655-2016-05-26-hillary-clinton-admits-u-s-created-al-qaeda-isis.htm.

Thank you for sharing this.

Same thing in Libya & Iran -- assassination & regime change, only to have them turn on us.

[Wilikon]

REPUBLICAN PARTY Sets Primary Turnout Record – 28 Million Votes with 5 States Left



The AP and Real Clear Politics today reported that Donald Trump surpassed the number of delegates needed to win the Republican nomination for President. With the delegates awarded from his win Tuesday in the state of Washington and additional delegates reporting predominantly in Pennsylvania and North Dakota, Trump surpassed this magic number today.

The Republican Party started the year with 17 bona fide candidates in the race. This was more than any major party ever. In spite of this, Trump has now accumulated 57% of all Republican delegates to date and enough to win the nomination. (Note that the Green Papers website has yet to record Trump going over the top.)

As of today 45 Republican state elections and 44 Democrat state elections have taken place. Trump leads Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders in state wins with 31 and in primaries with 28. He’s won 69% of the state elections to date.

Trump has received more than 11 million votes to date in the state elections according to www.thegreenpapers.com. This is 42% of all Republican votes received to date.

The Republican Party has set a party record this year in pre-convention state election turnout with over 28 million votes to date which is 136% of the record high voter turnout in 2008.  That’s four million more votes than the Democratic primary race this year.

There are five states left to vote including California.

This increase in votes can be attributed to Donald Trump.


http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/05/republican-party-sets-primary-turnout-record-28-million-votes-5-states-left/

[Spendulus]

Hillary Clinton Admits U.S. Created Al Qaeda, ISIS

Why isn't the Mainstream Media (MSM) in America reporting the fact that Hillary Clinton admitted in public that the U.S. government created Al Qaeda, ISIS, Al Nusra, etc.? Why does the MSM refuse to tell the American people that the United States has not ever actually fought ISIS but instead has surreptitiously and very actively supported ISIS and the other radical Muslim terrorists in the Middle East? Why has the media refused to reveal the fact that ever since Russia started to fight a true offensive war against ISIS the terrorist organization has been reduced to almost half?
....

Thank you for sharing this.

Same thing in Libya & Iran -- assassination & regime change, only to have them turn on us.

What is not clearly stated is the objectives of Hillary and Obama here, versus the national interests of the American people.
Hillary is in debt to Saudi interests, and has an Iranian girlfriend.  Obama has an Iranian chief of staff.

We should be on the side with Russia against ISIS and others, and Trump sees this quite clearly.

[Wilikon]

 

[BADecker]

Trump's Vince Foster attack backed by new evidence

As Donald Trump revives the two-decade old Vince Foster case, the charge that the cause of death of the top aide and close friend of the Clintons may not have been suicide has once again been dismissed as the stuff of "right-wing conspiracy theory."

But less than three months ago, WND reported a resignation letter surfaced from the lead investigator in independent counsel Robert Fiske's investigation of the Foster case, Miguel Rodriguez, outlining evidence of his charge that the case was fixed.

Thirteen years ago, WND reported Rodriguez, an assistant U.S. attorney, made an audio recording in which he charged the suicide ruling was predetermined, the crime scene was altered and major newspaper editors killed stories by reporters pursuing the truth.

"This whole notion of [Fiske and Starr] doing an honest investigation is laughable," Rodriguez says in the tape.

In his resignation letter, Rodriquez refers to photographs showing a wound on Foster's neck that was not mentioned in Starr's official government report.

Hillary for prosecution, not president! Join the sizzling campaign to put Mrs. Clinton where she really belongs.

The obvious questions: How could a suicide victim be found with two wounds, a .38-caliber gunshot into the mouth that exited through his head and another wound on the right side of his neck that one of the paramedics described as a small-caliber bullet hole? And why would the government investigators go to great lengths to cover it up?

Read more at http://mobile.wnd.com/2016/05/trumps-vince-foster-attack-backed-by-new-evidence/.

[BADecker]

Marco Rubio: Media Should Report 'Truth' About Professional Protesters Disrupting Trump

"Hope media will start to report truth, many of the violent protestors [at Donald Trump] events are 'professional protestors,' not grassroots," he said on Twitter early this morning.

Rubio added that there was a "whole industry of professional disrupters who go to events to disrupt them knowing cameras will gravitate to them."

"These protests [are] not organic," he said.

Rubio's comments are starkly different than his reaction to the protests in Chicago when the Florida senator was still running against Trump for the Republican nomination for president.

"I'm telling you, that this boiling point that we have now reached has been fed largely by the fact that we have a frontrunner in my party who has fed into language that basically justifies physically assaulting people who disagree with you," Rubio said in a press conference the morning after the riots in Chicago in March.

Read more at http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/05/26/marco-rubio-media-report-truth-donald-trump-protestors/.

[Wilikon]

Trump's Decision To Debate Sanders In California Is His Most Genius Move Yet



If the Trump/Sanders debate proceeds as planned in California, you’re about to witness one of the most important moments of a 2016 general election that hasn’t even begun yet. To say such a debate would be an unmitigated disaster for Hillary Clinton would be the understatement of the century. Let’s explore why.

First of all, Hillary Clinton outright rejected a debate request from Bernie Sanders ahead of the June 7th California primary. Given Sanders’ recent momentum, as well as her need to persuade a significant number of his supporters to back her in November; such a denial was not only arrogant, it was highly insulting to voters in America’s largest state. From team Clinton’s perspective there was little upside to agreeing to a debate, versus easily manageable downside from a few days of negative media coverage.

Or so they thought…

The above strategic thought process would’ve worked in almost every other election season and against any other candidate. Unfortunately for her, it doesn’t work in 2016, and it certainly doesn’t work against Donald Trump.

Trump understands human nature as well as anyone I’ve ever observed. He’s also likely the most skilled natural politician of my lifetime, with perhaps the exception of Bill Clinton in his prime. Under conventional thinking, Trump would also certainly deny a Sanders debate request for the same reasons Clinton declined it. There’s little to gain in publicly battling a guy with nothing to lose, and you’ve already wrapped up the Republican nomination anyway. That said, Trump is far too savvy to fall victim to such straightforward thinking. He understands that debating Sanders in California ahead of the primary presents a once in a lifetime opportunity to embarrass and belittle Clinton in front of the whole world before the general election even begins.

Think about it for a second. Who cares what happens during the debate itself. Think about what the media will be saying. Think about how weak, irrelevant and stupid a Trump/Sanders contest will make Hillary Clinton look. As the largest state in the union heads to the voting booths Hillary Clinton can’t be bothered to have a discussion with Bernie Sanders, yet Donald Trump is more than willing. I can see the headlines already:

    Hillary MIA in California?

    Where in the World is Hillary?

    Hillary Nowhere to be Found in California Primary.

You get the point. Trump will appear Presidential, while Hillary will look like a discredited Goldman Sachs crook hiding from a 74-year-old socialist. Which, by the way, is exactly what she’s doing.

Naturally, the whining hordes of Clinton sycophants and paid online trolls who don’t think they should have to work to secure the Presidency, will bitch and moan at Sanders. They’ll blame him for all her problems, when the truth is this disaster, like most of her disasters, is entirely of her own making. Hillary Clinton was offered the opportunity to debate Sanders in California. She declined. You can’t blame Trump for jumping on the opportunity to make her look extraordinarily stupid. That’s just politics.


http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-05-27/trumps-decision-debate-sanders-california-his-most-genius-move-yet

[Racey]

Glenn Beck Jumps On The Trump Train


Beck went on CNN to discuss a possible jump aboard Trump’s candidacy, despite calling him a “pathological narcissistic sociopath.” He told host Alisyn Camerota that “Unlike some politicians I say what I mean and mean what I say.

Given Beck’s mercurial nature, opposing Trump, supporting Zuckerberg, and so on, I though this facial symmetry analysis was interesting. I probably should have corrected the eyes, but the zany look struck me as funny, and it somehow seemed to capture the personae of Beck. Nevertheless, notice how Glenn only emoted the smile with one side of his face, and it was the right side.




http://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/

[bryant.coleman]

http://edition.cnn.com/2016/05/27/politics/trump-says-he-will-not-debate-sanders/

Trump says that he is not interested in debating Bernie Sanders. This is not going to go down well with the American public. It was Trump who initially suggested such an idea, and now backing out from it is not going to give him any brownie points. Hitlery and his goons are going to use this opportunity to paint him as a coward who is not capable of taking on the Democrats.

[tvbcof]

http://edition.cnn.com/2016/05/27/politics/trump-says-he-will-not-debate-sanders/

Trump says that he is not interested in debating Bernie Sanders. This is not going to go down well with the American public. It was Trump who initially suggested such an idea, and now backing out from it is not going to give him any brownie points. Hitlery and his goons are going to use this opportunity to paint him as a coward who is not capable of taking on the Democrats.

Or he'll make a big deal about how the media is totally greedy and won't do charity right, and tie in establishment Hillary with them.  The media probably is plenty greedy and do not wish to set a precedent where they are on the hook for providing revenue neutral airtime any time someone wishes to score political points and suggest it.

If I were Trump, I would state that as one of my '100 day' bullet points, I'll do a debate with Sanders when I am president.  It will be a low budget production available to on-line to everyone who is interested in the study of political science and philosophy.  And in the mean time, of course, Hillary/Sanders debates are quite appropriate until and unless Sanders stops winning so much and drops out.

[Wilikon]

http://edition.cnn.com/2016/05/27/politics/trump-says-he-will-not-debate-sanders/

Trump says that he is not interested in debating Bernie Sanders. This is not going to go down well with the American public. It was Trump who initially suggested such an idea, and now backing out from it is not going to give him any brownie points. Hitlery and his goons are going to use this opportunity to paint him as a coward who is not capable of taking on the Democrats.

If only bernie was representing the democrat party. He is not.

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/delegate-targets/


TRUMP answered to a question if he was willing to do a one on one with bernie. He said yes if it was met with his conditions. When you go to those American TV shows the guest knows the questions in advance so not to be too surprised. TRUMP knew he was going to say yes, knowing he would not do it. There is a crisis for the berniebots, not much for TRUMP. Can harpy clinton use this against him when she was the one who refused to meet bernie one last time? She can try.

Who was in need for a massive TV exposure with millions of viewers one last time? TRUMP or bernie? Who's making bernie beg on his knees for a TV show? Harpy or TRUMP? Who will still lose in a few weeks, not matter the exposure? TRUMP or bernie? Who will be mad as hell to lose against a liar, berniebots or TRUMP supporters?

Berniebots say now THIS, THIS is the reason why they will never vote for TRUMP.... He will be responsible for the lost of bernie... How insane berniebots can be? Well, by voting for harpy clinton, the one who's destroyed bernie sanders? Are they going to vote for her, or stay at home or vote libertarian?


Now after all the past controversies that was supposed to destroy TRUMP's victory, on a scale of 1 to 11, how high is this one?

He is simply reminding what a mega cancer for the democrats harpy clinton is.

Harpy is full of scandals, her health is bad, and they need to make a decision bringing a biden+warren ticket, and force that decision on berniebots, quick. It is almost too late.


Tic tac toe vs 3D chess.

[Wilikon]

 

[Wilikon]

 

[RoomBot]

 

WTF is that???