CRYPTSY stopping withdraw locking accounts without notifying users! Class Action

[vancefox]

Furthermore:

Pursuant to the USA Patriot Act of 2001, the Secretary of the Treasury was required to finalize regulations before October 26, 2002 making KYC mandatory for all US banks. The related processes are required to confirm to a customer identification program (CIP)

https://www.ffiec.gov/bsa_aml_infobase/documents/BSA_AML_FAQ.pdf

The CIP rule provides that a “customer” generally is “a person that opens a new account.” 31
C.F.R. § 103.121(a)(3)(i)(A).

Cryptsy put limits on non-FIAT for current and new customers because THEY wanted to.  Nothing more.

[BitJohn]

I've had to explain to people about the $25 a day limit..
People don't believe it.. they think it's lying Troll FUD  

I posted on another topic here to a bunch of stunned users..
Yeah it's true and that BitJohn had said it was to encourage users to move up from tier1 i believe.

Sort of off topic my comment but it -IS- helpful info.
So people that guy above me commenting "CryptoNick" was not Trolling
They REALLY do have a limit like that..

I of course see why they did that and makes sense in a way i suppose.. but
That low of a limit is nasty and kind of cruel to users.
What if you sent money over then noticed after and did NOT want to get verified to a higher tier ?
You'd be screwed LOL

Exactly! Users could send in $1,000 worth of coins and before even one trade it will take you 10 months to get your money Out or off the Exchange... This limit should only be on your profits! And it is worded $25 a day so people will not realize until it is too late that $100 is the real limit. This is deceptive!

That limit is only for Tier 0 at Kraken that limit is ZERO money. KYC is the law after all not a Cryptsy law but like a no shit requirement. Tier limits are a thing at every legitimate exchange. Never understood why folks cannot grasp that. To run an exchange you have to comply with laws to do business. Unless your BTC-e of course. I was still there when the tier system was drawn up and it is completely based off of Kraken's.

The minimum information required to match someone against the SDN list and OFAC is Name DOB, city, country. So Tier one requires those things.

Gleb all the tier 1 tech support is overseas (Americans are expensive)... Don't bug that poor Karen Smith lady your way off.

Before you mention KYC you might want to look it up and understand it...  So... I'll throw the complete and utter bullshit flag on your statement.

KYC is a law that mandates identification which differs in regulation from country to country.  For the US, where Cryptsy is based, KYC mandates complete identification for all transactions under it's purview... not just those over $100/month.  You (Cryptsy) has a broad tier system applying to all customers which means that you would have to follow the most stringent (US policy/law).

That's something you might be able to grasp.

If I'm wrong, prove it.

wow your sooo smart.... Don't "you" me I don't work there I'm responding because I know the why. Cryptsy has a compliance team and lawyers that have always dealt with that stuff. Obviously Cryptsy is slowly compelling their user base to make them more compliant. You don't have to be the best you just cannot be the worst.

Cryptsy will always make the effort to stay in the middle of the pack when it comes to compliance.

I do think that if your unwilling to provide your name DOB city etc then your probably one of the crooks they are trying to stop... The majority of posts I used to respond to where "Cryptsy stole my money" was related to some Iranian or someone on the SDN list trying to skirt the system. The law requires them to seize the assets and hold them.

[BitJohn]

Furthermore:

Pursuant to the USA Patriot Act of 2001, the Secretary of the Treasury was required to finalize regulations before October 26, 2002 making KYC mandatory for all US banks. The related processes are required to confirm to a customer identification program (CIP)

https://www.ffiec.gov/bsa_aml_infobase/documents/BSA_AML_FAQ.pdf

The CIP rule provides that a “customer” generally is “a person that opens a new account.” 31
C.F.R. § 103.121(a)(3)(i)(A).

Cryptsy put limits on non-FIAT for current and new customers because THEY wanted to.  Nothing more.

The patriot act is hardly the only agency telling exchanges what they have to do. Cryptsy's compliance officer does what the agencies, and the lawyers tell them they need to do its that simple. Again its the same as all the other exchanges. It's a standard.

[vancefox]

Before you mention KYC you might want to look it up and understand it...  So... I'll throw the complete and utter bullshit flag on your statement.

KYC is a law that mandates identification which differs in regulation from country to country.  For the US, where Cryptsy is based, KYC mandates complete identification for all transactions under it's purview... not just those over $100/month.  You (Cryptsy) has a broad tier system applying to all customers which means that you would have to follow the most stringent (US policy/law).

That's something you might be able to grasp.

If I'm wrong, prove it.

wow your sooo smart.... Don't "you" me I don't work there I'm responding because I know the why. Cryptsy has a compliance team and lawyers that have always dealt with that stuff. Obviously Cryptsy is slowly compelling their user base to make them more compliant. You don't have to be the best you just cannot be the worst.

Cryptsy will always make the effort to stay in the middle of the pack when it comes to compliance.

I do think that if your unwilling to provide your name DOB city etc then your probably one of the crooks they are trying to stop... The majority of posts I used to respond to where "Cryptsy stole my money" was related to some Iranian or someone on the SDN list trying to skirt the system. The law requires them to seize the assets and hold them.

For someone who isn't Cryptsy anymore YOU'RE sure going to bat for them quite a bit...

And Cryptsy dumped this KYC bullshit out of nowhere forcing customers to comply.  If I didn't want you to know my name and I had more than 25USD worth of non-FIAT product on YOUR old exchange I'd have to wait days, months or even years to withdraw my balance without conducting a single trade.  That is bullshit.

What's most fucked up is Cryptsy says nothing.  You said it yourself.  You don't work there.  Why isn't Cryptsy officially spouting this bullshit?  Oh wait, you don't know since you don't work there any more...

I luckily pulled all my skin out of that game while I had the chance... if Cryptsy acts more like a business instead of a mafia controlled lemonade stand I'll use them but this changing the rules of the game in the middle of a play is about as fucked up as you can get.

[Spoetnik]

Well i figured it's time i start putting years worth of tips to use..

An informant sent me this way back.
I have more too LOTS more

Private Message Title = Cryptsy corruption evidence, conspiracy and Prom!

Thought you might like for me to post this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=718100.msg8113716#msg8113716

You should keep all the evidence offline for safe keeping. Don't want Imagur or Bitcointalk removing it!

http://imgur.com/ASqD6sV,Et7xbxX,yY1RNRa,ld8zLnq,IJI747U,bS40Cq9,AeO8PpF,AhAKwCp,WOgxRlx,iqCpqO5,MemabGp,HvFc5CO,Bu303cE,iXlVGdr,OsqeJuH,kzqVEkL,Y19oR2o,q59yz2m,rvG1HmO,wi57jk7,YjoMaTC,cygg1zK,yPLHtTe,n58Gub5,qCaZ5tE,9d8Rtqr,B81kL5I,podoJ4p

[vancefox]

Furthermore:

Pursuant to the USA Patriot Act of 2001, the Secretary of the Treasury was required to finalize regulations before October 26, 2002 making KYC mandatory for all US banks. The related processes are required to confirm to a customer identification program (CIP)

https://www.ffiec.gov/bsa_aml_infobase/documents/BSA_AML_FAQ.pdf

The CIP rule provides that a “customer” generally is “a person that opens a new account.” 31
C.F.R. § 103.121(a)(3)(i)(A).

Cryptsy put limits on non-FIAT for current and new customers because THEY wanted to.  Nothing more.

The patriot act is hardly the only agency telling exchanges what they have to do. Cryptsy's compliance officer does what the agencies, and the lawyers tell them they need to do its that simple. Again its the same as all the other exchanges. It's a standard.

http://www.protiviti.com/en-US/Documents/Resource-Guides/Guide-to-US-AML-Requirements-5thEdition-Protiviti.pdf

Maybe you, BitJohn (not necessarily Cryptsy), can enlighten me on what else is directing KYC requirements?  It's page 11 on the above so you know what I'm looking at.





Maybe I'm wrong?  If not... I raise that bullshit flag high.

[Hippie Tech]

Furthermore:

Pursuant to the USA Patriot Act of 2001, the Secretary of the Treasury was required to finalize regulations before October 26, 2002 making KYC mandatory for all US banks. The related processes are required to confirm to a customer identification program (CIP)

https://www.ffiec.gov/bsa_aml_infobase/documents/BSA_AML_FAQ.pdf

The CIP rule provides that a “customer” generally is “a person that opens a new account.” 31
C.F.R. § 103.121(a)(3)(i)(A).

Cryptsy put limits on non-FIAT for current and new customers because THEY wanted to.  Nothing more.

The patriot act is hardly the only agency telling exchanges what they have to do. Cryptsy's compliance officer does what the agencies, and the lawyers tell them they need to do its that simple. Again its the same as all the other exchanges. It's a standard.

http://www.protiviti.com/en-US/Documents/Resource-Guides/Guide-to-US-AML-Requirements-5thEdition-Protiviti.pdf

Maybe you, BitJohn (not necessarily Cryptsy), can enlighten me on what else is directing KYC requirements?  It's page 11 on the above so you know what I'm looking at.

http://s23.postimg.org/jpkz9od4b/aml.png

http://s18.postimg.org/4cdhkpsnd/aml2.png

Maybe I'm wrong?  If not... I raise that bullshit flag high.

Same ole BitJohn.. playing dumber than dumb can be. YOU SILLY GUY.

He put on the same act when 2-3 of us were questioning him/everyone on their blatant violations of the insider trading laws, via the cryptsy chatbox.

[Spoetnik]

@Gleb check out the chatbox pic's i just posted
It shows Horus trying to set up a meeting on IRC with Prom
then Prom says let's do Skype.. and we all know how much the back room boys like Skype LOL

THEN
The Bitcointalk forum link has EVEN more info !
Then i posted EVEN more such as logs of my 1 year ban on chat.
And other people chimed in with more evidence.

I have been called a conspiracy nut for years in regards to Cryptsy but let's try a bit of common sense shall we ?

I have said the FED's are for sure going to be interested in all this.
This forum has been hacked at least 3 times i know of.. i bet some were SQL database dumps and IP logs etc for the FBI.

Cryptsy has been a perfect little honey pot.
For who ? The US govt.
Conspiracy huh ?

BigVern and BitJohn are on record bragging about being the computer tech specialist whispering in 4 star general ears.
Not enough ?
I have a PM from Horus from a week ago warning me BitJohn is a high up military guy and
i better not press for info on WHO he is.

Now lets pause for a moment shall we..
What would you do if you were an FBI agent named Jim Shockney from Texas and you wanted to collect data ?
Get an admin position on Cryptsy so you could snoop on peoples verified ID's and trade ACTIVITY.
What does he do ? coding ? nope.. that is allegedly Paul's job as they always say to us.
Look at Jim's picture.. does he look like a Crypto guy ?
Fuck that he's a narc !

I said that simply to get to the BTC-e ties.
The US fed's don't have access to BTC-e and i bet they REALLY want it bad !
It's a haven for a billion dollar black market economy used by hackers and terrorists.
They need badly to get access to BTC-e any way they can.
And what better way than to get all buddy buddy with the chat box mod's and make one of them a Cryptsy mod
make plans for BTC-e code's (cross exchange ties) and then let them pump their shits coins on Cryptsy.

Cross referencing..
The US Fed's ALWAYS need access points.. logging is a bonus to them and they will run it for half a decade..
What they really want is too control access points to cross reference key players and large sums of money
moving around the globe.. and a key hub is BTC-e the Russian terrorist haven.

I think the btc-e boys have been hood winked and bs'd by the US military boy's at Cryptsy.
I also encourage them to cover their tracks NOW !
Moosa koolio bumface prom bobsurplus etc..
You think i am the enemy ? ..think again  

I have thought all of this since day one with Cryptsy etc and i have warned all of you countless times.
But sadly the FBI just looooooves Cocky fucktards.. they pour avalanches of data all of them LOL

Think i am high on crack ?
Well i have info on this stuff in File sharing circles and i have watched it play out in the crypto scene gradually too.
If the FBI does not care ?
Why did they arrest 2 guys who met from LocalBitcoins in a Florida parking lot ?
Besides look at the news about the 2 FBI agents arrested after the Gox court case..
You can see a break down of what the FBI agents had been doing among us all in the crypto scene.
They used multiple names and lied and extorted and stole and then arrested people..
then in the end THEY themslevs got arrested LOL

and yeahhh boys i smell a fucking reapeat HAHAHHA

I got it cocked and loaded and you're all gonna hear it.. BANG ! ..I told you so

EDIT:
Cryptsy should have gone down insolvent long ago.. it's only running still so they can investigate us all.

[JCviggen]

Exactly! Users could send in $1,000 worth of coins and before even one trade it will take you 10 months to get your money Out or off the Exchange... This limit should only be on your profits! And it is worded $25 a day so people will not realize until it is too late that $100 is the real limit. This is deceptive!

Let's not exaggerate. Anyone can get to Tier 1 and 2000/day simply by filling in a name and address. Any name and address, it's not like it's being actually verified by anyone and the upgrade is instantaneous. Annoying but hardly impossible to "comply" with is it?

The real issue is that the coins with decent volume and market depth have insane delays to withdraw. In every way it appears that the hot wallets of those coins simply don't have enough in them as small transactions work better than large ones and the "queue" can skip over an earlier larger one and process a smaller WD as I noticed myself. That doesn't necessarily prove that Cryptsy doesn't have the coins, they could be in a cold wallet, but then the question has to be why aren't they topping up the hot wallets.

[BitJohn]

Before you mention KYC you might want to look it up and understand it...  So... I'll throw the complete and utter bullshit flag on your statement.

KYC is a law that mandates identification which differs in regulation from country to country.  For the US, where Cryptsy is based, KYC mandates complete identification for all transactions under it's purview... not just those over $100/month.  You (Cryptsy) has a broad tier system applying to all customers which means that you would have to follow the most stringent (US policy/law).

That's something you might be able to grasp.

If I'm wrong, prove it.

wow your sooo smart.... Don't "you" me I don't work there I'm responding because I know the why. Cryptsy has a compliance team and lawyers that have always dealt with that stuff. Obviously Cryptsy is slowly compelling their user base to make them more compliant. You don't have to be the best you just cannot be the worst.

Cryptsy will always make the effort to stay in the middle of the pack when it comes to compliance.

I do think that if your unwilling to provide your name DOB city etc then your probably one of the crooks they are trying to stop... The majority of posts I used to respond to where "Cryptsy stole my money" was related to some Iranian or someone on the SDN list trying to skirt the system. The law requires them to seize the assets and hold them.

For someone who isn't Cryptsy anymore YOU'RE sure going to bat for them quite a bit...

And Cryptsy dumped this KYC bullshit out of nowhere forcing customers to comply.  If I didn't want you to know my name and I had more than 25USD worth of non-FIAT product on YOUR old exchange I'd have to wait days, months or even years to withdraw my balance without conducting a single trade.  That is bullshit.

What's most fucked up is Cryptsy says nothing.  You said it yourself.  You don't work there.  Why isn't Cryptsy officially spouting this bullshit?  Oh wait, you don't know since you don't work there any more...

I luckily pulled all my skin out of that game while I had the chance... if Cryptsy acts more like a business instead of a mafia controlled lemonade stand I'll use them but this changing the rules of the game in the middle of a play is about as fucked up as you can get.

Fair enough on the someone from Cryptsy should be talking... I just get bent out of shape on certain things like the Tier shit. It is definitely a thing hence why EVERYONE is doing it.

I mean you can bitch about it all day, but call your attorney and say hey they wont give me my money unless I provide them Name, DOB City and state....Any guess what his answer will be? Take the challenge. keep us informed.

I'm chatting in here because I happen to like Spoetnik, and Glebs company. After all I have always like Spoetniks theory's on the various madness of the scene. Gleb I didn't really know but I find his sense of humor refreshing. Hippietech could get hit by a train and I would likely celebrate. My only regret would be the train probably made it too quick.

[Horus_Cryptsy]

I replied, in depth. This thread has gone full retard, I just check in once in a while for some shiggles. I reply and it is swamped by 5 more pages of mostly wrong information.

[Hippie Tech]

Funny how Cryptsy markets still have trading and volume when the entire site is down due to DDoS (so they claim):
https://www.cryptsy.com/markets/view/DOGE_BTC

Smells like a Willy bot to me, or maybe Vern running some kind of bot on the exchange internally?

They are called trading bots..

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=507103.0

The original CAT was designed specifically for cryptsy.

Is this one? https://www.shodan.io/host/106.185.29.223

Now you lost me. heh..

What does that IP have to do with that rigged trading bot ?

I was inquiring if that's the IP that the bot uses to assess Cryptsy.

Where did you find that IP ?

Was the OP onto something when he said..

Essentially, Big Vern = Mark Karpeles.

https://www.google.ca/maps/dir//3+Chome-6-28+Aobadai,+Meguro-ku,+T%C5%8Dky%C5%8D-to+153-0042,+Japan/@35.6318045,139.6874603,7851m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m8!4m7!1m0!1m5!1m1!1s0x6018f4ab30cf846d:0xc0ce1ab089a73e4d!2m2!1d139.6904493!2d35.6526836

https://www.shodan.io/search?query=cryptsy

https://who.is/domain-history/primedice.com

https://who.is/domain-history/anonymousspeech.com

Registrant Name: MICHAEL WEBER
Registrant Organization: ANONYMOUSSPEECH
Registrant Street: 1-3-3 SAKURA HOUSE
Registrant City: TOKYO
Registrant State/Province: TOKYO
Registrant Postal Code: 169-0072
Registrant Country: JP
Registrant Phone: +81.09037462746

https://www.google.ca/maps/place/SAKURA+HOUSE+co.ltd./@35.6952041,139.6985367,12.58z/data=!4m6!1m3!3m2!1s0x60188cd62cee7047:0x4e341cc7eebc61a5!2sSAKURA+HOUSE+co.ltd.!3m1!1s0x60188cd62cee7047:0x4e341cc7eebc61a5

[Spoetnik]

US Fed's Honey Pot !
Whether they are *individually in on it or not i have no doubt !

Seems Cryptsy just likes to pull a Fodor.. proof gets posted and they say ohh you sooo crazy. LOL

Crypto...........

what is it ?

- money.
- secrecy.
- thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands of coins POSTED on exchanges.

made by whom ?
masked coin cloners that go to extreme levels to hide their tracks and identities.

pump groups that efficiently lie to the public then rob them.

every fucking bit of it tied to these fuckers playing dumb.. FACT !

What the fuck would posses Horus to sit there on chat and coddle and stroke Prom ?
Then arrange a meeting on IRC / Skype ?
Where HE HAS already been with countless other coin makers.. too many to mention.

                                                                                             ...

One of these days shit is REALLY going to hit the fan and we will see who is right.
In the meantime i hope to feed the fed's (from various countries) all the info they need to hunt these fuckers.

a billion dollar economy and Fed's around the world don't care ?
Not fucking likely..

All i wonder is who gets these fuckers first ? The Fed's or the public with class action law suits.

BitJohn said Cryptsy is drowning and has laid off people.. hell he was let go
How in gods name do they make any money ?
They use to rely on trade fee's pretty heavily.

End users need to cover their ass ..no one is going to.
When Cryptsy closes it's doors they are gonna ride into the sunset like Mark did.
Last i heard from Mark was he was pissing people off on Twitter posting pictures of sunsets
as he sat on the beach having a martinee.. you think he gives two shits about your lost Bitcoin ?

You think the people who run this forum give two shits about your Cryptsy Transfers ?
You think the police are going to care when Cryptsy shuts it's doors ?

Gleb said it nicely..
Why are we trying to help Investards ?

I warned people about Gox and all i got was cheerleading and fanboyism.
Spoetnik says --> I Told You So

[Kn_os]

hey! this threat is realy moved to chat between two person, it is impossible to read...

Let's back to topic. Cryptsy's problem with btc withdraw.

If look on cryptsy' wallets.
Can it be cryptsy hot wallets: 0.006 btc on balance
https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/Cryptsy.com

Is this cryptsy's cold wallet? 7.5 btc on balance
https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/Cryptsy.com-old

Or anybody can give a link to cryptsy's cold wallet if they have one at all?

[Scam_Fighters]

Furthermore:

Pursuant to the USA Patriot Act of 2001, the Secretary of the Treasury was required to finalize regulations before October 26, 2002 making KYC mandatory for all US banks. The related processes are required to confirm to a customer identification program (CIP)

https://www.ffiec.gov/bsa_aml_infobase/documents/BSA_AML_FAQ.pdf

The CIP rule provides that a “customer” generally is “a person that opens a new account.” 31
C.F.R. § 103.121(a)(3)(i)(A).

Cryptsy put limits on non-FIAT for current and new customers because THEY wanted to.  Nothing more.

The patriot act is hardly the only agency telling exchanges what they have to do. Cryptsy's compliance officer does what the agencies, and the lawyers tell them they need to do its that simple. Again its the same as all the other exchanges. It's a standard.

http://www.protiviti.com/en-US/Documents/Resource-Guides/Guide-to-US-AML-Requirements-5thEdition-Protiviti.pdf

Maybe you, BitJohn (not necessarily Cryptsy), can enlighten me on what else is directing KYC requirements?  It's page 11 on the above so you know what I'm looking at.

http://s23.postimg.org/jpkz9od4b/aml.png

http://s18.postimg.org/4cdhkpsnd/aml2.png

Maybe I'm wrong?  If not... I raise that bullshit flag high.

Same ole BitJohn.. playing dumber than dumb can be. YOU SILLY GUY.

He put on the same act when 2-3 of us were questioning him/everyone on their blatant violations of the insider trading laws, via the cryptsy chatbox.

I wanted to make an update pointing out the fact that Hippietech is continuing to abuse the feedback system here by deleting and then reapplying one of his negative ratings for me in order to attempt to keep my rating from returning to normalcy repeatedly after I have received multiple new ratings. He monitors my ratings, and when he sees someone leave a new positive one, he deletes just one of his negative ratings and reapplys it to game the trust system over and over. According to Theymos this is trust rating abuse and is not allowed, yet here he is doing it.

...It's entirely legitimate to give someone a new positive rating just to negate a negative rating. (In this case you should explicitly respond to the negative rating you're negating.) It is not legitimate to keep deleting and reposting negative ratings to put the system back into "this guy just turned scammer!" mode. People who do that shouldn't be trusted.

I've read the entire thread and I agree with muddafudda on this one. You paid him 5 LTCs and want a refund? How many hours did muddafudda spend on this?

Honestly, at $125 (current price, I assume it was in that ballpark when the deal was made) I'm not sure what you were expecting. Coingen costs about $125 (which didn't exist of course at the time of this deal) and you were expecting a high quality, custom made coin for the same price?

You probably would have been better off paying a reasonable price to a good developer, rather than hoping to get lucky with a $125 developer.

Brain diarrhea.

I think he's a troll from the beef council. I am seriously turned off to the whole cow hugging movement by shitheads like hippytech.

... Hippie Tech you are just trying to spread lies about Soopy  and just before Navajo is about to release anon ...on March the 1   Hippie Tech you are just a fuder THAT SPREAD LIES  NAVAJO IS NOT SHIT COIN  ...................................... BUD

Name: Vegancoin
3 Letter Code: VEG
TotalCoins: unlimited
POS Stake as %: 2.1 per year
Days till POS Stake:  2.1
Block Rewards: 21 VEG, doubles every 64512 blocks or approx 32 weeks to a max 84 coins per block.
Block Times: 5 minute blocks, 21 confs for minted blocks/PoS, 3 confs for TXs
Port:2169
RPCPort:2170

Scam Alert!

Hippie Tech #Vegancoin aka  1 of the BIGGEST FUDdder

Is that your NEW SCAM COIN? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1263214.0  [ANN] [BITVEGAN] [VEG] [BE HEALTY BE VEGAN]
48 BTC ICO!!! Smells like a Hippie Tech BULLSH***T Coin Freakshow  

[not.you]

Exactly! Users could send in $1,000 worth of coins and before even one trade it will take you 10 months to get your money Out or off the Exchange... This limit should only be on your profits! And it is worded $25 a day so people will not realize until it is too late that $100 is the real limit. This is deceptive!

Let's not exaggerate. Anyone can get to Tier 1 and 2000/day simply by filling in a name and address. Any name and address, it's not like it's being actually verified by anyone and the upgrade is instantaneous. Annoying but hardly impossible to "comply" with is it?

The real issue is that the coins with decent volume and market depth have insane delays to withdraw. In every way it appears that the hot wallets of those coins simply don't have enough in them as small transactions work better than large ones and the "queue" can skip over an earlier larger one and process a smaller WD as I noticed myself. That doesn't necessarily prove that Cryptsy doesn't have the coins, they could be in a cold wallet, but then the question has to be why aren't they topping up the hot wallets.

I am not sure what the cryptsy verification tiers look like since I have never bothered verifying there since I had already decided not to use cryptsy at all after they were found to be acting less than honorably with the whole paycoin fiasco.  Here is what my kraken verification looks like without ever having sent them any documentation.  They did at one point however lock my account when they detected me using an IP from a state other than the one I live in.  This is because my work uses a business class ISP so the way the ISP has it networked, it all goes to a NOC in another state so it appears to be a public IP address in that state.  I explained it to Kraken and they looked at their records and saw that I also connected regularly from an IP in the state where I claimed to live and they unlocked me.

My Kraken limits without any documentation are $5k crypto and $2k USD a day.  And 5 times that amount USD and 10 times that amount crypto per month.  Of course a major difference also is that if you do a withdrawal from Kraken it just goes through right away without weeks of excuses and support tickets with generic bullshit stories in them.

[Gleb Gamow]

@Horus Can you push my withdraw of 122K ADC (Alligator Dung Coin). Thanks.

Horus: Done!

@Hours What's the status of Cryptsy adding YBC (Yak Blood Coin)?

Horus: We're currently syncing the wallet now along with LFC (Little Foot Coin).

[cohnhead]

@Horus Can you push my withdraw of 122K ADC (Alligator Dung Coin). Thanks.

Horus: Done!

@Hours What's the status of Cryptsy adding YBC (Yak Blood Coin)?

Horus: We're currently syncing the wallet now along with LFC (Little Foot Coin).

so there is a lot of that going on in the chatbox...I think its more placebo effect than anything. I'm trading lightly with them but whatever withdrawals I have done in last few days of btc have taken between 12-16 hours...hate to say those times seem to be getting longer.

I asked Horus to "kick" or "push" thru some withdrawals but not sure if my asking actually helped them go thru.

Gleb, I was reading this other thread..i think your services are needed. your skills...nothing short of amazing (when used for good of course)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1261455.40

[Gleb Gamow]

@Horus Can you push my withdraw of 122K ADC (Alligator Dung Coin). Thanks.

Horus: Done!

@Hours What's the status of Cryptsy adding YBC (Yak Blood Coin)?

Horus: We're currently syncing the wallet now along with LFC (Little Foot Coin).

so there is a lot of that going on in the chatbox...I think its more placebo effect than anything. I'm trading lightly with them but whatever withdrawals I have done in last few days of btc have taken between 12-16 hours...hate to say those times seem to be getting longer.

I asked Horus to "kick" or "push" thru some withdrawals but not sure if my asking actually helped them go thru.

Gleb, I was reading this other thread..i think your services are needed. your skills...nothing short of amazing (when used for good of course)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1261455.40

Now on it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1261455.msg13087565#msg13087565

[Hippie Tech]

Furthermore:

Pursuant to the USA Patriot Act of 2001, the Secretary of the Treasury was required to finalize regulations before October 26, 2002 making KYC mandatory for all US banks. The related processes are required to confirm to a customer identification program (CIP)

https://www.ffiec.gov/bsa_aml_infobase/documents/BSA_AML_FAQ.pdf

The CIP rule provides that a “customer” generally is “a person that opens a new account.” 31
C.F.R. § 103.121(a)(3)(i)(A).

Cryptsy put limits on non-FIAT for current and new customers because THEY wanted to.  Nothing more.

The patriot act is hardly the only agency telling exchanges what they have to do. Cryptsy's compliance officer does what the agencies, and the lawyers tell them they need to do its that simple. Again its the same as all the other exchanges. It's a standard.

http://www.protiviti.com/en-US/Documents/Resource-Guides/Guide-to-US-AML-Requirements-5thEdition-Protiviti.pdf

Maybe you, BitJohn (not necessarily Cryptsy), can enlighten me on what else is directing KYC requirements?  It's page 11 on the above so you know what I'm looking at.

http://s23.postimg.org/jpkz9od4b/aml.png

http://s18.postimg.org/4cdhkpsnd/aml2.png

Maybe I'm wrong?  If not... I raise that bullshit flag high.

Same ole BitJohn.. playing dumber than dumb can be. YOU SILLY GUY.

He put on the same act when 2-3 of us were questioning him/everyone on their blatant violations of the insider trading laws, via the cryptsy chatbox.

I wanted to make an update pointing out the fact that Hippietech is continuing to abuse the feedback system here by deleting and then reapplying one of his negative ratings for me in order to attempt to keep my rating from returning to normalcy repeatedly after I have received multiple new ratings. He monitors my ratings, and when he sees someone leave a new positive one, he deletes just one of his negative ratings and reapplys it to game the trust system over and over. According to Theymos this is trust rating abuse and is not allowed, yet here he is doing it.

...It's entirely legitimate to give someone a new positive rating just to negate a negative rating. (In this case you should explicitly respond to the negative rating you're negating.) It is not legitimate to keep deleting and reposting negative ratings to put the system back into "this guy just turned scammer!" mode. People who do that shouldn't be trusted.

I've read the entire thread and I agree with muddafudda on this one. You paid him 5 LTCs and want a refund? How many hours did muddafudda spend on this?

Honestly, at $125 (current price, I assume it was in that ballpark when the deal was made) I'm not sure what you were expecting. Coingen costs about $125 (which didn't exist of course at the time of this deal) and you were expecting a high quality, custom made coin for the same price?

You probably would have been better off paying a reasonable price to a good developer, rather than hoping to get lucky with a $125 developer.

Brain diarrhea.

I think he's a troll from the beef council. I am seriously turned off to the whole cow hugging movement by shitheads like hippytech.

... Hippie Tech you are just trying to spread lies about Soopy  and just before Navajo is about to release anon ...on March the 1   Hippie Tech you are just a fuder THAT SPREAD LIES  NAVAJO IS NOT SHIT COIN  ...................................... BUD

Name: Vegancoin
3 Letter Code: VEG
TotalCoins: unlimited
POS Stake as %: 2.1 per year
Days till POS Stake:  2.1
Block Rewards: 21 VEG, doubles every 64512 blocks or approx 32 weeks to a max 84 coins per block.
Block Times: 5 minute blocks, 21 confs for minted blocks/PoS, 3 confs for TXs
Port:2169
RPCPort:2170

Scam Alert!

Hippie Tech #Vegancoin aka  1 of the BIGGEST FUDdder

Is that your NEW SCAM COIN? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1263214.0  [ANN] [BITVEGAN] [VEG] [BE HEALTY BE VEGAN]
48 BTC ICO!!! Smells like a Hippie Tech BULLSH***T Coin Freakshow 

LOLz at that new coin. RESERVED

Which one of those scammers are you ?

@all be very careful with any links posted by this user..

bump for the lulz

http: / / canitbesaturdaynow . com/ images/ fpics/ 1415/ 1245503063621__large . jpg

DO NOT CLICK THAT LINK ! 100 MALICIOUS FILES

http://quttera.com/detailed_report/canitbesaturdaynow.com