IOTA

[iotatoken]

Interesting article with Marc Andreessen's thoughts on IoT:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/internet/12050185/Marc-Andreessen-In-20-years-every-physical-item-will-have-a-chip-implanted-in-it.html

I think people like Marc Andreessen should be interested in Jinn and companies like Samsara could be interested in Iota.  

Indeed, but it's both.
Andreessen-Horowitz has already poured tens of millions into Bitcoin and stated publicly that they will invest further hundreds of millions in the coming years toward bitcoin/blockchain start-ups. They're on my list of people to contact re: IOTA, given that they got a position in blockchain oriented projects, there is bound to be overlap.

[1714300469]

1714300469

[Videodrome]

Interesting article with Marc Andreessen's thoughts on IoT:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/internet/12050185/Marc-Andreessen-In-20-years-every-physical-item-will-have-a-chip-implanted-in-it.html

I think people like Marc Andreessen should be interested in Jinn and companies like Samsara could be interested in Iota.  

Indeed, but it's both.
Andreessen-Horowitz has already poured tens of millions into Bitcoin and stated publicly that they will invest further hundreds of millions in the coming years toward bitcoin/blockchain start-ups. They're on my list of people to contact re: IOTA, given that they got a position in blockchain oriented projects, there is bound to be overlap.

Your approach is very professional,thanks for updating us every day.(also in christmas time)

[Tobo]

Indeed, but it's both.
Andreessen-Horowitz has already poured tens of millions into Bitcoin and stated publicly that they will invest further hundreds of millions in the coming years toward bitcoin/blockchain start-ups. They're on my list of people to contact re: IOTA, given that they got a position in blockchain oriented projects, there is bound to be overlap.

True. He is probably the kind of people who can understand Jinn and Iota very well and are able to help/advice on building the right business model in the mean time.

[tolikkk]

somewhere there seen that he will be IOTA is, I think, protective sheath, security for all the various networks the blockchain?
in addition, of course, the Internet of things 2.0

[hashtag101]

So what is next in the marketing phase?

[50cent_rapper]

So what is next in the marketing phase?

I don't know about marketing, but we are currently waiting news about gui front-end ?

[tobeaj2mer01]

So what is next in the marketing phase?

I don't know about marketing, but we are currently waiting news about gui front-end ?

When will IOTA be listed on exchange?

[tolikkk]

So what is next in the marketing phase?

I don't know about marketing, but we are currently waiting news about gui front-end ?

When will IOTA be listed on exchange?

in the words of the developers, the coin sold after launch, the exchanges, the launch is scheduled for January, but rather, at the end of January, to wait, but with patience, though, but the processing to generate interest
interesting the lack of the usual composite is inherent in bitcoin, but the blockchain is missing, yet other changes, very interested

[durerus]

I made a mistake. I bought IOTA with JINN from my NXT account, but put my newly created IOTA address in the form on the website. Then the website showed me an amount of BTC to send. Then I sent the same IOTA address via my NXT account to the IOTA crowdsale NXT account. Is this O.K.? Will I get my IOTA tokens on the address or should I create a new address?

[Come-from-Beyond]

I made a mistake. I bought IOTA with JINN from my NXT account, but put my newly created IOTA address in the form on the website. Then the website showed me an amount of BTC to send. Then I sent the same IOTA address via my NXT account to the IOTA crowdsale NXT account. Is this O.K.? Will I get my IOTA tokens on the address or should I create a new address?

Should be O.K.

[Come-from-Beyond]

@eragmus: What is your opinion about https://chrispacia.wordpress.com/2015/12/23/lightning-network-skepticism/?

[child_harold]

https://blog.ethereum.org/2015/12/24/understanding-serenity-part-i-abstraction/

"...One particular interesting consequence is that with the current plan for Serenity, Ethereum will be optionally quantum-safe; if you are scared of the NSA having access to a quantum computer, and want to protect your account more securely, you can personally switch to Lamport signatures at any time. Proof of stake further bolsters this, as even if the NSA had a quantum computer and no one else they would not be able to exploit that to implement a 51% attack. The only cryptographic security assumption that will exist at protocol level in Ethereum is collision-resistance of SHA3..."

as I understand it, after the launch of Serenity , Ethereum will contain protection against quantum attacks quantum computers and eliminates the need of additional add-ons for security and a manipulation of accounts is very interesting

Comments?

EDIT: Reading previous page/guess it's been covered.

[cryptomite]

@eragmus: What is your opinion about https://chrispacia.wordpress.com/2015/12/23/lightning-network-skepticism/?

If in Alice cant send to the retailer through bob, who cares. Maybe if its Bitcoin trying to use off chain transactions to help it, I can see how it could be a problem for them.

Does this same lighting tech effect how tangle works? Or is it just used for off chain transactions.

Fair warning Im a complete layman when it comes to coding

[iotatoken]

@eragmus: What is your opinion about https://chrispacia.wordpress.com/2015/12/23/lightning-network-skepticism/?

If in Alice cant send to the retailer through bob, who cares. Maybe if its Bitcoin trying to use off chain transactions to help it, I can see how it could be a problem for them.

Does this same lighting tech effect how tangle works? Or is it just used for off chain transactions.

Fair warning Im a complete layman when it comes to coding

The point is more to show that Lightning Network is not IoT suited at all. A lot of bitcoiners think that bitcoin solves all problems in this world, including hunger and cancer, so you need posts like this to show why this is not the case. Which is why IOTA was made.

[Tobo]

I translated David's article (https://medium.com/@DavidSonstebo/iota-97592581f985#.g46t9or68) into Chinese and posted on the biggest Chinese btc forum - http://8btc.com/thread-27171-1-1.html

Hope our Chinese follows can go there to view it or make comments on it to bump it. Let's get more people to know about Iota.

[50cent_rapper]

I translated David's article (https://medium.com/@DavidSonstebo/iota-97592581f985#.g46t9or68) into Chinese and posted on the biggest Chinese btc forum - http://8btc.com/thread-27171-1-1.html

Hope our Chinese follows can go there to view it or make comments on it to bump it. Let's get more people to know about Iota.

Very interesting to see how people will react.

I have a suspicion that ethereum smart contracts is not a big deal, just hyped.

[Tobo]

Very interesting to see how people will react.
I have a suspicion that ethereum smart contracts is not a big deal, just hyped.

We hope to attract more devs to brainstorm and build projects on top of Iota at this stage.

[50cent_rapper]

Very interesting to see how people will react.
I have a suspicion that ethereum smart contracts is not a big deal, just hyped.

We hope to attract more devs to brainstorm and build projects on top of Iota at this stage.

I'd like to see an infographic, something like:

"IOTA - post blockchain era".

• no blockchain
• no fees
• no hard TPS
• quantum secure
• lightweight
• scalable
• cross-platform

Just to grab some attention.

[Tobo]

I'd like to see an infographic, something like:
"IOTA - post blockchain era".

• no blockchain
• no fees
• no hard TPS
• quantum secure
• lightweight
• scalable
• cross-platform

Just to grab some attention.

good idea.

[cryptomite]

@eragmus: What is your opinion about https://chrispacia.wordpress.com/2015/12/23/lightning-network-skepticism/?

If in Alice cant send to the retailer through bob, who cares. Maybe if its Bitcoin trying to use off chain transactions to help it, I can see how it could be a problem for them.

Does this same lighting tech effect how tangle works? Or is it just used for off chain transactions.

Fair warning Im a complete layman when it comes to coding

The point is more to show that Lightning Network is not IoT suited at all. A lot of bitcoiners think that bitcoin solves all problems in this world, including hunger and cancer, so you need posts like this to show why this is not the case. Which is why IOTA was made.

So I was correct that lightning would only be used for off chain transactions when it comes to Iota? Which is perfectly fine.

And you're saying that Bitcoiners seem to think that Lightning will make Bitcoin do these other things that Iota already does, in which case they're wrong.


Do I got this? Or do I still need to adjust my perception here some?