[ANN][PIVX] - PRIVATE INSTANT VERIFIED TRANSACTION - PROOF OF STAKE - ZEROCOIN

[HighAllTime]

I think price will be back to 500-600 satoshi.

Dang. Was hoping more like 300-400 so I can buy a whole lot more cheap.

If it dips below 1000 it will soon shoot back up. Time to buy is now in this dip.

The closer to 1000 sat = the better risk reward = the more people will load up.

I think in a few weeks' /months' perspective it won't matter much if you bought at 800 sat or 2000 sat. With this small market cap the growth will be substantial anyway.

What's more, selling and rebuying substantial amounts is very hard. Even if one had dumped one week ago at let's say 1900 sat average, market rebuying a few hundred k would be more expensive now.

[1715212246]

1715212246

[1715212246]

1715212246

[1715212246]

1715212246

[1715212246]

1715212246

[cryptohunter]

I think price will be back to 500-600 satoshi.

What makes you think that?

Any word on getting this on polo?

[borris123]

I think price will be back to 500-600 satoshi.

What makes you think that?

Any word on getting this on polo?

Polo only going add us when there is volume so they can make some money, which there isn't atm. Once whitepaper is out for truly anonymous, expect to see a boost but until then just accumulate more.

I happy with the price atm for accumulating there is nothing really that makes us unique enough to warrant large investors. But the community is growing.

[4x13]

*****kokokoin CPAH0NXMCAXV0NO2DXLAUJWTUD is the WINNER!!*****

Wow, thanks! Didn't expect this to happen.

BTW, i have same problem with zero masternode reward: http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/DNET/tx.php?tx=649c6bda6cb2e49f0b3081c852f44097ee8b62697dacc28fb8bb5fea1f0db7d9

As for masternode voting, i think it's better to make in-wallet interface for voting with all your masternodes instead of forcing to vote.

The zero masternode reward, is caused by not having the reward enforcement enabled.

[borris123]

*****kokokoin CPAH0NXMCAXV0NO2DXLAUJWTUD is the WINNER!!*****

Wow, thanks! Didn't expect this to happen.

BTW, i have same problem with zero masternode reward: http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/DNET/tx.php?tx=649c6bda6cb2e49f0b3081c852f44097ee8b62697dacc28fb8bb5fea1f0db7d9

As for masternode voting, i think it's better to make in-wallet interface for voting with all your masternodes instead of forcing to vote.

The zero masternode reward, is caused by not having the reward enforcement enabled.

i had it couple of times. how does that work?

you changed the op title now to advertise Upcoming Trustless Truly Untraceable Anon. will there be a discussion of what this entails? whitepaper etc?

[4x13]

*****kokokoin CPAH0NXMCAXV0NO2DXLAUJWTUD is the WINNER!!*****

Wow, thanks! Didn't expect this to happen.

BTW, i have same problem with zero masternode reward: http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/DNET/tx.php?tx=649c6bda6cb2e49f0b3081c852f44097ee8b62697dacc28fb8bb5fea1f0db7d9

As for masternode voting, i think it's better to make in-wallet interface for voting with all your masternodes instead of forcing to vote.

The zero masternode reward, is caused by not having the reward enforcement enabled.

i had it couple of times. how does that work?

you changed the op title now to advertise Upcoming Trustless Truly Untraceable Anon. will there be a discussion of what this entails? whitepaper etc?

It was changed as a request, Yes there will be discussion at some point, but as stated previously, we have a lot to do before that happens. We are not rushing into any implementation, we have a clear plan on what we want to do. We need more Dev's to speed up the process.

[cryptohunter]

DNET Dev StakeBox has started working on the pull requests and few other enhancements:

In-wallet Bittrex Trading.
https://twitter.com/jakimanboy/status/796918176927780864

In-wallet Masternode Management
https://twitter.com/jakimanboy/status/796966185845882880

User editable wallet themes is currently being worked on as well.
So yeah, the devs are very active right now in the background.

Official Website is now online also!
http://darknet-crypto.com

This is great.

In wallet masternode management and anything to make the set up of masternodes a few clicks of work perhaps a couple of copy and pastes max on your vps would encourage more masternodes. The entire masternode set up needs to be made as simple and quick as possible.

The more coins in masternodes the greater the price the greater the interest in the coin.

[LemonAndFriesOne]

any estimates on when you think the anon tech will be ready for test?

[4x13]

any estimates on when you think the anon tech will be ready for test?

I can't in good faith, give you estimates or Hype. When it is at a point it is ready, I assure you we will have an open invitation to participate.

[coinwider]

Official Website is now online also!
http://darknet-crypto.com

I have 2 proposals for site design:
1. Background of top slider is transparent but the text shouldn't be transparent.
2. Dark-red text is hard to read on dark-grey background. It's better to change it to something more contrast.

Agreed. I can do a site redesign for a bounty

DNET Dev StakeBox has started working on the pull requests and few other enhancements:

In-wallet Bittrex Trading.
https://twitter.com/jakimanboy/status/796918176927780864

In-wallet Masternode Management
https://twitter.com/jakimanboy/status/796966185845882880

User editable wallet themes is currently being worked on as well.
So yeah, the devs are very active right now in the background.

Official Website is now online also!
http://darknet-crypto.com

love the new website design and the logo as background           (just one misspelling on 1. page in the POS 0.10.x Core description - 3. line "darkent"  Darknet )

nice and clear CONFIGURATION infos!  just added the TOR and IPV6 nodes    (question can we leave bantime=50 now? as i think it's implemented in v2.1.3.0)




@homepage hoster - sorry for that detail but please change the misspelling as described above -  we have to write our coins name right

[coinwider]

I think it also goes against the economical freedom cryptos try to represent. To be forced to vote sounds more to north korean puppet elections than to a free liberal system... I don't like the idea, maybe a small "bonus" for the MN's which vote, but not penalties and similar.

Well, forced voting happens here in Australia also. (you get fined if you don't)

But yeah, forced voting isn't what I want either really. I think increased awareness of new & existing proposals should be a priority.
Not sure what the best way for this is either yet. But something wallet based (proposals tab, alerting optioned ect.) would be best?
Also, there are talks of extra reward for masternodes that vote. But we also don't want extra inflation. So this seems a little tricky.

Most effort come with ease of use and as you mentioned if in-wallet masternodes are available an opt-in-voting would be best (IMO). After MN creation a pop-up or an extra MN voting tab in the wallet would be convenient.

[coinwider]

Ok, let me explain a bit, one of the main issues in the masternode voting, is when only a few vote, then the budget control becomes very centralised. Dash is experiencing this right now. We don't want to go there. But as pointed out, we have put some work into an announcement panel inside the wallet for direct communications. This particular subject isn't something we are rushing into, there will be a lot more research, and number crunching before a serious option can be considered, but saying this... something will need to be changed to get more to vote.

Also, there is an option to abstain during voting. You do not have to vote only yes/no

So please let us hear your ideas, and solutions.

s3v3nh4cks we know that voting is substantial for a good progress and therefore we have to define the voting system more exactly. We have to find consensus about how many votes are needed and in which time.
Those 2 points, IMO, have primarly to be cleared.

1. We could, for example, define proposals to reach a total vote of 75% or 66% respective 3/4 or 2/3 majority of active MN in a given time    ... (insert period of time)...

2. Penalties or fines for "non-voting-MN" will be contraproductive - as we need MNs for our infrastructure why shall we fine them? This step would hinder new MN growth.

3. We could think about a "seesaw"-Staker-voting; giving stakers the possiblity to vote on proposals but not to open them. The voting balance could be the same or lower as "staking-seesaw".


@community:    What are your thougths about that?

[borris123]

stuck between 1000sat and 2000. lots of cheap coins there tho. someone trying accumulate low.

[LemonAndFriesOne]

any estimates on when you think the anon tech will be ready for test?

I can't in good faith, give you estimates or Hype. When it is at a point it is ready, I assure you we will have an open invitation to participate.

 ok good enough

[CGC Project]

any estimates on when you think the anon tech will be ready for test?

I can't in good faith, give you estimates or Hype. When it is at a point it is ready, I assure you we will have an open invitation to participate.

Fair enough, thanks!

[kokokoin]

*****kokokoin CPAH0NXMCAXV0NO2DXLAUJWTUD is the WINNER!!*****

Wow, thanks! Didn't expect this to happen.

BTW, i have same problem with zero masternode reward: http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/DNET/tx.php?tx=649c6bda6cb2e49f0b3081c852f44097ee8b62697dacc28fb8bb5fea1f0db7d9

As for masternode voting, i think it's better to make in-wallet interface for voting with all your masternodes instead of forcing to vote.

Received 10k DNET. Thanks!

[q327K091]

another big one is on the horizon,  13.2387   10.5956 1059564.43118000 0.00001000  I doubt it will bite but its good to have base like this, it shows the confidence

I and maybe 3 other people could take this and exit but no Sir, not a chance (that's a used car @borris123 right there)

update: all 83 master nodes are operating well and without exceptions, scheduled collection time 2+ weeks a bit slower than in the past due to growth in master nodes count, but rewards do happen , as per usual we collect and put back into the growing network

[borris123]

another big one is on the horizon,  13.2387   10.5956 1059564.43118000 0.00001000  I doubt it will bite but its good to have base like this, it shows the confidence

I and maybe 3 other people could take this and exit but no Sir, not a chance (that's a used car @borris123 right there)

update: all 83 master nodes are operating well and without exceptions, scheduled collection time 2+ weeks a bit slower than in the past due to growth in master nodes count, but rewards do happen , as per usual we collect and put back into the growing network

getting close to it now tho :O not much volume tho few bitcoin makes it jump up and down loads. its probably the same person selling to dump it down to get it close to the 1000sat so people sell into it.

[q327K091]

maybe.. people should just add master nodes as much as humanely (and by price) possible trust me on that one it is invaluable.. trades +10 BTC +/- have meanings insofar people can spin off new master nodes @ cheap

so far "base" is holding as they "know" the above.. master node network was a brilliant brilliant innovation by dash developers.. like for real, it is HUGELY valuable in more ways than one

you will have some copy cats.. like mue (I did look but they have miscalculated not here!), but they price for master node is prohibitive but yes.. it is all about the "private network"

10.7125   10.3849   1153873.96620829 0.00000900  this order will be absorbed soon.. if this is the same person he or she is at work to distribute coins so we have larger network of nodes, and frankly it does not matter how , as long it is done

if you keep going and are the way you are we might get to 10,000 master nodes in 2017.. and that will be extraordinary by any account

[borris123]

smooth switchover to reduced POS rewards.