Graet (OP)
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 08, 2012, 08:53:41 AM |
|
We have run a duplicate payout for block 201731 - miners that had a score have now been paid twice for that block ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) The balance of the unusual fees I will put into the "buffer" - DGM has no "buffer" as such. I do however ensure I keep funds aside from times of good luck to cover times of bad, an unofficial buffer if you like ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Best wishes Graeme
|
|
|
|
Pontius
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 08, 2012, 09:14:17 AM |
|
We have run a duplicate payout for block 201731 - miners that had a score have now been paid twice for that block ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.graphics99.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F06%2Fwhos-awesome.jpg&t=665&c=AMeiaKoyjWHc-A)
|
|
|
|
Graet (OP)
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 08, 2012, 09:16:01 AM |
|
now you make me blush thanks ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
Graet (OP)
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 09, 2012, 02:02:09 PM |
|
share processing got stuck as we found block 202481 we have restarted processing but stats will look weird for the next few hours
|
|
|
|
abracadabra
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 09, 2012, 05:09:19 PM |
|
We have run a duplicate payout for block 201731 - miners that had a score have now been paid twice for that block ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.graphics99.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F06%2Fwhos-awesome.jpg&t=665&c=AMeiaKoyjWHc-A) I think there's a better version of that "Who's Awesome" somewhere on the internet ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
mdude77
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 10, 2012, 03:41:36 PM |
|
Are we trying to set a new record? 17hr 37minutes since last block.
I keep tweaking things.. right now I'm glad I have 1/2 pointed here and 1/2 at eclipse.
M
|
I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent! Come join me!
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 10, 2012, 03:55:11 PM |
|
Are we trying to set a new record? 17hr 37minutes since last block.
I keep tweaking things.. right now I'm glad I have 1/2 pointed here and 1/2 at eclipse.
M
If everyone divided their hashrate among all pools equally (and thus all pools had equal hashrate) there'd be very little variance in earnings at all and PPS wouldn't be needed.
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3582
Merit: 1094
Think for yourself
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 10, 2012, 04:03:34 PM |
|
Are we trying to set a new record? 17hr 37minutes since last block.
I keep tweaking things.. right now I'm glad I have 1/2 pointed here and 1/2 at eclipse.
M
If everyone divided their hashrate among all pools equally (and thus all pools had equal hashrate) there'd be very little variance in earnings at all and PPS wouldn't be needed. And then, I suppose, there would be world peace. Hope you don't mind if don't hold my breath.
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
Graet (OP)
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 10, 2012, 04:09:04 PM |
|
Are we trying to set a new record? 17hr 37minutes since last block.
I keep tweaking things.. right now I'm glad I have 1/2 pointed here and 1/2 at eclipse.
M
-ozbot/#ozcoin- BLOCK: 202682 | 13044563 shares | 18h 0m 23s | Amount: 50.0792249 | Found by slaveindebt | 427.04% of difficulty record is 800% long way off ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
|
mdude77
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 10, 2012, 04:29:50 PM |
|
Are we trying to set a new record? 17hr 37minutes since last block.
I keep tweaking things.. right now I'm glad I have 1/2 pointed here and 1/2 at eclipse.
M
-ozbot/#ozcoin- BLOCK: 202682 | 13044563 shares | 18h 0m 23s | Amount: 50.0792249 | Found by slaveindebt | 427.04% of difficulty record is 800% long way off ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) I should have said something hours ago!! M
|
I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent! Come join me!
|
|
|
mdude77
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2012, 09:28:59 AM |
|
Are we trying to set a new record? 17hr 37minutes since last block.
I keep tweaking things.. right now I'm glad I have 1/2 pointed here and 1/2 at eclipse.
M
If everyone divided their hashrate among all pools equally (and thus all pools had equal hashrate) there'd be very little variance in earnings at all and PPS wouldn't be needed. I usually don't follow everything you say. But this one got me thinking. This implies that at any given moment, some pool somewhere is having good luck, therefore, if you were in all pools, you'd never have bad luck. I don't think that's true. All pools could be having bad luck, which means PPS would still come out ahead. Did I miss something along the way? M
|
I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent! Come join me!
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2012, 10:00:00 AM |
|
Yes, you missed that the weighted average luck of all the pools you are mining on is ... the weighted average luck of all the pools you are mining on ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) So it's adding up the hash rates of all the pools you are mining on and thus reducing your pool block finding variance due to that. Even the whole network doesn't necessarily match PPS in the short term ... it's always of course one of the 3: above, the same, below
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2012, 11:20:18 AM |
|
Are we trying to set a new record? 17hr 37minutes since last block.
I keep tweaking things.. right now I'm glad I have 1/2 pointed here and 1/2 at eclipse.
M
If everyone divided their hashrate among all pools equally (and thus all pools had equal hashrate) there'd be very little variance in earnings at all and PPS wouldn't be needed. I usually don't follow everything you say. But this one got me thinking. This implies that at any given moment, some pool somewhere is having good luck, therefore, if you were in all pools, you'd never have bad luck. I don't think that's true. All pools could be having bad luck, which means PPS would still come out ahead. Did I miss something along the way? M To put it yet another way, this statement: This implies that at any given moment, some pool somewhere is having good luck, therefore, if you were in all pools, you'd never have bad luck.
which, as you suggest is incorrect, is ignoring the fact that we're looking at an average earning over many blocks. What I'm saying (and what Meni Rosenfeld explained in another thread a while back) is that as time goes on and you submit shares to blocks, the variance of mining at a single non PPS pool is much greater than the variance of mining at all non PPS pools. There's more to it than that, but that's the basic gist of it. I usually don't follow everything you say.
Not sure if I was just insulted, there. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) /OT
|
|
|
|
Graet (OP)
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2012, 01:31:36 PM |
|
What about Namecoin-Mining? Did it get stuck? Namecoin Round: [ 1,250,782 Shares | 2d 9h 56m | 90.34% Efficiency ] sure looks like it tonight's thing to fix cheers
|
|
|
|
Dalkore
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1026
Mining since 2010 & Hosting since 2012
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2012, 04:29:00 PM |
|
Pool: [ 160.32 GHash/s | 118 Users | 240 Workers ] - What happened? I got bumped off?
|
Hosting: Low as $60.00 per KW - LinkTransaction List: jayson3 +5 - ColdHardMetal +3 - Nolo +2 - CoinHoarder +1 - Elxiliath +1 - tymm0 +1 - Johnniewalker +1 - Oscer +1 - Davidj411 +1 - BitCoiner2012 +1 - dstruct2k +1 - Philj +1 - camolist +1 - exahash +1 - Littleshop +1 - Severian +1 - DebitMe +1 - lepenguin +1 - StringTheory +1 - amagimetals +1 - jcoin200 +1 - serp +1 - klintay +1 - -droid- +1 - FlutterPie +1
|
|
|
Krak
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2012, 04:35:37 PM |
|
I usually don't follow everything you say.
Not sure if I was just insulted, there. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Pretty sure that was a compliment. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
|
|
|
Graet (OP)
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2012, 04:56:03 PM |
|
Pool: [ 160.32 GHash/s | 118 Users | 240 Workers ] - What happened? I got bumped off?
shouldn't have been bumped off site lagged while 2 days of NMC shares processed caught up now ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
Dalkore
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1026
Mining since 2010 & Hosting since 2012
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2012, 07:46:08 PM |
|
Thank You, I see it is back to normal.
|
Hosting: Low as $60.00 per KW - LinkTransaction List: jayson3 +5 - ColdHardMetal +3 - Nolo +2 - CoinHoarder +1 - Elxiliath +1 - tymm0 +1 - Johnniewalker +1 - Oscer +1 - Davidj411 +1 - BitCoiner2012 +1 - dstruct2k +1 - Philj +1 - camolist +1 - exahash +1 - Littleshop +1 - Severian +1 - DebitMe +1 - lepenguin +1 - StringTheory +1 - amagimetals +1 - jcoin200 +1 - serp +1 - klintay +1 - -droid- +1 - FlutterPie +1
|
|
|
mdude77
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 12, 2012, 12:10:48 AM |
|
which, as you suggest is incorrect, is ignoring the fact that we're looking at an average earning over many blocks. What I'm saying (and what Meni Rosenfeld explained in another thread a while back) is that as time goes on and you submit shares to blocks, the variance of mining at a single non PPS pool is much greater than the variance of mining at all non PPS pools. There's more to it than that, but that's the basic gist of it.
I think I get that. I usually don't follow everything you say.
Not sure if I was just insulted, there. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) /OT Not at all! That means you speak way over my head most of the time! M
|
I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent! Come join me!
|
|
|
LazyOtto
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 12, 2012, 04:26:29 AM |
|
Has the PPS accumulations/payout balance stopped incrementing?
I could be wrong, but it looks like mine has stalled out over the last few hours.
|
|
|
|
|