[ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today!

[o0o0]

So this whole talk about about building the foundations and all that was just bullshit apparently. They can't even get the leaderboard right.

Sorry about the large pic. Slack sucks.

werent they all saying take your time to harden the api? is huey admitting that they cant secure the api?

also i love the statement about payments changes... whats the matter gravity not making enough?

maybe they should do ico round 2 and use their masternode coins generated. gravity was clearly worth 300btc in dev costs.

transparency wise i wonder how much ico they've spent and how many $$$ left

[CryptoBuds]

They'd have a shit tone more spending power of their ICO if they didn't cash it out around $750. That decision alone should make people question the team.

[suchmoon]

werent they all saying take your time to harden the api? is huey admitting that they cant secure the api?

also i love the statement about payments changes... whats the matter gravity not making enough?

maybe they should do ico round 2 and use their masternode coins generated. gravity was clearly worth 300btc in dev costs.

transparency wise i wonder how much ico they've spent and how many $$$ left

Oh give them a break. It's been only ~5 months since Gravity launch, that's like 5 minutes in ionomy time. They'll secure it in the next 10-20 years for sure and then...


Edited 2020-11-29 to fix a broken image

[CryptoBuds]

werent they all saying take your time to harden the api? is huey admitting that they cant secure the api?

also i love the statement about payments changes... whats the matter gravity not making enough?

maybe they should do ico round 2 and use their masternode coins generated. gravity was clearly worth 300btc in dev costs.

transparency wise i wonder how much ico they've spent and how many $$$ left

Oh give them a break. It's been only ~5 months since Gravity launch, that's like 5 minutes in ionomy time. They'll secure it in the next 10-20 years for sure and then...

If ION isn't about building games, wonder why they said they'd release 1 game per month? If they're building an ecosystem, wouldn't a secure API need to be provided? Or do they just adapt the business plan any way the whales can spin it at the moment? So many more questions. I thought all along ION was a gaming coin.

[suchmoon]

werent they all saying take your time to harden the api? is huey admitting that they cant secure the api?

also i love the statement about payments changes... whats the matter gravity not making enough?

maybe they should do ico round 2 and use their masternode coins generated. gravity was clearly worth 300btc in dev costs.

transparency wise i wonder how much ico they've spent and how many $$$ left

Oh give them a break. It's been only ~5 months since Gravity launch, that's like 5 minutes in ionomy time. They'll secure it in the next 10-20 years for sure and then...

If ION isn't about building games, wonder why they said they'd release 1 game per month? If they're building an ecosystem, wouldn't a secure API need to be provided? Or do they just adapt the business plan any way the whales can spin it at the moment? So many more questions. I thought all along ION was a gaming coin.

To be fair, MrCoins (along with his twin Robin) is quite unhinged even by ionomy standards. He won't hesitate to spew any nonsense that he thinks would help to pump XPY ION.

[korvas128]

werent they all saying take your time to harden the api? is huey admitting that they cant secure the api?

also i love the statement about payments changes... whats the matter gravity not making enough?

maybe they should do ico round 2 and use their masternode coins generated. gravity was clearly worth 300btc in dev costs.

transparency wise i wonder how much ico they've spent and how many $$$ left

Oh give them a break. It's been only ~5 months since Gravity launch, that's like 5 minutes in ionomy time. They'll secure it in the next 10-20 years for sure and then...

If ION isn't about building games, wonder why they said they'd release 1 game per month? If they're building an ecosystem, wouldn't a secure API need to be provided? Or do they just adapt the business plan any way the whales can spin it at the moment? So many more questions. I thought all along ION was a gaming coin.

To be fair, MrCoins (along with his twin Robin) is quite unhinged even by ionomy standards. He won't hesitate to spew any nonsense that he thinks would help to pump XPY ION.

A big thanks to you and your fellow bullshitters. Your bullshit is having  a real impact on the price



If the increase starts to stall before we get to $2 could you or your friends inject some more bullshit.... don't think the btc soft fork will be enough so I suggest you finish the post with a momma joke, something like

yo korvas128 yo momma so dumb, when she went to the movies and saw the "Under 17 not permitted" sign, she left to get 16 of her friends

That should do the trick 

[suchmoon]

A big thanks to you and your fellow bullshitters. Your bullshit is having  a real impact on the price

https://i.gyazo.com/4c9a260be681d71906e8cc2249062aa7.png

If the increase starts to stall before we get to $2 could you or your friends inject some more bullshit.... don't think the btc soft fork will be enough so I suggest you finish the post with a momma joke, something like

yo korvas128 yo momma so dumb, when she went to the movies and saw the "Under 17 not permitted" sign, she left to get 16 of her friends

That should do the trick 

Sorry about your mother.

You seem to have this illusion that "trolls" are somehow dependent on the price or trying to influence it or some shit like that. I'm quite sure that most folks in this thread don't own ION and haven't shorted it either. Moreover, quite a few probably hold or use Bitcoin and/or other coins that have actual utility or at least volume.

This ION pump will ensure more comedy for the future when the "team" gets hacked, or "hacked", or just falls flat on their faces trying to do another U-turn. All I hope for is that the new bagholders (if there are any, and not just the same paycoiners buying from each other) are making an informed choice to invest in this thrice-failed flustercuck.

[o0o0]

lots of coins going up... exchanges have btc in and out frozen so people are raising coins to pull existing btc funds on exchanges into their wallets on exchange.

like when ion wallet on bittrex wasnt taking withdrawals there was a pump. people knew nobody could get ion in to sell so they had it cornered. its pumper tricks 101 korvas.

that is unless ionomy released games overnight or some big feature. you dont even use logic. you just go all nuts on a price rise and stop replying on big drops. when it goes back down into the 20ks ill remind you and im sure you wont reply to it then or you'll blame some troll or something im sure

[Bitgenius777]

Are masternodes going up again. Because of uncertainty about bitcoins reputation bcus of hardfork?

[korvas128]

Are masternodes going up again. Because of uncertainty about bitcoins reputation bcus of hardfork?

Not the only reason but definitely an element. Interestingly if you look at the whole crypto market BTC still represents 48% of it. 

[korvas128]

lots of coins going up... exchanges have btc in and out frozen so people are raising coins to pull existing btc funds on exchanges into their wallets on exchange.

like when ion wallet on bittrex wasnt taking withdrawals there was a pump. people knew nobody could get ion in to sell so they had it cornered. its pumper tricks 101 korvas.

that is unless ionomy released games overnight or some big feature. you dont even use logic. you just go all nuts on a price rise and stop replying on big drops. when it goes back down into the 20ks ill remind you and im sure you wont reply to it then or you'll blame some troll or something im sure

oOoO are you trying to win bullshitter of the month  

1) Bitrex had frozen their BTC wallet for how long...... 24 hrs max ??. ION's wallet was frozen for much longer ..... at least a week. One was in preparation for a soft fork the other to stop an exploit. If there was parity in the frozen wallet timescales then okay valid point but there wasn't so bullshit

2) Trying to position the Gravity exploit as a problem with the API..... bullshit

https://www.cnet.com/uk/news/apple-security-update-iphone-ipad-ios-hack-broadpwn/

3) Trying to position the 8 to 1 XPY/ION conversion as a bad option then demanding I provide you with data to justify something which is a just plain wrong is bullshit. Asking me to pull data together to substantiate your assumption is also kinda stupid too....... You do know that for every cent the ION price rises it makes your assumption more ridiculous

Ion could do with another boost especially when you consider Ionomy have yet to make any announcements. Your bullshit alone could take ION to $2...... fingers crossed  

[suchmoon]

2) Trying to position the Gravity exploit as a problem with the API..... bullshit

https://www.cnet.com/uk/news/apple-security-update-iphone-ipad-ios-hack-broadpwn/

What does your link have to do with anything?

Of course the shitty API is the problem... it allows fake scores to be submitted to the leaderboard and the "team" was manually removing them FOR 5 FUCKING MONTHS until they got bored and called it an exploit.

[korvas128]

2) Trying to position the Gravity exploit as a problem with the API..... bullshit

https://www.cnet.com/uk/news/apple-security-update-iphone-ipad-ios-hack-broadpwn/

What does your link have to do with anything?

Of course the shitty API is the problem... it allows fake scores to be submitted to the leaderboard and the "team" was manually removing them FOR 5 FUCKING MONTHS until they got bored and called it an exploit.

Oh you didn't get the memo just another example of bullshit positioned as facts..... like I'm gonna tell you

Considering you lurk on slack 24/7 I'm surprised this slipped through  

[o0o0]

korvas are you trying to win liar of the month? show me where i said the 8:1 deal was a bad option else you are telling lies. i said you numbers are wrong. i said your 9 cents turned into current price was wrong because for that to happen you had to buy all you xpy at the low which very few did. many and id guess yourself included bought xpy at a higher rate not the 9 cents. you are giving false numbers by not taking the median price in xpy.

you are happy to present a number and look for data only when it matches your desired outcome. you sir are a liar.

[suchmoon]

2) Trying to position the Gravity exploit as a problem with the API..... bullshit

https://www.cnet.com/uk/news/apple-security-update-iphone-ipad-ios-hack-broadpwn/

What does your link have to do with anything?

Of course the shitty API is the problem... it allows fake scores to be submitted to the leaderboard and the "team" was manually removing them FOR 5 FUCKING MONTHS until they got bored and called it an exploit.

Oh you didn't get the memo just another example of bullshit positioned as facts..... like I'm gonna tell you

Considering you lurk on slack 24/7 I'm surprised this slipped through  

You're making less sense than usual. You call something bullshit and then answer a question by calling it bullshit too 

Your argumentation skills may need some work. Just saying.

[korvas128]

korvas are you trying to win liar of the month? show me where i said the 8:1 deal was a bad option else you are telling lies. i said you numbers are wrong. i said your 9 cents turned into current price was wrong because for that to happen you had to buy all you xpy at the low which very few did. many and id guess yourself included bought xpy at a higher rate not the 9 cents. you are giving false numbers by not taking the median price in xpy.

you are happy to present a number and look for data only when it matches your desired outcome. you sir are a liar.

You are not stupid but.....

In the real world normally people make a claim then use data to back up whatever claim they were making. Only a dumb ass would make a claim posting data that was  contrary to what they were saying. Why would you ask me to do this again and again and again

Until you publish data backing up your statement of  'You sir are a liar' you're just full of shit

[korvas128]

2) Trying to position the Gravity exploit as a problem with the API..... bullshit

https://www.cnet.com/uk/news/apple-security-update-iphone-ipad-ios-hack-broadpwn/

What does your link have to do with anything?

Of course the shitty API is the problem... it allows fake scores to be submitted to the leaderboard and the "team" was manually removing them FOR 5 FUCKING MONTHS until they got bored and called it an exploit.

Oh you didn't get the memo just another example of bullshit positioned as facts..... like I'm gonna tell you

Considering you lurk on slack 24/7 I'm surprised this slipped through  

You're making less sense than usual. You call something bullshit and then answer a question by calling it bullshit too 

Your argumentation skills may need some work. Just saying.

If you'd been monitoring slack then you would understand what I meant...... maybe you went off for a shit when the update was posted and so missed it

Anyway I'm on holiday now bye bye

[vibehubdev]

Stealth Addresses... how does that work?

[suchmoon]

2) Trying to position the Gravity exploit as a problem with the API..... bullshit

https://www.cnet.com/uk/news/apple-security-update-iphone-ipad-ios-hack-broadpwn/

What does your link have to do with anything?

Of course the shitty API is the problem... it allows fake scores to be submitted to the leaderboard and the "team" was manually removing them FOR 5 FUCKING MONTHS until they got bored and called it an exploit.

Oh you didn't get the memo just another example of bullshit positioned as facts..... like I'm gonna tell you

Considering you lurk on slack 24/7 I'm surprised this slipped through  

You're making less sense than usual. You call something bullshit and then answer a question by calling it bullshit too 

Your argumentation skills may need some work. Just saying.

If you'd been monitoring slack then you would understand what I meant...... maybe you went off for a shit when the update was posted and so missed it

Anyway I'm on holiday now bye bye

Yeah right 

You're lying. There is nothing on slack (or anywhere) to tie the broadpwn exploit to the Gravity exploit. But it's nice to have the slack excuse because you can always weasel out of substantiating your claim as everybody knows slack is uber-crappy for finding stuff.

I did however find a link to torbokipanda ranting on StackExchange, so that was entertaining. Thanks for reminding to visit slack.

[o0o0]

korvas are you trying to win liar of the month? show me where i said the 8:1 deal was a bad option else you are telling lies. i said you numbers are wrong. i said your 9 cents turned into current price was wrong because for that to happen you had to buy all you xpy at the low which very few did. many and id guess yourself included bought xpy at a higher rate not the 9 cents. you are giving false numbers by not taking the median price in xpy.

you are happy to present a number and look for data only when it matches your desired outcome. you sir are a liar.

You are not stupid but.....

In the real world normally people make a claim then use data to back up whatever claim they were making. Only a dumb ass would make a claim posting data that was  contrary to what they were saying. Why would you ask me to do this again and again and again

Until you publish data backing up your statement of  'You sir are a liar' you're just full of shit

you just contradicted yourself! in the real world people back statement with data. you made a statement and your data was 2 numbers! ill tell you what you back yours and ill show mine. ill even be kind and show 4.
- xpy full ico price to ion now
- xpy 3/4 price to ion now
- xpy 1/2 price to ion now
- xpy end price to ion now

im going to go on a limb and guess that only the last one has a value. few wouldhave bought that low.