Obyte: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments

[bcsuisse]

Hi,

I got excited about byteball and logged in to link steem and byteball.
now my byteball adress is in my brothers laptop. how can I log out again?

I remember that there was a button LOG OUT. i dont see that anymore

if anybody has a solution please help.

thanks

just set a password and you are fine

figured it out. had to delete the folder which was stored.
the payment I had sent is unconfirmed for several hours, is byteball network slow at the moment?

[CryptKeeper]

Hi,

I got excited about byteball and logged in to link steem and byteball.
now my byteball adress is in my brothers laptop. how can I log out again?

I remember that there was a button LOG OUT. i dont see that anymore

if anybody has a solution please help.

thanks

just set a password and you are fine

figured it out. had to delete the folder which was stored.
the payment I had sent is unconfirmed for several hours, is byteball network slow at the moment?

Yes, the network is very slow at the moment, the chief developer is looking into it!

[Wekkel]

The Steemit Attestation Bot seems down (nothing happens when adding the bot)?

[dave_bbp]

Hi all. I have 2 small questions:
1. Apparently IBM finally came to terms regarding the WCG stats (https://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/viewthread_thread,40876_offset,130). Are there any plans yet to resume the Byte distribution for WCG?

2. I had a bet placed on the football world championship semi-final. Now for more than 2 days I cannot redeem the winning contract. As soon as I hit "send" it doesn't really do anything but wait and sometimes synchronize and eventually gives "[internal] response timeout".
Is this also related to the extremely slow network at the moment or is there an additional problem with the betting bot?

[LoyceV]

Yes, the network is very slow at the moment, the chief developer is looking into it!

Yesterday, I (finally) upgraded my old wallet to the latest version, but now I can't make any transaction. After a long time, I get this:

Code:

[internal] response timeout

[lettet9879]

If the giveaway is end,Byteball would face criticism from steemians and it could lead very bad for byteball..I think 1% steemians registered with byteball

[jjacob]

What do you think after looking at the following chart?
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/byteball/
Is it stimulating your greedy instinct a bit?  

of course, each investor has personal glance, and different decision, I have simply gave you a hint on Byteball price chart.

It does look like there is potential. But almost all altcoins are trading at levels way below their all time highs. A lot of people believe that Byteball has potential; it definitely has seen a lot of development, but for some reason the price just doesn't take off.

[CryptoRobert]

What do you think after looking at the following chart?
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/byteball/
Is it stimulating your greedy instinct a bit?  

of course, each investor has personal glance, and different decision, I have simply gave you a hint on Byteball price chart.

It does look like there is potential. But almost all altcoins are trading at levels way below their all time highs. A lot of people believe that Byteball has potential; it definitely has seen a lot of development, but for some reason the price just doesn't take off.

I guess that the main reason is that the distribution is not completed yet. In this phase whales are probably slowly accumulating, but they wouldn't pump the price with so many indistributed coins in dev's hands. Generally speaking, big speculations over coins not entirely distributed could turn out being more dangerous than with fully distributed coins. Just my humble guess.

[seven.71]

What do you think after looking at the following chart?
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/byteball/
Is it stimulating your greedy instinct a bit?  

of course, each investor has personal glance, and different decision, I have simply gave you a hint on Byteball price chart.

It does look like there is potential. But almost all altcoins are trading at levels way below their all time highs. A lot of people believe that Byteball has potential; it definitely has seen a lot of development, but for some reason the price just doesn't take off.

I guess that the main reason is that the distribution is not completed yet. In this phase whales are probably slowly accumulating, but they wouldn't pump the price with so many indistributed coins in dev's hands. Generally speaking, big speculations over coins not entirely distributed could turn out being more dangerous than with fully distributed coins. Just my humble guess.

market bear still occur small possibility there is big pump in market
although from the chart it looks beautiful for the input into the bag more but very risky because there is no sign BTC rise significantly

[cointrader78]

somebody interested in doing the name attestation Kyc PM me so i send you free bytes 😝

[HCP]

Something weird happening since latest update... out of nowhere I've started getting this error:

Uncaught exception: Error: Error: SQLITE_ERROR: too many SQL variables SELECT unit, level, latest_included_mc_index, main_chain_index, is_on_main_chain FROM parenthoods JOIN units ON parent_unit=unit WHERE child_unit IN(?) YA/nY0OfioVfSn3YQT6dq6k/7Io6f55syrtakNDFJ3g=, 2+u6D6Y6Owr5BLDmT0xs/gKvF0xWbyY8G36no4nwfKo=,

Because the error message is longer than the wallet window, there is no "OK" or "Cancel" button available to press... so the wallet is basically usuable

[CosaNostra]

Hi guys! Network is working fine for ya?

[CryptKeeper]

Hi guys! Network is working fine for ya?

No, the Byteball network is in maintenance mode. The chief developer posted this on our Slack:

‘the graph is very complex now, which makes validation very slow, and it is still performed in sql. So large complex graph became possible after we allowed spending unconfirmed funds. Trying to do urgent performance improvements now’

[jjacob]

‘the graph is very complex now, which makes validation very slow, and it is still performed in sql. So large complex graph became possible after we allowed spending unconfirmed funds. Trying to do urgent performance improvements now’

Wasn't the scalability of DAG supposed to be much, much better than blockchain? I thought that was the selling point of Byteball and other cryptocurrencies based on DAG. But if validation becomes slower as the graph becomes more complex, then we really don't have a competitive advantage in using DAG,.

[jwinterm]

‘the graph is very complex now, which makes validation very slow, and it is still performed in sql. So large complex graph became possible after we allowed spending unconfirmed funds. Trying to do urgent performance improvements now’

Wasn't the scalability of DAG supposed to be much, much better than blockchain? I thought that was the selling point of Byteball and other cryptocurrencies based on DAG. But if validation becomes slower as the graph becomes more complex, then we really don't have a competitive advantage in using DAG,.

I think the immediate issue is the original design decision to use sqlite for db - it is just a single file database that isn't intended for much beyond like a single small website or data storage in lab or something. Howard Chu says, "shoulda used LMDB."

[CryptKeeper]

‘the graph is very complex now, which makes validation very slow, and it is still performed in sql. So large complex graph became possible after we allowed spending unconfirmed funds. Trying to do urgent performance improvements now’

Wasn't the scalability of DAG supposed to be much, much better than blockchain? I thought that was the selling point of Byteball and other cryptocurrencies based on DAG. But if validation becomes slower as the graph becomes more complex, then we really don't have a competitive advantage in using DAG,.

That’s a valid concern but please mind that we have mostly unoptimised code here. IMO the underlying SQL server is the bottleneck here, there’s no flaw in the DAG scalability. This was already discussed several times but the optimization of the database functions was postponed because other improvements seemed to be more urgent.

[vlom]

Hi guys! Network is working fine for ya?

No, the Byteball network is in maintenance mode. The chief developer posted this on our Slack:

‘the graph is very complex now, which makes validation very slow, and it is still performed in sql. So large complex graph became possible after we allowed spending unconfirmed funds. Trying to do urgent performance improvements now’

does this mean it is not possible to make transactions?

and if the is important to all users thatthe Byteball network is in maintenance mode then the wallet should show a message after startup.

[bspus]

‘the graph is very complex now, which makes validation very slow, and it is still performed in sql. So large complex graph became possible after we allowed spending unconfirmed funds. Trying to do urgent performance improvements now’

Wasn't the scalability of DAG supposed to be much, much better than blockchain? I thought that was the selling point of Byteball and other cryptocurrencies based on DAG. But if validation becomes slower as the graph becomes more complex, then we really don't have a competitive advantage in using DAG,.

That’s a valid concern but please mind that we have mostly unoptimised code here. IMO the underlying SQL server is the bottleneck here, there’s no flaw in the DAG scalability. This was already discussed several times but the optimization of the database functions was postponed because other improvements seemed to be more urgent.

Since most people are encouraged to run the wallet in light mode anyway, would it make sense for the full nodes to use a full capability DBMS? Assuming the performance benefits would be that significant and thinking about long term future.

[CryptoRobert]

‘the graph is very complex now, which makes validation very slow, and it is still performed in sql. So large complex graph became possible after we allowed spending unconfirmed funds. Trying to do urgent performance improvements now’

Wasn't the scalability of DAG supposed to be much, much better than blockchain? I thought that was the selling point of Byteball and other cryptocurrencies based on DAG. But if validation becomes slower as the graph becomes more complex, then we really don't have a competitive advantage in using DAG,.

That’s a valid concern but please mind that we have mostly unoptimised code here. IMO the underlying SQL server is the bottleneck here, there’s no flaw in the DAG scalability. This was already discussed several times but the optimization of the database functions was postponed because other improvements seemed to be more urgent.

As long as it is a choice and not a flaw, I see no problem there. However, it would be nice if the wallet would have the capability to display a message of maintainence status.

[muleroaa]

‘the graph is very complex now, which makes validation very slow, and it is still performed in sql. So large complex graph became possible after we allowed spending unconfirmed funds. Trying to do urgent performance improvements now’

Wasn't the scalability of DAG supposed to be much, much better than blockchain? I thought that was the selling point of Byteball and other cryptocurrencies based on DAG. But if validation becomes slower as the graph becomes more complex, then we really don't have a competitive advantage in using DAG,.

That’s a valid concern but please mind that we have mostly unoptimised code here. IMO the underlying SQL server is the bottleneck here, there’s no flaw in the DAG scalability. This was already discussed several times but the optimization of the database functions was postponed because other improvements seemed to be more urgent.

What about now though, will more emphasis be placed towards optimizing database functions? It appears to have quite some impact.