Obyte: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments

[cryptohunter]

when are we relisting the units as mbytes or bytes??

first bit of good news here for some time

this will have a good impact for the next bull run bringing in the next swarms of people that believe cheap random unit size is important and not looking at MC

We aren't. Where is all this FUD coming from? lol - this Pineappleexpress idiot has got you all spreading rumours

FUD?

how can this positive move requested by many in this community be fud?

[1680173563]

1680173563

[1680173563]

1680173563

[1680173563]

1680173563

[zuzuca]

Are there still free Byteball to get in the airdrop or is it closed now?

is it closed for a while now and we do have any info that will ever be back on. but deh..you could buy some at these prices 

[meterse]

when are we relisting the units as mbytes or bytes??

first bit of good news here for some time

this will have a good impact for the next bull run bringing in the next swarms of people that believe cheap random unit size is important and not looking at MC

We aren't. Where is all this FUD coming from? lol - this Pineappleexpress idiot has got you all spreading rumours

FUD?

how can this positive move requested by many in this community be fud?

I (and many, many ,any others) 100% agree with you, its a common request from the community which clearly makes sense to do

[altcoinb]

Everyone can now check out the winners of the second edition of the Byteball Use-a-Thon - Steem edition.

There's a brief summary of all the use cases that are now being explored. While we of course know that some contestants will abandon their ideas, we also know that some of them will definitely be realized in the time to come.

Check out the post here: Steem Use-a-Thon by Byteball - Winners Announcement

Question? Wanting to know more about the contestants? Have an idea for how the next Use-a-Thon could potentially look like? Hit me up either on Slack or Telegram :-)

Thank you for this huge summary of all use cases and the 2000 MB

[Zer0Sum]

Everyone can now check out the winners of the second edition of the Byteball Use-a-Thon - Steem edition.

There's a brief summary of all the use cases that are now being explored. While we of course know that some contestants will abandon their ideas, we also know that some of them will definitely be realized in the time to come.

Check out the post here: Steem Use-a-Thon by Byteball - Winners Announcement

Question? Wanting to know more about the contestants? Have an idea for how the next Use-a-Thon could potentially look like? Hit me up either on Slack or Telegram :-)

Thank you for this huge summary of all use cases and the 2000 MB

So the top "use cases" are highly technical involving devs on Github and one Discord silo  

And the entire Steem thread is worth $0.47...
Which pretty much explains why Steem is worthless = a graveyard for zero value bloggers.

Crypto is dying for cross-chain transactions and you pick STEEM?
Why not link Byteball to a major platform with a future... or are we forever stuck in some sketchy Bitshares Ghetto?

[sailthor]

when are we relisting the units as mbytes or bytes??

first bit of good news here for some time

this will have a good impact for the next bull run bringing in the next swarms of people that believe cheap random unit size is important and not looking at MC

We aren't. Where is all this FUD coming from? lol - this Pineappleexpress idiot has got you all spreading rumours

FUD?

how can this positive move requested by many in this community be fud?

The wording implies it IS happening. It isn’t, we’ve requested a rebrand months ago.

[MirkoIta]

when are we relisting the units as mbytes or bytes??

first bit of good news here for some time

this will have a good impact for the next bull run bringing in the next swarms of people that believe cheap random unit size is important and not looking at MC

We aren't. Where is all this FUD coming from? lol - this Pineappleexpress idiot has got you all spreading rumours

FUD?

how can this positive move requested by many in this community be fud?

I (and many, many ,any others) 100% agree with you, its a common request from the community which clearly makes sense to do

For what is worth I am against that TBH, as I was against the change in unit of account from BTC to mBTC, bits or anything else.

[meterse]

Coming soon, a new distribution method that rewards people that are social (rewards will be controlled again by 12 month smart contracts)

[pineapple express]

Coming soon, a new distribution method that rewards people that are social (rewards will be controlled again by 12 month smart contracts)

again twitter and bitcointalk shitposting ? You are the worst marketing team in space and the main factor of byterbal downtrend.

[cryptohunter]

when are we relisting the units as mbytes or bytes??

first bit of good news here for some time

this will have a good impact for the next bull run bringing in the next swarms of people that believe cheap random unit size is important and not looking at MC

We aren't. Where is all this FUD coming from? lol - this Pineappleexpress idiot has got you all spreading rumours

FUD?

how can this positive move requested by many in this community be fud?

I (and many, many ,any others) 100% agree with you, its a common request from the community which clearly makes sense to do

For what is worth I am against that TBH, as I was against the change in unit of account from BTC to mBTC, bits or anything else.

There is no sensible argument for not reducing the unit size.

It has been demonstrated time and time again that gbyte resisted major noob investment due to the perceived expense of byteball. I must of seen 100 threads about why people decided on other projects with far larger market caps because they were cheaper and better value based on unit size.  The fact they are misguided did nothing to boost our cap and thus gain far more attention and financial support.

[Rune]

People just love bigger numbers and when there buying they want to get more for less.
I see so many people who want to buy ripple even after it is past 50c because it's so cheap compared to bitcoin.
I think re doing the unit size would be very helpful for this project and not be bad for any people who know better.

[altcoinb]

People just love bigger numbers and when there buying they want to get more for less.
I see so many people who want to buy ripple even after it is past 50c because it's so cheap compared to bitcoin.
I think re doing the unit size would be very helpful for this project and not be bad for any people who know better.

I start here a poll https://steemit.com/byteball/@altcoinb/byteball-wallet-poll-what-is-the-best-unit-for-the-future,
but nobody vote  

[kaicrypzen]

... a new distribution method that rewards people that are social ...

Maybe it would be nice to consider (if it hasn't already been considered) distributing blackbytes as well. I agree it needs more work and that they might be dumped but maybe it will give them some exposure.

[CleanCutKid]

Where can I trade blackbytes?

[meterse]

Where can I trade blackbytes?

http://freebe.byte-ball.com/

[pineapple express]

Where can I trade blackbytes?

http://freebe.byte-ball.com/

where i can use blackbytes?

[Oren4000]

when are we relisting the units as mbytes or bytes??

first bit of good news here for some time

this will have a good impact for the next bull run bringing in the next swarms of people that believe cheap random unit size is important and not looking at MC

We aren't. Where is all this FUD coming from? lol - this Pineappleexpress idiot has got you all spreading rumours

FUD?

how can this positive move requested by many in this community be fud?

I (and many, many ,any others) 100% agree with you, its a common request from the community which clearly makes sense to do

For what is worth I am against that TBH, as I was against the change in unit of account from BTC to mBTC, bits or anything else.

There is no sensible argument for not reducing the unit size.

It has been demonstrated time and time again that gbyte resisted major noob investment due to the perceived expense of byteball. I must of seen 100 threads about why people decided on other projects with far larger market caps because they were cheaper and better value based on unit size.  The fact they are misguided did nothing to boost our cap and thus gain far more attention and financial support.

You will not please everybody when you change something like the unit size. There will always be those in favor and against. It will be up to the team to decide what course of action to take based on their analysis and feedback from the community.

[DarkKnightNeverDie]

I sold my GBYTES around $290 months ago (coins I received from my bounty works).
I bought back around 5 days ago.
In the meantime, I don't worry about the current price of the coin, its long downward trend (mostly come to the end) at any point of time after buying them back.
Byteball will witness growth time soon as well as most of altcoins in the market.

[cryptohunter]

when are we relisting the units as mbytes or bytes??

first bit of good news here for some time

this will have a good impact for the next bull run bringing in the next swarms of people that believe cheap random unit size is important and not looking at MC

We aren't. Where is all this FUD coming from? lol - this Pineappleexpress idiot has got you all spreading rumours

FUD?

how can this positive move requested by many in this community be fud?

I (and many, many ,any others) 100% agree with you, its a common request from the community which clearly makes sense to do

For what is worth I am against that TBH, as I was against the change in unit of account from BTC to mBTC, bits or anything else.

There is no sensible argument for not reducing the unit size.

It has been demonstrated time and time again that gbyte resisted major noob investment due to the perceived expense of byteball. I must of seen 100 threads about why people decided on other projects with far larger market caps because they were cheaper and better value based on unit size.  The fact they are misguided did nothing to boost our cap and thus gain far more attention and financial support.

You will not please everybody when you change something like the unit size. There will always be those in favor and against. It will be up to the team to decide what course of action to take based on their analysis and feedback from the community.

There is no need to please everyone especially people that have no real argument for their view. UNLESS they are proven to be huge investors that will be leaving if things change. Even so a poll is the best way forward. ON THIS BOARD so we don't need to sign up to other crap to vote. We are all here lets vote on it here. Problem is now most byteball holders barely check the thread since it is something they probably want to forget they invested in at this point.

This isn't even all tonych's fault. At the start there was a high proportion of people here telling us all that his idea to knowingly give HUGE swathes of this minting to other ICO mangers for free was not an issue.

It is simple - a huge proportion of noobs are under the impression cheap per unit projects are cheaper and better value than high cost per unit projects regardless of cap.

This proportion went elsewhere in the last bull.

However this is not the only issue byteball has by any means. I think the distribution needs to be completed. You can't keep getting investors to invest based on x and then tell them it is now y. It kills trust. YOu need to find a way to make it more decentralised - 1 person controlling every single aspect is not what trustless decentralised projects are aiming for.

Having said all of that I can't stop myself accumulating more each week. Financial madness or a gem just biding it's time. We will see.

[meterse]

Can you contribute?