|
kaicrypzen
|
 |
January 27, 2017, 04:29:02 PM |
|
"The 3rd and subsequent rounds (yet to be announced) will follow similar rules, but the relative weight of bytes vs. BTC in the 3rd and further rounds will change and will gradually increase to 1 BTC=62.5 MB. "
You stated this in the original post.
But isn't the second round already 1BTC=62.5MB , so how can it increase to that in further rounds ?
Actually, for the second round 1 BTC is equivalent to 625 MB because 1 BTC gives 62.5 MB, the same as 625 MB would give. In the subsequent rounds, bytes weight will increase (BTC weight will decrease) until 1 BTC grants the same as 62.5 MB. I agree the sentence in the opening post is a bit ambiguous though. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can see the statistics of your reports to moderators on the "Report to moderator" pages.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
pwpwpw
|
|
January 27, 2017, 04:45:45 PM |
|
There is a file byteball.sqlite in the appdata\local\byteball which is 315MB currently, that must be the DAG, do I need to back that up too or only the user data (about 35MB) ? |
|
|
|
johny08
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1045
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 27, 2017, 04:47:38 PM |
|
Hi,i have got a question.
Why receive adress is diffrent between my insert adress?
Which adress should i pay BTC?
Thanks a lot
The addresses belong to your wallet. |
|
|
|
|
|
kaicrypzen
|
|
January 27, 2017, 05:44:59 PM |
|
There is a file byteball.sqlite in the appdata\local\byteball which is 315MB currently, that must be the DAG, do I need to back that up too or only the user data (about 35MB) ?
byteball.sqlite contains data about your wallets, addresses, transactions, paired devices and other stuff, check it out if you can and see what's there  . This file should definitely be backed up.
In the first round I received about 1.3Gbyte for each 1BTC linked.
In the second round I should expect 62.5MB for each 1BTC linked, which is about x20 times lower..
right?
Yes, that's right. |
|
|
|
str4wm4n
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1611
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 27, 2017, 05:53:41 PM |
|
Wait I thought I under stood this but I'm a bit confused now...
How any MB will be given for 10 BTC linked in the 2nd round?
|
|
|
|
|
|
zanzibar
|
|
January 27, 2017, 05:58:02 PM |
|
Wait I thought I under stood this but I'm a bit confused now...
How any MB will be given for 10 BTC linked in the 2nd round?
62.5mb/1BTC linked |
|
|
|
|
Limx Dev
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2226
Merit: 1346
|
|
January 27, 2017, 05:58:07 PM |
|
Wait I thought I under stood this but I'm a bit confused now...
How any MB will be given for 10 BTC linked in the 2nd round?
0,625 GB or 625 MB |
Bitcore BTX since 2017 - Telegram || Megacoin MΣC since 2013 - Telegram || Bitsend BSD since 2014 |
|
|
str4wm4n
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1611
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 27, 2017, 06:00:18 PM |
|
Thanks I just misread "Actually, for the second round 1 BTC is equivalent to 625 MB because 1 BTC gives 62.5 MB, the same as 625 MB would give."
Makes sense to me now.
|
|
|
|
|
CryptKeeper
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2042
Merit: 1055
|
|
January 27, 2017, 06:04:54 PM |
|
Thanks I just misread "Actually, for the second round 1 BTC is equivalent to 625 MB because 1 BTC gives 62.5 MB, the same as 625 MB would give."
Makes sense to me now.
On a side note: You can also buy 16.66 GB with your 1 BTC now and get 10% as bonus on top from the distribution! 😄 |
Follow me on twitter! I'm a private Bitcoin and altcoin hodler. Giving away crypto for free on my Twitter feed!
|
|
|
ginky
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
|
|
January 27, 2017, 07:16:00 PM |
|
Any news about poloniex listing? One exchange isn't serious  |
|
|
|
|
|
pwpwpw
|
|
January 27, 2017, 07:22:48 PM |
|
Thanks I just misread "Actually, for the second round 1 BTC is equivalent to 625 MB because 1 BTC gives 62.5 MB, the same as 625 MB would give."
Makes sense to me now.
what? 625 = 62.5 how did that make sense ? |
|
|
|
mishax1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1016
|
|
January 27, 2017, 07:24:14 PM |
|
Any news about poloniex listing? One exchange isn't serious It will get enough userbase after the next distribution , I believe that will bring some attention from polo.. |
|
|
|
|
|
jacaf01
|
|
January 27, 2017, 07:24:34 PM |
|
I'm just curious to know why developer decided to give out the tokens out free and not go for ICO funding also how is he going to get fund to keep sustaining the platform and scale the project.
|
|
|
|
|
tonych (OP)
|
|
January 27, 2017, 07:28:15 PM |
|
Any info on who the twelve validating witnesses are atm? I'm assuming they're just twelve servers being run by tonych, but curious if there is any more info available.
You are right I'm still running all 12 witnesses myself. You shouldn't say "validating witnesses" - witnesses are validating exactly as much as any other full node. |
Simplicity is beauty
|
|
|
|
tonych (OP)
|
|
January 27, 2017, 07:29:42 PM |
|
Can I send the micropayment from a jaxx wallet to prove my btc balance?
JAXX used HD Wallets as far as I know, so no. Use Electrum and sign and message might be the easiest way. There is nothing wrong with HD as long as the private keys are controlled by you (the user). |
Simplicity is beauty
|
|
|
mishax1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1016
|
|
January 27, 2017, 07:30:32 PM |
|
I'm just curious to know why developer decided to give out the tokens out free and not go for ICO funding also how is he going to get fund to keep sustaining the platform and scale the project.
Do you mean like other anonymous devs that come up with a brand new and special coin and try to collect $50m ? |
|
|
|
|
|
kaicrypzen
|
|
January 27, 2017, 07:35:46 PM |
|
Thanks I just misread "Actually, for the second round 1 BTC is equivalent to 625 MB because 1 BTC gives 62.5 MB, the same as 625 MB would give."
Makes sense to me now.
what? 625 = 62.5 how did that make sense ? Where do you see 625 = 62.5  ? In the second round: 1 byte will grant 0.1 byte => 625 MB will grant 62.5 MB. 1 BTC will grant 62.5 MB. => 1 BTC and 625 MB grant the same amount, which is 62.5 MB => 1 BTC has the same weight as 625 MB. |
|
|
|
|
pwpwpw
|
|
January 27, 2017, 07:40:51 PM |
|
Thanks I just misread "Actually, for the second round 1 BTC is equivalent to 625 MB because 1 BTC gives 62.5 MB, the same as 625 MB would give."
Makes sense to me now.
what? 625 = 62.5 how did that make sense ? Where do you see 625 = 62.5 ? In the second round: 1 byte will grant 0.1 byte => 625 MB will grant 62.5 MB. 1 BTC will grant 62.5 MB. => 1 BTC and 625 MB grant the same amount, which is 62.5 MB => 1 BTC has the same weight as 625 MB. it was confusing about the BB you already have vs what you gonna get. I get it now. |
|
|
|
|
jacaf01
|
|
January 27, 2017, 07:53:12 PM |
|
I'm just curious to know why developer decided to give out the tokens out free and not go for ICO funding also how is he going to get fund to keep sustaining the platform and scale the project.
Do you mean like other anonymous devs that come up with a brand new and special coin and try to collect $50m ? It does not necessarily mean anonymous developer, what I'm really trying to ask is how is this project funded, because I can see alot of people have bought into it already maybe is because of the freebies |
|
|
|
|
grzem
|
|
January 27, 2017, 08:58:42 PM |
|
I'm really trying to ask is how is this project funded, because
Did you heard about Bitcoin? |
|
|
|
|
