Bitcoin Forum
April 24, 2026, 01:09:56 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 30.2 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 [202] 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 ... 1128 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Obyte: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments  (Read 1236336 times)
Tradingriver
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 150
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 31, 2017, 06:55:10 PM
 #4021

i tried to sell some Byteball with the internal chatbot and i set my units to "GB" and sent 3 GB, but the wallet sent in reality 3 bytes ist this a known bug?

Seems like if i send a transaction he is ignoring what account i set. It shows GB but it sends bytes.


2.

one more question. If i put a buy or sell order on, could i chancel it later? the bot documentation shows nothing.

Please upgrade to the latest wallet version 1.1.1!

I am on the latest version
tonych (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 986
Merit: 1036


View Profile WWW
January 31, 2017, 07:30:38 PM
 #4022

If you installed the full wallet can you send a transaction before its synced?

With Bitcoin and most altcoin wallets you can send a transaction before they are fully synced provided the wallet shows it contains your coins. Is byteball the same?

Yes, you can (if the outputs you are going to spend are already in your copy of the DAG).

Simplicity is beauty
ArabMist
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 107
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 31, 2017, 07:32:43 PM
 #4023

Id say the blackbytes + Tor support makes Byteball more secure and anonymous than even Monero or Zcash.

I hope noone will really believe the quoted words, or they may find themselves in serious troubles...
Now you are just trolling and spreading fear with only these three dots ... to back it up, because your own shit coin iota is worthless.

@tonych, do you support the claim of SatoNatomato the Expert?

Nope. Tony is too professional and most likely too busy to get involved via your baiting.
bitcampaign
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2114
Merit: 268


Vave.com - Crypto Casino


View Profile
January 31, 2017, 07:34:37 PM
 #4024

I think the need to add new trading site for ByteBall, at least it can help people who want to hold onto the bag for byteball

🎁
█▀▀









▀▀▀

▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

FREE
20 SPINS

.
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

▀▀█









▀▀▀
.VAVE.COM.
.NO KYC.
.VAVE20FS.

█▀▀









▀▀▀

▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

CLAIM
NOW

.
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

▀▀█









▀▀▀
🎁
tonych (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 986
Merit: 1036


View Profile WWW
January 31, 2017, 07:48:47 PM
 #4025

I think I won't wait for SatoNatomato's response, it will likely contain only nonsense. I'll explain my concern right away:

Byteball uses witnesses. There are 2 ways to choose the witnesses:

1. They are picked by every user for himself
2. They are elected via global voting

If it's #1 then it becomes possible that some users are almost isolated from each other because they have only few common witnesses. #2 leads to a more serious problem which arises if a user is faced with more than 2 options (just google why it's a serious problem, there should be many links with mathematical proofs on impossibility of coming to a satisfying consensus). The problem of picking an option has already striked twice in the cryptoindustry. First it was Ripple/Stellar consensus flaw drama when Stellar admitted to have a flawed consensus while Ripple decided to make appearance they were fine (heh, they had enough money not to care about community opinion). The second time which I remember it was Factom drama, now I can't find the links, but in few words: they "sold" a flawed voting mechanism which was unfixable because they allowed more than 2 options.

So my concern is that cryptocoin developers don't take voting seriosly. I noticed this several years ago in Bitshares. Back then I was thinking that voting is easy, only after working with two professors (on two separate tasks) who were specializing in voting I got that it's all actually not that simple...

Voting is not easy indeed, and there is no voting in Byteball consensus.  Instead, there is a requirement that witness lists of neighboring (and not just neighboring - see the white paper for details) units on the DAG are compatible.  Compatible means that they differ by no more than one mutation.  This is similar to biology where the genes of a parent and child are very similar but not the same, and the genes of any member of the same species are also similar but not identical.

Simplicity is beauty
tonych (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 986
Merit: 1036


View Profile WWW
January 31, 2017, 07:58:57 PM
 #4026

Id say the blackbytes + Tor support makes Byteball more secure and anonymous than even Monero or Zcash.

I hope noone will really believe the quoted words, or they may find themselves in serious troubles...
Now you are just trolling and spreading fear with only these three dots ... to back it up, because your own shit coin iota is worthless.

@tonych, do you support the claim of SatoNatomato the Expert?

I think the privacy features of all 3 coins are more or less the same for most practical purposes.   What differs, and what matters most for regular users, is usability.

Simplicity is beauty
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010

Newbie


View Profile
January 31, 2017, 08:06:55 PM
 #4027

I think the privacy features of all 3 coins are more or less the same for most practical purposes.   What differs, and what matters most for regular users, is usability.

Thx, I'll use this together with other fuckups of SatoNatomato (which he will, of course, make in the future) to show the real level of his "competence".
SatoNatomato
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 31, 2017, 08:51:26 PM
 #4028

I think the privacy features of all 3 coins are more or less the same for most practical purposes.   What differs, and what matters most for regular users, is usability.

Thx, I'll use this together with other fuckups of SatoNatomato (which he will, of course, make in the future) to show the real level of his "competence".
Another appeal to authority argument.  Roll Eyes

I still stand by my words, regardless what tonych thinks, respectfully disagree.

Again no technical discussion from you.

Iota still has no decentralized consensus algorithm aside from centralized "milestones", cannot defend against Sybils/spamming, and does not work or even make sense on IoT devices due to the useless "Proof-of-Work".

You do have a high competence in trolling though, if you only applied that technically that would be great.
Kryptowerk
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2338
Merit: 1500


Disobey.


View Profile
January 31, 2017, 09:43:15 PM
 #4029

helping me find a solution to link two wallets with two BTC accounts using the transition bot.

What is the exact problem you are facing? When you say two wallets, are they on the same device or on two different devices? Normally, on the same device, when you change wallets, your receiving address also changes. Did you try selecting a wallet, going to the chat, inserting your BB address and then your BTC address (and following instructions) and then doing the same on the other wallet? How did it go?

Thanks a lot! Just entering the address of the new wallet worked to start the bot again.  (:

HODOR.
CryptoSporidium
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 405
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 01, 2017, 12:18:45 AM
 #4030

Quote from: CryptKeeper link=topic=1608859.msg17686855#msg17686855

Please upgrade to the latest wallet version 1.1.1!

Is it better to uninstall previous version, or can we just install over the top of old version?
22naru
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 501


View Profile
February 01, 2017, 12:44:55 AM
 #4031

Id say the blackbytes + Tor support makes Byteball more secure and anonymous than even Monero or Zcash.

I hope noone will really believe the quoted words, or they may find themselves in serious troubles...
Now you are just trolling and spreading fear with only these three dots ... to back it up, because your own shit coin iota is worthless.

@tonych, do you support the claim of SatoNatomato the Expert?

I think the privacy features of all 3 coins are more or less the same for most practical purposes.   What differs, and what matters most for regular users, is usability.
keep bring great ideas and make BB to be accepted and used all over the .net
22naru
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 501


View Profile
February 01, 2017, 12:48:03 AM
 #4032

Quote from: CryptKeeper link=topic=1608859.msg17686855#msg17686855

Please upgrade to the latest wallet version 1.1.1!

Is it better to uninstall previous version, or can we just install over the top of old version?
upgrade it , is working  fine ... if you will like to uninstall make a back up of all your BB folder.
strasboug
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 01, 2017, 02:42:03 AM
 #4033

I think the privacy features of all 3 coins are more or less the same for most practical purposes.   What differs, and what matters most for regular users, is usability.

Thx, I'll use this together with other fuckups of SatoNatomato (which he will, of course, make in the future) to show the real level of his "competence".
Another appeal to authority argument.  Roll Eyes

I still stand by my words, regardless what tonych thinks, respectfully disagree.

Again no technical discussion from you.

Iota still has no decentralized consensus algorithm aside from centralized "milestones", cannot defend against Sybils/spamming, and does not work or even make sense on IoT devices due to the useless "Proof-of-Work".

You do have a high competence in trolling though, if you only applied that technically that would be great.

I agree with you. Let's not worry about other coins, after all this is where we should discuss byteball, not other coins. Let them troll in their own threads.

From usage point of view, what tony puts in is good enough on the security side.
altseeker
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 01, 2017, 03:03:06 AM
 #4034

I think the privacy features of all 3 coins are more or less the same for most practical purposes.   What differs, and what matters most for regular users, is usability.

Thx, I'll use this together with other fuckups of SatoNatomato (which he will, of course, make in the future) to show the real level of his "competence".
Another appeal to authority argument.  Roll Eyes

I still stand by my words, regardless what tonych thinks, respectfully disagree.

Again no technical discussion from you.

Iota still has no decentralized consensus algorithm aside from centralized "milestones", cannot defend against Sybils/spamming, and does not work or even make sense on IoT devices due to the useless "Proof-of-Work".

You do have a high competence in trolling though, if you only applied that technically that would be great.

I think you need to start developing your own coin and show us what you got.
wpalczynski
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 01, 2017, 04:40:05 AM
Last edit: February 01, 2017, 05:47:44 AM by wpalczynski
 #4035

May i suggest moving the discussions to https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1354220.0

Thanks.
I would gladly talk there.

But he just deletes my posts from that thread.

Then he comes in this thread and spreads FUD about anything I write, especially anything positive I write about Byteball, even when I answer other peoples questions - he counters with fear and vagueness, appeal to his authority or attempts to ridicule.

Should be banned from this thread really, he hasnt contributed anything constructive in the past 10 pages.

I hope most people are familiar with his method of concerned or gentle trolling and see right through it.  It is cluttering up the thread though and should be moderated.

cybterpunk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 414
Merit: 101


View Profile
February 01, 2017, 06:01:17 AM
 #4036

Id say the blackbytes + Tor support makes Byteball more secure and anonymous than even Monero or Zcash.

I hope noone will really believe the quoted words, or they may find themselves in serious troubles...
Now you are just trolling and spreading fear with only these three dots ... to back it up, because your own shit coin iota is worthless.

@tonych, do you support the claim of SatoNatomato the Expert?

I think the privacy features of all 3 coins are more or less the same for most practical purposes.   What differs, and what matters most for regular users, is usability.

people use bitcoin because bitcoin is stable. hope byteball is stable as the stone.
nillohit
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100

***crypto trader***


View Profile
February 01, 2017, 06:39:38 AM
 #4037

I just found a bug in the exchange bot. Dev team please, look into this issue. exchange bot can't recognize BTC address. Today I was going to sell at 0.06973 rate. but, the bot failed to recognize my BTC address :

Here is the chat history -

> sell at 0.069733

Selling at 0.069733 BTC/GB..
Please let me know your Bitcoin address.

19Gfy42KDdu65LWH3nGxMuALtoEvp44d9s

> This doesn't look like a valid Byteball address. Please use "Insert my address" button at the bottom of the screen, then hit "Send".

Screenshot here -

П    |⧛ ☛  Join the signature campaign and earn free PI daily!  ✅ |⧛    П
|⧛         ☛  PiCoin - get in now  ✅     ☛ No ICO!  ✅          |⧛
Karartma1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2310
Merit: 1425



View Profile
February 01, 2017, 07:28:45 AM
 #4038

Sorry if this has already been asked but can't find it.
It is clear to me how to link BTC addresses for distribution rounds but what about Byteball addresses? Do I have to collect my newly acquired byteball into my linked addy or do they get funded automatically and I don't have do anything (except controlling the keys)?

Thanks
Krypt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1574
Merit: 1177



View Profile
February 01, 2017, 07:52:51 AM
 #4039

It is clear to me how to link BTC addresses for distribution rounds but what about Byteball addresses? Do I have to collect my newly acquired byteball into my linked addy or do they get funded automatically and I don't have do anything (except controlling the keys)?
|
|
V
The distribution rules:

BTC to bytes: 1 BTC of proven balance gives you 62.5 MB (0.0625 GB)
BTC to blackbytes: 1 BTC of proven balance gives you 2.1111 * 62.5 million blackbytes (money supply of blackbytes is 2.1111 times more than that of bytes)
Bytes to bytes: 1 byte on any Byteball address gives you 0.1 new bytes
Bytes to blackbytes: 1 byte on linked Byteball address gives you 0.21111 blackbytes
so from unlinked byte address you'll get new bytes only (not blackbytes).
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010

Newbie


View Profile
February 01, 2017, 08:46:15 AM
 #4040

I hope most people are familiar with his method of concerned or gentle trolling and see right through it.  It is cluttering up the thread though and should be moderated.

Let me reveal my guess why you support SatoNatomato:

You are a trader who cares only about his profit. SatoNatomato spreads lies trying to make the price rise higher. This aligns with your intention to sell for higher profit. Once you sell you'll start hating SatoNatomato's dirty tactics because they won't align with your intention to buy cheaper.

Am I right?
Pages: « 1 ... 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 [202] 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 ... 1128 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!