cryptodev2014
Full Member
 Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
I Love CryptoDAO.com
|
 |
October 27, 2016, 12:23:39 PM |
|
I am interested , getting in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlike traditional banking where clients have only a few account numbers, with Bitcoin people can create an unlimited number of accounts (addresses). This can be used to easily track payments, and it improves anonymity.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CryptKeeper
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1055
|
|
October 27, 2016, 01:00:05 PM |
|
|
Follow me on twitter! I'm a private Bitcoin and altcoin hodler. Giving away crypto for free on my Twitter feed!
|
|
|
|
someone111
|
|
October 27, 2016, 03:12:04 PM |
|
Can I already create a wallet on the mainnet?
|
-
|
|
|
|
grzem
|
|
October 27, 2016, 03:39:25 PM |
|
Still not clear, do we got 2 kind of bytes or one? |
|
|
|
lerecidiviste
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 27, 2016, 04:27:50 PM |
|
text message inside wallet app how do i get to on my message list/history  ? seems i can see only incoming one ? (fresh one) thanks |
|
|
|
|
lerecidiviste
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
|
October 27, 2016, 04:36:21 PM
Last edit: October 27, 2016, 04:55:16 PM by lerecidiviste |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
zanzibar
|
|
October 27, 2016, 04:50:56 PM |
|
Any guestimations on how much BTC will be linked to Byteball accounts during distribution, my guess is 12k BTC total.
|
|
|
|
|
tonych (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 964
Merit: 1008
|
|
October 27, 2016, 05:13:23 PM |
|
Still not clear, do we got 2 kind of bytes or one? We've got two currencies: - bytes: the native currency, transactions are visible to everyone, like in Bitcoin - blackbytes: untraceable currency, transactions are not public |
Simplicity is beauty
|
|
|
tonych (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 964
Merit: 1008
|
|
October 27, 2016, 05:22:59 PM |
|
text message inside wallet app how do i get to on my message list/history ? seems i can see only incoming one ? (fresh one) For better privacy, your message history is cleared every time you close the app. |
Simplicity is beauty
|
|
|
tonych (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 964
Merit: 1008
|
|
October 27, 2016, 05:25:44 PM |
|
You are correct, you have to pair devices first. It is required only for blackbytes, not for bytes. |
Simplicity is beauty
|
|
|
CryptoHobo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 27, 2016, 05:27:23 PM |
|
seen alot of tweets about this so have installed the wallet and am syncing now  where&when should i link a btc address? i see in op it needs to be done by the end of October/beginning of November or have i missed it? |
|
|
|
|
tonych (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 964
Merit: 1008
|
|
October 27, 2016, 05:36:16 PM |
|
The only fair criticism that I'd see as desirable to avoid is the exchanges and other ico wallets with 1000s of btc that aren't really 'theirs' suddenly having 'too much' to be beneficial for byteball.
Regarding ICO wallets, I reached out to James (jl777) who is currently running Komodo ICO. He replied that keeping the received bytes for himself he considers unethical, and he will use the bytes as additional funding for Komodo. I'm quite happy with this decision and hope other ICO founders will also use their funds responsibly. I also contacted Christoph Hering, Founder & CEO of BlockPay, which had a pre-ICO not long ago. His response was like I expected: "As an ICO Startup, we would prefer option 3. and use the funds in the best interest of our investors. Holding Investor funds is a great responsibility and we need to act responsibly with the funds that do not belong to us." Option 3 is receiving bytes and using them as additional funding for BlockPay. |
Simplicity is beauty
|
|
|
|
zanzibar
|
|
October 27, 2016, 08:08:01 PM |
|
The only fair criticism that I'd see as desirable to avoid is the exchanges and other ico wallets with 1000s of btc that aren't really 'theirs' suddenly having 'too much' to be beneficial for byteball.
Regarding ICO wallets, I reached out to James (jl777) who is currently running Komodo ICO. He replied that keeping the received bytes for himself he considers unethical, and he will use the bytes as additional funding for Komodo. I'm quite happy with this decision and hope other ICO founders will also use their funds responsibly. I also contacted Christoph Hering, Founder & CEO of BlockPay, which had a pre-ICO not long ago. His response was like I expected: "As an ICO Startup, we would prefer option 3. and use the funds in the best interest of our investors. Holding Investor funds is a great responsibility and we need to act responsibly with the funds that do not belong to us." Option 3 is receiving bytes and using them as additional funding for BlockPay. Meaning every group holding significant BTC has only their best interests in mind? |
|
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
|
October 27, 2016, 08:31:38 PM |
|
The only fair criticism that I'd see as desirable to avoid is the exchanges and other ico wallets with 1000s of btc that aren't really 'theirs' suddenly having 'too much' to be beneficial for byteball.
Regarding ICO wallets, I reached out to James (jl777) who is currently running Komodo ICO. He replied that keeping the received bytes for himself he considers unethical, and he will use the bytes as additional funding for Komodo. I'm quite happy with this decision and hope other ICO founders will also use their funds responsibly. I also contacted Christoph Hering, Founder & CEO of BlockPay, which had a pre-ICO not long ago. His response was like I expected: "As an ICO Startup, we would prefer option 3. and use the funds in the best interest of our investors. Holding Investor funds is a great responsibility and we need to act responsibly with the funds that do not belong to us." Option 3 is receiving bytes and using them as additional funding for BlockPay. Meaning every group holding significant BTC has only their best interests in mind? Well its better than if they kept the funds for themselves personally. Then again who will really bother to see if they keep to this? null the top 1 to 2 % of btc wallets from getting BB and do random day snapshot would solve all of these issues or not? |
|
|
|
tonych (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 964
Merit: 1008
|
|
October 27, 2016, 10:35:25 PM |
|
The only fair criticism that I'd see as desirable to avoid is the exchanges and other ico wallets with 1000s of btc that aren't really 'theirs' suddenly having 'too much' to be beneficial for byteball.
Regarding ICO wallets, I reached out to James (jl777) who is currently running Komodo ICO. He replied that keeping the received bytes for himself he considers unethical, and he will use the bytes as additional funding for Komodo. I'm quite happy with this decision and hope other ICO founders will also use their funds responsibly. I also contacted Christoph Hering, Founder & CEO of BlockPay, which had a pre-ICO not long ago. His response was like I expected: "As an ICO Startup, we would prefer option 3. and use the funds in the best interest of our investors. Holding Investor funds is a great responsibility and we need to act responsibly with the funds that do not belong to us." Option 3 is receiving bytes and using them as additional funding for BlockPay. Meaning every group holding significant BTC has only their best interests in mind? Well its better than if they kept the funds for themselves personally. Exactly my opinion. Then again who will really bother to see if they keep to this?
Their investors have all reasons to bother, haven't they? null the top 1 to 2 % of btc wallets from getting BB and do random day snapshot would solve all of these issues or not?
One issue is that exchanges and ICO fundraisers hold coins that don't actually belong to them. So far it looks solvable. Any other issues? |
Simplicity is beauty
|
|
|
|
|
lerecidiviste
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
|
October 28, 2016, 06:56:02 AM |
|
issue = maybe some can get leverage for there account and display a higher number of BTC than the real one ...... for free distribution example i have 10 btc leverage x i display btc x |
|
|
|
|
lerecidiviste
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
|
October 28, 2016, 07:22:14 AM |
|
 let's test more the wallet app & build our LUCK 1/ send me 13 byteballs here = KEH3EVIQERUMB56ETUYTLM2AFIVKTFBK 2/ i send them back to you 3/ we can pair our wallets 4/ i send u 13 blackbytes 5/ u send them back to me 
|
|
|
|
|
lerecidiviste
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
|
October 28, 2016, 07:42:28 AM |
|
question what will be the THEORETICAL average speed of confirmation ? for byteballs and blackbytes ? thanks
|
|
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
|
October 28, 2016, 08:06:57 AM |
|
The only fair criticism that I'd see as desirable to avoid is the exchanges and other ico wallets with 1000s of btc that aren't really 'theirs' suddenly having 'too much' to be beneficial for byteball.
Regarding ICO wallets, I reached out to James (jl777) who is currently running Komodo ICO. He replied that keeping the received bytes for himself he considers unethical, and he will use the bytes as additional funding for Komodo. I'm quite happy with this decision and hope other ICO founders will also use their funds responsibly. I also contacted Christoph Hering, Founder & CEO of BlockPay, which had a pre-ICO not long ago. His response was like I expected: "As an ICO Startup, we would prefer option 3. and use the funds in the best interest of our investors. Holding Investor funds is a great responsibility and we need to act responsibly with the funds that do not belong to us." Option 3 is receiving bytes and using them as additional funding for BlockPay. Meaning every group holding significant BTC has only their best interests in mind? Well its better than if they kept the funds for themselves personally. Exactly my opinion. Then again who will really bother to see if they keep to this?
Their investors have all reasons to bother, haven't they? null the top 1 to 2 % of btc wallets from getting BB and do random day snapshot would solve all of these issues or not?
One issue is that exchanges and ICO fundraisers hold coins that don't actually belong to them. So far it looks solvable. Any other issues? True the investors should take an interest in this. However not all ICO owners will stick to it like jl777 most will just pocket it and most other ICOs don't even have a ledger for how their BTC is spent? so why would they create any ledger for how their byte ball was spent or converted to BTC. You are putting a lot to trust when you have no need to. Can you simply explain why you are reluctant to null the top 1 or 2 % of BTC wallets? I see no reason to go to all the hassle of asking exchanges and ico devs to be fair and distribute the BB ...when we can just take them and BTC whales who already super rich out of the equation. I mean if you are in the top 2% of BTC wallets can you really not afford to buy some BB if you choose? How many BTC do you have to be in the top 2% at this time?? You get the wide distribution but it will be seen as more fair to the crypto community. For sure this is your thread and for now you are not getting much criticism over rewarding the super rich with the bulk of your coins since people kiss up to the devs in their own thread. However I can GUARANTEE you if this project takes off that will be the MAIN criticism that you will get going forward. All you will hear in later years is this was the coin that rewarded the already crypto rich. Unfaircoin. I would even suggest nulling the top 5% of wallets or where ever has the most effect on the distribution curve. Look at coins that can be seen in any way as being unfair lately... this could be seen as tantamount to a huge premine by BTC whales. It looks a great project I would just hate to see it tarnished with that brush. Imagine the manipulation accusations especially if exchanges don't play ball. It just seems sensible to null the top x% of wallets and do a random snapshot. Unless there is a good reason not to that I'm not seeing. |
|
|
|
|
