Bitcoin Forum
December 05, 2016, 08:43:34 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 [170] 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 ... 226 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1200 TH] EMC: 0 Fee DGM. Anonymous PPS. US & EU servers. No Registration!  (Read 461253 times)
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
September 17, 2012, 05:25:21 PM
 #3381

Code:
Dear Namecoin,

Please eat a bag of dicks.

Sincerely,

EMC

Anyway, block processing got hung up a bit due to namecoin.  It's fixed now and I've added some code to let block processing continue even if namecoin has issues... should have done that in the first place.  Sorry folks.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
1480970614
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480970614

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480970614
Reply with quote  #2

1480970614
Report to moderator
1480970614
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480970614

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480970614
Reply with quote  #2

1480970614
Report to moderator
1480970614
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480970614

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480970614
Reply with quote  #2

1480970614
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1480970614
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480970614

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480970614
Reply with quote  #2

1480970614
Report to moderator
1480970614
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480970614

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480970614
Reply with quote  #2

1480970614
Report to moderator
runlinux
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 567



View Profile WWW
September 17, 2012, 05:27:38 PM
 #3382

Glad to hear you got it fixed!

kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
September 17, 2012, 08:55:22 PM
 #3383

I've found 7 blocks with this pool and I haven't been paid 50 BTC. That's the bad thing about pooled mining Sad
Which probably means there are 6 people who have found no blocks in the same amount of time and also got paid ...
It's how pools reduce variance.
It's the reason you use a pool.

Had you mined solo at the same time you may have found 0, 7 or even 14 blocks.

You found 7 blocks because EMC gave you work that had 7 blocks in it.

Mining on DeepBit a while ago I found 3 blocks - and got paid less than 1 block there also.
I did not stop using pools because of that.
Mining at less than 2.5GH/s I found 3 blocks at various pools in March, and 3 blocks again in May.
Since May ... none.
Wow looks like pools solving variance is working really well - gotta love using pools Smiley

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
rocks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1153


View Profile
September 18, 2012, 03:34:31 AM
 #3384

This was pretty interesting, can anyone explain it?

2 blocks were found back to back within six seconds. EMC block 2218 and 2219.

However 7 bitcoin blocks were found between 2217 and 2218 and 14 bitcoin blocks between 2218 and 2219. Which implies the network found 21 blocks in 12 seconds.



Any idea what is going on? I'm assuming something is off the timestamps and block 2217 did not take 6 whole hours...
Lethos
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476


Keep it Simple. Every Bit Matters.


View Profile WWW
September 18, 2012, 07:23:54 AM
 #3385

That is easy to explain: Variance.

It was the same answer, last time it was asked.

Lethos Designs | UK BTC Seller -  Local Bitcoins | BTC OTC Rating | 1EFhXfX9uXsbXBF3LC69GiVfS3SHCsyMR1
FPGA: 2x Quad XC6SLX150 Boards
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
September 18, 2012, 07:25:20 AM
 #3386

As I said several posts up name coin screwed up block processing. It should not happen again as I have changed he code to prevent it.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
The00Dustin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 806


View Profile
September 18, 2012, 10:14:11 AM
 #3387

While I'm late to the last posted question, I would have pointed out the post about nmc processing causing the problem since that has happened before (with similar information posted in the thread with the question).  However, another interesting possibility that could cause similar issues (at least at blockchain.org apparently) is the nrolltime functionality being used to lessen server load.  I have seen newer blocks at blockchain.org showing older times than the blocks preceding them, and apparently that is because they use the timestamp in the block, which is apparently what nrolltime changes, and apparently isn't used (at least not strictly) to verify block legitimacy.  I think EMC's stats show when the block's shares were processed (or something like that), as opposed to when the block was created, so this explanation probably would never apply here, but it could be interesting to anyone curious about time discrepancies like this.
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
September 18, 2012, 11:03:13 AM
 #3388

While I'm late to the last posted question, I would have pointed out the post about nmc processing causing the problem since that has happened before (with similar information posted in the thread with the question).  However, another interesting possibility that could cause similar issues (at least at blockchain.org apparently) is the nrolltime functionality being used to lessen server load.  I have seen newer blocks at blockchain.org showing older times than the blocks preceding them, and apparently that is because they use the timestamp in the block, which is apparently what nrolltime changes, and apparently isn't used (at least not strictly) to verify block legitimacy.  I think EMC's stats show when the block's shares were processed (or something like that), as opposed to when the block was created, so this explanation probably would never apply here, but it could be interesting to anyone curious about time discrepancies like this.
Yes bitcoind allows blocks to be 7200 seconds in the future - then the block following will of course be in the past relative to it.
You'll find roughly 10% of blocks in the blockchain like this ...

I call roll-n-time a hack for a reason Tongue

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
rocks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1153


View Profile
September 18, 2012, 05:16:40 PM
 #3389

As I said several posts up name coin screwed up block processing. It should not happen again as I have changed he code to prevent it.

OK, thanks for the explaination. Well those were blocks from last night so it seems to still be happening FYI.
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
September 18, 2012, 07:32:21 PM
 #3390

The problem happened last night

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
runlinux
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 567



View Profile WWW
September 21, 2012, 11:25:34 AM
 #3391

Inaba, I sent you a PM the other night about logging into the pool. When you get some time and can take a look at it, that'd be great!

Loving the crazy low stale / reject rates!!! (26671 / 61)

Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
September 21, 2012, 05:52:10 PM
 #3392

Where'd you send the PM?

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
Badonkadonk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560



View Profile
September 22, 2012, 10:14:29 PM
 #3393

pool down? cant connect to eu / us 1 2 or 3 atm  Cry

Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
September 22, 2012, 10:36:12 PM
 #3394

Don't think so. I anyone else having problems? There is 1.5 TH active at the moment.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
DobZombie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756


TheBitcoinMuseum.com


View Profile
September 22, 2012, 10:46:08 PM
 #3395

My reported total GH rate is about half what it should be
0.o

That would mean I was disconnected from eclipse servers for nearly half an hour

The Bitcoin Museum is back under my control, but I still need to go through all the code. DO NOT PURCHASE ANYTHING FROM IT

The Biggest Collection of Bitcoin Memorabilia The Bitcoin Museum
Series 2 BitcoinNerd 1g Silver coin thread!
Discount Jewellery! Noella Jean Jewellery



Buy premium Champanges, Spirits & Wines in Australia! My Bitmit Items

Tip Me if you Hate Justin Bieber 1DobZomBiE2gngvy6zDFKY5b76yvDbqRra
Badonkadonk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560



View Profile
September 22, 2012, 10:52:34 PM
 #3396

got connection timed out on eu now, changed to us3 and got on, just reinstalled my drivers aswell, might be my router or something, to tired too check it out now Tongue

runlinux
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 567



View Profile WWW
September 22, 2012, 11:07:38 PM
 #3397

I am unable to get to diff10.

serp
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 244


@serp


View Profile WWW
September 22, 2012, 11:08:05 PM
 #3398

us1 stopped working for me.
I switched to us3 and it's working now.

Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
September 22, 2012, 11:22:46 PM
 #3399

One of the servers lost power, it should be back up now.  It's a chronic problem - I will be moving that server to a new datacenter ASAP. 

Grrr

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
DobZombie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756


TheBitcoinMuseum.com


View Profile
September 23, 2012, 12:37:19 AM
 #3400

That's why I've got all the servers listed in my backup pools. They've all gotta be down for me to disconnect from EMC Smiley

Inuba, you're mining at 400ghs? You must have some of those BFL sc hooked up?

Can't wait for mine. 40gh/s is gonna be AWESOME Cheesy

The Bitcoin Museum is back under my control, but I still need to go through all the code. DO NOT PURCHASE ANYTHING FROM IT

The Biggest Collection of Bitcoin Memorabilia The Bitcoin Museum
Series 2 BitcoinNerd 1g Silver coin thread!
Discount Jewellery! Noella Jean Jewellery



Buy premium Champanges, Spirits & Wines in Australia! My Bitmit Items

Tip Me if you Hate Justin Bieber 1DobZomBiE2gngvy6zDFKY5b76yvDbqRra
Pages: « 1 ... 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 [170] 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 ... 226 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!