[1200 TH] EMC: 0 Fee DGM. Anonymous PPS. US & EU servers. No Registration!

[Inaba]

Yeah, and Paypal, though that's no longer and option. 

[1713926759]

1713926759

[Inaba]

Connectivity from the people having trouble at home should be fixed.  The routing table got set to a class A address somehow.  It should work now... sorry about that! I  have no idea how that would have even happened.

[xblitz]

Connectivity from the people having trouble at home should be fixed.  The routing table got set to a class A address somehow.  It should work now... sorry about that! I  have no idea how that would have even happened.

awesome!  confirmed it works now!

[DobZombie]

Something strange just happened.

I got an SMS telling me one of my rigs failed. I got 3 rigs called alpha, beta and gamma.

Now it said last activity from beta was an hour ago, but when I logged in he was quite happily hashing away on us1

. I restarted cgminer and its all good again.

This happened to anyone else?

[poon-TANG]

Ya something is f'd up. Hash rate is all wrong and can't log on to EMC forum.

[Inaba]

Stats should be fixed now.  There was a minor hiccup but stat processing caught up pretty quickly.  As for not being able to login, I'm not seeing any problems there. Are you still having problems?

[DobZombie]

None that I can see. It all seems to be a go-er

[poon-TANG]

Errr' Im brain dead today....using wrong password for logon. My fault.

[mdude77]

Could you put a total worker hash rate in the API?  Right now there is a value for each worker, but it's not raw, which makes adding it up difficult.  Adding a new row for totals would be great.

Also, could you change the "last work submitted" to a value that isn't subjective to your server?  Right now it returns a date/time stamp.  Apparently your server is about 2 mins different from mine, because the timestamp works out to 2+ mins old, when on your web server, it says a few seconds.  (active workers).

Thanks.

[DobZombie]

Do our names get encoded into the solved block? If not, can it?

I feel the urge to be a little vein

[The00Dustin]

Do our names get encoded into the solved block? If not, can it?

I feel the urge to be a little vein

Luke-Jr has mentioned BFGMiner's ability to do this in a few places (including the BFGMiner thread, obviously).  Note the correct word is vane, but if you are willing to use BFGMiner, then you should, theoretically be able to do this.  Since the pool is anonymous, it wouldn't make sense for the pool to do it for you even if it was a normal thing.

[Askit2]

Do our names get encoded into the solved block? If not, can it?

I feel the urge to be a little vein

Luke-Jr has mentioned BFGMiner's ability to do this in a few places (including the BFGMiner thread, obviously).  Note the correct word is vane, but if you are willing to use BFGMiner, then you should, theoretically be able to do this.  Since the pool is anonymous, it wouldn't make sense for the pool to do it for you even if it was a normal thing.

I could have sworn it was vain. Vein is the thing blood flows through, vane is a portion of a propeller/impeller assembly or a banner to tell wind direction, vain is either idle and useless or conceited.

[thirdlight]

I could have sworn it was vain. Vein is the thing blood flows through, vane is a portion of a propeller/impeller assembly or a banner to tell wind direction, vain is either idle and useless or conceited.

+1

[philips]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQZmCJUSC6g

[The00Dustin]

Note the correct word is vane

I could have sworn it was vain. Vein is the thing blood flows through, vane is a portion of a propeller/impeller assembly or a banner to tell wind direction, vain is either idle and useless or conceited.

*facepalm*  That's why I almost never correct people publicly.  I did know that it was the root of the word vanity, but I didn't double-check my spelling (I knew what a vein was, and I know what a vane is, but oh well).

[mdude77]

Could you put a total worker hash rate in the API?  Right now there is a value for each worker, but it's not raw, which makes adding it up difficult.  Adding a new row for totals would be great.

Also, could you change the "last work submitted" to a value that isn't subjective to your server?  Right now it returns a date/time stamp.  Apparently your server is about 2 mins different from mine, because the timestamp works out to 2+ mins old, when on your web server, it says a few seconds.  (active workers).

Thanks.

Could someone quote me please?  I don't think Inaba has ever replied to me, I get the sneaky suspicion I got on his ignore list somehow.

M

[organofcorti]

Could you put a total worker hash rate in the API?  Right now there is a value for each worker, but it's not raw, which makes adding it up difficult.  Adding a new row for totals would be great.

Also, could you change the "last work submitted" to a value that isn't subjective to your server?  Right now it returns a date/time stamp.  Apparently your server is about 2 mins different from mine, because the timestamp works out to 2+ mins old, when on your web server, it says a few seconds.  (active workers).

Thanks.

Could someone quote me please?  I don't think Inaba has ever replied to me, I get the sneaky suspicion I got on his ignore list somehow.

M

Inaba doesn't ignore his miners. He is an extremely busy beaver though, so he might have missed your post when the new page started.

[Inaba]

When you say the total worker hashrate, you mean the hashrate of all the workers combined? 

As for the time stamp... I'm not sure how I could make it not subjective to the server, since it has to use the clock.  Share processing can affect the last time your worker is deemed active as well.  The server syncs with NTP every few hours, so if your time is off from the server time, and the share processing delay does not account for it, are you synced with a time server somewhere?

You are not on ignore by any means, I don't have anyone on ignore.

[mdude77]

When you say the total worker hashrate, you mean the hashrate of all the workers combined?  

Yes, precisely that.

As for the time stamp... I'm not sure how I could make it not subjective to the server, since it has to use the clock.  Share processing can affect the last time your worker is deemed active as well.  The server syncs with NTP every few hours, so if your time is off from the server time, and the share processing delay does not account for it, are you synced with a time server somewhere?

If you listed it in "time since", instead of a timestamp, while it would be subjective to the server, it means something locally.  As in, 5min 30sec ago is 5min 30sec ago, regardless of whether it's my clock or your clock.  Whereas if it says "21:12:30", that's 6.5 mins ago for me, but might be 4.5 mins ago for you.  See the difference?

You are not on ignore by any means, I don't have anyone on ignore.

Thanks!

M

[RHA]

I don't have anyone on ignore.

It's a pity. There are a few people (in another threads), which obviously should have been on your ignore list.
You wouldn't waste time feeding the trolls.