Bitcoin Forum
December 04, 2016, 12:32:53 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 [172] 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 ... 226 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1200 TH] EMC: 0 Fee DGM. Anonymous PPS. US & EU servers. No Registration!  (Read 461102 times)
dave3
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 227


View Profile
September 25, 2012, 10:10:17 AM
 #3421

I don't think the estimation from the server will be perfect to give you exactly the right number of getworks. It will only ever be approximate within a range of timeframes. If you run cgminer 2.7.6 it will show you what diff shares you are submitting now.

I upgraded cgminer from 2.7.5 to 2.7.6 today and ran it for a few hours on both a regular server, and the dynamic test server to compare them.

This is with a regular server (us3.eclipsemc.com:8337):

Code:
cgminer version 2.7.6 - Started: [2012-09-25 13:50:55]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):1878.9 (avg):1596.6 Mh/s | Q:154  A:1979  R:6  HW:0  E:1285%  U:15.9/m
 TQ: 0  ST: 3  SS: 0  DW: 17  NB: 14  LW: 5007  GF: 1  RF: 0  WU: 22.1
 Connected to http://us3.eclipsemc.com:8337 with LP as user ---
 Block: 00000343360189b2e6653ae3f7eb361e...  Started: [15:28:23]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 BFL 0:  59.8C         | 803.7/798.9Mh/s | A:1000 R:4 HW:0 U: 8.06/m
 BFL 1:  62.7C         | 803.8/797.7Mh/s | A: 981 R:2 HW:0 U: 7.90/m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 [2012-09-25 15:52:31] Accepted 0e608cb9 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:52:33] Accepted 55ff4821 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:52:42] Accepted 05ec9fc0 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:52:42] Accepted b1fc8319 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:52:47] Accepted 0276cffd Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:52:48] Accepted 2753bbc0 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:52:55] Accepted 5110c078 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:52:55] Accepted d42a26ae Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:53:00] Accepted b950b119 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:53:05] Accepted 55edde49 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:53:09] Accepted 00e85f88 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:53:09] Accepted 8cfcad21 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:53:14] Accepted 71bc86cd Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:53:21] Accepted 9d78a652 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:53:25] Accepted c50b2095 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:53:30] Accepted 217974b9 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:53:41] Accepted 9a920baf Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:53:41] Accepted 7ed0bb23 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:53:43] Accepted 2a6c466f Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:53:46] Accepted 9857a9d5 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:53:48] Accepted b5c1cc2e Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:53:52] Accepted 6743b6ff Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:53:52] Accepted 2dc972cb Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:53:54] Accepted 77e4d753 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:53:59] Accepted 29a11631 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:54:02] Accepted 6571c1ed Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:54:18] Accepted bab78252 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:54:20] Accepted 02da1ab3 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:54:27] Accepted 4d5210ee Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:54:29] Accepted 99466391 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:54:31] Accepted 7ea77f2b Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:54:31] Accepted 636bd8f8 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:54:47] Accepted 8e54c592 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:54:50] Accepted 8cba9563 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:54:58] Accepted b2b6e95e Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:55:01] Accepted 66a19fcb Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 15:55:01] Accepted 1bebd1a8 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0

This is with the dynamic test server (us3.eclipsemc.com:8437):

Code:
cgminer version 2.7.6 - Started: [2012-09-25 15:56:27]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):1468.6 (avg):1582.5 Mh/s | Q:238  A:1003  R:0  HW:0  E:421%  U:8.3/m
 TQ: 0  ST: 3  SS: 0  DW: 50  NB: 15  LW: 4656  GF: 1  RF: 0  WU: 22.1
 Connected to http://us3.eclipsemc.com:8437 with LP as user ---
 Block: 00000005f1bf5387d0157105a798cd0e...  Started: [17:56:50]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 BFL 0:  59.8C         | 677.6/791.6Mh/s | A:508 R:0 HW:0 U: 4.20/m
 BFL 1:  62.6C         | 675.1/791.6Mh/s | A:496 R:0 HW:0 U: 4.10/m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 [2012-09-25 17:53:19] Accepted 49cb55c7 Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:53:41] Accepted 02086e52 Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:53:57] Accepted 2e7f4139 Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:54:02] Accepted 0075386a Diff 3 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:54:02] Accepted 1a00b705 Diff 3 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:54:02] Accepted 4a2ed23d Diff 3 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:54:07] Accepted 4557f784 Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:54:18] Accepted 3655886d Diff 3 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:54:23] Accepted 4441bebe Diff 3 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:54:29] Accepted 3b213e0d Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:54:29] Accepted 1605cab9 Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:54:50] Accepted 47808422 Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:54:56] Accepted 13c76db5 Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:54:56] Accepted 2542d6cc Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:55:01] Accepted 0321f232 Diff 3 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:55:01] Accepted 39169afd Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:55:11] Accepted 49a31924 Diff 3 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:55:12] Accepted 0da5cfc7 Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:55:17] Accepted 262aabc0 Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:55:17] Accepted 1732aeab Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:55:28] Accepted 26c27c9f Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:55:33] Accepted 1fb350f5 Diff 3 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:55:33] Accepted 385fe40c Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:55:38] Accepted 196fe903 Diff 3 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:55:44] Accepted 4cc5006d Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:55:54] Accepted 25339073 Diff 3 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:55:59] Accepted 276ed065 Diff 3 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:56:00] Accepted 184a84f4 Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:56:00] Accepted 05b945fc Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:56:10] Accepted 19dcec1f Diff 3 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:56:32] Accepted 41e5c544 Diff 4 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:56:42] Accepted 3e5718c1 Diff 4 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:56:50] LONGPOLL from pool 0 detected new block
 [2012-09-25 17:57:05] LONGPOLL from pool 0 requested work restart
 [2012-09-25 17:57:16] Accepted 062c4e21 Diff 4 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:57:16] Accepted 14c46c49 Diff 4 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:57:22] Accepted 04c7a1ba Diff 4 BFL 0 pool 0
1480854773
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480854773

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480854773
Reply with quote  #2

1480854773
Report to moderator
1480854773
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480854773

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480854773
Reply with quote  #2

1480854773
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1480854773
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480854773

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480854773
Reply with quote  #2

1480854773
Report to moderator
1480854773
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480854773

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480854773
Reply with quote  #2

1480854773
Report to moderator
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
September 25, 2012, 10:19:10 AM
 #3422

I don't think the estimation from the server will be perfect to give you exactly the right number of getworks. It will only ever be approximate within a range of timeframes. If you run cgminer 2.7.6 it will show you what diff shares you are submitting now.

I upgraded cgminer from 2.7.5 to 2.7.6 today and ran it for a few hours on both a regular server, and the dynamic test server to compare them.

This is with a regular server (us3.eclipsemc.com:8337):

Code:
cgminer version 2.7.6 - Started: [2012-09-25 13:50:55]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):1878.9 (avg):1596.6 Mh/s | Q:154  A:1979  R:6  HW:0  E:1285%  U:15.9/m
 TQ: 0  ST: 3  SS: 0  DW: 17  NB: 14  LW: 5007  GF: 1  RF: 0  WU: 22.1
 Connected to http://us3.eclipsemc.com:8337 with LP as user ---
 Block: 00000343360189b2e6653ae3f7eb361e...  Started: [15:28:23]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 BFL 0:  59.8C         | 803.7/798.9Mh/s | A:1000 R:4 HW:0 U: 8.06/m
 BFL 1:  62.7C         | 803.8/797.7Mh/s | A: 981 R:2 HW:0 U: 7.90/m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 [2012-09-25 15:52:31] Accepted 0e608cb9 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0

This is with the dynamic test server (us3.eclipsemc.com:8437):

Code:
cgminer version 2.7.6 - Started: [2012-09-25 15:56:27]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):1468.6 (avg):1582.5 Mh/s | Q:238  A:1003  R:0  HW:0  E:421%  U:8.3/m
 TQ: 0  ST: 3  SS: 0  DW: 50  NB: 15  LW: 4656  GF: 1  RF: 0  WU: 22.1
 Connected to http://us3.eclipsemc.com:8437 with LP as user ---
 Block: 00000005f1bf5387d0157105a798cd0e...  Started: [17:56:50]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 BFL 0:  59.8C         | 677.6/791.6Mh/s | A:508 R:0 HW:0 U: 4.20/m
 BFL 1:  62.6C         | 675.1/791.6Mh/s | A:496 R:0 HW:0 U: 4.10/m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 [2012-09-25 17:53:19] Accepted 49cb55c7 Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:56:32] Accepted 41e5c544 Diff 4 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:56:42] Accepted 3e5718c1 Diff 4 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-25 17:56:50] LONGPOLL from pool 0 detected new block
 [2012-09-25 17:57:05] LONGPOLL from pool 0 requested work restart
 [2012-09-25 17:57:16] Accepted 062c4e21 Diff 4 BFL 0 pool 0
 

Looks perfect. Note how the WU is identical on both counts, and that the dynamic server is changing the diff on more than one occasion. It will start at diff 1 and slowly converge on the best balanced diff over time.

Inaba, notice what I have reported before how there are 2 longpolls 15 seconds apart on dynamic diff though? cgminer can tell when a longpoll is associated with a new block or just a request for a work restart. This 2nd longpoll still seems wrong.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
September 25, 2012, 01:21:30 PM
 #3423

Does it only happen on the test server or on the regular servers as well? 

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
K1773R
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526


/dev/null


View Profile
September 26, 2012, 07:32:03 AM
 #3424

EU Server (208.110.68.114) is down since some time now.

EDIT:
down since 3 hours.

[GPG Public Key]  [Devcoin Builds]  [BBQCoin Builds]  [Multichain Blockexplorer]  [Multichain Blockexplorer - PoS Coins]  [Ufasoft Miner Linux Builds]
BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM AK1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: NK1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: LKi773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: EK1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: bK1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
stevegee58
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 783



View Profile
September 26, 2012, 10:46:02 AM
 #3425

US1 appears to be down for about 3 hours.

You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
cyberlync
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226



View Profile
September 26, 2012, 01:47:11 PM
 #3426

EU Server (208.110.68.114) is down since some time now.

EDIT:
down since 3 hours.

EU server? afaik it has not been set up yet? it's just pointing to us1 or something?

Giving away your BTC's? Send 'em here: 1F7XgercyaXeDHiuq31YzrVK5YAhbDkJhf
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
September 26, 2012, 01:51:38 PM
 #3427

@#$#@$ data center.  Power went out again.  I've got the new server built in the new data center, I just need to transfer everything over.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
K1773R
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526


/dev/null


View Profile
September 26, 2012, 02:02:02 PM
 #3428

EU Server (208.110.68.114) is down since some time now.

EDIT:
down since 3 hours.

EU server? afaik it has not been set up yet? it's just pointing to us1 or something?

yes "EU" server, some months back a server was called so (ask inaba), now its really pointing to us1.eclipsemc.com Wink

[GPG Public Key]  [Devcoin Builds]  [BBQCoin Builds]  [Multichain Blockexplorer]  [Multichain Blockexplorer - PoS Coins]  [Ufasoft Miner Linux Builds]
BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM AK1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: NK1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: LKi773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: EK1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: bK1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
cyberlync
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226



View Profile
September 26, 2012, 11:04:10 PM
 #3429

EU Server (208.110.68.114) is down since some time now.

EDIT:
down since 3 hours.

EU server? afaik it has not been set up yet? it's just pointing to us1 or something?

yes "EU" server, some months back a server was called so (ask inaba), now its really pointing to us1.eclipsemc.com Wink

Well, I know there has been one in the past, been mining here for quite some time, but it has been taken down, due to high cost. I also recall Inaba mentioning that he has been looking at some cheaper hosts, so there is a good chance it will be online again. In the meantime, while it points to us1 anyway, I just think it's confusing to newcomers to call it EU.

Giving away your BTC's? Send 'em here: 1F7XgercyaXeDHiuq31YzrVK5YAhbDkJhf
P_Shep
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


View Profile WWW
September 27, 2012, 01:33:56 AM
 #3430

There may need to be some tweaking done to get efficency up (either to the pool, or cgminer). I'm getting the following results:

http://pool.maxbtc.com:8332      GW:668   A:10229   E:1531.3 %
http://us2.ozco.in:8332         GW:347   A:9074   E:2615 %   
http://us1.eclipsemc.com:8337   GW:764   A:2723   E:356.4 %

I'm particularly looking at the Get Works. It's pretty well up there.
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
September 27, 2012, 02:16:26 AM
 #3431

There may need to be some tweaking done to get efficency up (either to the pool, or cgminer). I'm getting the following results:

http://pool.maxbtc.com:8332      GW:668   A:10229   E:1531.3 %
http://us2.ozco.in:8332         GW:347   A:9074   E:2615 %   
http://us1.eclipsemc.com:8337   GW:764   A:2723   E:356.4 %

I'm particularly looking at the Get Works. It's pretty well up there.
If you're mining at higher difficulty, you need to take that into account because at diff 3 for example you'll be getting 1/3 the accepted amount and that's normal.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
September 27, 2012, 02:35:18 AM
 #3432

There may need to be some tweaking done to get efficency up (either to the pool, or cgminer). I'm getting the following results:

http://pool.maxbtc.com:8332      GW:668   A:10229   E:1531.3 %
http://us2.ozco.in:8332         GW:347   A:9074   E:2615 %   
http://us1.eclipsemc.com:8337   GW:764   A:2723   E:356.4 %

I'm particularly looking at the Get Works. It's pretty well up there.
If you're mining at higher difficulty, you need to take that into account because at diff 3 for example you'll be getting 1/3 the accepted amount and that's normal.
Yeah use the API 'pools' and look at:
"Difficulty Accepted", "Difficulty Rejected", "Getworks"

To compare "A:" but including difficulty - compare "Difficulty Accepted" instead

To compare "R:" but including difficulty - compare "Difficulty Rejected" instead

To compare "E:" but including difficulty - compare "Difficulty Accepted" / "Getworks"

which I'd call DA: DR: and DE: Smiley

Edit: "Accepted difficulty shares:" and "Rejected difficulty shares:" are also reported in the summary when you exit cgminer

Edit2: oh yeah ... 2.7.6 Smiley

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
dave3
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 227


View Profile
September 27, 2012, 03:20:36 AM
 #3433

Looks perfect. Note how the WU is identical on both counts, and that the dynamic server is changing the diff on more than one occasion. It will start at diff 1 and slowly converge on the best balanced diff over time.

Inaba, notice what I have reported before how there are 2 longpolls 15 seconds apart on dynamic diff though? cgminer can tell when a longpoll is associated with a new block or just a request for a work restart. This 2nd longpoll still seems wrong.

Does it only happen on the test server or on the regular servers as well? 

I'm not noticing the 2 longpolls on the regular server lately.  I am getting mostly difficulty 1 work on the regular servers, though, vs. difficulty 3-4 on the old dynamic test server.

Code:
cgminer version 2.7.6 - Started: [2012-09-26 12:10:13]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):1649.6 (avg):1597.3 Mh/s | Q:1574  A:22040  R:98  HW:0  E:1400%  U:15.9/m
 TQ: 0  ST: 3  SS: 0  DW: 79  NB: 138  LW: 55791  GF: 1  RF: 0  WU: 21.9
 Connected to http://us3.eclipsemc.com:8337 with LP as user ---
 Block: 0000057befa5e4ea1f12b6b56fa989a5...  Started: [11:11:32]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 BFL 0:  60.2C         | 803.1/798.7Mh/s | A:11041 R:49 HW:2 U: 7.98/m
 BFL 1:  63.4C         | 803.5/798.6Mh/s | A:11001 R:49 HW:0 U: 7.96/m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 [2012-09-27 11:09:57] Accepted afa33bbb Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:10:13] Accepted 1a3b9d2e Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:10:14] Accepted 44666613 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:10:14] Accepted 602149e8 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:10:18] Accepted 62f0fa16 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:10:20] Accepted 2c49a385 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:10:25] LONGPOLL from pool 0 detected new block
 [2012-09-27 11:10:36] Accepted 1fc2f51b Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:10:36] Accepted 500a382d Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:10:38] Accepted 2e9dc75e Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:10:52] Accepted 43b06466 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:10:58] Accepted 636b4a48 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:10:58] Accepted 3eb0c5cb Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:10:59] Accepted 7cd95ce8 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:11:03] Accepted 7f7e4a38 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:11:30] Rejected 3466ea5f Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0 (stale-prevblk)
 [2012-09-27 11:11:31] Rejected 39d00c82 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0 (stale-prevblk)
 [2012-09-27 11:11:32] LONGPOLL from pool 0 detected new block
 [2012-09-27 11:11:43] Accepted 795269f0 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:11:44] Accepted 45d8e560 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:11:48] Accepted 7432e540 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:11:49] Accepted 5669dba7 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:11:54] Accepted 64fac8bb Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:11:59] Accepted 28c1cdaa Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:12:05] Accepted 3c1a1f4a Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:12:10] Accepted 1ed1da11 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:12:10] Accepted 8c657058 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:12:15] Accepted 367221cb Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:12:15] Accepted 55ebc308 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:12:31] Accepted 8bae2d32 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:12:31] Accepted 6e2f41cd Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:12:36] Accepted 78a3ead1 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:12:42] Accepted 3ed611cc Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:12:47] Accepted 675e97e7 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:12:47] Accepted 602b37bd Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:13:03] Accepted 38d160d6 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:13:03] Accepted 2d07a0a8 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
K1773R
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526


/dev/null


View Profile
September 27, 2012, 04:43:22 AM
 #3434

EU Server (208.110.68.114) is down since some time now.

EDIT:
down since 3 hours.

EU server? afaik it has not been set up yet? it's just pointing to us1 or something?

yes "EU" server, some months back a server was called so (ask inaba), now its really pointing to us1.eclipsemc.com Wink

Well, I know there has been one in the past, been mining here for quite some time, but it has been taken down, due to high cost. I also recall Inaba mentioning that he has been looking at some cheaper hosts, so there is a good chance it will be online again. In the meantime, while it points to us1 anyway, I just think it's confusing to newcomers to call it EU.
i missed that, good to know ty Wink

[GPG Public Key]  [Devcoin Builds]  [BBQCoin Builds]  [Multichain Blockexplorer]  [Multichain Blockexplorer - PoS Coins]  [Ufasoft Miner Linux Builds]
BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM AK1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: NK1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: LKi773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: EK1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: bK1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
P_Shep
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


View Profile WWW
September 27, 2012, 06:02:30 AM
 #3435

There may need to be some tweaking done to get efficency up (either to the pool, or cgminer). I'm getting the following results:

http://pool.maxbtc.com:8332      GW:668   A:10229   E:1531.3 %
http://us2.ozco.in:8332         GW:347   A:9074   E:2615 %   
http://us1.eclipsemc.com:8337   GW:764   A:2723   E:356.4 %

I'm particularly looking at the Get Works. It's pretty well up there.
If you're mining at higher difficulty, you need to take that into account because at diff 3 for example you'll be getting 1/3 the accepted amount and that's normal.
Yeah use the API 'pools' and look at:
"Difficulty Accepted", "Difficulty Rejected", "Getworks"

To compare "A:" but including difficulty - compare "Difficulty Accepted" instead

To compare "R:" but including difficulty - compare "Difficulty Rejected" instead

To compare "E:" but including difficulty - compare "Difficulty Accepted" / "Getworks"

which I'd call DA: DR: and DE: Smiley

Edit: "Accepted difficulty shares:" and "Rejected difficulty shares:" are also reported in the summary when you exit cgminer

Edit2: oh yeah ... 2.7.6 Smiley


I'm looking at absolutes... Higher difficulty shares is drastically reducing up traffic as expected, but at the expense of down traffic. I'm thinking there's an optimal trade-off between difficulty and traffic. Inaba basically arbitrarily chose where to put the difficulty. With a little experimentation the optimal Hashrate/difficulty ratio could be found. ...Or function, perhaps it's not linear.
As a comparison with the original diff 1 shares I was getting efficiencies of 700-800% at EMC. CGminer is telling me difficulty peaks at ~9 ( I have 5000MH/s)
It's not a problem, after all most Internet connections have a high download rate. Just thought I'd raise the issue.
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
September 27, 2012, 06:49:06 AM
 #3436

There may need to be some tweaking done to get efficency up (either to the pool, or cgminer). I'm getting the following results:

http://pool.maxbtc.com:8332      GW:668   A:10229   E:1531.3 %
http://us2.ozco.in:8332         GW:347   A:9074   E:2615 %   
http://us1.eclipsemc.com:8337   GW:764   A:2723   E:356.4 %

I'm particularly looking at the Get Works. It's pretty well up there.
If you're mining at higher difficulty, you need to take that into account because at diff 3 for example you'll be getting 1/3 the accepted amount and that's normal.
Yeah use the API 'pools' and look at:
"Difficulty Accepted", "Difficulty Rejected", "Getworks"

To compare "A:" but including difficulty - compare "Difficulty Accepted" instead

To compare "R:" but including difficulty - compare "Difficulty Rejected" instead

To compare "E:" but including difficulty - compare "Difficulty Accepted" / "Getworks"

which I'd call DA: DR: and DE: Smiley

Edit: "Accepted difficulty shares:" and "Rejected difficulty shares:" are also reported in the summary when you exit cgminer

Edit2: oh yeah ... 2.7.6 Smiley


I'm looking at absolutes... Higher difficulty shares is drastically reducing up traffic as expected, but at the expense of down traffic. I'm thinking there's an optimal trade-off between difficulty and traffic. Inaba basically arbitrarily chose where to put the difficulty. With a little experimentation the optimal Hashrate/difficulty ratio could be found. ...Or function, perhaps it's not linear.
As a comparison with the original diff 1 shares I was getting efficiencies of 700-800% at EMC. CGminer is telling me difficulty peaks at ~9 ( I have 5000MH/s)
It's not a problem, after all most Internet connections have a high download rate. Just thought I'd raise the issue.
You missed the point then. If your average difficulty is 9 then your effective efficiency is 356.4 * 9.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
P_Shep
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


View Profile WWW
September 27, 2012, 07:00:31 AM
 #3437

Peaks at 9... There's no way EMC some how had over 20000 shares (equivilent) submitted in the same time the others has 10000.
Forget about submitted shares.
I'm just talking about Get works. EMC has more get works over the same time than the other pools. That shouldn't be the case.
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
September 27, 2012, 07:20:04 AM
 #3438

Peaks at 9... There's no way EMC some how had over 20000 shares (equivilent) submitted in the same time the others has 10000.
Forget about submitted shares.
I'm just talking about Get works. EMC has more get works over the same time than the other pools. That shouldn't be the case.

Oh I see.  Maybe has a shorter rolltime set, dunno. Anyway soon with stratum and friends all these statistics become irrelevant.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
September 27, 2012, 09:22:56 AM
 #3439

Peaks at 9... There's no way EMC some how had over 20000 shares (equivilent) submitted in the same time the others has 10000.
Forget about submitted shares.
I'm just talking about Get works. EMC has more get works over the same time than the other pools. That shouldn't be the case.

Again you need to look at the API to get conclusive numbers to compare pool performance (or any performance) due to the effect of difficulty.
Yes the number of GetWorks is relevant, but the figures I mentioned before MUST be used in the comparison to ensure that EMC is being compared properly (since EMC can have >1 difficulty shares also)
Also, the API stats report has information in it that may need to be considered in a comparison also (e.g. roll-n-time info)
I'm not saying any numbers are right or wrong, but simply that those API report figures must be looked at in any comparison.

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
P_Shep
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


View Profile WWW
September 27, 2012, 03:28:13 PM
 #3440

I haven't coded up Anubis to display that yet (get to it soon), but the stats say that maxbtc has roll time of 60, and oz/emc of 120. So I was expecting similar GW to oz.
Pages: « 1 ... 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 [172] 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 ... 226 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!