|
Tmdz
|
 |
November 18, 2016, 11:34:10 PM |
|
Almost no change on Rx 470 elpida 4gb, only 137 h/s and v6 was 130 h/s
But the older 7950 and 290 cards got a nice improvement.
7950 137 h/s
290 180 h/s
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mettalmag
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1084
Merit: 1003
≡v≡
|
|
November 18, 2016, 11:40:01 PM |
|
xfx RX480 8G 150s/ max, there's an ETH bios mod for low power. Gigabyte RX480 8G 152-155s/ no mod. Asus RX480 8G 150s/ no mod. xfx non reference RX480 8G 160-165s/ with ETH bios mod for low power. Sappire nitro RX480 8G 155s/ with low power mod. These are the hashrates I got after updating my rigs, considering that the farm is quite long way to drive I'm not risking to play with bios, but if there are any chances to increase these hashrates significantly with custom mods I'd be glad to have them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
lexele
|
|
November 18, 2016, 11:44:12 PM |
|
my two rx 470 were mining same speed with v6, now on v7 it's one at 162 and the other at 152 (almost not improved)...
|
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1710
|
|
November 18, 2016, 11:45:32 PM |
|
my two rx 470 were mining same speed with v6, now on v7 it's one at 162 and the other at 152 (almost not improved)...
I think the main difference with the RX between v6 and v7 is power consumption. |
|
|
|
|
SushiNoTomato
|
|
November 18, 2016, 11:50:26 PM |
|
my two rx 470 were mining same speed with v6, now on v7 it's one at 162 and the other at 152 (almost not improved)...
I think the main difference with the RX between v6 and v7 is power consumption. I've noticed the same kind of thing happening with my 280x cards, though one of them might just need a good cleaning and a can of compressed air since it does get hotter than the other. |
|
|
|
|
|
suggsy89
|
|
November 18, 2016, 11:52:39 PM |
|
my two rx 470 were mining same speed with v6, now on v7 it's one at 162 and the other at 152 (almost not improved)...
Check ASIC quality of the cards, and adjust the power according to the card, a higher ASIC quality of a card will require less power to produce the same speed etc. |
|
|
|
|
antantti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
|
|
November 18, 2016, 11:54:56 PM |
|
my two rx 470 were mining same speed with v6, now on v7 it's one at 162 and the other at 152 (almost not improved)...
I think the main difference with the RX between v6 and v7 is power consumption. Adaseb, now is the time to sell those tahiti's. Sell them like 150 sol miners and I am sure there are plenty of buyers. Looks like giant dinosaur hawaii is back. For a moment at least. |
|
|
|
|
|
Lucky - Luciano
|
|
November 19, 2016, 12:03:33 AM |
|
while i appreciate the constant speed increases. am i the only one who thinks we are being dripfed these as the diff goes up and the price drops. these speed increases are only keeping our mining income roughly the same. why is it that we can't get the full speed right off and actually make some money from this rather than the same old story of the big money men make the most.
Completely optimizing the code to best work with a new algorithm takes time. Has nothing to do with price of the currency compared to the miner's new version release dates. I believe we're getting pretty close to the limit on Sol/s. you are very wrong Well fkin speak up dude O.o, sure there's a great possibility Claymore has been holding out so he can make some big bucks on the side but unless you have evidence of this then you're just spitting conspiracy theories. Not only Claymore programmer. Do not forget Pascal much more powerful GPU. Do you think that for him there is not a secret private powerful miner? |
|
|
|
|
Nthused
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1001
|
|
November 19, 2016, 12:08:33 AM |
|
As the age old saying goes "Don't bite the hand that feeds you"  |
|
|
|
|
|
Acguy
|
|
November 19, 2016, 12:31:12 AM |
|
These updates are amazing
|
|
|
|
|
kisk
|
|
November 19, 2016, 12:34:50 AM |
|
Rosewill Quark 1200w 80+ Platinum
2x Asus ----- RX 480 4gb (0,1)
2x Gigabyte RX 480 8gb (2,3)
All stock clocks
-i 4
v5:
Total Speed: 504.138 H/s --- GPU0 120.002 H/s, GPU1 118.917 H/s, GPU2 132.939 H/s, GPU3 132.279 H/s
Power: 675w @ Wall --- 0.7469 sols per watt
Price: USD: ~$117.26 @ EOD 11/13
v6:
Total Speed: 579.036 H/s --- GPU0 139.112 H/s, GPU1 139.372 H/s, GPU2 149.891 H/s, GPU3 150.670 H/s
Power: 692w @ Wall --- 0.8368 sols per watt
Price: USD: ~$109.34 @ EOD 11/15
v7:
Total Speed: 654.334 H/s --- GPU0 158.062 H/s, GPU1 157.204 H/s, GPU2 169.050 H/s, GPU3 170.018 H/s
Power: 695w @ Wall --- 0.9415 sols per watt
Price: USD: ~$71.07 @ EOD 11/18
Fighting an uphill battle here.......
|
|
|
|
|
|
king_pin
|
|
November 19, 2016, 12:42:01 AM |
|
@kisk
What Frequencies are u using?
|
|
|
|
|
kisk
|
|
November 19, 2016, 12:44:50 AM |
|
while i appreciate the constant speed increases. am i the only one who thinks we are being dripfed these as the diff goes up and the price drops. these speed increases are only keeping our mining income roughly the same. why is it that we can't get the full speed right off and actually make some money from this rather than the same old story of the big money men make the most.
Completely optimizing the code to best work with a new algorithm takes time. Has nothing to do with price of the currency compared to the miner's new version release dates. I believe we're getting pretty close to the limit on Sol/s. you are very wrong Well fkin speak up dude O.o, sure there's a great possibility Claymore has been holding out so he can make some big bucks on the side but unless you have evidence of this then you're just spitting conspiracy theories. Not only Claymore programmer. Do not forget Pascal much more powerful GPU. Do you think that for him there is not a secret private powerful miner? Its not about who is a better programmer. You might have missed this awesome thread from nerdralph talking about limits: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1679855 |
|
|
|
|
ByteKingz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
November 19, 2016, 12:48:39 AM |
|
In Version 7 i have from time to time the error:
ZEC: Stratum - socket send failed 10053, disconnect
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meech
|
|
November 19, 2016, 12:50:43 AM |
|
"Jaw drop!" for the 7th time. Keep up the outstanding work. R9 390 214, R9 290 198, R480 166, R9 270x 91
Too bad the 480's, 470's can't be better but they do run more efficient. Wish AMD would release their top of the line cards soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stealth8368
|
|
November 19, 2016, 01:00:51 AM |
|
In Version 7 i have from time to time the error:
ZEC: Stratum - socket send failed 10053, disconnect
yes I am have this issue also |
|
|
|
|
|
delle54
|
|
November 19, 2016, 01:03:43 AM |
|
#Wish AMD would release their top of the line cards soon. I read somewhere, that they may not be good at mining. |
|
|
|
|
antantti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
|
|
November 19, 2016, 01:16:04 AM |
|
Hahaha, silence.
Next phase is that someone made bad investment but it wasn't me.
Second phase fuck I bought these on credit.
Third, wtf need to pay some power too?
Fourth, how do I cash out??
Mom and dad are so angry, why?
|
|
|
|
|
|
delle54
|
|
November 19, 2016, 01:18:38 AM |
|
Mom and dad are so angry, why? What do you mean and how old are you? 12? |
|
|
|
|
|
Altcoining
|
|
November 19, 2016, 01:19:23 AM |
|
while i appreciate the constant speed increases. am i the only one who thinks we are being dripfed these as the diff goes up and the price drops. these speed increases are only keeping our mining income roughly the same. why is it that we can't get the full speed right off and actually make some money from this rather than the same old story of the big money men make the most.
Completely optimizing the code to best work with a new algorithm takes time. Has nothing to do with price of the currency compared to the miner's new version release dates. I believe we're getting pretty close to the limit on Sol/s. you are very wrong Well fkin speak up dude O.o, sure there's a great possibility Claymore has been holding out so he can make some big bucks on the side but unless you have evidence of this then you're just spitting conspiracy theories. Not only Claymore programmer. Do not forget Pascal much more powerful GPU. Do you think that for him there is not a secret private powerful miner? It's probably easier and more profitable just to release this with a dev fee. |
|
|
|
|
|
