grendel25
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1031
|
|
February 21, 2017, 01:49:57 AM |
|
Since V12 it seems to run for 3+ hours and then the computer starts rebooting in 5-15 cycles... and then it ran for 45 minutes and then for over an hour again... weirdness
Further down this road and the "stability" seemed to get worse. However, in the end I can't say that it was mainly attributed to v12+ or something else. I ended up getting several blue screens and then finally doing a reset. I'm back to an apparent "stable" condition but it has only been an hour. Also... I'm running a 3-year old 850 Watt power supply and measuring up to 815 watts with my kill-a-watt at the wall. That's with 4x 7950's in the rig. I measure around 100 Watts before the miner turns on so I guess that would average around 175 watts per card. This is without any undervolting. I tried undervolting along with this whole stability troubleshooting process and I wasn't successful at all. I may try again since the reset of Windows 10 OS seems to have made things more stable. So what does the 850 watt power supply mean anyway? Should I be able to pull up to 850 at the wall and be fine? I read elsewhere in this thread (I think) that you could pull upwards of what your power supply is rated for and this gets into the realm of efficiency. Regardless... I'm jonesing for a new PSU so that I'm not so near the apparent threshold.
|
|
|
|
zzzzzzzzzz
|
|
February 21, 2017, 02:35:39 AM |
|
Since V12 it seems to run for 3+ hours and then the computer starts rebooting in 5-15 cycles... and then it ran for 45 minutes and then for over an hour again... weirdness
Further down this road and the "stability" seemed to get worse. However, in the end I can't say that it was mainly attributed to v12+ or something else. I ended up getting several blue screens and then finally doing a reset. I'm back to an apparent "stable" condition but it has only been an hour. Also... I'm running a 3-year old 850 Watt power supply and measuring up to 815 watts with my kill-a-watt at the wall. That's with 4x 7950's in the rig. I measure around 100 Watts before the miner turns on so I guess that would average around 175 watts per card. This is without any undervolting. I tried undervolting along with this whole stability troubleshooting process and I wasn't successful at all. I may try again since the reset of Windows 10 OS seems to have made things more stable. So what does the 850 watt power supply mean anyway? Should I be able to pull up to 850 at the wall and be fine? I read elsewhere in this thread (I think) that you could pull upwards of what your power supply is rated for and this gets into the realm of efficiency. Regardless... I'm jonesing for a new PSU so that I'm not so near the apparent threshold. The PSU rating is for the DC side (inside the system), not the AC side (wall). So, if the PSU is 90% efficient, it should max out at (100/90) * 850 = 944 watts at the wall.
|
|
|
|
nesic1
|
|
February 21, 2017, 02:56:12 AM |
|
how much 7950 give and what are the clocks? i get around 261H/s
on mine gigabyte at 1190/1497 +10% power doing around 308 h/s. i'm at 261.5H@925/1201 @920mV
|
|
|
|
grendel25
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1031
|
|
February 21, 2017, 03:10:08 AM |
|
Since V12 it seems to run for 3+ hours and then the computer starts rebooting in 5-15 cycles... and then it ran for 45 minutes and then for over an hour again... weirdness
Further down this road and the "stability" seemed to get worse. However, in the end I can't say that it was mainly attributed to v12+ or something else. I ended up getting several blue screens and then finally doing a reset. I'm back to an apparent "stable" condition but it has only been an hour. Also... I'm running a 3-year old 850 Watt power supply and measuring up to 815 watts with my kill-a-watt at the wall. That's with 4x 7950's in the rig. I measure around 100 Watts before the miner turns on so I guess that would average around 175 watts per card. This is without any undervolting. I tried undervolting along with this whole stability troubleshooting process and I wasn't successful at all. I may try again since the reset of Windows 10 OS seems to have made things more stable. So what does the 850 watt power supply mean anyway? Should I be able to pull up to 850 at the wall and be fine? I read elsewhere in this thread (I think) that you could pull upwards of what your power supply is rated for and this gets into the realm of efficiency. Regardless... I'm jonesing for a new PSU so that I'm not so near the apparent threshold. The PSU rating is for the DC side (inside the system), not the AC side (wall). So, if the PSU is 90% efficient, it should max out at (100/90) * 850 = 944 watts at the wall. I'm back to the random restarts I'm kind of thinking it's the power supply but if I still have over 100 watts overhead I'd think it would be okay. But that's still a lot of work on a 3-4 year old power supply.
|
|
|
|
xuanmichael
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
February 21, 2017, 03:29:58 AM |
|
stock 6 Vga HIS 8G rx480 core 1288/mem 2000 ,setting undervolt 1000mV ; v12: 293H/s @wall 1050w but v12.1: 302H/s @wall 1200w
|
|
|
|
lonelyworks
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
February 21, 2017, 05:50:28 AM |
|
Claymore, it seems that there's little bug in your program... When I mine with all my 7 rigs, sometime the miner just cannot connect. It says connected to the server and then timeout for 20 seconds. In the version 11 it wasn't doing this and its doing this on all my 7 rigs. After a little while its connecting and mining, but its just that sometime when my rigs reconnect it can take up to 30 minutes. Please fix this
|
|
|
|
zzzzzzzzzz
|
|
February 21, 2017, 05:52:20 AM |
|
Since V12 it seems to run for 3+ hours and then the computer starts rebooting in 5-15 cycles... and then it ran for 45 minutes and then for over an hour again... weirdness
Further down this road and the "stability" seemed to get worse. However, in the end I can't say that it was mainly attributed to v12+ or something else. I ended up getting several blue screens and then finally doing a reset. I'm back to an apparent "stable" condition but it has only been an hour. Also... I'm running a 3-year old 850 Watt power supply and measuring up to 815 watts with my kill-a-watt at the wall. That's with 4x 7950's in the rig. I measure around 100 Watts before the miner turns on so I guess that would average around 175 watts per card. This is without any undervolting. I tried undervolting along with this whole stability troubleshooting process and I wasn't successful at all. I may try again since the reset of Windows 10 OS seems to have made things more stable. So what does the 850 watt power supply mean anyway? Should I be able to pull up to 850 at the wall and be fine? I read elsewhere in this thread (I think) that you could pull upwards of what your power supply is rated for and this gets into the realm of efficiency. Regardless... I'm jonesing for a new PSU so that I'm not so near the apparent threshold. The PSU rating is for the DC side (inside the system), not the AC side (wall). So, if the PSU is 90% efficient, it should max out at (100/90) * 850 = 944 watts at the wall. I'm back to the random restarts I'm kind of thinking it's the power supply but if I still have over 100 watts overhead I'd think it would be okay. But that's still a lot of work on a 3-4 year old power supply. If you have the option, you could move a card off that rig and see if stability returns. Just a thought.
|
|
|
|
|
envaluecrypto
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
February 21, 2017, 08:30:17 AM |
|
Stability issues with windows... Better on linux?
|
|
|
|
Demarsac
|
|
February 21, 2017, 09:23:40 AM |
|
Stability issues with windows... Better on linux?
I am using linux since v.12 with modded bioses, RX 480's Rock solid since then, i don't even remember when i did a restart last time
|
|
|
|
Farstdury
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 0
|
|
February 21, 2017, 10:23:15 AM |
|
Since V12 it seems to run for 3+ hours and then the computer starts rebooting in 5-15 cycles... and then it ran for 45 minutes and then for over an hour again... weirdness
Further down this road and the "stability" seemed to get worse. However, in the end I can't say that it was mainly attributed to v12+ or something else. I ended up getting several blue screens and then finally doing a reset. I'm back to an apparent "stable" condition but it has only been an hour. Also... I'm running a 3-year old 850 Watt power supply and measuring up to 815 watts with my kill-a-watt at the wall. That's with 4x 7950's in the rig. I measure around 100 Watts before the miner turns on so I guess that would average around 175 watts per card. This is without any undervolting. I tried undervolting along with this whole stability troubleshooting process and I wasn't successful at all. I may try again since the reset of Windows 10 OS seems to have made things more stable. So what does the 850 watt power supply mean anyway? Should I be able to pull up to 850 at the wall and be fine? I read elsewhere in this thread (I think) that you could pull upwards of what your power supply is rated for and this gets into the realm of efficiency. Regardless... I'm jonesing for a new PSU so that I'm not so near the apparent threshold. The PSU rating is for the DC side (inside the system), not the AC side (wall). So, if the PSU is 90% efficient, it should max out at (100/90) * 850 = 944 watts at the wall. I'm back to the random restarts I'm kind of thinking it's the power supply but if I still have over 100 watts overhead I'd think it would be okay. But that's still a lot of work on a 3-4 year old power supply. You need to reduce the frequency. The peak power is quite high. There are spikes.
|
|
|
|
Dr_Victor
|
|
February 21, 2017, 10:42:18 AM |
|
With v.12.1 I have 'Memory can not be read' error. With 12 it is ok. 6*380x/win 8.1/15.12. Any suggestions, please?
|
yobit.net is banned from signatures
|
|
|
vapourminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4508
Merit: 4084
what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?
|
|
February 21, 2017, 01:20:01 PM |
|
With v.12.1 I have 'Memory can not be read' error. With 12 it is ok. 6*380x/win 8.1/15.12. Any suggestions, please?
is this message from the miner or windows? what intensity? how much system ram? swap file size? psu brand and wattage? any bios tweaks on the cards(s). what are the cards clocks (core/mem)?
|
|
|
|
AzzAz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1030
Merit: 1006
|
|
February 21, 2017, 01:37:14 PM |
|
Since V12 it seems to run for 3+ hours and then the computer starts rebooting in 5-15 cycles... and then it ran for 45 minutes and then for over an hour again... weirdness
Further down this road and the "stability" seemed to get worse. However, in the end I can't say that it was mainly attributed to v12+ or something else. I ended up getting several blue screens and then finally doing a reset. I'm back to an apparent "stable" condition but it has only been an hour. Also... I'm running a 3-year old 850 Watt power supply and measuring up to 815 watts with my kill-a-watt at the wall. That's with 4x 7950's in the rig. I measure around 100 Watts before the miner turns on so I guess that would average around 175 watts per card. This is without any undervolting. I tried undervolting along with this whole stability troubleshooting process and I wasn't successful at all. I may try again since the reset of Windows 10 OS seems to have made things more stable. So what does the 850 watt power supply mean anyway? Should I be able to pull up to 850 at the wall and be fine? I read elsewhere in this thread (I think) that you could pull upwards of what your power supply is rated for and this gets into the realm of efficiency. Regardless... I'm jonesing for a new PSU so that I'm not so near the apparent threshold. The PSU rating is for the DC side (inside the system), not the AC side (wall). So, if the PSU is 90% efficient, it should max out at (100/90) * 850 = 944 watts at the wall. I'm back to the random restarts I'm kind of thinking it's the power supply but if I still have over 100 watts overhead I'd think it would be okay. But that's still a lot of work on a 3-4 year old power supply. You need to reduce the frequency. The peak power is quite high. There are spikes. Best is to mine @60-70 % of PSU power. There is max eff. Also ZEC mining demands stable PSU, there are power spikes demanding large 12V output electrolyths
|
|
|
|
Jukagid
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 0
|
|
February 21, 2017, 01:38:36 PM |
|
Since V12 it seems to run for 3+ hours and then the computer starts rebooting in 5-15 cycles... and then it ran for 45 minutes and then for over an hour again... weirdness
Further down this road and the "stability" seemed to get worse. However, in the end I can't say that it was mainly attributed to v12+ or something else. I ended up getting several blue screens and then finally doing a reset. I'm back to an apparent "stable" condition but it has only been an hour. Also... I'm running a 3-year old 850 Watt power supply and measuring up to 815 watts with my kill-a-watt at the wall. That's with 4x 7950's in the rig. I measure around 100 Watts before the miner turns on so I guess that would average around 175 watts per card. This is without any undervolting. I tried undervolting along with this whole stability troubleshooting process and I wasn't successful at all. I may try again since the reset of Windows 10 OS seems to have made things more stable. So what does the 850 watt power supply mean anyway? Should I be able to pull up to 850 at the wall and be fine? I read elsewhere in this thread (I think) that you could pull upwards of what your power supply is rated for and this gets into the realm of efficiency. Regardless... I'm jonesing for a new PSU so that I'm not so near the apparent threshold. The PSU rating is for the DC side (inside the system), not the AC side (wall). So, if the PSU is 90% efficient, it should max out at (100/90) * 850 = 944 watts at the wall. I'm back to the random restarts I'm kind of thinking it's the power supply but if I still have over 100 watts overhead I'd think it would be okay. But that's still a lot of work on a 3-4 year old power supply. You need to reduce the frequency. The peak power is quite high. There are spikes. Best is to mine @60-70 % of PSU power. There is max eff. Also ZEC mining demands stable PSU, there are power spikes demanding large 12V output electrolyths I run at about 70% of the power limit.
|
|
|
|
d57heinz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1453
Merit: 1011
Bitcoin Talks Bullshit Walks
|
|
February 21, 2017, 02:47:49 PM |
|
anyone notice that 390x show 500 hs for the first 30 sec then it steadily drops. 12.1. Is that potential or just that the rounds havent avg out. Most of time it started way short and worked its way up not other way around.. Just wondering Edit for what its worth it does it on all cards. even 290x shows 450 h/s ZEC - Total Speed: 2793.691 H/s, Total Shares: 1, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00 08:46:22:493 1894 ZEC: GPU0 465.998 H/s, GPU1 477.434 H/s, GPU2 488.427 H/s, GPU3 398.163 H/s, GPU4 428.854 H/s, GPU5 511.049 H/s GPU #0: Hawaii 08:46:22:306 1894 GPU #1: Hawaii 08:46:22:337 1894 GPU #2: Hawaii 08:46:22:399 1894 GPU #3: Hawaii 08:46:22:415 1894 GPU #4: Hawaii 08:46:22:431 1894 GPU #5: Hawaii
BR
|
As in nature, all is ebb and tide, all is wave motion, so it seems that in all branches of industry, alternating currents - electric wave motion - will have the sway. ~Nikola Tesla~
|
|
|
ilievdh
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
February 21, 2017, 04:46:46 PM |
|
My videocards are rejected: ./zecminer64: /usr/local/lib/libOpenCL.so.1: no version information available (required by ./zecminer64) ./zecminer64: /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./zecminer64) ./zecminer64: /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./zecminer64)
ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» º Claymore's ZCash AMD GPU Miner v11.1 Beta º ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ
ZEC: 1 pool is specified Main ZCash pool is zec.suprnova.cc:2242 AMD OpenCL platform not found No AMD OPENCLGPUs found, exit
I am using the open source drivers with 2 7950 cards and I have Opencl Support. Please, make the miner so, that Platform Name: Clover and Platform Vendor: Mesa are accepted by your miner too. Here is the full output of clinfo: clinfo: /usr/local/lib/libOpenCL.so.1: no version information available (required by clinfo) clinfo: /usr/local/lib/libOpenCL.so.1: no version information available (required by clinfo) Number of platforms: 1 Platform Profile: FULL_PROFILE Platform Version: OpenCL 1.1 Mesa 17.1.0-devel (git-0514b0b) Platform Name: Clover Platform Vendor: Mesa Platform Extensions: cl_khr_icd
Platform Name: Clover Number of devices: 2 Device Type: CL_DEVICE_TYPE_GPU Vendor ID: 1002h Max compute units: 28 Max work items dimensions: 3 Max work items[0]: 256 Max work items[1]: 256 Max work items[2]: 256 Max work group size: 256 Preferred vector width char: 16 Preferred vector width short: 8 Preferred vector width int: 4 Preferred vector width long: 2 Preferred vector width float: 4 Preferred vector width double: 2 Native vector width char: 16 Native vector width short: 8 Native vector width int: 4 Native vector width long: 2 Native vector width float: 4 Native vector width double: 2 Max clock frequency: 925Mhz Address bits: 64 Max memory allocation: 2254857830 Image support: No Max size of kernel argument: 1024 Alignment (bits) of base address: 1024 Minimum alignment (bytes) for any datatype: 128 Single precision floating point capability Denorms: No Quiet NaNs: Yes Round to nearest even: Yes Round to zero: No Round to +ve and infinity: No IEEE754-2008 fused multiply-add: No Cache type: None Cache line size: 0 Cache size: 0 Global memory size: 3221225472 Constant buffer size: 2147483647 Max number of constant args: 16 Local memory type: Scratchpad Local memory size: 32768 Kernel Preferred work group size multiple: 64 Error correction support: 0 Unified memory for Host and Device: 1 Profiling timer resolution: 0 Device endianess: Little Available: Yes Compiler available: Yes Execution capabilities: Execute OpenCL kernels: Yes Execute native function: No Queue on Host properties: Out-of-Order: No Profiling : Yes Platform ID: 0x7f0ede9a1a00 Name: AMD TAHITI (DRM 2.43.0 / 4.4.38, LLVM 3.9.1) Vendor: AMD Device OpenCL C version: OpenCL C 1.1 Driver version: 17.1.0-devel Profile: FULL_PROFILE Version: OpenCL 1.1 Mesa 17.1.0-devel (git-0514b0b) Extensions: cl_khr_global_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_global_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_byte_addressable_store cl_khr_fp64
Device Type: CL_DEVICE_TYPE_GPU Vendor ID: 1002h Max compute units: 28 Max work items dimensions: 3 Max work items[0]: 256 Max work items[1]: 256 Max work items[2]: 256 Max work group size: 256 Preferred vector width char: 16 Preferred vector width short: 8 Preferred vector width int: 4 Preferred vector width long: 2 Preferred vector width float: 4 Preferred vector width double: 2 Native vector width char: 16 Native vector width short: 8 Native vector width int: 4 Native vector width long: 2 Native vector width float: 4 Native vector width double: 2 Max clock frequency: 925Mhz Address bits: 64 Max memory allocation: 2254857830 Image support: No Max size of kernel argument: 1024 Alignment (bits) of base address: 1024 Minimum alignment (bytes) for any datatype: 128 Single precision floating point capability Denorms: No Quiet NaNs: Yes Round to nearest even: Yes Round to zero: No Round to +ve and infinity: No IEEE754-2008 fused multiply-add: No Cache type: None Cache line size: 0 Cache size: 0 Global memory size: 3221225472 Constant buffer size: 2147483647 Max number of constant args: 16 Local memory type: Scratchpad Local memory size: 32768 Kernel Preferred work group size multiple: 64 Error correction support: 0 Unified memory for Host and Device: 1 Profiling timer resolution: 0 Device endianess: Little Available: Yes Compiler available: Yes Execution capabilities: Execute OpenCL kernels: Yes Execute native function: No Queue on Host properties: Out-of-Order: No Profiling : Yes Platform ID: 0x7f0ede9a1a00 Name: AMD TAHITI (DRM 2.43.0 / 4.4.38, LLVM 3.9.1) Vendor: AMD Device OpenCL C version: OpenCL C 1.1 Driver version: 17.1.0-devel Profile: FULL_PROFILE Version: OpenCL 1.1 Mesa 17.1.0-devel (git-0514b0b) Extensions: cl_khr_global_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_global_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_byte_addressable_store cl_khr_fp64
|
|
|
|
laik2
|
|
February 21, 2017, 05:59:56 PM |
|
You won't get any working setup using Mesa-LLVM OpenCL implementation Use amdgpu-pro opencl/libopencl My videocards are rejected: ./zecminer64: /usr/local/lib/libOpenCL.so.1: no version information available (required by ./zecminer64) ./zecminer64: /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./zecminer64) ./zecminer64: /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./zecminer64)
ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» º Claymore's ZCash AMD GPU Miner v11.1 Beta º ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ
ZEC: 1 pool is specified Main ZCash pool is zec.suprnova.cc:2242 AMD OpenCL platform not found No AMD OPENCLGPUs found, exit
I am using the open source drivers with 2 7950 cards and I have Opencl Support. Please, make the miner so, that Platform Name: Clover and Platform Vendor: Mesa are accepted by your miner too. Here is the full output of clinfo: clinfo: /usr/local/lib/libOpenCL.so.1: no version information available (required by clinfo) clinfo: /usr/local/lib/libOpenCL.so.1: no version information available (required by clinfo) Number of platforms: 1 Platform Profile: FULL_PROFILE Platform Version: OpenCL 1.1 Mesa 17.1.0-devel (git-0514b0b) Platform Name: Clover Platform Vendor: Mesa Platform Extensions: cl_khr_icd
Platform Name: Clover Number of devices: 2 Device Type: CL_DEVICE_TYPE_GPU Vendor ID: 1002h Max compute units: 28 Max work items dimensions: 3 Max work items[0]: 256 Max work items[1]: 256 Max work items[2]: 256 Max work group size: 256 Preferred vector width char: 16 Preferred vector width short: 8 Preferred vector width int: 4 Preferred vector width long: 2 Preferred vector width float: 4 Preferred vector width double: 2 Native vector width char: 16 Native vector width short: 8 Native vector width int: 4 Native vector width long: 2 Native vector width float: 4 Native vector width double: 2 Max clock frequency: 925Mhz Address bits: 64 Max memory allocation: 2254857830 Image support: No Max size of kernel argument: 1024 Alignment (bits) of base address: 1024 Minimum alignment (bytes) for any datatype: 128 Single precision floating point capability Denorms: No Quiet NaNs: Yes Round to nearest even: Yes Round to zero: No Round to +ve and infinity: No IEEE754-2008 fused multiply-add: No Cache type: None Cache line size: 0 Cache size: 0 Global memory size: 3221225472 Constant buffer size: 2147483647 Max number of constant args: 16 Local memory type: Scratchpad Local memory size: 32768 Kernel Preferred work group size multiple: 64 Error correction support: 0 Unified memory for Host and Device: 1 Profiling timer resolution: 0 Device endianess: Little Available: Yes Compiler available: Yes Execution capabilities: Execute OpenCL kernels: Yes Execute native function: No Queue on Host properties: Out-of-Order: No Profiling : Yes Platform ID: 0x7f0ede9a1a00 Name: AMD TAHITI (DRM 2.43.0 / 4.4.38, LLVM 3.9.1) Vendor: AMD Device OpenCL C version: OpenCL C 1.1 Driver version: 17.1.0-devel Profile: FULL_PROFILE Version: OpenCL 1.1 Mesa 17.1.0-devel (git-0514b0b) Extensions: cl_khr_global_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_global_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_byte_addressable_store cl_khr_fp64
Device Type: CL_DEVICE_TYPE_GPU Vendor ID: 1002h Max compute units: 28 Max work items dimensions: 3 Max work items[0]: 256 Max work items[1]: 256 Max work items[2]: 256 Max work group size: 256 Preferred vector width char: 16 Preferred vector width short: 8 Preferred vector width int: 4 Preferred vector width long: 2 Preferred vector width float: 4 Preferred vector width double: 2 Native vector width char: 16 Native vector width short: 8 Native vector width int: 4 Native vector width long: 2 Native vector width float: 4 Native vector width double: 2 Max clock frequency: 925Mhz Address bits: 64 Max memory allocation: 2254857830 Image support: No Max size of kernel argument: 1024 Alignment (bits) of base address: 1024 Minimum alignment (bytes) for any datatype: 128 Single precision floating point capability Denorms: No Quiet NaNs: Yes Round to nearest even: Yes Round to zero: No Round to +ve and infinity: No IEEE754-2008 fused multiply-add: No Cache type: None Cache line size: 0 Cache size: 0 Global memory size: 3221225472 Constant buffer size: 2147483647 Max number of constant args: 16 Local memory type: Scratchpad Local memory size: 32768 Kernel Preferred work group size multiple: 64 Error correction support: 0 Unified memory for Host and Device: 1 Profiling timer resolution: 0 Device endianess: Little Available: Yes Compiler available: Yes Execution capabilities: Execute OpenCL kernels: Yes Execute native function: No Queue on Host properties: Out-of-Order: No Profiling : Yes Platform ID: 0x7f0ede9a1a00 Name: AMD TAHITI (DRM 2.43.0 / 4.4.38, LLVM 3.9.1) Vendor: AMD Device OpenCL C version: OpenCL C 1.1 Driver version: 17.1.0-devel Profile: FULL_PROFILE Version: OpenCL 1.1 Mesa 17.1.0-devel (git-0514b0b) Extensions: cl_khr_global_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_global_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_byte_addressable_store cl_khr_fp64
|
|
|
|
jstefanop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2172
Merit: 1401
|
|
February 21, 2017, 07:04:41 PM |
|
Anyone else notice that v12/12.1 is reporting about a 5% higher hashrate than pool(flypool) for polaris based cards?
For example a 470 is reporting 280H/s miner side, and 260H/s poolside average. With 2% fee should be reporting ~275H/s.
Can anyone else on flypool with polaris cards confirm...want to see if its just me or a pool related issue.
|
|
|
|
sorry2xs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Dark Passenger Bitcoin miner 2013,Bitcoin node
|
|
February 21, 2017, 07:52:51 PM |
|
Anyone else notice that v12/12.1 is reporting about a 5% higher hashrate than pool(flypool) for polaris based cards?
For example a 470 is reporting 280H/s miner side, and 260H/s poolside average. With 2% fee should be reporting ~275H/s.
Can anyone else on flypool with polaris cards confirm...want to see if its just me or a pool related issue. [/quote1.8 kH/s 1.6 kH/s 480s ref.
|
Please tip the Node 1MPWKB23NsZsXHANnFwVAWT86mL24fqAjF; KO4UX THAT NO GOOD DO GOODER BAT!!!
|
|
|
|