NiceHashSupport
|
|
February 06, 2017, 01:38:14 PM |
|
There is indeed a bug regarding shares! Will be fixed in next release.
|
|
|
|
PovertyByte
|
|
February 06, 2017, 04:01:54 PM Last edit: February 06, 2017, 04:16:55 PM by PovertyByte |
|
There is indeed a bug regarding shares! Will be fixed in next release.
Is there any reason why PascalCoin causes a lot of extra heat? Only reason I can think of is if the script directs its power draw to a specific section of the card that is closer to the temperature sensor. Closest example of different temp readings on the same TDP I ever saw mining would be running a memory and core dependent coin like ZEC with one power target, and than mining a core dependent script like LBC or DCR with a memory underclock where less power is going to the VRAM and a slightly higher core voltage is hit in the same TDP. Not the case with PascalCoin vs ZEC. Everything is the same except the temps really shoot up I remember when ZEC mining was new and NiceHash brought out one of the early ZEC miners, the card would pull less than the minimum power limit but was hitting a higher core clock than actually possible with full power. So I really do not know if it is a temperature misread or if there is something actually stressing the card out
|
|
|
|
NiceHashSupport
|
|
February 06, 2017, 04:56:05 PM |
|
There is indeed a bug regarding shares! Will be fixed in next release.
If anyone can catch the bug (using -f 0 for full file logging), would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
ioglnx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
|
|
February 06, 2017, 05:47:35 PM |
|
Doesn#t work anymore on suprnova or nanopool. It started and then GPU load drops to 0..thats it.
|
GTX 1080Ti rocks da house... seriously... this card is a beast³ Owning by now 18x GTX1080Ti :-D @serious love of efficiency
|
|
|
NiceHashSupport
|
|
February 06, 2017, 05:55:19 PM |
|
Run with -f 0 and paste here what log file says.
|
|
|
|
Kompik
|
|
February 06, 2017, 06:22:55 PM |
|
Device 0: Hasher interrupted.
This error is normal?
|
Bitrated user: Kompik.
|
|
|
NiceHashSupport
|
|
February 06, 2017, 06:29:13 PM |
|
Device 0: Hasher interrupted.
This error is normal?
This is not an error but rather information that CUDA feeding loop has been interrupted (but will be be restarted back on of course).
|
|
|
|
Kompik
|
|
February 06, 2017, 09:12:07 PM |
|
Device 0: Hasher interrupted.
This error is normal?
This is not an error but rather information that CUDA feeding loop has been interrupted (but will be be restarted back on of course). Ok so it is ok even though it is repeating all the time?
|
Bitrated user: Kompik.
|
|
|
NiceHashSupport
|
|
February 06, 2017, 09:59:31 PM |
|
Device 0: Hasher interrupted.
This error is normal?
This is not an error but rather information that CUDA feeding loop has been interrupted (but will be be restarted back on of course). Ok so it is ok even though it is repeating all the time? Yes, if you don't use debug printing, it is not visible.
|
|
|
|
PovertyByte
|
|
February 06, 2017, 11:22:03 PM |
|
Is the extra heat output something that will be worked on later? I am assuming the fixed issue is the shares problem
|
|
|
|
NiceHashSupport
|
|
February 07, 2017, 12:22:49 AM |
|
The algorithm is basically SHA256 thus GPU can be fully utilized with no waiting for memory (such as with equihash). There is trully 100% extreme load. If you want lower heat, limit your TDP or play with -ct and -cb parameters. You cannot compare pascal algorithm to equihash, pascal is more similar to blake algorithms (such as decred).
|
|
|
|
Vcxz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
|
February 07, 2017, 11:02:52 AM |
|
Can it do solo mining ?
|
|
|
|
|
Vetal_inside
Member
Offline
Activity: 78
Merit: 10
|
|
February 08, 2017, 01:25:38 AM |
|
There is indeed a bug regarding shares! Will be fixed in next release.
If anyone can catch the bug (using -f 0 for full file logging), would be greatly appreciated! Thanks! v1.0.0.b Something like this: [[2017-02-08 02:45:50.878003] [thread=0x000013d8] [debug]] device#8 | Found nonce: 6c4fedd7 diff=12.4733 [[2017-02-08 02:45:50.878003] [thread=0x000013d8] [debug]] net | Sending share #1691 [[2017-02-08 02:45:50.878003] [thread=0x000013d8] [trace]] net | Sending: {"id":1691,"method":"mining.submit","params":["wallet","463","e620202020202020","589a69ab","6c4fedd7"]} [[2017-02-08 02:45:50.940517] [thread=0x000013a0] [trace]] net | Received: {"id":1691,"result":null,"error":[23,"low difficulty share of 12.47332076155086"]} [[2017-02-08 02:45:50.940517] [thread=0x000013a0] [info]] net | Share #1691 rejected reason: low difficulty share of 12.47332076155086 Here is full log.
|
|
|
|
Zoke
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
February 09, 2017, 04:42:16 AM |
|
Doesn#t work anymore on suprnova or nanopool. It started and then GPU load drops to 0..thats it.
What's your bat looks like please?
|
|
|
|
samuraijin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 261
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
|
|
February 09, 2017, 06:04:27 AM |
|
i found here for information from yesterday I was thinking to mine pascalcoin and using NVidia, I'll try to test my hashrate
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
February 09, 2017, 10:34:55 AM |
|
Pretty nice job guys, the miner work flawlessly.
|
|
|
|
Streetlight9
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
February 09, 2017, 02:55:09 PM |
|
.
|
|
|
|
giagge
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1001
|
|
February 09, 2017, 03:13:38 PM |
|
Write the correct .bat for suprnova and gtx 1070 pls .
|
|
|
|
|