JayJuanGee
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4018
Merit: 11904
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"
|
 |
March 21, 2018, 10:05:34 PM |
|
You are a useful tool for the bankster corporate shills; hopefully they are paying you in bitcoin, even if that remains ironic for you to be receiving and perhaps HODLing the thing that you are FUDding. Haven't you argued vehemently against increasing Bitcoin's native blocksize limit? Have you then not served the interests of the fat bankster pigs as well? Another fuckster BIG BLOCKer nutjob. Oh my?  Don't you realize BIG BLOCKer talking points are dead, and you need to come up with something new? By the way, you try to make this about me, you newbie bcash shill, and I am not arguing shit in regards to the various BIG BLOCKer nutjob claims that come into this thread periodically, so don't try to frame the issue as if I have some kind of thing to prove, because I don't. Most frequently, when one of you BIG BLOCKer nutjob comes into the thread to make your stupid ass claims, you try to act as if the other side has the burden to prove that it is correct rather than you, when it does not. The fact of the matter is if you want BIG BLOCKS to be adopted, then you have the burden to show that it is going to be helpful in some kind of way (you need to show with facts and/or logic).. at least more helpful than it hurts, and it seems that no one of importance (besides a bunch of stupid ass bcash supporters) is convinced about the lack of evidence and/or logic that you various BIG BLOCKer nutjobs have produced for your position about the supposed goodness of BIG BLOCKS... So why don't you go back to r/btc or Bitcoin.com where your views are more appreciated, and to support your bcash BIG BLOCK crap that is going to spread around the world... hahahahahaha.. NOT too likely to spread more than sinking to zero, and that is why you are in this thread trying to bash bitcoin rather than building on your BIG BLOCKer btrash project that is going to bring more problems than it solves to the extent that it has hardly any smart/competent developers who are able to really focus on what is important in a coin... 
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1688
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
 |
March 21, 2018, 10:35:47 PM |
|
Bitcoin ... mining costs over 1000$ per user a year. How the heck is more people having it going to fix this?!
Amortizing the unit system price across more users does exactly this, silly. At the end even he confesses that there are newer and better cryptos then bitcoin,
If so, he is wrong. Certainly there are newer cryptos than bitcoin. And there are other cryptos that are better at niche use cases than bitcoin. But as far as being a usable money or store of value, bitcoin remains king of the hill. This guy doesn't know the heck he is talking about and is possibly having some kind of a mental breakdown.
Odd thing to publicize about yourself, but okay....
|
|
|
|
El duderino_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2814
Merit: 13991
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
|
 |
March 21, 2018, 11:10:11 PM |
|
Breaking 24777$ prediction game FINAL LIST 27/12/2017 bikerleszno  29/12/2018 cAPSLOCK  30/12/2017 digithusiast  31/12/2017 Raja_MBZ  01/01/2018 elg  02/01/2018 wachtwoord  03/01/2018 JimboToronto  04/01/2018 d_eddie  05/01/2018 BTCMILLIONAIRE  06/01/2018 HanvanBitcoin  07/01/2018 ghandi  08/01/2018 savetherainforrest  09/01/2018 explorer  10/01/2018 bicoinpsycho  11/01/2018 Bitcoinaire  12/01/2018 speedwheel  13/01/2018 undeadbitcoiner  14/01/2018 northypoale  15/01/2018 ivomm  16/01/2018 maca068  17/01/2018 bitcoinvest  18/01/2018 last of the v8s  19/01/2018 mfort312  20/01/2018 1982dre  21/01/2018 flamast2  22/01/2018 RealMachasm  23/01/2018 willope  24/01/2018 kartala  25/01/2018 orpington  26/01/2018 rolling  27/01/2018 LFC_bitcoin  28/01/2018 jojo69  29/01/2018 CristiTCM  30/01/2018 rayX12  31/01/2018 realsteelboy  01/02/2018 twocorn  02/02/2018 mancroofer  03/02/2018 True Myth  04/02/2018 poolminor  05/02/2018 itod  06/02/2018 scheptan  07/02/2018 vapourminer  08/02/2018 alexeft  09/02/2018 siera  10/02/2018 AlcoHoDL  11/02/2018 Dunkelheit667  12/02/2018 yonton  13/02/2018 Wekkel  14/02/2018 Thekool1s  15/02/2018 starmman  16/02/2018 Globb0  17/02/2018 leveldkrypto  18/02/2018 olesh  19/02/2018 BitCoinBurger  20/02/2018 Paashaas  21/02/2018 flynn  22/02/2018 icygreen  23/02/2018 erisdiscordia  24/02/2018 phil_s  25/02/2018 sirazimuth  26/02/2018 Arriemoller  27/02/2018 yonton  28/02/2018 Muttley  01/03/2018 bones261  02/03/2018 heater  03/03/2018 soullyG  04/03/2018 InvoKing  05/03/2018 Notme  06/03/2018 sa_94  07/03/2018 NUFCrichard  08/03/2018 Imbatman  09/03/2018 Roombot  10/03/2018 STT  11/03/2018 badream  13/03/2018 erre  14/03/2018 julian071  15/03/2018 podyx  17/03/2018 fragout  18/03/2018 fabiorem  21/03/2018 dakustaking76 23/03/2018 nikauforest 31/03/2018 vroom 01/04/2018 somac. 02/04/2018 kurious 04/04/2018 fluidjax 05/04/2018 bitcoinbunny 08/04/2018 tyler1890 10/04/2018 ludwigvon 11/04/2018 hairymaclairy 16/04/2018 practicaldreamer 18/04/2018 free-bit.co.in 27/04/2018 drbrockoin 01/05/2018 sprinkles 02/06/2018 oblox 07/07/2018 IntroVert 03/08/2018 toxic2040 28/08/2018 bitserve 15/10/2018 Yefi 05/11/2018 mikenz 31/12/2018 melman2002 01/01/2019 Spaceman_Spiff_Original 12/02/2019 FractalUniverse 21/04/2019 gentlemand 20/02/2020 romneymoney 18/12/2021 luckygenough56 UPDATE AND GOOD LUCK
|
|
|
|
Last of the V8s
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4393
Be a bank
|
 |
March 21, 2018, 11:28:40 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 2282
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
V8 please reduce your output of quality content. I have merited you excessively and it’s just not sustainable.
|
|
|
|
bitserve
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1621
Self made HODLER ✓
|
 |
March 21, 2018, 11:53:01 PM Merited by BobLawblaw (1) |
|
V8 please reduce your output of quality content. I have merited you excessively and it’s just not sustainable.
Confirmed.
|
|
|
|
gembitz
|
 |
March 21, 2018, 11:56:37 PM Merited by BobLawblaw (1) |
|
V8 please reduce your output of quality content. I have merited you excessively and it’s just not sustainable.
TBH, I'm a merit source, and down to my last 3 sendable sMerits, at the moment :| (No - DO NOT MERIT THIS POST YOU SILLY GOOSES !) ... and Theymos expects me to venture out of this thread ?! I'm trying to top off other posters from time to time when I notice they are running low as well. Too much quality here, folks. i'm still waiting on the +merit windows wallet :-D ha
|
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3976
Merit: 9212
https://bpip.org
|
 |
March 21, 2018, 11:59:02 PM Merited by BobLawblaw (3) |
|
EDIT: Goddamn you, suchmoon...
It was an accident, I swear, I tripped and fell on the merit button.
|
|
|
|
Rosewater Foundation
|
V8 please reduce your output of quality content. I have merited you excessively and it’s just not sustainable.
TBH, I'm a merit source, and down to my last 3 sendable sMerits, at the moment :| (No - DO NOT MERIT THIS POST YOU SILLY GOOSES !) ... and Theymos expects me to venture out of this thread ?! I'm trying to top off other posters from time to time when I notice they are running low as well. Too much quality here, folks. EDIT: Goddamn you, suchmoon... There are a few meritorious posts out there. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3174746.0But you really have to go looking for them. And who wants to do that? Edit: At the height of China's command over the Bitcoin market a couple or more years ago the number of full nodes there regularly fell below 100. I've just had a look and the number of full nodes has gone up hugely in the last few months to over 2000 now, in fact it's added over 1000 in the last month alone. https://bitnodes.earn.com/dashboard/?days=730Can anyone in the know tell me why this has happened?
|
|
|
|
bones261
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828
|
 |
March 22, 2018, 12:11:06 AM |
|
V8 please reduce your output of quality content. I have merited you excessively and it’s just not sustainable.
TBH, I'm a merit source, and down to my last 3 sendable sMerits, at the moment :| (No - DO NOT MERIT THIS POST YOU SILLY GOOSES !) ... and Theymos expects me to venture out of this thread ?! I'm trying to top off other posters from time to time when I notice they are running low as well. Too much quality here, folks. EDIT: Goddamn you, suchmoon... I still have 106 smerits from the initial disbursement in addition to to a few more from my recently acquired "duty." I guess that I have been way too stingy. It's really hard branching out. Quite frankly, I'm not finding much to merit.  Oh well, at least people don't seem to like my posts much. So I am not acquiring many smerits on top of everything else. I should be able to bring this down to a balance of zero by year end. Thanks for the tip off. 
|
|
|
|
realr0ach
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
|
 |
March 22, 2018, 12:13:25 AM |
|
And then cleanse the town with fire...

|
|
|
|
Elwar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386
Viva Ut Vivas
|
 |
March 22, 2018, 12:14:01 AM |
|
Probably should ask in Dev but you folks are hip to the latest things...
Is there a way to automatically forward from an address you control to another address? Like some perpetual address locking mechanism?
I'm looking at Rootstock.
The way it works (as far as I can tell right now) is that you send from your wallet to a designated Rootstock controlled Bitcoin address.
At that point the bitcoins are locked and the same amount of Smartcoins are released on the Rootstock network back to the address of the wallet you sent from (again, I have no idea if this is reality). So now you have control of your Rootstock smartcoins because you know the private key of the originating address.
You can do all of your smartcoin stuff, then when you want them back in bitcoins you send to a designated Rootstock exit address and coins are released to an address you sent from on Rootstock (maybe that's how it works?).
I was wondering if there would be a way to send from one address to another on the Bitcoin network but have it go through Rootstock, do some filtering or whatever and come back without needing to run wallet software to move it along.
|
|
|
|
Last of the V8s
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4393
Be a bank
|
 |
March 22, 2018, 12:20:38 AM |
|
 did not know that tbh
|
|
|
|
|
Elwar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386
Viva Ut Vivas
|
 |
March 22, 2018, 12:29:17 AM |
|
SHA-2 (Secure Hash Algorithm 2) is a set of cryptographic hash functions.
SHA-256 is used in several different parts of the Bitcoin network:
Mining uses SHA-256 as the Proof of work algorithm. SHA-256 is used in the creation of bitcoin addresses to improve security and privacy.
|
|
|
|
Rosewater Foundation
|
 |
March 22, 2018, 12:32:39 AM |
|
Another pearl from the Dev section: nLockTime is specific to the subject transaction. This means if you sign a transaction with an nLockTime, that transaction cannot confirm in a block prior to that constraint.
OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY on the other hand, restrict outputs of a transaction from being spent prior to a certain constraint. There are very different use cases for OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY than for nLockTime. If a customer is withdrawing funds from a service, there is no real reason why the service would want to restrict the customer from spending their withdrawal anything other than immediately.
As mentioned above, OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY will be used with LN and other similar payment channels. It is likely that OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY was soft-forked into Bitcoin with LN/payments channels in mind.
|
|
|
|
d_eddie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2800
Merit: 4115
|
 |
March 22, 2018, 12:33:19 AM |
|
SHA-2 (Secure Hash Algorithm 2) is a set of cryptographic hash functions.
SHA-256 is used in several different parts of the Bitcoin network:
Mining uses SHA-256 as the Proof of work algorithm. SHA-256 is used in the creation of bitcoin addresses to improve security and privacy.
How dare you contradict? Satoshi knows better for sure. 
|
|
|
|
xhomerx10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4144
Merit: 9382
|
 |
March 22, 2018, 12:45:13 AM Last edit: March 22, 2018, 12:55:44 AM by xhomerx10 Merited by Last of the V8s (1) |
|
SHA-2 (Secure Hash Algorithm 2) is a set of cryptographic hash functions.
SHA-256 is used in several different parts of the Bitcoin network:
Mining uses SHA-256 as the Proof of work algorithm. SHA-256 is used in the creation of bitcoin addresses to improve security and privacy.
Yeah and without ECDSA they're pretty tough to spend. Seems like crypto currencies need cryptography to function. Anyone know what Satoshi -1 was driving at? edit: major correction of the meaning of Satoshi
|
|
|
|
Last of the V8s
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4393
Be a bank
|
 |
March 22, 2018, 01:00:25 AM |
|
Another pearl from the Dev section: nLockTime is specific to the subject transaction. This means if you sign a transaction with an nLockTime, that transaction cannot confirm in a block prior to that constraint.
OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY on the other hand, restrict outputs of a transaction from being spent prior to a certain constraint. There are very different use cases for OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY than for nLockTime. If a customer is withdrawing funds from a service, there is no real reason why the service would want to restrict the customer from spending their withdrawal anything other than immediately.
As mentioned above, OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY will be used with LN and other similar payment channels. It is likely that OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY was soft-forked into Bitcoin with LN/payments channels in mind.
Panthers52=Quickseller=MasterP should know a thing or two about escrow and how to screw with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|