Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[StartupAnalyst]

I have long wanted to buy myself such a thing so that each time not to write with my hand, but to put a seal.
Just imagine how insignificant, but still create an effect, if each of the WO participants will buy one for themselves and stamp on each bill of which he pays.

This is the seal I was talking about. If you're interested, you can follow the link and see. I think forever you can watch not only how water flows or fire burns, but also on it!

[1560932008]

1560932008

[1560932008]

1560932008

[1560932008]

1560932008

[1560932008]

1560932008

[d_eddie]

Unbarted debarts
and the living is easy
but she still feels fake.

[Dabs]

Not sure what to make of it.
Does he think that it is over already?
If not, than there was no event like the blowup of two Bear Stearns hedge funds (in 2007) yet.
We shall see.

It’s a bit of a joke.  He is saying the bear market has been so strongly predicted that it won’t happen.

I'm actually thinking now is a good time to buy some low cost index funds or ETFs.

[micgoossens]

F*** i do hate such a sudden red BAR

Quickly into HODLbed and good night WO’s

[JayJuanGee]

Governments  > Corrupt
Banks            > Scammers
Money           > Devaluation

Buying Bitcoin is the only solution.

The article is by Martin Mühleisen 2018 (Director of the Strategy, Policy and Review Department (SPR) of the IMF), but the image is the reality of Bitcoin, past , present and future.

https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2018/06/index.htm

Appears to be a built in assumption that dressing up, in a suit, is a part of transforming into more evolved.  I doubt that cypherpunks would buy into that kind of an assumption, and cypherpunk thinking seem to be a decently large motivating force behind bitcoin.

[jojo69]

[JayJuanGee]

This is the first meme in the style of a Rocket.

Sorry for the quality but the forum does not show a file larger than 3Mb...  

I like the spelling "you will loose money"   hahhahahahaha

[kingcolex]

Not sure what to make of it.
Does he think that it is over already?
If not, than there was no event like the blowup of two Bear Stearns hedge funds (in 2007) yet.
We shall see.

It’s a bit of a joke.  He is saying the bear market has been so strongly predicted that it won’t happen.

I'm actually thinking now is a good time to buy some low cost index funds or ETFs.

When everyone predicts something it usually doesn't follow through especially when its investing.

[JayJuanGee]

https://twitter.com/brian_trollz/status/1094673219968253955
thread oh about the next UASF
nb it's not just Lukejr advocating

Reluctant to give this too much airtime because it will just bring out the trolls.

They are hypothesizing about a collapse in hash rate due to reduction in miner awards at sone future unknown date. So they want to take radical action now to reduce the block size to 300kb. But the hash rate is near ATH.  

It’s hard not to interpret this as just a miner money grab.  Don’t fix what ain’t broke.  Focus on Schnorr and Lightning and other important shit.

I have zero enthusiasm for more block size wars.  If an urgent need develops in the future let’s look at it then.  We don’t need to take radical action to fix theoretical future problems now.

Reducing blocksize to 300k, for example, could be a softfork that is sort of like a preferred mining but does not absolutely restrict to 300k, no?  And, the block will continue to have the 1mb limit while there would be a decent numbers of miners choosing to run the 300k restrictive software... something like that?

Seems like a decent idea, and it does not seem like a miner grab nor anticipation that lower hash rate is a condition precedent.  It has other block propagation goals, no?

I'm not advocating, just pointing it out, but I don't see this push going away.

Fair nuff.  I see this as a social attack and we just need to innoculate ourselves.

I don't see it as an attack.. but I doubt that it is very likely to go through... Seems like there is a decent amount of tendency towards the status quo, and any group that wants to get significant and meaningful consensus towards limiting blocks to 300k is going to have a decently uphill battle to convince others that such a reduction (limitation) is necessary and helpful based on facts and logic (in other words, they have the burden to provide both sufficient evidence and sufficient logic otherwise status quo will continue to reign).  

TLDR:  Currently, a push to educate and perhaps convince others to support a usaf softfork to 300k blocks  does not seem like a threat to me, and it also seems like a bit of an uphill battle to convince others of the necessity of such.

[StartupAnalyst]

This is the first meme in the style of a Rocket.

Sorry for the quality but the forum does not show a file larger than 3Mb...  

I like the spelling "you will loose money"   hahhahahahaha

What would you say about these pictures?

Gentlemen, what do you think which of these pictures would look better on a hat?

№1                                                                                                                                            

№2

№3

[kingcolex]

I need more green over here, I want to see so many green candles I think it's green Hanukkah, not just these here and there pop ups.

[JayJuanGee]

[edited out]

What would you say about these pictures?

Even though 1 would be the easiest to see on a hat avatar, and I really don't know anything about the actual character, my personal preference, based on just the cool bad-ass leather jacket and sunglasses appeal of the underlying image is 3, 1, 2.... as I have reordered them below to disambiguate. 

By the way, I don't really appreciate the split-personality feeling that I get from image 2... that is why I put that one last in my avatar image preference order.

№3

№1                                                                                                                                            

№2

[StartupAnalyst]

[edited out]

What would you say about these pictures?

Even though 1 would be the easiest to see on a hat avatar, and I really don't know anything about the actual character, my personal preference, based on just the cool bad-ass leather jacket and sunglasses appeal of the underlying image is 3, 1, 2.... as I have reordered them below to disambiguate. 

By the way, I don't really appreciate the split-personality feeling that I get from image 2... that is why I put that one last in my avatar image preference order.

№3

№1                                                                                                                                             

№2

Thank you for the detailed answer! Honestly, I also like the third one more, and I'm also afraid that the first one will be very poorly visible on the hat

[Biodom]

[edited out]

What would you say about these pictures?

Even though 1 would be the easiest to see on a hat avatar, and I really don't know anything about the actual character, my personal preference, based on just the cool bad-ass leather jacket and sunglasses appeal of the underlying image is 3, 1, 2.... as I have reordered them below to disambiguate.  

By the way, I don't really appreciate the split-personality feeling that I get from image 2... that is why I put that one last in my avatar image preference order.

№3

№1                                                                                                                                            

№2

Thank you for the detailed answer! Honestly, I also like the third one more, and I'm also afraid that the first one will be very poorly visible on the hat

yeah,#3 and #1 are both good, but too dark in appearance.

[jbreher]

https://twitter.com/brian_trollz/status/1094673219968253955
thread oh about the next UASF
nb it's not just Lukejr advocating

Frickin' lunacy.

[Biodom]

https://twitter.com/brian_trollz/status/1094673219968253955
thread oh about the next UASF
nb it's not just Lukejr advocating

Frickin' lunacy.

maybe we should just stay away from any more changes in the blocksize, for chrissake!
that goes for both parties.

[mirakal]

I need more green over here, I want to see so many green candles I think it's green Hanukkah, not just these here and there pop ups.

We will probably see a whole lot of green this month.
BTC is moving slowly to the moon, may this time I've get the correct prediction, once we reached $6,000 - next stop would be $10,000.
I wish it's just that easy. 

[bitserve]

https://twitter.com/brian_trollz/status/1094673219968253955
thread oh about the next UASF
nb it's not just Lukejr advocating

Frickin' lunacy.

Indeed.

[StartupAnalyst]

[JayJuanGee]

Wonder what the chances of breaking $4,000 this week are?

About 38.6%

I think when we finally get above $6,000 again (whenever that is) we can call that the very early beginning of the next bull run.

We have to get above $6k and stay above it for a significant amount of time.. Seems to me that merely bouncing abov $6k would not be enough to have confidence that the bottom is "in" ... currently $3,120.

I think we’ll break $6,000 towards the end of 2019. It’d be great if we climb slowly towards that figure. I’d love to be able to buy another 4 or 5 bitcoin’s before it gets to the stage where it might be unaffordable to buy whole one’s again.

As usual gentlemen please make sure you’re accumulating now. These prices will be laughed at in a couple of years. Total once in a lifetime opportunity now to set yourselves up forever as financially comfortable.

Go BTC Go !!!!!!

I, mostly, agree with this... of course, getting above $6k could come sooner, perhaps in less than 2 months (best case scenario), but staying above $6k convincingly could reasonably take until the end of the year-ish.

Edit - BTW, I’m sorry for being disloyal gentlemen but I bought some GRIN a couple of hours ago.

Traitor!!!!!!!