Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 09:53:46 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 4683 4684 4685 4686 4687 4688 4689 4690 4691 4692 4693 4694 4695 4696 4697 4698 4699 4700 4701 4702 4703 4704 4705 4706 4707 4708 4709 4710 4711 4712 4713 4714 4715 4716 4717 4718 4719 4720 4721 4722 4723 4724 4725 4726 4727 4728 4729 4730 4731 4732 [4733] 4734 4735 4736 4737 4738 4739 4740 4741 4742 4743 4744 4745 4746 4747 4748 4749 4750 4751 4752 4753 4754 4755 4756 4757 4758 4759 4760 4761 4762 4763 4764 4765 4766 4767 4768 4769 4770 4771 4772 4773 4774 4775 4776 4777 4778 4779 4780 4781 4782 4783 ... 33317 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26371299 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
zyk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 101


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 08:30:16 PM
 #94641

From http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1ymwzj/mtgox_still_authoring_invalid_transactions/
(According to an earlier post on that thread, user @nullc is Gregory Maxwell, one of the core developers)

Quote
@nullc 114 points 21 hours ago

I haven't seen any evidence that they're testing anything— just the regular dust sweeping transactions that they've had going on continually.

Initially when MTGox suspended withdraws I was fairly confident that all would be fixed soon (and said so as much on Reddit)— their technical issues were simple, and with proper controls in place could not have resulted in especially large losses. I especially expected losses to be small considering that they were reported by users and not discovered by MTGox themselves.

Considering MTGox's subsequent behavior— the extended outage, talk of withdraw limits, etc, I'm no longer confident of anything. Sad

Are there any news newer than this one, about the "MtGOX is testing" rumor?



Not that I have seen since - saw that yesterday - and I am pretty convinced from having read that thread it is indeed Greg Maxwell - he basically said they still haven't fixed it, and he wasn't at all convinced they were even close to doing it.



What will get fixed by tomorrows laywer announcement is the drain of Gox assets by the Sepa and Yen accounts...

To get a complete overview of the situation the system will need to be in a stable state Wink
The forum strives to allow free discussion of any ideas. All policies are built around this principle. This doesn't mean you can post garbage, though: posts should actually contain ideas, and these ideas should be argued reasonably.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714730026
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714730026

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714730026
Reply with quote  #2

1714730026
Report to moderator
spooderman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 1022


View Profile WWW
February 23, 2014, 08:39:33 PM
 #94642

ofoM oohC oohC

edit: train in reverse
adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
February 23, 2014, 08:40:15 PM
 #94643

Abandon ship!!!

 Cheesy
MANofthePEOPLE
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 08:41:48 PM
 #94644

whats up at stamp?
kurious
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2590
Merit: 1643



View Profile
February 23, 2014, 08:45:42 PM
 #94645

From http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1ymwzj/mtgox_still_authoring_invalid_transactions/
(According to an earlier post on that thread, user @nullc is Gregory Maxwell, one of the core developers)

Quote
@nullc 114 points 21 hours ago

I haven't seen any evidence that they're testing anything— just the regular dust sweeping transactions that they've had going on continually.

Initially when MTGox suspended withdraws I was fairly confident that all would be fixed soon (and said so as much on Reddit)— their technical issues were simple, and with proper controls in place could not have resulted in especially large losses. I especially expected losses to be small considering that they were reported by users and not discovered by MTGox themselves.

Considering MTGox's subsequent behavior— the extended outage, talk of withdraw limits, etc, I'm no longer confident of anything. Sad

Are there any news newer than this one, about the "MtGOX is testing" rumor?



Not that I have seen since - saw that yesterday - and I am pretty convinced from having read that thread it is indeed Greg Maxwell - he basically said they still haven't fixed it, and he wasn't at all convinced they were even close to doing it.

Creating transactions out of immature coins is a separate problem from transaction malleability. Gox is guilty of handling both situations poorly.

The fact that they haven't fixed creating transactions out of immature coins doesn't necessarily mean they also haven't fixed internal accounting problems stemming from transaction malleability.

I certainly don't expect them to go above and beyond and fix multiple problems at once!

You may be right - I am not even close to understanding core dev stuff - but he did say this in response to someone asking about malleability fix:


nullc 113 points 1 day ago

I haven't seen any evidence that they're testing anything— just the regular dust sweeping transactions that they've had going on continually.

Initially when MTGox suspended withdraws I was fairly confident that all would be fixed soon (and said so as much on Reddit)— their technical issues were simple, and with proper controls in place could not have resulted in especially large losses. I especially expected losses to be small considering that they were reported by users and not discovered by MTGox themselves.

Considering MTGox's subsequent behavior— the extended outage, talk of withdraw limits, etc, I'm no longer confident of anything. Sad

EDIT - couldn't do Italics!
Holliday
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120
Merit: 1009



View Profile
February 23, 2014, 08:47:41 PM
 #94646

whats up at stamp?

I don't know, I was watching, then I walked away for like two minutes and I see decent volume buys around $600.

Did someone put up a low wall that immediately got munched?

Wisdom is showing me a 573 bitcoin buy at $600.
MoreFun
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1003


WePower.red


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 08:48:50 PM
 #94647

whats up at stamp?

I don't know, I was watching, then I walked away for like two minutes and I see decent volume buys around $600.

Did someone put up a low wall that immediately got munched?

That wall was dumped down to $600.
empowering
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1441



View Profile
February 23, 2014, 08:58:55 PM
 #94648

(edit.. it is all a little bit death threaty huh)
 
Shocked  a little bit......

Special at Starbucks: ricin frappucino

I know they like it over there but I do not think they put rice in their frappucinos  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
empowering
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1441



View Profile
February 23, 2014, 09:02:34 PM
 #94649


I guess we need to ask this guy


http://www.mtgoxtakeover.com/?q=who


 Who we are ?

For many good reasons, the members of our Team will not show up for the moment.

Our Team BTC Account is: 1GaVv4WvWgHPaRCS7MHeQJv3tF8sXqRR46

You can contact us support@mtgoxtakeover.com

 

Who am I ?

I am Lehner Franz, 39 years old, Cybercrime Specialist, 2 Children

...

(edit.. it is all a little bit death threaty huh)
 

A little bit?
"If this situation will be handled down in a serious way, nobody will kill you." --from the Msg to Mark page.

I know I read the page... I was understating the deathyness of the situaiton
 
Balthazar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3108
Merit: 1358



View Profile
February 23, 2014, 09:03:54 PM
 #94650

HODL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!   
CryptStorm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 09:10:32 PM
 #94651


...

I know I read the page... I was understating the deathyness of the situaiton
Empowering, I realize you got it (and were understating), I was agreeing with you and highlighting the intensity of the page for others, as in "holy shit, did you guys read what this guy is actually writing!?!?".

Franz comes off as an off-kilter nut job, who's fairly self-important. *sigh*

It's not that I don't share some frustration, but, the messiah complex isn't helping, either.
EuroTrash
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500



View Profile
February 23, 2014, 09:10:59 PM
 #94652

Creating transactions out of immature coins is a separate problem from transaction malleability. Gox is guilty of handling both situations poorly.

The fact that they haven't fixed creating transactions out of immature coins doesn't necessarily mean they also haven't fixed internal accounting problems stemming from transaction malleability.

I certainly don't expect them to go above and beyond and fix multiple problems at once!

My understanding is that because of the immature coins problem, mr. K. had setup automatic reissue. Basically when a Gox-initiated transaction would not appear in the blockchain for a certain time, some cron-job-or-whatever would credit the user back with the coins. I speculate that the job was, of course, looking for transactions by txid.

Now think of these two scenarios:
1. transaction fails because of incorrect padding; Gox credits the amount back to user; user fixes the transaction manually and rebroadcasts it; transaction succeeds
2. transaction fails because of immature coins; Gox credits the amount back to user; user rebroadcasts the transaction; transaction succeeds

Both scenarios have, by default, nothing to do with malleability. But still they will cause Gox' accounting to go bananas and some very happy users, who could then go malicious and try to find a way to iterate the process and empty Gox' wallets.

Malleability also makes it worse because even when automatic reissue is turned off, once the malicious user has learned that Gox support people are trained only to look for transactions by txid, he can rebroadcast the transaction with a different txid and still complain to Gox support that he did not receive his coins.
billyjoeallen
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007


Hide your women


View Profile WWW
February 23, 2014, 09:12:01 PM
 #94653

"If this situation will be handled down in a serious way, nobody will kill you."

"handled down"? Doesn't appear to be a native English speaker. Something like "All your Gox are belong to us."

marcelv3612
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 09:12:33 PM
 #94654

funny how TA works.

I bet we are going to test 560-590 in the next few hours. Anyone up for the bet? 1BTC Smiley

(go below 590 within the next 4 hours)
EuroTrash
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500



View Profile
February 23, 2014, 09:13:58 PM
 #94655

funny how TA works.

I bet we are going to test 560-590 in the next few hours. Anyone up for the bet? 1BTC Smiley

biafore, is that you?
CryptStorm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 09:14:08 PM
 #94656

Creating transactions out of immature coins is a separate problem from transaction malleability. Gox is guilty of handling both situations poorly.

The fact that they haven't fixed creating transactions out of immature coins doesn't necessarily mean they also haven't fixed internal accounting problems stemming from transaction malleability.

I certainly don't expect them to go above and beyond and fix multiple problems at once!

My understanding is that because of the immature coins problem, mr. K. had setup automatic reissue. Basically when a Gox-initiated transaction would not appear in the blockchain for a certain time, some cron-job-or-whatever would credit the user back with the coins. I speculate that the job was, of course, looking for transactions by txid.

Now think of these two scenarios:
1. transaction fails because of incorrect padding; Gox credits the amount back to user; user fixes the transaction manually and rebroadcasts it; transaction succeeds
2. transaction fails because of immature coins; Gox credits the amount back to user; user rebroadcasts the transaction; transaction succeeds

Both scenarios have, by default, nothing to do with malleability. But still they will cause Gox' accounting to go bananas and some very happy users, who could then go malicious and try to find a way to iterate the process and empty Gox' wallets.

Malleability also makes it worse because even when automatic reissue is turned off, once the malicious user has learned that Gox support people are trained only to look for transactions by txid, he can rebroadcast the transaction with a different txid and still complain to Gox support that he did not receive his coins.

EuroTrash, this description is what I understood as well, although I believe I also saw a paste-bin conversation or perhaps just a comment that suggested gox went further and automated the process of crediting the accounts for which the transactions had failed. Obviously, I may be mistaken.
CryptStorm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 09:15:47 PM
 #94657

"If this situation will be handled down in a serious way, nobody will kill you."

"handled down"? Doesn't appear to be a native English speaker. Something like "All your Gox are belong to us."


Try imagining it with Franz wearing a leather smock, speaking with a thick German accent-- sounds fine to me. Tongue
spooderman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 1022


View Profile WWW
February 23, 2014, 09:16:46 PM
 #94658

wow would be nice to see a genuine bet. They always turn out to be trolls on here. I'll escrow if you want.

edit: this looks more like a bear trap to me anyway
billyjoeallen
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007


Hide your women


View Profile WWW
February 23, 2014, 09:22:22 PM
 #94659

"If this situation will be handled down in a serious way, nobody will kill you."

"handled down"? Doesn't appear to be a native English speaker. Something like "All your Gox are belong to us."

Range trading cracks me up. How many times are these panic monkeys gonna sell me the same coins at $550 and buy them back higher?
Maybe I'll wait for $540 this time.
magicmexican
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 23, 2014, 09:22:48 PM
 #94660

epic waves
Pages: « 1 ... 4683 4684 4685 4686 4687 4688 4689 4690 4691 4692 4693 4694 4695 4696 4697 4698 4699 4700 4701 4702 4703 4704 4705 4706 4707 4708 4709 4710 4711 4712 4713 4714 4715 4716 4717 4718 4719 4720 4721 4722 4723 4724 4725 4726 4727 4728 4729 4730 4731 4732 [4733] 4734 4735 4736 4737 4738 4739 4740 4741 4742 4743 4744 4745 4746 4747 4748 4749 4750 4751 4752 4753 4754 4755 4756 4757 4758 4759 4760 4761 4762 4763 4764 4765 4766 4767 4768 4769 4770 4771 4772 4773 4774 4775 4776 4777 4778 4779 4780 4781 4782 4783 ... 33317 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!