xhomerx10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3990
Merit: 8761
|
|
January 01, 2018, 03:47:38 PM |
|
... and back on ignore you go. You've got serious issues, bro. FYI there is a "Show/Hide" button on the right of ignored posts so you don't have to Unignore members for a dirty peek on a hidden message. I know you know it, but anyway ... would not a true ignore button make it so you dont even know that the ignoree actually posts? otherwise whats the use? i mean last time i tried using it i ended up "dirty peeking" (love the term btw) every ignored post outta curiosity which kinda renders the whole concept useless doesn't it? or maybe that's just me, idk.... The ignore button sometimes works to clarify the thread. No offence intended but it enables me to temporarily eliminate walls of text that don't interest me especially when I'm using my phone.
|
|
|
|
sirazimuth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3514
Merit: 3613
born once atheist
|
|
January 01, 2018, 03:49:21 PM |
|
... and back on ignore you go. You've got serious issues, bro. FYI there is a "Show/Hide" button on the right of ignored posts so you don't have to Unignore members for a dirty peek on a hidden message. I know you know it, but anyway ... would not a true ignore button make it so you dont even know that the ignoree actually posts? otherwise whats the use? i mean last time i tried using it i ended up "dirty peeking" (love the term btw) every ignored post outta curiosity which kinda renders the whole concept useless doesn't it? or maybe that's just me, idk.... The ignore button sometimes works to clarify the thread. No offence intended but it enables me to temporarily eliminate walls of text that don't interest me especially when I'm using my phone. ah ok. I'll buy that.
|
|
|
|
the artful bodger
|
|
January 01, 2018, 03:59:34 PM |
|
... and back on ignore you go. You've got serious issues, bro. FYI there is a "Show/Hide" button on the right of ignored posts so you don't have to Unignore members for a dirty peek on a hidden message. I know you know it, but anyway ... would not a true ignore button make it so you dont even know that the ignoree actually posts? otherwise whats the use? i mean last time i tried using it i ended up "dirty peeking" (love the term btw) every ignored post outta curiosity which kinda renders the whole concept useless doesn't it? or maybe that's just me, idk.... The ignore button sometimes works to clarify the thread. No offence intended but it enables me to temporarily eliminate walls of text that don't interest me especially when I'm using my phone. However, if someone quotes a post you ignored its full text gets displayed in the quote. There's no escaping quoted walls of text (like stolfi's).
|
|
|
|
Dabs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1912
The Concierge of Crypto
|
|
January 01, 2018, 05:12:54 PM |
|
They would need to phase out legacy addresses slowly, while allowing usage of old ones. They'd take several months before supporting Segwit only. Or never. You can still use uncompressed legacy addresses today (but why would you when you can do compressed.)
|
|
|
|
aesma
|
|
January 01, 2018, 05:38:24 PM |
|
Most people are lost on the workings of BTC and how to predict important factors like Fees. I swear this user experience is so important to the ongoing viability for crypto overall, Im bullish on technology which enables the user not just theoretical achievements just being helpful and predictable is a massive bonus. I agree with the recent posts by the ETH founder and others who state people have lost their way thinking of price, ironic thing to say on price thread but predicting price is looking at the more important factors then speculators. Im more bullish when people watch where they walk then staring at the sky I can understand not delving into the maths side of things, but what BTC brings to the table is the ability to send money without banks. If you don't understand how to actually send coins, you shouldn't put money in this. At Christmas dinner I was talking with a cousin who has put money into BTC recently and was worried. I didn't advise him that move, as I don't want the trouble. He was worried because of the correction, so I asked him : where are your coins, in your wallet ? He didn't know what a wallet was, everything is on an exchange... I educated him about the dangers of this, at least.
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
|
January 01, 2018, 07:01:15 PM |
|
Segwit by default rather than Segwit only should be sufficient
|
|
|
|
flynn
|
|
January 01, 2018, 08:17:47 PM Last edit: January 01, 2018, 08:47:48 PM by flynn |
|
looking good so far, but not much volume, maybe tomorrow ? [edit] that's BTC/EUR, not very significant anyway, BTC/$ looks different
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3318
Merit: 4603
diamond-handed zealot
|
|
January 01, 2018, 08:29:00 PM |
|
the crippling dread is starting to recede
probably bearish
|
|
|
|
Neo_Coin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 293
"Be Your Own Bank"
|
|
January 01, 2018, 09:18:33 PM |
|
ATM in Hong Kong:
|
|
|
|
realr0ach
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
|
|
January 01, 2018, 09:30:06 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
RoomBot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1130
|
|
January 01, 2018, 10:30:57 PM |
|
Can I keep my paper wallets in there?
|
|
|
|
TERA2
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 222
Deb Rah Von Doom
|
|
January 01, 2018, 10:32:07 PM |
|
This chart looks like there's a bull sneaking around in it.
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3318
Merit: 4603
diamond-handed zealot
|
|
January 01, 2018, 10:34:22 PM |
|
This chart looks like there's a bull sneaking around in it.
that's what scares me
|
|
|
|
RoomBot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1130
|
|
January 01, 2018, 10:42:47 PM |
|
At 13300 someone sold 700 BTC on bitfinex down to 12768. Sells like this are highly suspicious and quite often in the last 2 weeks. I am convinced that the xrp company is behind the last attack just like Ver and sockpuppets did before that. This was prepared months ago by gathering hundred of thousands BTC, then sell each time it starts rising. In the meantime they buy of their own offers (mostly) to continue the pump. Fortunately, BTC has only several millions coins in circulation, so this manipulation can't continue longer than few weeks. Hodlers know this and won't fall for their satanic rituals Right on!
|
|
|
|
explorer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2016
Merit: 1259
|
|
January 01, 2018, 10:43:34 PM |
|
Who won the informal 31-12-17 price guess? I believe OP designated NY time?
|
|
|
|
RoomBot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1130
|
|
January 01, 2018, 10:52:13 PM |
|
Who sold at the bottom?
That's so 2017. It's 2018: Who will win the new ATH booty???
Answer: ALL HODlers.
|
|
|
|
mike4001
|
|
January 01, 2018, 11:05:14 PM |
|
At 13300 someone sold 700 BTC on bitfinex down to 12768. Sells like this are highly suspicious and quite often in the last 2 weeks. I am convinced that the xrp company is behind the last attack just like Ver and sockpuppets did before that. This was prepared months ago by gathering hundred of thousands BTC, then sell each time it starts rising. In the meantime they buy of their own offers (mostly) to continue the pump. Fortunately, BTC has only several millions coins in circulation, so this manipulation can't continue longer than few weeks. Hodlers know this and won't fall for their satanic rituals Thats actually a good point. Noone in their right mind would sell these many coins at 13300 when the price has been 14k+ several times in the last 2 weeks.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3864
Merit: 11014
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
January 01, 2018, 11:06:01 PM |
|
ATM in Hong Kong: If this is real, for some reason, you see that bitcoin.com is stamped on the top of the bitcoin ATMs. Does anyone consider that as strange? Are folks believing that Bitcoin.com is a legitimate entrance into information about bitcoin? There seem to be quite a few folks who get confused by this kind of information, including supposed legitimacy in a name, such as bitcoin.com (which is really nearly a full fledged attack on bitcoin, no?)
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3318
Merit: 4603
diamond-handed zealot
|
|
January 01, 2018, 11:11:51 PM |
|
Who won the informal 31-12-17 price guess? I believe OP designated NY time?
I was among the 12-14 guessers
|
|
|
|
the artful bodger
|
|
January 01, 2018, 11:17:59 PM |
|
At 13300 someone sold 700 BTC on bitfinex down to 12768. Sells like this are highly suspicious and quite often in the last 2 weeks. I am convinced that the xrp company is behind the last attack just like Ver and sockpuppets did before that. This was prepared months ago by gathering hundred of thousands BTC, then sell each time it starts rising. In the meantime they buy of their own offers (mostly) to continue the pump. Fortunately, BTC has only several millions coins in circulation, so this manipulation can't continue longer than few weeks. Hodlers know this and won't fall for their satanic rituals Thats actually a good point. Noone in their right mind would sell these many coins at 13300 when the price has been 14k+ several times in the last 2 weeks. I remember at the end of August 2015 there was a crash down to $200 on most exchanges, and bitfinex was the only exchange where the price crashed to $150. A few months after that the bear market ended and the price rapidly pumped to $500. It's like someone was desperately trying to bring the price down using bitfinex. Nobody sensible would dump like that on bitfinex when they could get far better prices on any other exchange.
|
|
|
|
|