Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[realr0ach]

and Indians in America?

This is a standard libtard propaganda line.  Here a Commanche indian describes his own people as a Nazi-like race bent on the destruction of all outsiders and says that if the indians had won, they would have exterminated all the whites while the whites actually gave them mercy and let them live:

https://vdare.com/articles/a-comanche-on-the-fear-of-a-white-planet

That was their land till the white people took it from them.

Not like I care. But that's what happened.

If you read the Indian guy's article, he explains how the Indians were all in perpetual warfare with each other, so the whites were the equivalent of just another Indian group fighting turf wars for all intents and purposes.  Nobody seems to care if the Commanche exterminate the Cherokee or whatever, but if the whites win, it's suddenly a travesty.

[mindrust]

I tend to ignore any bullshit comes out of ass mouth but I couldn't this time.
Christianity is as dirty as other two.
You act like you know so much yet you "forgot" to mention the crusades.

Crusades are the campaigns in the Eastern Mediterranean aimed at recovering the Holy Land from Muslim rule

According to the Muslims, they were protecting the Holy Land from the Christians.

How about that?

Then I think we should return the favor and "protect" their holy land with a couple of nuclear bombs over Mecca and Medina and then finish it of with a total annihilation of Saudi Arabia and all muslim holy places. And from there go on to totally inihilate islam.

How about that?

It would have been done already if they thought they could get away with it.

Hitler thought he could get away with it.

But he couldn't.

You are free to try.

Btw, The Turks did get away with it. The Americans did too. 

[Last of the V8s]

via Imgflip Meme Generator

https://twitter.com/bluangelmerri/status/1106414050509012997?s=21

DailyHodl don't know how to spell because.  They spell it like this: "bcause" and expect people to take them seriously?

no no bcause is the name of this company. really. bcause. lol

[Arriemoller]

WO guys,no racism here please.We all are just human created from one semen

All WOs are created from one seamen?
I'm a bit skeptical to that, but I'll check with my mom.

[Globb0]

'Religion is the root of all evil' is proven once again

https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Root_of_All_Evil%3F

or money

Maybe you don't even distinguish between the 2

[realr0ach]

'Religion is the root of all evil' is proven once again

or money

Maybe you don't even distinguish between the 2

Or maybe if you guys weren't noobs you probably would have noticed it's not really even possible to define the word "evil" without religious context.

[Arriemoller]

Religions are the worst manipulation and disease in history.

Nope. EVERYONE was religious until a few hundred years ago, it's like blaming wars on breathing. Try again.

Re: Crusade guy: The muslims did it. Literally.

Yes, but in a historical context the problems with religions didn't start until the monotheistic religions became popular. Before that there were no religious wars, a shitload of wars for other reasons, but religion wasn't one of them.

Do you have any fucking idea how violent tribal cultures are? Religious nations as we understand them are fucking utopias of peace comparatively.

yes

So. Religion is a good thing for peace, then?

The monotheistic religions are bad for peace, the earlier polytheistic ones are neither good nor bad.

The greeks were at constant war. The japanese spent centuries slaughtering their own kind. The vikings liked to rape and pillage (Hi!).

The abrahamic religions, as much as I don't like them, are clearly more peaceful than polytheistic religions.

And maybe that's our downfall.

Yes, but not for religious reasons.

[Globb0]

WO guys,no racism here please.We all are just human created from one semen

All WOs are created from one seamen?
I'm a bit skeptical to that, but I'll check with my mom.

If dad wanked and gizzed nearly as much as I did in my life? the probability of me even being here as me this second before you is seemingly infinitely unlikely.

and yet here I am, a kind of Schrödinger's gism cat.


Blergh!

[JayJuanGee]

Actually you might have persuaded me that 2 + 2 doesn’t necessarily equal 4.  You might have gotten me there.

I haven’t responded because I am still thinking about it.  To your point, it’s not a topic I know a lot about.

 Just to add to the shades of grey; the numeral 4 doesn't even exist in base 2 and 3 number systems and while it exists in the base 4 number system as a descriptor,  2+2=10

edit: Help!  I've fallen behind in the thread and I can't catch up.

A vast majority of recent thread posts seem to be ONLY tangentially related to the title of the thread, for what that's worth?

[realr0ach]

Anyways, this post explains all you really need to know about religion:

Hell is empty because all the devils are here:

[infofront]

@ infofront:

Surely I like the new poll:

>>>>>>How many BTC does it take to be a fuckyoucoiner?
 1
 2-9
 10-19
 20-39
 40-69
 70-99
 100-149
 150-199
 200-499
 500-999
 1000+
<<<<<

I am presuming this to be a question based on current market conditions, and BTC expectations on such current market conditions.. so to be able to say that you are in a kind of "fuck you" status right now.. and based on minimum number of coins to perceive yourself to have sufficiently reached such "fuck you" status.

Since you may have seen some of my posts on that subject, you likely have a decent idea where I fall. Accordingly, I do believe that the ranges at the bottom are too small and the ranges at the top are too large, but I suppose we can see where the respondents fall and I suspect that the results should skew towards the top.... based on what I believe to be the presumptions of the question; however, can already see that the results seem to be more scattered so responders seem to be reaching presumptions different from my own... who would have thunk?   

Yeah it's pretty ambiguous. Maybe a time frame would be helpful, but I figured I'd let everyone keep their own timeframes.

[Arriemoller]

I tend to ignore any bullshit comes out of ass mouth but I couldn't this time.
Christianity is as dirty as other two.
You act like you know so much yet you "forgot" to mention the crusades.

Crusades are the campaigns in the Eastern Mediterranean aimed at recovering the Holy Land from Muslim rule

According to the Muslims, they were protecting the Holy Land from the Christians.

How about that?

Then I think we should return the favor and "protect" their holy land with a couple of nuclear bombs over Mecca and Medina and then finish it of with a total annihilation of Saudi Arabia and all muslim holy places. And from there go on to totally inihilate islam.

How about that?

It would have been done already if they thought they could get away with it.

Hitler thought he could get away with it.

But he couldn't.

You are free to try.

Btw, The Turks did get away with it. The Americans did too. 

Saudi Arabia is safe as long as the west needs their oil. As soon as we don't need it anymore they better make sure they are friends with us or they will be up shit creek without a paddle.

[realr0ach]

It’s not MSM outrage but this is what the Australian Prime Minister has to say about the Senator’s hot take:

The kike shill HairyMaclairy's Jussie Smollet hoax failed so he's back with a new scam - Jussie Smollet mosque hoax 2.0.  Pictures of the same crisis actor pretending to be three different people in 3...2...1.

[mindrust]

Saudi Arabia is safe as long as the west needs their oil. As soon as we don't need it anymore they better make sure they are friends with us or they will be up shit creek without a paddle.

Probably true.

The problem with this scenario is, there are other customers waiting in line to make business with the Arabs. USA don't have a choice right now.

China  

Russia  

And the oil there is not going to dry up any time soon.

When it does, SA will be no more that's what I agree with.

Tired of politics. I am off. Enough for today. :/

Wow almost $4k. 

[Arriemoller]

If you adhere to a religion that condones and even encourages terrorism and slaughter of anyone that holds another opinion then your own, you are not innocent.

There is no doubt about that, but implying that Islam is a religion that condones and even encourages terrorism and slaughter of anyone that holds another opinion then your own seems far from accurate (and I'm being nice).
Can you explain, with facts and numbers and cause and effect where this comes from?

You guys are quite the funny bunch, thanks for the entertainment

It comes from the koran. To much text for this thread, so here's a link http://www.deceptioninthechurch.com/koran.html.

It's actually way more complex than just cherry-picking some translated verses and stripping them out of their very specific context to make them match whatever reality you want them to depict...

Well actually you Ibian is the one who should explain with facts and numbers and cause and effect why you would be right in saying that some people deserve to be massacred and emphasizing the massacre of their children too...
I know you don't need it (and probably don't deserve it either) but I somehow pity you, go figure.

Immigration without integration always leads to war. You won't accept this. No matter, your turn.

You are clearly not answering my question and shifting the discussion towards something else... My question was very clear, you are saying that some people deserve to be murdered along with their children and you seem to think that you are right in saying/thinking that, I asked you to explain to me (as you said) with facts and numbers and cause and effect why, and here I am still waiting...

No it's not, it's actually that simple

[JayJuanGee]

Breaking $4,000 is so close yet seems so significant. I’m not sure why but $4,000 seems like a psychological barrier to break & stay above.

That first sentence is what I was thinking. 

The second sentence should not be very surprising in the whole scheme of things. 

Bearwhales want to hold the BTC price down as low as they can and for as long as they can, and they will choose any BTC price point that works for those objectives.  I doubt that there is anything special about $4k, except that it just seems to be working for the moment.  We should also realize there are going to continue to be such resistance points at various small levels of random increments on the way up.. while such short term UP is far from guaranteed, yet resistance will continue to occur until the momentum (towards up) reverses, which could take anywhere between a few months and several years...

Of course we have this lil dynamic of the BTC halvening in a bit more than a year that is going to cause additional physical (financial) pressures upon those peeps trying to continue to hold this bad boy down.




  Wishing them good luck. 















                                                                              (NOT)

[LFC_Bitcoin]

@ infofront:

Surely I like the new poll:

>>>>>>How many BTC does it take to be a fuckyoucoiner?
 1
 2-9
 10-19
 20-39
 40-69
 70-99
 100-149
 150-199
 200-499
 500-999
 1000+
<<<<<

I am presuming this to be a question based on current market conditions, and BTC expectations on such current market conditions.. so to be able to say that you are in a kind of "fuck you" status right now.. and based on minimum number of coins to perceive yourself to have sufficiently reached such "fuck you" status.

Since you may have seen some of my posts on that subject, you likely have a decent idea where I fall. Accordingly, I do believe that the ranges at the bottom are too small and the ranges at the top are too large, but I suppose we can see where the respondents fall and I suspect that the results should skew towards the top.... based on what I believe to be the presumptions of the question; however, can already see that the results seem to be more scattered so responders seem to be reaching presumptions different from my own... who would have thunk?   

Yeah it's pretty ambiguous. Maybe a time frame would be helpful, but I figured I'd let everyone keep their own timeframes.

I’m not going to reveal what I voted because it would possibly reveal how many coins I have.

[Globb0]

it's not really even possible to define the word "evil" without religious context.

Anyways, this post explains all you really need to know about religion:

Hell is empty because all the devils are here:

So you admit you are religious obviously, otherwise, by your own logic, you would not use the term Hell or Devil.


Maybe you argue against your own existence. How confusing.

[JayJuanGee]

You act like you know so much yet you "forgot" to mention the crusades.

I usually let my sidekick Ibian take care of the more mundane topics.  I would assign Trollgoossens to the task instead, but he knows literally nothing.

Who are you calling a sidekick, sidekick?!

Almost deserves a merit for humor.. one of you goofballs.... but I have not yet broken the merit seal for Roach.. don't want to encourage his level of off-topic hate-filled phoney baloney, and yet really, here, Roach was the one with the most original NPC play.. regarding the "sidekick" assertion.  

[realr0ach]

So you admit you are religious obviously, otherwise, by your own logic, you would not use the term Hell or Devil.

I simply stated using the phrase "religion is the root of all evil" is an oxymoron since you can't define "evil" without a religious context.  As for what I believe personally, I state what the evidence of the observable universe shows here:

https://steemit.com/science/@r0achtheunsavory/the-r0ach-report-25-computer-science-proves-the-existence-of-a-variable-known-as-god-but-not-what-god-actually-is